This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 |
Try read description of changes before do such things, okay? You just blindness retrieve some fake source link, like I even care what in infobox. You can change infobox or just don`t involve in edition if only you can do is press undo and call it a day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.21.245.89 ( talk) 11:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
>What we have is an age given in a dated publication, You even don`t read that publication! There is NO DATE like 2001 or 2002 try do SEARCH ON PAGE IN YOUR BROWSER. Why you so stubborn?
See:
So what do we do here? I noticed this last week. Do we keep listing the production codes, or do we remove them as we can no longer source them? And The Futon Critic can't be used as a production code source for Disney Channel series because of the current issues it's having with Disney Channel series. There may be more affected series, but I'm only doing current series and current seasons. Amaury • 17:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Looks like we'll need to keep an eye on this one... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Separately, we're likely going to need protection on Big Time Rush (band). But I'm not giving the IP the satisfaction of filing the report... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 01:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm curious about your edit here and why it was reverted. The only change was the removal of the word "Animated" from the category title. Courage the Cowardly Dog is an animated series. Shouldn't it fall into this subcategory instead of its broader parent category? Paper Luigi T • C 02:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
There's been a lot of WP:DE coming from IP(s)v6 editing from 2601:* today. Dunno if they are all related, or if anything can be done, but the pattern seems to be the same – messing with episode tables, episode numbering, series overview tables, etc. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:27, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
There's an entire article of the song on Know Your Meme. Plus there are so many videos of it all over the Internet. How is it not a meme? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebb1993 ( talk • contribs) 19:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
My edit on the article List of iCarly characters keeps getting reverted, even though I cited proof. WowSoCool112 ( talk) 02:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
It turns out Hans leaving Anna to die and speeding up what happened to her was just as bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.141.200 ( talk) 18:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Very well. I will point out if Anna wasn't cursed, Hans might have planned a little accident for her too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.141.200 ( talk) 21:36, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Before you start listing your argument against doing this, I’ll add this information for your review and response.
"This film was released by 20th Century Fox, despite Disney’s purchase of them" (this’ll apply only to films released under a specific timeframe)
I understand if you’ll disagree (I hope you don’t, but won’t be disappointed if you do happen to disagree with including that note at the bottom of the page, to not disturb 20th Century Fox‘s position in the infobox, if you can specify either a year or time where including WDSMP in the distributor note on the info box won’t be invalid (my suggestion would be maybe anything after a year has passed since the acquisition or when Disney flat out says 20th Century Fox will no longer appear as the credited distributor, despite them being the production company and wanting control over how to handle their copyright notice, Disney will distribute their films, even if that’s not what you want (as you clearly seem like someone who feels that 20th Century Fox‘s legacy would be ruined if Disney added WDSMP this, WDSMP that) just please give this a long-term thought and potentially try to offer up a compromise to this whole situation as I don’t want to see you annoyed with the anonymous accounts and their insistence of WDSMP inclusion, just please provide a compromise for them so that they’ll stop their inclusion of WDSMP in the info box. I know that’s what you want and that is one solution to the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.54.163.113 ( talk) 01:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
I need more eyes here, please. Disruptive IP refusing to use the talk page and not understanding how things typically work. Leads generally summarize what is mentioned in more detail throughout the body of the article, and there is absolutely no reason to remove said body content on the basis that it's in the lead, so therefore it's redundant, which it's not. Ping MPFitz1968 as well. Amaury • 08:37, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Care to comment on BLP additions like this? The Vancouver Sun source is at least decent, but in general I'm of the opinion that stuff like this is non-notable unless a BLP/celebrity is particularly known for charitable works. Otherwise, stuff like this always strikes me as either WP:FANCRUFT or as "promotional" and thus WP:UNDUE... Thoughts? -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 13:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Just Roll with It#Sourcing guest cast. I'll happily accept whichever way this goes, but this requires a stronger consensus than just 2 to 1, and I would be saying the same if it were the other way, so more opinions would definitely be welcome. Amaury • 17:11, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo, shouldn't this edit be reverted on the basis of WP:ABOUTSELF? I don't have an Instagram account, so I can't check the comment that goes along with it, but it's from Fishel's verified account, so it seems like it's legitimate... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 13:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Would appreciate more eyes here – Koavf, an experienced editor who should know better, is disruptively removing the primary but valid WP:ABOUTSELF source rather than discussing it. Pinging MPFitz1968, who I believe also watches this article, as well. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 07:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Still need more eyes on this one – pinging MPFitz1968 again too. Koavf seems unprepared to WP:DROPTHESTICK... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 23:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
@ IJBall and MPFitz1968: Please keep an eye on this. Seems a bit similar to when people kept wanting to include the "controversy" on Bella and the Bulldogs (see its talk page). Amaury • 14:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
The IP "resolution vandal" (see: User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 21#65.190.212.37) – also guilty of WP:OVERLINKing – is now at 174.253.137.152. You've handled the previous reports for this one, so I figured you'll know how to handle it. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in the 174.* range – now at 174.250.144.217. Same M.O. – unsourced messing around with resolution, and just wrong removals (i.e. inaccurate) of redirects as per WP:NOTBROKEN. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
It's probably time to ask for semi-protection on this one. But this has been persistent... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 19:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Need some eyes on this one, as those editing are (re)adding the actor's birthday without any sources to back it. Pinging Amaury and IJBall. Also, IJBall, does Bassett meet notability requirements? His only main role is with High School Musical: The Musical: The Series and his next known role was recurring, as Aidan, on Stuck in the Middle, so I'm doubting he meets WP:NACTOR. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 23:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Geraldo, I know I have sought your help before and I must confess I need it now as well. There is a user on "Steve Chen"'s page who is making edits not agreed upon by the Talk page and is not discussing on the Talk page despite my imploring him to do so. I don't want to edit-war. Who is the appropriate person to approach about this issue? I have done all within my power. Apoorva Iyer ( talk) 03:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi there. Demond Anthony ( talk) 18:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
@ MPFitz1968 and IJBall: I am going to need more eyes here, please! Amaury • 20:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
This is another one that probably warrants a mass-revert, basically as per accuracy and WP:NOTBROKEN. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 18:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I’m a (decently) new editor and I have a question. Would persopo.com be considered a reliable source? I’m sorry for asking on your talk page, but I can’t find a private message option. Andhw ( talk) 00:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
I deserve to have Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures be main distributor of the post-merger Fox films! -- XSMan2016 ( talk) 02:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, why did you revert this disamb?. It looks helpful to me. Best wishes Anna ( talk) 18:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Previous discussion now archived at User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 22#Danielle Fishel.
@ IJBall and MPFitz1968: Something needs to be done about this user, like pretty much now. Their edits are now WP:DE. Nothing in their discussion supports secondary and only secondary sources. In fact, it seems like it even leans slightly on the side of no harm in including both primary and secondary sources. Amaury • 23:39, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Are the latest edits correct? Doesn't MOS:TENSE apply? The only time we use absolute past tense is in the case of a deceased person. Amaury • 01:48, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry about not adding a reliable source.I'm new to Wikipedia so I didn't know.Sorry about the mess up.Please respond
Kind regards Keke Zoë Keke Zoë ( talk) 06:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Ok thank you Keke Zoë ( talk) 07:41, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo, I don't have an Instagram account, so can you please check this to confirm that it verifies this edit? Thanks. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Damon Runyon's short story
"Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the
hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well GP. MarnetteD| Talk 11:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that there was an account whose username was similar to yours, and that account is blocked. He also made another account similar to the first one. ☶☲Senny☶☲ (☎) 17:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo, can this be considered a WP:RS (for WP:BLP info)? Thanks. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 00:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! | |
Hello Geraldo Perez, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Why was this reverted? Is it not a Category:Live action television programs based on films-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 02:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
@ MPFitz1968: With Zap2it's issues resolved now, what do you can could be the issue with The Futon Critic? This one is even more bizarre as it seems to only be affecting Disney Channel series, at least in terms of the networks I watch. It's not site-wide like Zap2it's issue was. I still never heard back and it's still not fixed. Amaury • 17:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
They are at this again ( contributions), for which they've been reverted before. Time for a mass revert again? It's obvious they didn't take their ANI report to heart. Ping IJBall as well. Past discussion: User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 22#ExtraEditing. Amaury • 19:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo, in the same vein – Are these edits correct or not?... Thanks. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 02:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
This is probably not something I'm going to tackle, partly because it would require a lot of work since there are 26 seasons and partly because the pages are "run" by people who don't or refuse to understand how things work. However, is there ever an excuse not to order episodes by air date? Look at pages like List of Power Rangers Beast Morphers episodes or List of Power Rangers Dino Charge episodes, where the Halloween and Christmas episodes are always listed at the bottom, but notice the air dates, especially for the latter. And if you look at The Futon Critic, they have regular production codes—for example, 921 and 922 or 521 and 522—so they're not special episodes, they're just special-themed episodes. There's a difference. They have no effect on the story. In other words, they're "standalone" episodes, in the context that they don't have any continuation of the regular story arc, they're just Halloween and Christmas episodes that should still be ordered by air date and numbered. We don't list the Halloween and Christmas episodes for other networks' series, like Nickelodeon, Disney Channel, the broadcast networks, etc., at the bottom without numbering. Power Rangers should be no different. Amaury • 21:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
On Mob Wives I'd do it myself, however, I'm not sure how to do it since it's two edits. GUIpsp ( talk) 18:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Why is Spies in Disguise mentioned to be distributed by 20th century fox when it has been purchased by Disney. Avinash101297 ( talk) 10:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
The general consensus here is to retain the credited distributor ("20th Century Fox" or "Fox Searchlight Pictures") and as such, to not unilaterally change names of credited subsidiary distributors to their parent, "Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures"Geraldo Perez ( talk) 18:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはGeraldo Perezたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
02:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Amaury • 18:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
It is not very kind of you to delete edits made by others that are true. Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
For example, Frozen and Bizaardvark where you and your friends revert the edit of the fact that it is on Disney +. It is true and should be on the page. While it is common sense, I should be able to read an article on something and say, “oh! This sounds entertaining. Oh! It’s on disney plus? I can go watch this now!” Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:20, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
What is in appropriate about the fact that they are on Disney +? Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
I think I understand this now. Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
You and your cyber friends delete edits that you don’t think are important even tho they are. Just because It isn’t important to you, doesn’t mean it isn’t important to everyone else Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo – do you know who the IP vandal is at these two articles? User:Binksternet seemed to think it was somebody named User:Verone66 – do you know anything about this?... And any idea on how to handle this? – They don't seem to be going away... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:44, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 |
Try read description of changes before do such things, okay? You just blindness retrieve some fake source link, like I even care what in infobox. You can change infobox or just don`t involve in edition if only you can do is press undo and call it a day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.21.245.89 ( talk) 11:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
>What we have is an age given in a dated publication, You even don`t read that publication! There is NO DATE like 2001 or 2002 try do SEARCH ON PAGE IN YOUR BROWSER. Why you so stubborn?
See:
So what do we do here? I noticed this last week. Do we keep listing the production codes, or do we remove them as we can no longer source them? And The Futon Critic can't be used as a production code source for Disney Channel series because of the current issues it's having with Disney Channel series. There may be more affected series, but I'm only doing current series and current seasons. Amaury • 17:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Looks like we'll need to keep an eye on this one... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Separately, we're likely going to need protection on Big Time Rush (band). But I'm not giving the IP the satisfaction of filing the report... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 01:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm curious about your edit here and why it was reverted. The only change was the removal of the word "Animated" from the category title. Courage the Cowardly Dog is an animated series. Shouldn't it fall into this subcategory instead of its broader parent category? Paper Luigi T • C 02:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
There's been a lot of WP:DE coming from IP(s)v6 editing from 2601:* today. Dunno if they are all related, or if anything can be done, but the pattern seems to be the same – messing with episode tables, episode numbering, series overview tables, etc. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:27, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
There's an entire article of the song on Know Your Meme. Plus there are so many videos of it all over the Internet. How is it not a meme? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebb1993 ( talk • contribs) 19:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
My edit on the article List of iCarly characters keeps getting reverted, even though I cited proof. WowSoCool112 ( talk) 02:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
It turns out Hans leaving Anna to die and speeding up what happened to her was just as bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.141.200 ( talk) 18:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Very well. I will point out if Anna wasn't cursed, Hans might have planned a little accident for her too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.141.200 ( talk) 21:36, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Before you start listing your argument against doing this, I’ll add this information for your review and response.
"This film was released by 20th Century Fox, despite Disney’s purchase of them" (this’ll apply only to films released under a specific timeframe)
I understand if you’ll disagree (I hope you don’t, but won’t be disappointed if you do happen to disagree with including that note at the bottom of the page, to not disturb 20th Century Fox‘s position in the infobox, if you can specify either a year or time where including WDSMP in the distributor note on the info box won’t be invalid (my suggestion would be maybe anything after a year has passed since the acquisition or when Disney flat out says 20th Century Fox will no longer appear as the credited distributor, despite them being the production company and wanting control over how to handle their copyright notice, Disney will distribute their films, even if that’s not what you want (as you clearly seem like someone who feels that 20th Century Fox‘s legacy would be ruined if Disney added WDSMP this, WDSMP that) just please give this a long-term thought and potentially try to offer up a compromise to this whole situation as I don’t want to see you annoyed with the anonymous accounts and their insistence of WDSMP inclusion, just please provide a compromise for them so that they’ll stop their inclusion of WDSMP in the info box. I know that’s what you want and that is one solution to the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.54.163.113 ( talk) 01:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
I need more eyes here, please. Disruptive IP refusing to use the talk page and not understanding how things typically work. Leads generally summarize what is mentioned in more detail throughout the body of the article, and there is absolutely no reason to remove said body content on the basis that it's in the lead, so therefore it's redundant, which it's not. Ping MPFitz1968 as well. Amaury • 08:37, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Care to comment on BLP additions like this? The Vancouver Sun source is at least decent, but in general I'm of the opinion that stuff like this is non-notable unless a BLP/celebrity is particularly known for charitable works. Otherwise, stuff like this always strikes me as either WP:FANCRUFT or as "promotional" and thus WP:UNDUE... Thoughts? -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 13:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Just Roll with It#Sourcing guest cast. I'll happily accept whichever way this goes, but this requires a stronger consensus than just 2 to 1, and I would be saying the same if it were the other way, so more opinions would definitely be welcome. Amaury • 17:11, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo, shouldn't this edit be reverted on the basis of WP:ABOUTSELF? I don't have an Instagram account, so I can't check the comment that goes along with it, but it's from Fishel's verified account, so it seems like it's legitimate... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 13:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Would appreciate more eyes here – Koavf, an experienced editor who should know better, is disruptively removing the primary but valid WP:ABOUTSELF source rather than discussing it. Pinging MPFitz1968, who I believe also watches this article, as well. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 07:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Still need more eyes on this one – pinging MPFitz1968 again too. Koavf seems unprepared to WP:DROPTHESTICK... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 23:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
@ IJBall and MPFitz1968: Please keep an eye on this. Seems a bit similar to when people kept wanting to include the "controversy" on Bella and the Bulldogs (see its talk page). Amaury • 14:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
The IP "resolution vandal" (see: User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 21#65.190.212.37) – also guilty of WP:OVERLINKing – is now at 174.253.137.152. You've handled the previous reports for this one, so I figured you'll know how to handle it. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in the 174.* range – now at 174.250.144.217. Same M.O. – unsourced messing around with resolution, and just wrong removals (i.e. inaccurate) of redirects as per WP:NOTBROKEN. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
It's probably time to ask for semi-protection on this one. But this has been persistent... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 19:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Need some eyes on this one, as those editing are (re)adding the actor's birthday without any sources to back it. Pinging Amaury and IJBall. Also, IJBall, does Bassett meet notability requirements? His only main role is with High School Musical: The Musical: The Series and his next known role was recurring, as Aidan, on Stuck in the Middle, so I'm doubting he meets WP:NACTOR. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 23:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Geraldo, I know I have sought your help before and I must confess I need it now as well. There is a user on "Steve Chen"'s page who is making edits not agreed upon by the Talk page and is not discussing on the Talk page despite my imploring him to do so. I don't want to edit-war. Who is the appropriate person to approach about this issue? I have done all within my power. Apoorva Iyer ( talk) 03:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi there. Demond Anthony ( talk) 18:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
@ MPFitz1968 and IJBall: I am going to need more eyes here, please! Amaury • 20:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
This is another one that probably warrants a mass-revert, basically as per accuracy and WP:NOTBROKEN. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 18:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I’m a (decently) new editor and I have a question. Would persopo.com be considered a reliable source? I’m sorry for asking on your talk page, but I can’t find a private message option. Andhw ( talk) 00:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
I deserve to have Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures be main distributor of the post-merger Fox films! -- XSMan2016 ( talk) 02:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, why did you revert this disamb?. It looks helpful to me. Best wishes Anna ( talk) 18:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Previous discussion now archived at User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 22#Danielle Fishel.
@ IJBall and MPFitz1968: Something needs to be done about this user, like pretty much now. Their edits are now WP:DE. Nothing in their discussion supports secondary and only secondary sources. In fact, it seems like it even leans slightly on the side of no harm in including both primary and secondary sources. Amaury • 23:39, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Are the latest edits correct? Doesn't MOS:TENSE apply? The only time we use absolute past tense is in the case of a deceased person. Amaury • 01:48, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry about not adding a reliable source.I'm new to Wikipedia so I didn't know.Sorry about the mess up.Please respond
Kind regards Keke Zoë Keke Zoë ( talk) 06:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Ok thank you Keke Zoë ( talk) 07:41, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo, I don't have an Instagram account, so can you please check this to confirm that it verifies this edit? Thanks. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Damon Runyon's short story
"Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the
hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well GP. MarnetteD| Talk 11:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that there was an account whose username was similar to yours, and that account is blocked. He also made another account similar to the first one. ☶☲Senny☶☲ (☎) 17:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo, can this be considered a WP:RS (for WP:BLP info)? Thanks. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 00:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! | |
Hello Geraldo Perez, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Why was this reverted? Is it not a Category:Live action television programs based on films-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 02:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
@ MPFitz1968: With Zap2it's issues resolved now, what do you can could be the issue with The Futon Critic? This one is even more bizarre as it seems to only be affecting Disney Channel series, at least in terms of the networks I watch. It's not site-wide like Zap2it's issue was. I still never heard back and it's still not fixed. Amaury • 17:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
They are at this again ( contributions), for which they've been reverted before. Time for a mass revert again? It's obvious they didn't take their ANI report to heart. Ping IJBall as well. Past discussion: User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 22#ExtraEditing. Amaury • 19:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo, in the same vein – Are these edits correct or not?... Thanks. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 02:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
This is probably not something I'm going to tackle, partly because it would require a lot of work since there are 26 seasons and partly because the pages are "run" by people who don't or refuse to understand how things work. However, is there ever an excuse not to order episodes by air date? Look at pages like List of Power Rangers Beast Morphers episodes or List of Power Rangers Dino Charge episodes, where the Halloween and Christmas episodes are always listed at the bottom, but notice the air dates, especially for the latter. And if you look at The Futon Critic, they have regular production codes—for example, 921 and 922 or 521 and 522—so they're not special episodes, they're just special-themed episodes. There's a difference. They have no effect on the story. In other words, they're "standalone" episodes, in the context that they don't have any continuation of the regular story arc, they're just Halloween and Christmas episodes that should still be ordered by air date and numbered. We don't list the Halloween and Christmas episodes for other networks' series, like Nickelodeon, Disney Channel, the broadcast networks, etc., at the bottom without numbering. Power Rangers should be no different. Amaury • 21:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
On Mob Wives I'd do it myself, however, I'm not sure how to do it since it's two edits. GUIpsp ( talk) 18:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Why is Spies in Disguise mentioned to be distributed by 20th century fox when it has been purchased by Disney. Avinash101297 ( talk) 10:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
The general consensus here is to retain the credited distributor ("20th Century Fox" or "Fox Searchlight Pictures") and as such, to not unilaterally change names of credited subsidiary distributors to their parent, "Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures"Geraldo Perez ( talk) 18:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはGeraldo Perezたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
02:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Amaury • 18:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
It is not very kind of you to delete edits made by others that are true. Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
For example, Frozen and Bizaardvark where you and your friends revert the edit of the fact that it is on Disney +. It is true and should be on the page. While it is common sense, I should be able to read an article on something and say, “oh! This sounds entertaining. Oh! It’s on disney plus? I can go watch this now!” Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:20, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
What is in appropriate about the fact that they are on Disney +? Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
I think I understand this now. Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
You and your cyber friends delete edits that you don’t think are important even tho they are. Just because It isn’t important to you, doesn’t mean it isn’t important to everyone else Amazingmonkey2006 ( talk) 20:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Geraldo – do you know who the IP vandal is at these two articles? User:Binksternet seemed to think it was somebody named User:Verone66 – do you know anything about this?... And any idea on how to handle this? – They don't seem to be going away... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:44, 30 December 2019 (UTC)