Please do not add links to a company you own or control, this is considered spamming. There is a particular problem with editing and especially creating articles on companies with which you have a strong association, whihc is a form of vanity strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. Just zis Guy you know? 19:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello from George. I removed all the links to Blogtronix Web page.
I did provide several external links discussing what BLogtronix is. Blogtronix is one of the very very few companies presenting real and actual Corporate blogging capabilities. I think it will be good for both sides that Blogtronix is listed here. I will do anything with the article so it complies with the Wikipedia inclusion guidelines - these is no doubt about it.
links:
Ernst & Young - VP of Internal Communications - Rod Boothby
http://www.innovationcreators.com/2006/04/blogtronix_is_web_office_techn.html
http://www.enterpriseweb2.com/?p=67 - Jerry Bowles
And Robert Scoble, Ex-Microsoft Chief Blogger and now PodTech VP: http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2005/10/31/i-totally-screwed-up-on-post-about-blogtronix/
http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/04/27/another-test-of-is-microsoft-listening/
George again: another article mentioning Blogtronix in BusinessWeek:
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jul2006/tc20060718_932217.htm
From George: Tom and Anthony, please indicate what I need to change so it is not considered as a spam. What is it different than the article for Movable Type? open the movable type article and tell me what is different! I will chaneg what I have to to have Blogtronix included in Wikipedia but you guys are not helping here, I know you are editors, not support center but the guidlines are not clear what i need to remove especially when I have the example with Movable type. They are in the same position we are in!
George: I edited the article additionaly - please check and advise.
Thanks for uploading Image:BlogtronixLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Please do not add links to a company you own or control, this is considered spamming. There is a particular problem with editing and especially creating articles on companies with which you have a strong association, whihc is a form of vanity strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. Just zis Guy you know? 19:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello from George. I removed all the links to Blogtronix Web page.
I did provide several external links discussing what BLogtronix is. Blogtronix is one of the very very few companies presenting real and actual Corporate blogging capabilities. I think it will be good for both sides that Blogtronix is listed here. I will do anything with the article so it complies with the Wikipedia inclusion guidelines - these is no doubt about it.
links:
Ernst & Young - VP of Internal Communications - Rod Boothby
http://www.innovationcreators.com/2006/04/blogtronix_is_web_office_techn.html
http://www.enterpriseweb2.com/?p=67 - Jerry Bowles
And Robert Scoble, Ex-Microsoft Chief Blogger and now PodTech VP: http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2005/10/31/i-totally-screwed-up-on-post-about-blogtronix/
http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/04/27/another-test-of-is-microsoft-listening/
George again: another article mentioning Blogtronix in BusinessWeek:
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jul2006/tc20060718_932217.htm
From George: Tom and Anthony, please indicate what I need to change so it is not considered as a spam. What is it different than the article for Movable Type? open the movable type article and tell me what is different! I will chaneg what I have to to have Blogtronix included in Wikipedia but you guys are not helping here, I know you are editors, not support center but the guidlines are not clear what i need to remove especially when I have the example with Movable type. They are in the same position we are in!
George: I edited the article additionaly - please check and advise.
Thanks for uploading Image:BlogtronixLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)