Hi. I hope this is an option to receive answers to my questions. Geometricjewels ( talk) 08:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Geometricjewels, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
David Biddulph (
talk)
18:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, Anon126 and David. The problem with the article on beadwork is that modern mainstream beadwork has not reached the level of a peer reviewed science yet. There are a few journals and a quickly growing number of books, but as far as I know they concentrate on specific tutorials, patterns and techniques rather than on any overview like it would be nice to have on a wiki page. I believe to be fairly knowledgable in the field, I know a number of teachers but of no schools, other than a fairly ridiculous attempt to make money by conferring expensive but meaningless diplomas. I was apalled by the misrepresentation in the wikipedia article on beadwork and was hoping to find consent for my correction. Geometricjewels ( talk) 21:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I hope this is an option to receive answers to my questions. Geometricjewels ( talk) 08:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Geometricjewels, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
David Biddulph (
talk)
18:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, Anon126 and David. The problem with the article on beadwork is that modern mainstream beadwork has not reached the level of a peer reviewed science yet. There are a few journals and a quickly growing number of books, but as far as I know they concentrate on specific tutorials, patterns and techniques rather than on any overview like it would be nice to have on a wiki page. I believe to be fairly knowledgable in the field, I know a number of teachers but of no schools, other than a fairly ridiculous attempt to make money by conferring expensive but meaningless diplomas. I was apalled by the misrepresentation in the wikipedia article on beadwork and was hoping to find consent for my correction. Geometricjewels ( talk) 21:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)