Welcome...
Hello, GenuineMongol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Aramgar (
talk) 15:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Aramgar ( talk) 15:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
The MPs were sworn in, so presumably we've got full results now...? But where? Thanks! — Nightstallion 15:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Is "History of Mongolia" the same as those four "Mongolchuud - Nuudel Suudal" volumes (2006 paperback edition)? I have had both books in my hand, but the latter work looks (from the outside) as if it would contain much more text. Yaan ( talk) 10:05, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
I think there is a problem with you source for "Elbegdorj sworn in". The link leads to the main site of www.news.mn, not to the specific article. I think the problem is with news.mn, it seems can get a stable url by copying the one at the end of the article. Is it this article you have been referring to? Regards, Yaan ( talk) 12:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
User:Political Dweeb here wants to explain that I found by having a google search with the title Mongolian Democratic Union and I find that the first of the many websites is Wikipedia with the title "Mongolian Democratic Union - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". However when I clicked on it it the name of the article was not that name but was Democratic Union Coalition (1996-2000). Do you know why this is and does this mean its possible I could put the Image:MDU.jpg there. Here below I've put a link here to show you of the google search I did on this political party finding the first website that was Wikipedia.
Political Dweeb talk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.235.223.6 ( talk) 04:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Whispe ring 07:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
You wrote at WP:RFPP:
In reply to this, I wanted to say, that I chose a short protection because the last time it was protected was some months ago, so if it was not protected the last months, maybe there was no reason. If the protection does not stop the vandalism, you can re-request a longer one any time. THat way does not hurt you and does cost you little time, but a longer protection might have lost us good contributions without much reasoning. So, if vandalism outweighs good faith edits in a week again, I'd be happy to grant you longer protection. Just ask me directly or at WP:RFPP. Regards Yhw os 12:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi GenuineMongol, Can I ask your opinion concerning this map? What d'you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Greater_China.GIF It's found in this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_China
Gantuya eng ( talk) 09:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I'd like to ask a favor of you, namely would it be possible for you to translate at least some of the text in the Mongolian article to fill out the English stub? I'd love to be able to do it, but my Mongolian is non-existent :) Thanks! - Yupik ( talk) 00:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I can't revert a change to this map to the Version of Yaan. Can you please help me? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Greater_China.GIF Gantuya eng ( talk) 10:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.png
Gantuya eng ( talk) 15:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi GenuineMongol! Hurry to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mongolia_during_Tang_rule#Mongolia_during_Tang_rule and write down your opinion. Iim muuhai novshiin oguuleliig ali hurdanaar ustgah heregtei shuu. Eniig uldeemeer hun hojij bolohgui!!! G Purevdorj ( talk) 10:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Please share your view of the comments I've posted at here. From a superficial scan of the AfD thread I gather that I've given only cursory attention to aspects of this article which you find objectionable.
As I continue to work on improving the quality and scope of Horses in East Asian warfare, I would want to be better informed about a point-of-view I had not previously considered. -- Tenmei ( talk) 20:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Inner Asia during the Tang Dynasty#Semi-protection needed. -- Tenmei ( talk) 16:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Your continued editing, without providing sources or any kind of material to back you up whatsoever, is violative of wikipedia policy. Please check the opinions of respected editors such as Pericles. Your vandalism if it continues will be reported.
Teeninvestor (
talk) 23:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Assuming I could have or should have done something differently, I've asked for help at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Tenmei reported by Teeninvestor. Perhaps this will slow things down a bit. -- Tenmei ( talk) 00:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I posted the following on
Teeninvestor's talk page. --
Tenmei (
talk) 20:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry. Do I need to apologize? You are not required to be a part of this.
You are welcome to participate, of course; but I wasn't intending to drag you into anything. I used this ArbCom notice template because I thought it would be easily recognizeable; but if misled you by doing this, that's bad. Sorry.
Having asked for your feedback, I was persuaded that I was a little bit obliged to "keep you in the loop" ... but I truly had no intention to burden you unfairly. -- Tenmei ( talk) 23:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
An Arbitration case has been opened, and is located here. As I understand it, the open-ended process invites anyone to participate, not only those who contributed to the thread which led to a case being opened.
I wonder if this forum might be worth your investment of time and attention -- if only because of the possibility that you glimpse some better way of dealing with those who would dismiss, deride, or devalue your future contribution labeling you "pro-Mongolian" (as if it were a self-evident and obviously perjorative term). This seems rather like those who have sought to diminish my Wikipedia contributions with a label "Japanese" (as if "Japanese" were to be understood an arguably derisive term).
I would guess you probably understand that my primary focus is elsewhere, but I'm still troubled by that "pro-Mongolian" gambit in the AfD thread. It's not so much that the innuendo was introduced, although I'm very clear that it shouldn't have been tolerated by the consensus. What still bothers me particularly is that this derisive tactic proved to be so easy, so effective, so readily accepted by the so-called "uninvolved" or "neutral" others in that discussion thread. I wish there were some way to leverage this ArbCom "event" so that such needless tactics were less easy or that such heedless claims were accorded closer scrutiny? Just a thought ...?
To be frank, I don't quite understand how this will unfold from this point on -- especially in light of what Teeninvestor has posted thus far, but the formal notice that the case had been accepted included the following, which I construe as being addressed as much to you as me:
Bottom line: If you can see some way to convert this from a mere academic exercise into something with practical and practicable consequences, please share your thoughts with me or with some member of ArbCom. You aren't obliged to do anything, but, as promised, I'm keeping you informed as developments follow one after another.
On an optimistic note, will you join me in hoping that this process can be converted into something which is demonstrably constructive, useful, helpful? -- Tenmei ( talk) 19:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
The ArbCom case is moving inevitably towards conclusion. The only part of it which plausibly concerns you is one of my proposed remedies:
I have added my arguments to what G Purevdorj posted some weeks ago. If you want to add your voice to this one thread, now would be a good time to contribute whatever you think best. --20:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
I've created a table of Tsagaan Sar dates in Tsagaan_Sar#Dates, loaning the idea from the Tibetan new year article. However our table could be longer. In the current table the date for Mongolian Tsagaan Sar are missing for the following European years: 1989, 1993, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2000. If you are interested please find the Tsagaan Sar dates for them. Gantuya eng ( talk) 11:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
What do you think about this (I mean the accuracy of the article, not the topic)? I know this practice existed in the past, but was polygamy really a topic in certain newspapers in 2005 or not? Yaan ( talk) 12:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi!
this German source says he was minister of finance only in 1998, as does Morris Rossabi in "Modern Mongolia". And unfortunately I was unable to find more on this on his website (maybe because my Mongolian is not good enough). Of course it might well be Rossabi and Corff are both wrong, so maybe you can look into it again? Regards, Yaan ( talk) 10:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
I am afraid my understanding of WP:RS or WP:V is a bit different. That Rossabi has an own POV does not mean he is complely unreliable on facts. Of course cross-checking and being a bit cautions about repeating his claims is always better, but to simply dismiss him just because he has an own opinion seems a bit too easy. As for what was the motivation for the MPRP to boycott parliament etc., additional sources are of course welcome. Yaan ( talk) 15:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I am going to revert that article once again. I will try to implement some changes that seem uncontroversial, and include the statement for the confirmation of which you wanted some time. I think the article could mention some DP allegations about the riot itself (not just about the elections), but I think you might be more qualified to look into this. Yaan ( talk) 14:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
You said that only 10% of Mongols speak fluent Russian. I'm very confused : I thought Mongolia was among the best friends of Russia since both nations fought together against the Japanese in 1939. Mongolia even adopted cyrillic alphabet after Russia. So, I'm very surprised to learn that Russian language is not widspread among Mongols. You also said that English became the first foreign language. Does it mean that you want closer ties with the USA ? Mitch1981 ( talk) 16:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok thanks for the information. But then the article on Mongolia needs to be revised because it states that "The Russian language is the most frequently spoken foreign language in Mongolia". on the Languages section.
As far as I know, Mongolia is part of the Shanghai Cooperation in which Russian is the one of the two working languages. So, don't you think it will reassert somehow the position of Russian in your country ? Mitch1981 ( talk) 16:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks a lot for the article.
I think it would be a good idea to mention what category those works you mentioned fall into. Are they novels, individual short stories, collections of short stories, or something else. I suppose it is the second, but I am not completely sure about what you intended.
Some of his works have been translated into German, most of them during socialism, a new edition of two short stories is available via books-on-demand ( translator+editor's webpage). I don't know if this is very important.
And, can you confirm that E. Bat-Uul is his son, or is this just an urban myth?
Regards, Yaan ( talk) 12:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mongol Empire. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. --
Caspian blue 07:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Look the map's accuracy has been contested and disputed for almost a year mainly feuding between Historiographer and Enerelt, not me. You'd better check the history instead of making such the bogus accusation that I started the edit war. You're the one who resumed the edit warring given the evidence. I'm giving you this edit warring warning since you've just engaged in edit warring for recent two days including 4 reverts without any participation on the talk page unlike me. Use discussion page.-- Caspian blue 07:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. It will be deeply appreciated if you look at article Outer Mongolia, 1911-1919 and give your opinion. Gantuya eng ( talk) 04:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Would you be able to assess if this person is notable: Ichinnorov Manjaa? It has been BLP Prodded. I speak no Mongolian and Google Translate can't handle it, so I find it impossible to assess the sources; what little there is about her in English is snippets or 404. If the article is deleted before you see this and you'd like to see it I can let you see the text. Fences& Windows 20:16, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, what is the story behind this edit? The name "Sambadondovyn Tserendorj" does not appear in any of the related articles, and is not supported by reliable sources, so I had to revert it. Can you shed some more light on the topic? -- Latebird ( talk) 08:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Сайн уу, өөрийн чинь username - ийг wikipedia - с олсон юм аа. Өөрөө их сайн contribution - ууд оруулсан байна гэж би харлаа. Надаа тусламж хэрэгтэй байна. Би сая бүртгүүлсэн article - үүсгэх хэрэгтэй байна . Яг сайн учирыг нь олохгүй л байна. Хичнээн зааварыг нь уншаад байгаа ч . Надад туслаач мэйл бичээрэй crys29feb@gmail.com
Болороо Bolortsetseg Crystal ( talk) 03:47, 20 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, Could you say something on this edit war? user Rajmaan is claiming Oirats Mongols are not Mongols and the "Mongol" identity was defined by the Qing. No one supported him, but he keeps posting his claims. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oirats#Edit_warring Thanks. 142.255.6.214 ( talk) 08:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello GenuineMongol,
I’m Irvin from PhilWiki Community, a member of the Communication Committee of the ESEAP Conference. ESEAP Conference 2018 is a regional conference for Wikimedia communities throughout the ESEAP region: ESEAP stands for East, Southeast Asia, and Pacific. Taking place in Bali, Indonesia on 5–6 May 2018, this is the first regional conference for these Wikimedia communities.
East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific are the most under-represented regions within the Wikimedia community. There is a significant number of Wikimedia contributors in our regions, yet we continue to struggle in establishing a well-managed community. This conference will bring participants from various ESEAP communities together in order to better understand the issues and to look for solutions. It also aims to connect people of the Wikimedia movement within ESEAP regions, to share ideas, and to build regional collaborations that are impossible to achieve through online communication.
We’ve got a lot of participation from several countries, but we’re lacking from your country. As we need more participants from your country, we believe that your contribution and participation would be a valuable asset to the success of this event. If you would like to participate in the conference, please do fill the form as soon as possible (by April 5, 2018) and we’ll inform you if you get selected for the conference.
Thank you and we hope to see you soon. --Filipinayzd 16:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Welcome...
Hello, GenuineMongol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Aramgar (
talk) 15:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Aramgar ( talk) 15:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
The MPs were sworn in, so presumably we've got full results now...? But where? Thanks! — Nightstallion 15:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Is "History of Mongolia" the same as those four "Mongolchuud - Nuudel Suudal" volumes (2006 paperback edition)? I have had both books in my hand, but the latter work looks (from the outside) as if it would contain much more text. Yaan ( talk) 10:05, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
I think there is a problem with you source for "Elbegdorj sworn in". The link leads to the main site of www.news.mn, not to the specific article. I think the problem is with news.mn, it seems can get a stable url by copying the one at the end of the article. Is it this article you have been referring to? Regards, Yaan ( talk) 12:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
User:Political Dweeb here wants to explain that I found by having a google search with the title Mongolian Democratic Union and I find that the first of the many websites is Wikipedia with the title "Mongolian Democratic Union - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". However when I clicked on it it the name of the article was not that name but was Democratic Union Coalition (1996-2000). Do you know why this is and does this mean its possible I could put the Image:MDU.jpg there. Here below I've put a link here to show you of the google search I did on this political party finding the first website that was Wikipedia.
Political Dweeb talk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.235.223.6 ( talk) 04:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Whispe ring 07:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
You wrote at WP:RFPP:
In reply to this, I wanted to say, that I chose a short protection because the last time it was protected was some months ago, so if it was not protected the last months, maybe there was no reason. If the protection does not stop the vandalism, you can re-request a longer one any time. THat way does not hurt you and does cost you little time, but a longer protection might have lost us good contributions without much reasoning. So, if vandalism outweighs good faith edits in a week again, I'd be happy to grant you longer protection. Just ask me directly or at WP:RFPP. Regards Yhw os 12:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi GenuineMongol, Can I ask your opinion concerning this map? What d'you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Greater_China.GIF It's found in this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_China
Gantuya eng ( talk) 09:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I'd like to ask a favor of you, namely would it be possible for you to translate at least some of the text in the Mongolian article to fill out the English stub? I'd love to be able to do it, but my Mongolian is non-existent :) Thanks! - Yupik ( talk) 00:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I can't revert a change to this map to the Version of Yaan. Can you please help me? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Greater_China.GIF Gantuya eng ( talk) 10:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.png
Gantuya eng ( talk) 15:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi GenuineMongol! Hurry to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mongolia_during_Tang_rule#Mongolia_during_Tang_rule and write down your opinion. Iim muuhai novshiin oguuleliig ali hurdanaar ustgah heregtei shuu. Eniig uldeemeer hun hojij bolohgui!!! G Purevdorj ( talk) 10:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Please share your view of the comments I've posted at here. From a superficial scan of the AfD thread I gather that I've given only cursory attention to aspects of this article which you find objectionable.
As I continue to work on improving the quality and scope of Horses in East Asian warfare, I would want to be better informed about a point-of-view I had not previously considered. -- Tenmei ( talk) 20:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Inner Asia during the Tang Dynasty#Semi-protection needed. -- Tenmei ( talk) 16:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Your continued editing, without providing sources or any kind of material to back you up whatsoever, is violative of wikipedia policy. Please check the opinions of respected editors such as Pericles. Your vandalism if it continues will be reported.
Teeninvestor (
talk) 23:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Assuming I could have or should have done something differently, I've asked for help at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Tenmei reported by Teeninvestor. Perhaps this will slow things down a bit. -- Tenmei ( talk) 00:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I posted the following on
Teeninvestor's talk page. --
Tenmei (
talk) 20:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry. Do I need to apologize? You are not required to be a part of this.
You are welcome to participate, of course; but I wasn't intending to drag you into anything. I used this ArbCom notice template because I thought it would be easily recognizeable; but if misled you by doing this, that's bad. Sorry.
Having asked for your feedback, I was persuaded that I was a little bit obliged to "keep you in the loop" ... but I truly had no intention to burden you unfairly. -- Tenmei ( talk) 23:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
An Arbitration case has been opened, and is located here. As I understand it, the open-ended process invites anyone to participate, not only those who contributed to the thread which led to a case being opened.
I wonder if this forum might be worth your investment of time and attention -- if only because of the possibility that you glimpse some better way of dealing with those who would dismiss, deride, or devalue your future contribution labeling you "pro-Mongolian" (as if it were a self-evident and obviously perjorative term). This seems rather like those who have sought to diminish my Wikipedia contributions with a label "Japanese" (as if "Japanese" were to be understood an arguably derisive term).
I would guess you probably understand that my primary focus is elsewhere, but I'm still troubled by that "pro-Mongolian" gambit in the AfD thread. It's not so much that the innuendo was introduced, although I'm very clear that it shouldn't have been tolerated by the consensus. What still bothers me particularly is that this derisive tactic proved to be so easy, so effective, so readily accepted by the so-called "uninvolved" or "neutral" others in that discussion thread. I wish there were some way to leverage this ArbCom "event" so that such needless tactics were less easy or that such heedless claims were accorded closer scrutiny? Just a thought ...?
To be frank, I don't quite understand how this will unfold from this point on -- especially in light of what Teeninvestor has posted thus far, but the formal notice that the case had been accepted included the following, which I construe as being addressed as much to you as me:
Bottom line: If you can see some way to convert this from a mere academic exercise into something with practical and practicable consequences, please share your thoughts with me or with some member of ArbCom. You aren't obliged to do anything, but, as promised, I'm keeping you informed as developments follow one after another.
On an optimistic note, will you join me in hoping that this process can be converted into something which is demonstrably constructive, useful, helpful? -- Tenmei ( talk) 19:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
The ArbCom case is moving inevitably towards conclusion. The only part of it which plausibly concerns you is one of my proposed remedies:
I have added my arguments to what G Purevdorj posted some weeks ago. If you want to add your voice to this one thread, now would be a good time to contribute whatever you think best. --20:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
I've created a table of Tsagaan Sar dates in Tsagaan_Sar#Dates, loaning the idea from the Tibetan new year article. However our table could be longer. In the current table the date for Mongolian Tsagaan Sar are missing for the following European years: 1989, 1993, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2000. If you are interested please find the Tsagaan Sar dates for them. Gantuya eng ( talk) 11:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
What do you think about this (I mean the accuracy of the article, not the topic)? I know this practice existed in the past, but was polygamy really a topic in certain newspapers in 2005 or not? Yaan ( talk) 12:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi!
this German source says he was minister of finance only in 1998, as does Morris Rossabi in "Modern Mongolia". And unfortunately I was unable to find more on this on his website (maybe because my Mongolian is not good enough). Of course it might well be Rossabi and Corff are both wrong, so maybe you can look into it again? Regards, Yaan ( talk) 10:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
I am afraid my understanding of WP:RS or WP:V is a bit different. That Rossabi has an own POV does not mean he is complely unreliable on facts. Of course cross-checking and being a bit cautions about repeating his claims is always better, but to simply dismiss him just because he has an own opinion seems a bit too easy. As for what was the motivation for the MPRP to boycott parliament etc., additional sources are of course welcome. Yaan ( talk) 15:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I am going to revert that article once again. I will try to implement some changes that seem uncontroversial, and include the statement for the confirmation of which you wanted some time. I think the article could mention some DP allegations about the riot itself (not just about the elections), but I think you might be more qualified to look into this. Yaan ( talk) 14:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
You said that only 10% of Mongols speak fluent Russian. I'm very confused : I thought Mongolia was among the best friends of Russia since both nations fought together against the Japanese in 1939. Mongolia even adopted cyrillic alphabet after Russia. So, I'm very surprised to learn that Russian language is not widspread among Mongols. You also said that English became the first foreign language. Does it mean that you want closer ties with the USA ? Mitch1981 ( talk) 16:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok thanks for the information. But then the article on Mongolia needs to be revised because it states that "The Russian language is the most frequently spoken foreign language in Mongolia". on the Languages section.
As far as I know, Mongolia is part of the Shanghai Cooperation in which Russian is the one of the two working languages. So, don't you think it will reassert somehow the position of Russian in your country ? Mitch1981 ( talk) 16:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks a lot for the article.
I think it would be a good idea to mention what category those works you mentioned fall into. Are they novels, individual short stories, collections of short stories, or something else. I suppose it is the second, but I am not completely sure about what you intended.
Some of his works have been translated into German, most of them during socialism, a new edition of two short stories is available via books-on-demand ( translator+editor's webpage). I don't know if this is very important.
And, can you confirm that E. Bat-Uul is his son, or is this just an urban myth?
Regards, Yaan ( talk) 12:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mongol Empire. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. --
Caspian blue 07:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Look the map's accuracy has been contested and disputed for almost a year mainly feuding between Historiographer and Enerelt, not me. You'd better check the history instead of making such the bogus accusation that I started the edit war. You're the one who resumed the edit warring given the evidence. I'm giving you this edit warring warning since you've just engaged in edit warring for recent two days including 4 reverts without any participation on the talk page unlike me. Use discussion page.-- Caspian blue 07:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. It will be deeply appreciated if you look at article Outer Mongolia, 1911-1919 and give your opinion. Gantuya eng ( talk) 04:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Would you be able to assess if this person is notable: Ichinnorov Manjaa? It has been BLP Prodded. I speak no Mongolian and Google Translate can't handle it, so I find it impossible to assess the sources; what little there is about her in English is snippets or 404. If the article is deleted before you see this and you'd like to see it I can let you see the text. Fences& Windows 20:16, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, what is the story behind this edit? The name "Sambadondovyn Tserendorj" does not appear in any of the related articles, and is not supported by reliable sources, so I had to revert it. Can you shed some more light on the topic? -- Latebird ( talk) 08:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Сайн уу, өөрийн чинь username - ийг wikipedia - с олсон юм аа. Өөрөө их сайн contribution - ууд оруулсан байна гэж би харлаа. Надаа тусламж хэрэгтэй байна. Би сая бүртгүүлсэн article - үүсгэх хэрэгтэй байна . Яг сайн учирыг нь олохгүй л байна. Хичнээн зааварыг нь уншаад байгаа ч . Надад туслаач мэйл бичээрэй crys29feb@gmail.com
Болороо Bolortsetseg Crystal ( talk) 03:47, 20 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, Could you say something on this edit war? user Rajmaan is claiming Oirats Mongols are not Mongols and the "Mongol" identity was defined by the Qing. No one supported him, but he keeps posting his claims. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oirats#Edit_warring Thanks. 142.255.6.214 ( talk) 08:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello GenuineMongol,
I’m Irvin from PhilWiki Community, a member of the Communication Committee of the ESEAP Conference. ESEAP Conference 2018 is a regional conference for Wikimedia communities throughout the ESEAP region: ESEAP stands for East, Southeast Asia, and Pacific. Taking place in Bali, Indonesia on 5–6 May 2018, this is the first regional conference for these Wikimedia communities.
East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific are the most under-represented regions within the Wikimedia community. There is a significant number of Wikimedia contributors in our regions, yet we continue to struggle in establishing a well-managed community. This conference will bring participants from various ESEAP communities together in order to better understand the issues and to look for solutions. It also aims to connect people of the Wikimedia movement within ESEAP regions, to share ideas, and to build regional collaborations that are impossible to achieve through online communication.
We’ve got a lot of participation from several countries, but we’re lacking from your country. As we need more participants from your country, we believe that your contribution and participation would be a valuable asset to the success of this event. If you would like to participate in the conference, please do fill the form as soon as possible (by April 5, 2018) and we’ll inform you if you get selected for the conference.
Thank you and we hope to see you soon. --Filipinayzd 16:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)