Hello, General Clanker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! // Timothy :: talk 23:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Wars: Battlefront, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wookie ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, General Clanker. Please stop excessively expanding plot sections of articles, as you have done with Grand Theft Auto IV, The Ballad of Gay Tony, Liberty City Stories, San Andreas, Bully, and several others. The Manual of Style states that "Plot sections should generally be no more than approximately 700 words, to retain focus." You have ignored several warnings about this, and are now disruptively editing. – Rhain ☔ 12:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
This a warning to please stop excessively expanding plot sections of articles concerning video games. You have been advised about this, and must now heed this. If you wish to know how to handle these articles, please refer to
MOS:VG.
GUtt01 (
talk)
08:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, General Clanker!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Eagleash (
talk)
16:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
|
Hi General Clanker, just letting you know that I reverted your removed of a section from Talk:Grand Theft Auto IV. Wikipedia works primarily through discussion and consensus building so it's important that discussions aren't removed so people can following discussions. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 11:10, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
This is just to let you know that there is currently a discussion going on regarding a number of articles concerning character lists for other GTA games, and as such, you may find your draft indefinitely declined if you cannot provide reliable sources. GUtt01 ( talk) 09:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:List of Grand Theft Auto IV characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
The redirect is a result of a recent erroneous move; with the target page not actually being in Wikipedia-space, this redirect serves no purpose.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IceWelder [ ✉] 13:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello General Clanker, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Star Wars: Battlefront II (2005 video game) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ferret ( talk) 18:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I just want to advise you that is not often wise to expand a plot of a fictional medium (video game, TV program, film, or book/comic) for a number of reasons. First, adding further details that are excessive are not helpful, especially if doesn't add more to the context of information given to help viewers understand the story, or overloads that context. Secondly, some major series have Wikis dedicated to this sort of information, and as such, any considerable details are more suited for these, than within Wikipedia, which is aimed at being a more generalised encyclopedia for various articles, including those on fictional works of art. Take a read of WP:VG/PLOT to understand the guidelines surrounding plot sections for video game articles. GUtt01 ( talk) 12:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
Jerry Steinfield ( talk) 08:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Amanda
(aka DQ)
16:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jedi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Order ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Do you think you can expand on Batman character Iman Avesta on “The Enemy Within”, “List of Batman supporting characters”, and “Emily O’Brien” articles? 80.2.22.175 ( talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars Battlefront II (2017 video game), you may be blocked from editing. Your editing, blanking of content, excessive plot expansions, lack of edit notes or explanations for why you're making sweeping changes, and refusal to communicate with editors who try to engage you is becoming excessively disruptive. If your editing patterns do not change, you are likely to be blocked. -- ferret ( talk) 12:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Yo my g you better stop what you’re doing RossButsy ( talk) 12:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Looking at the main cast; it should include J. B. Smoove before Alan Tudyk, as well as Christopher Meloni and Matt Oberg in recurring as neither have ever been credited as being in the main cast. 2600:1702:4990:B40:FD61:ED2B:3079:8540 ( talk), 7:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SNUGGUMS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
SNUGGUMS (
talk /
edits)
14:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Michael De Santa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Fiddle Faddle 14:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael De Santa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael De Santa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Rhain ☔ 05:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. Please understand that I am not actively targeting you out of spite or some malicious desire. I am just simply looking out for Wikipedia and other Wikipedians in general. I'm doing my best to uphold Wikipedia's rules such as WP:CMOS#PLOT and WP:TRIVIA, but your edits are making that difficult for me. I get that you want to make sure readers are as well informed as possible, but they don't need to know every single little detail about a piece of media or character nor does it need to be worded in such a long-winded, unprofessional fashion. Your edits tend to be on the unprofessional side, using jargon that adults would use in a casual sense instead of a professional one. Once again, I'm not targeting you specifically, and I apologize if it feels like that. It's just that there are hundreds of editors who feel the need to put in every single detail they can just because they think it's important, and I do this to them as well because they're either knowingly or unknowingly violating Wikipedia's rules. I'm just making sure the information is as concise as possible with as little words as possible. No useless filler or fat, just the meat of it all. Once more, I'm sorry if it feels like I've been picking on you. I'm just doing my best to keep Wikipedia neutral, professional, and concise. On a similar but sort of unrelated note, I also recommend using the "Show preview" button so you can iron out typos before someone else catches them. Blazewing16 ( talk) 04:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The extra spaces in the infobox are often there to aid readability for editors, please don't remove them. Thank you. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 23:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Migs Mayfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galactic Empire.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Claude (Grand Theft Auto), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drifter.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, General Clanker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:List of Grand Theft Auto IV characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for the wonderful job you did with your edits to the Batman '89 page. You summed up the first issue perfectly! Well done! Partyclams ( talk) 23:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. It seems that you have added
Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as
Connor (Assassin's Creed). You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia
guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an
attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you.
DanCherek (
talk)
17:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
can you edit Superman '78 please
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Assassins in popular culture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassins in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Clanker. I've started a discussion on Assassin's Creed Odyssey's talk page regarding the inclusion of references to the Discovery Tour and would appreciate your input. -- JascaDucato ( talk | contributions) 12:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed from some of your past edits that you have a tendency to add prose to articles not explicitly stated by the sources. For example, in your expansion of the history section in Assassin's Creed earlier this year, you have given numerous details that are not mentioned in the source used. This is a violation of WP:OR; please also be aware of WP:SYNTH, in that you must not combine details from a source to reach a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source. Such material needs to either be backed up by reliable sources, or alternatively—if this is not possibled—not mentioned at all. I appreciate that you want to further benefit articles by providing more information, however any material added that is likely to be questioned needs to be sufficiently sourced (also note that linking to other articles that backs up what you are adding is not a sufficient method of sourcing). Wikibenboy94 ( talk) 17:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Tunguska event in popular culture, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. A secondary source is required per
WP:IPCV.
DonIago (
talk)
01:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ratonhnhaké:ton, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratonhnhaké:ton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
You might be interested. Both of these GA articles may need some help a bit. 2001:4455:304:CB00:4138:AFB3:AA6E:3789 ( talk) 10:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Altaïr Ibn-LaʼAhad, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altaïr Ibn-LaʼAhad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haytham Kenway, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haytham Kenway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, General Clanker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! // Timothy :: talk 23:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Wars: Battlefront, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wookie ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, General Clanker. Please stop excessively expanding plot sections of articles, as you have done with Grand Theft Auto IV, The Ballad of Gay Tony, Liberty City Stories, San Andreas, Bully, and several others. The Manual of Style states that "Plot sections should generally be no more than approximately 700 words, to retain focus." You have ignored several warnings about this, and are now disruptively editing. – Rhain ☔ 12:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
This a warning to please stop excessively expanding plot sections of articles concerning video games. You have been advised about this, and must now heed this. If you wish to know how to handle these articles, please refer to
MOS:VG.
GUtt01 (
talk)
08:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, General Clanker!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Eagleash (
talk)
16:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
|
Hi General Clanker, just letting you know that I reverted your removed of a section from Talk:Grand Theft Auto IV. Wikipedia works primarily through discussion and consensus building so it's important that discussions aren't removed so people can following discussions. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 11:10, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
This is just to let you know that there is currently a discussion going on regarding a number of articles concerning character lists for other GTA games, and as such, you may find your draft indefinitely declined if you cannot provide reliable sources. GUtt01 ( talk) 09:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:List of Grand Theft Auto IV characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
The redirect is a result of a recent erroneous move; with the target page not actually being in Wikipedia-space, this redirect serves no purpose.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IceWelder [ ✉] 13:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello General Clanker, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Star Wars: Battlefront II (2005 video game) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ferret ( talk) 18:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I just want to advise you that is not often wise to expand a plot of a fictional medium (video game, TV program, film, or book/comic) for a number of reasons. First, adding further details that are excessive are not helpful, especially if doesn't add more to the context of information given to help viewers understand the story, or overloads that context. Secondly, some major series have Wikis dedicated to this sort of information, and as such, any considerable details are more suited for these, than within Wikipedia, which is aimed at being a more generalised encyclopedia for various articles, including those on fictional works of art. Take a read of WP:VG/PLOT to understand the guidelines surrounding plot sections for video game articles. GUtt01 ( talk) 12:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
Jerry Steinfield ( talk) 08:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Amanda
(aka DQ)
16:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jedi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Order ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Do you think you can expand on Batman character Iman Avesta on “The Enemy Within”, “List of Batman supporting characters”, and “Emily O’Brien” articles? 80.2.22.175 ( talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars Battlefront II (2017 video game), you may be blocked from editing. Your editing, blanking of content, excessive plot expansions, lack of edit notes or explanations for why you're making sweeping changes, and refusal to communicate with editors who try to engage you is becoming excessively disruptive. If your editing patterns do not change, you are likely to be blocked. -- ferret ( talk) 12:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Yo my g you better stop what you’re doing RossButsy ( talk) 12:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Looking at the main cast; it should include J. B. Smoove before Alan Tudyk, as well as Christopher Meloni and Matt Oberg in recurring as neither have ever been credited as being in the main cast. 2600:1702:4990:B40:FD61:ED2B:3079:8540 ( talk), 7:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SNUGGUMS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
SNUGGUMS (
talk /
edits)
14:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Michael De Santa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Fiddle Faddle 14:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael De Santa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael De Santa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Rhain ☔ 05:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. Please understand that I am not actively targeting you out of spite or some malicious desire. I am just simply looking out for Wikipedia and other Wikipedians in general. I'm doing my best to uphold Wikipedia's rules such as WP:CMOS#PLOT and WP:TRIVIA, but your edits are making that difficult for me. I get that you want to make sure readers are as well informed as possible, but they don't need to know every single little detail about a piece of media or character nor does it need to be worded in such a long-winded, unprofessional fashion. Your edits tend to be on the unprofessional side, using jargon that adults would use in a casual sense instead of a professional one. Once again, I'm not targeting you specifically, and I apologize if it feels like that. It's just that there are hundreds of editors who feel the need to put in every single detail they can just because they think it's important, and I do this to them as well because they're either knowingly or unknowingly violating Wikipedia's rules. I'm just making sure the information is as concise as possible with as little words as possible. No useless filler or fat, just the meat of it all. Once more, I'm sorry if it feels like I've been picking on you. I'm just doing my best to keep Wikipedia neutral, professional, and concise. On a similar but sort of unrelated note, I also recommend using the "Show preview" button so you can iron out typos before someone else catches them. Blazewing16 ( talk) 04:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The extra spaces in the infobox are often there to aid readability for editors, please don't remove them. Thank you. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 23:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Migs Mayfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galactic Empire.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Claude (Grand Theft Auto), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drifter.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, General Clanker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:List of Grand Theft Auto IV characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for the wonderful job you did with your edits to the Batman '89 page. You summed up the first issue perfectly! Well done! Partyclams ( talk) 23:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. It seems that you have added
Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as
Connor (Assassin's Creed). You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia
guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an
attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you.
DanCherek (
talk)
17:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
can you edit Superman '78 please
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Assassins in popular culture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassins in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Clanker. I've started a discussion on Assassin's Creed Odyssey's talk page regarding the inclusion of references to the Discovery Tour and would appreciate your input. -- JascaDucato ( talk | contributions) 12:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed from some of your past edits that you have a tendency to add prose to articles not explicitly stated by the sources. For example, in your expansion of the history section in Assassin's Creed earlier this year, you have given numerous details that are not mentioned in the source used. This is a violation of WP:OR; please also be aware of WP:SYNTH, in that you must not combine details from a source to reach a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source. Such material needs to either be backed up by reliable sources, or alternatively—if this is not possibled—not mentioned at all. I appreciate that you want to further benefit articles by providing more information, however any material added that is likely to be questioned needs to be sufficiently sourced (also note that linking to other articles that backs up what you are adding is not a sufficient method of sourcing). Wikibenboy94 ( talk) 17:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Tunguska event in popular culture, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. A secondary source is required per
WP:IPCV.
DonIago (
talk)
01:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ratonhnhaké:ton, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratonhnhaké:ton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
You might be interested. Both of these GA articles may need some help a bit. 2001:4455:304:CB00:4138:AFB3:AA6E:3789 ( talk) 10:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Altaïr Ibn-LaʼAhad, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altaïr Ibn-LaʼAhad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haytham Kenway, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haytham Kenway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)