Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page
Career assessments do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the
article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Versa
geek
03:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did in
this edit to
ESFJ. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as
advertising or promotion. Thank you.
Mjquin_id (
talk)
04:41, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Mjquin,
With regards to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator
Please see the heading at the bottom of the page: Free online Jungian typology assessments
There are 3 tests listed, which do as the heading suggests.
http://www.personalitytest.net/cgi-bin/q.pl is a Free online Jungian typology assessment. Now please look at http://www.career-test.co.uk/test.php. See that is is also a Free online Jungian typology assessment.
There is a heading Free online Jungian typology assessments, and below are 3 sites. This career-test.co.uk/test.php is an alternative test that is different to the other 3, but is also a Jungian type test, that completely and relevantly fits into this heading and page.
I am stunned that it is deleted, as if it is some sort of irrelevant or incorrect link. Please check to see that his link is absolutely no less relevant that the 3 that exist. What is wrong with having a relevant 4th test, that is appropriate information for this page? It is a MBTI type test (ie. Free online Jungian typology assessment).
I am not going to add SPAM links or irrelevant material to any wikipedia page. Only what is beneficial and correct. Please can you see that this link is correct to be placed.
Thank you genedna
If you need help, just ask. There are friendly people who can help you around every corner. Mjquin_id ( talk) 02:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Mjquin,
There is a page on this site that describes the ISTP personality. There it made sense to put a link on the ISTP wiki page to the ISTP page.
There are 16 personality types. ISTP, ENTP, ISTJ, etc. THere are separate pages to describe each person with respect to career guidence.
Surely it makes sense to have this additional reading that is relevant to the type.
It was not a case of spam at all, each link was relevant and appropriate.
There is also a wiki page about career tests!!!! How can you not add a link to a career test, when that is relevant to the page.
I am a new user, but only going to add relevant and dedicated information.
Surely new users need to add information?
Ok. I will not supply the further reading to the 16 personality types...... because this information you don't want users to access, even though it is original, informative and relevant.
However, there is still the unanswered issue of the three personalty test links on the MTBI type indicator page, and this test (career-test.co.uk/test.php), which is not a copy of the previous 3. Surely this link is relevant and should be added?
Why have any links to jungian type tests?
Surely this is a genuine and correct evidence? The site is not irrelevant or inappropriate. Surely you agree to that?
The other links I believed were totally appropriate. You don't want to add further reading links that are appropriate and relevant?
I am a biotechnologist, and understand scientific papers and references.
Again I plead a case that the link be allowed to stay please.
Regards, Vern (genedna)
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and DNA Solutions was created.
Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 03:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page
Career assessments do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the
article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Versa
geek
03:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did in
this edit to
ESFJ. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as
advertising or promotion. Thank you.
Mjquin_id (
talk)
04:41, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Mjquin,
With regards to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator
Please see the heading at the bottom of the page: Free online Jungian typology assessments
There are 3 tests listed, which do as the heading suggests.
http://www.personalitytest.net/cgi-bin/q.pl is a Free online Jungian typology assessment. Now please look at http://www.career-test.co.uk/test.php. See that is is also a Free online Jungian typology assessment.
There is a heading Free online Jungian typology assessments, and below are 3 sites. This career-test.co.uk/test.php is an alternative test that is different to the other 3, but is also a Jungian type test, that completely and relevantly fits into this heading and page.
I am stunned that it is deleted, as if it is some sort of irrelevant or incorrect link. Please check to see that his link is absolutely no less relevant that the 3 that exist. What is wrong with having a relevant 4th test, that is appropriate information for this page? It is a MBTI type test (ie. Free online Jungian typology assessment).
I am not going to add SPAM links or irrelevant material to any wikipedia page. Only what is beneficial and correct. Please can you see that this link is correct to be placed.
Thank you genedna
If you need help, just ask. There are friendly people who can help you around every corner. Mjquin_id ( talk) 02:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Mjquin,
There is a page on this site that describes the ISTP personality. There it made sense to put a link on the ISTP wiki page to the ISTP page.
There are 16 personality types. ISTP, ENTP, ISTJ, etc. THere are separate pages to describe each person with respect to career guidence.
Surely it makes sense to have this additional reading that is relevant to the type.
It was not a case of spam at all, each link was relevant and appropriate.
There is also a wiki page about career tests!!!! How can you not add a link to a career test, when that is relevant to the page.
I am a new user, but only going to add relevant and dedicated information.
Surely new users need to add information?
Ok. I will not supply the further reading to the 16 personality types...... because this information you don't want users to access, even though it is original, informative and relevant.
However, there is still the unanswered issue of the three personalty test links on the MTBI type indicator page, and this test (career-test.co.uk/test.php), which is not a copy of the previous 3. Surely this link is relevant and should be added?
Why have any links to jungian type tests?
Surely this is a genuine and correct evidence? The site is not irrelevant or inappropriate. Surely you agree to that?
The other links I believed were totally appropriate. You don't want to add further reading links that are appropriate and relevant?
I am a biotechnologist, and understand scientific papers and references.
Again I plead a case that the link be allowed to stay please.
Regards, Vern (genedna)
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and DNA Solutions was created.
Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 03:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)