Two things:

1. Your signature should wikilink back to either your talk page or your userpage, so people can find you. It probably shouldn't be just text.
2. About SheepBot: you should be able to run it for a 50-edit trial just by estimating; it doesn't have to be exact, and you can go a little bit over or a little bit below. The BAG just needs to see that the bot is working correctly when handling a moderate volume of pages.

Thanks, The Earwig ( Talk | Contribs) 15:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello, Gene-va. You have new messages at The Earwig's talk page.
Message added 04:22, 28 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. reply

The Earwig ( Talk | Contribs) 04:22, 28 September 2009 (UTC) reply

This is a confirmation edit.

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarise yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on Freenode and/or you may also wish to subscribe to the mailing list, which is used for internal discussions among the account creation team. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my talk page if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process! Maedin\ ^talk 09:08, 10 October 2009 (UTC) reply

I appreciate the polite manner in which you are conducting your request for approval for your bot, in addition that you are attempting to address community concerns. I'll trust you to do the necessary follow-ups and ignore this particular bot request for the future. Thanks for working as if you are part of a community-it makes it easier to build one. -- 69.225.5.4 ( talk) 04:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC) reply

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday November 15th, Columbia University area Last: 09/13/2009 This box: view •  talk •

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Wikipedia Loves Landmarks, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example particular problems posed by Wikipedia articles about racist and anti-semitic people and movements (see the September meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 03:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SheepBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page. reply

Hi Babylonian Armor I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SheepBot is labeled as needing your comment. Please visit the above link to reply to the requests. Thanks! -- BAGBot Talk 17:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC) reply

You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 9th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Sunday January 24, 2010 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 00:31, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday March 21st, Columbia University area Last: 11/15/2009 This box: view •  talk •

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Day NYC, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Lights Camera Wiki, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example User:ScienceApologist will present on " climate change, alternative medicine, UFOs and Transcendental Meditation" (see the November meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. And if the weather is good, we'll have a star party with the telescopes on the roof of Pupin Hall!

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 15:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC) reply

ACC

I'm a little confused why your bot marked McLaren F1 GTR as a dead end article. The³5₉ ( Talk) 10:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm confused too. Thankyou for pointing this out, it is probably the case the dead end list my bot is using may be lagging, or out of date. Whatever the case may be, I'll be sure to look at the problem at my next convenience. Babylonian Armor ( talk) 10:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Same goes with Byzantine architecture. Sheepbot marked it as dead end though it contains 213 wikiLinks according to TW. -- Fama Clamosa ( talk) 08:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

it has done the same to high middle ages, which is filled with links, so i will remove it now. Smitty1337 ( talk) 21:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Greetings Gene-va/Archive B, I see you're up for adoption, and I'm in the market. If ever you need advice or answers, just ask me -- any question, any time. I'd like to help however I can. Happy editing - Draeco ( talk) 12:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

With regards to this recent edit by SheepBot, I would suggest that adding a {{ Dead end}} template to an article that has been blanked is not the best possible way to handle the article's history. Perhaps reverting to a non-problematic version of the article would be a better solution. -- Allen3  ^talk 15:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply