Hello, Frozenranger, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help.
Red Director (
talk)
22:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.
We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 09:58, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
If you are unfamiliar with WP:NPOV, please do read it. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the information, also my comments are neutral. We cannot treat people as some unit of color, thus I believe your giving undue weight to race. @ EvergreenFir:
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Drmies (
talk)
19:59, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Frozenranger ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hi @ El C:, I sent you an email regarding this. I also see that you have locked the disscussion regarding the topic which I feel is the right thing to do. Thank you, have a good one Frozenranger ( talk) 20:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. You have not come close to addressing the reason for your block. You would do well to deal with your own editing and desist from accusing others. -- Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dear El C, Sorry to bother you, I feel that Drmies and EvergreenFir are inappropriately using their adminstrative power to have you ban me. All I wanted to do was have an informed discussion of why including / not including race would create the best article possible. If you have seen their comments they appear to be coming from an emotional state. I to confess that some of my comments were coming from an emotional state. If possible I would like you to remind them to be professional, and I will do my best to stay professional. Also I think by including white in the lead, the editors are falling into the texas sharp shooter fallacy by cherry picking facts. I have no problem including those facts later in the article. I think that by having them in the lead we are playing a narrative that doesn't support the values of wikipedia.
I hope that this shows that my intent was never to harrass people or make inappropriate comments or damage wikipedia in any way, I did not fully understand how to comment in the talk page regarding editoral changes. I see that the consenus is to include race and that will be the end of it.
thanks for your time Frozenranger ( talk) 20:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Frozenranger, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help.
Red Director (
talk)
22:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.
We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 09:58, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
If you are unfamiliar with WP:NPOV, please do read it. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the information, also my comments are neutral. We cannot treat people as some unit of color, thus I believe your giving undue weight to race. @ EvergreenFir:
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Drmies (
talk)
19:59, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Frozenranger ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hi @ El C:, I sent you an email regarding this. I also see that you have locked the disscussion regarding the topic which I feel is the right thing to do. Thank you, have a good one Frozenranger ( talk) 20:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. You have not come close to addressing the reason for your block. You would do well to deal with your own editing and desist from accusing others. -- Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dear El C, Sorry to bother you, I feel that Drmies and EvergreenFir are inappropriately using their adminstrative power to have you ban me. All I wanted to do was have an informed discussion of why including / not including race would create the best article possible. If you have seen their comments they appear to be coming from an emotional state. I to confess that some of my comments were coming from an emotional state. If possible I would like you to remind them to be professional, and I will do my best to stay professional. Also I think by including white in the lead, the editors are falling into the texas sharp shooter fallacy by cherry picking facts. I have no problem including those facts later in the article. I think that by having them in the lead we are playing a narrative that doesn't support the values of wikipedia.
I hope that this shows that my intent was never to harrass people or make inappropriate comments or damage wikipedia in any way, I did not fully understand how to comment in the talk page regarding editoral changes. I see that the consenus is to include race and that will be the end of it.
thanks for your time Frozenranger ( talk) 20:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)