{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.FromChrissenden ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm not sure why I've been CU blocked. I was quite open about the fact I am a retired user who scrambled their password. I'm under no obligation to reveal my past account (it wasn't under sanctions and there's no overlap with the issue that persuaded me to return) and I have good reasons not to, as I had detailed. I'm more than a little annoyed my account was even checked as it happens, suggesting as it does that someone out there automatically assumed without any evidence that I was up to no good, and decided to abuse their privileged position to fish for a technical reason to block me. I wonder if the guilty person even realised I had openly admitted to not being a new user? I'll be taking that up with the OC. FromChrissenden ( talk) 01:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The evidence seems entirely satisfactory to me. If you know about OC then you'll know about your further appeal options, so I won't bother explaining them. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
FromChrissenden ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
If this evidence is technical, someone with experience in busy but diverse networks and long retired but returning accounts (scrambled) needs to look at it. I have no doubt zzuuzz either doesn't know what he is doing, or is part of an effort to find any reason to block me because I was doing something highly unusual for Wikipedia, standing up for procedure and good order. I was not in breach of SOCK, there is no overlap, there were no sanctions on my scrambled account. And there were, of course, no valid grounds to even perform a check. Which will be an issue for someone to answer for, and anyone else who gives that person a free pass for a probably fraudulent justification because they're colleagues. I have yet to hear ST47 even say he had any clue I had already admitted being a returning user, so please don't cover for him if he has dropped you in it. People that clueless do not need to be doing this highly sensitive role. If it looks like incompetence, it probably was, so undo it. If it looks like I was blocked as punishment for retiring and then returning, I probably was, so undo it. FromChrissenden ( talk) 23:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ST47 ( talk) 05:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
with no sockpuppetry intentions... Then they should stop evading their many many blocks. TPA revoked. ST47 ( talk) 05:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but I pretty much had to close your discussion per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. It was already slightly dubious to start a discussion regarding the format of an RFC in the middle of it, but considering the {{ checkuserblock-account}} and match to a CBAN'd user... well there you go. If you get unblocked or similar, I'll be happy to self-revert though. Best of luck! – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 04:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.FromChrissenden ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm not sure why I've been CU blocked. I was quite open about the fact I am a retired user who scrambled their password. I'm under no obligation to reveal my past account (it wasn't under sanctions and there's no overlap with the issue that persuaded me to return) and I have good reasons not to, as I had detailed. I'm more than a little annoyed my account was even checked as it happens, suggesting as it does that someone out there automatically assumed without any evidence that I was up to no good, and decided to abuse their privileged position to fish for a technical reason to block me. I wonder if the guilty person even realised I had openly admitted to not being a new user? I'll be taking that up with the OC. FromChrissenden ( talk) 01:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The evidence seems entirely satisfactory to me. If you know about OC then you'll know about your further appeal options, so I won't bother explaining them. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
FromChrissenden ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
If this evidence is technical, someone with experience in busy but diverse networks and long retired but returning accounts (scrambled) needs to look at it. I have no doubt zzuuzz either doesn't know what he is doing, or is part of an effort to find any reason to block me because I was doing something highly unusual for Wikipedia, standing up for procedure and good order. I was not in breach of SOCK, there is no overlap, there were no sanctions on my scrambled account. And there were, of course, no valid grounds to even perform a check. Which will be an issue for someone to answer for, and anyone else who gives that person a free pass for a probably fraudulent justification because they're colleagues. I have yet to hear ST47 even say he had any clue I had already admitted being a returning user, so please don't cover for him if he has dropped you in it. People that clueless do not need to be doing this highly sensitive role. If it looks like incompetence, it probably was, so undo it. If it looks like I was blocked as punishment for retiring and then returning, I probably was, so undo it. FromChrissenden ( talk) 23:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ST47 ( talk) 05:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
with no sockpuppetry intentions... Then they should stop evading their many many blocks. TPA revoked. ST47 ( talk) 05:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but I pretty much had to close your discussion per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. It was already slightly dubious to start a discussion regarding the format of an RFC in the middle of it, but considering the {{ checkuserblock-account}} and match to a CBAN'd user... well there you go. If you get unblocked or similar, I'll be happy to self-revert though. Best of luck! – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 04:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)