|
I try to enforce them too. I'm just stopping by but I'll be out again. -- Addict 2006 13:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, you didn't have a userpage to look on, so I just sort of went with my natural assumption. I feel your pain though...my userpage is pink and I still get mistaken for a guy. ♠ P M C♠ 21:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Please see the Mike Read talk page regarding Rolf Mayo's crap attempts at humour by vandalising the article. Much of it revolves around a piss-take of Read's use (as far as I can tell, or care) of the word "feasible". The tagging was clearly bad faith. Fourohfour 19:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
well dude i don't know what one is chould you help imean amate in wiki is a good thing Kingdom of crash and spyro —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdom of crash and spyro ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
KOSAC is STILL posting that image for no reason. The guy needs reporting, as you said you would. CBFan 14:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Regarding this comment: please, just keep a cool head and back off from the guy. I'd rather not see the disagreement escalate again. All we need do is perform the necessary reverts (keeping WP:3RR in mind), and the unusable image will eventually be deleted; as indicated here, an admin has undertaken to deal with that image page in a more permanent manner. Cheers. -- Mark H Wilkinson ( t, c) 16:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
i never ment to do anything roung i just didn't understand wat i was doin roung-- Kingdom of crash and spyro 12:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC).
well were not he moved from irishia(thats were irish peps come from right) to england.-- Kingdom of crash and spyro 15:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC).
what does sockpupitry mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdom of crash and spyro ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
hm.well no i dont do that "sockpupetry" thing,ok -- Kingdom of crash and spyro 14:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC).
Strictly speaking, #2 of unacceptable image use doesn't forbid cropping per se; it's more there assert that one couldn't use a portion of an image which is related to one subject in order to illustrate an article not directly related. There are, in fact, suitable cases when cropping is desirable from the POV of WP:NFCC #3 (b) ("The entire work is not used if a portion will suffice.").
However, in the case of Image:Crash titans 4.PNG, the rather amateurish nature of the cropping, to my mind, makes it unsuitable for encyclopaedic purposes. -- Mark H Wilkinson ( t, c) 15:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
im not but id be careful as soon as titans comes out millions of fans are gonna start doin it just saying. im not sure if im logged in its messed up for some reason.kingdom
thanks for helping dude -- Kingdom of crash and spyro 17:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for trying to fix my mistake, it wasn't my fault, honest! I guess we're both mess-ups ;)
anemone|
projectors 20:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
i will not pu cm on cttr links,but now its like wen i edit its removed-- Kingdom of crash and spyro 11:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uka Uka. Someone wants Uka Uka's article deleted for no apparant reason whatsoever. Feel free to post your opinions. CBFan ( talk) 11:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
There is absolutely no reason for you to replace the content on this page. There is no reason why an editor can't blank their own talk page. Please revert yourself. -- Onorem♠ Dil 05:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ctr boxart.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 08:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
|
I try to enforce them too. I'm just stopping by but I'll be out again. -- Addict 2006 13:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, you didn't have a userpage to look on, so I just sort of went with my natural assumption. I feel your pain though...my userpage is pink and I still get mistaken for a guy. ♠ P M C♠ 21:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Please see the Mike Read talk page regarding Rolf Mayo's crap attempts at humour by vandalising the article. Much of it revolves around a piss-take of Read's use (as far as I can tell, or care) of the word "feasible". The tagging was clearly bad faith. Fourohfour 19:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
well dude i don't know what one is chould you help imean amate in wiki is a good thing Kingdom of crash and spyro —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdom of crash and spyro ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
KOSAC is STILL posting that image for no reason. The guy needs reporting, as you said you would. CBFan 14:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Regarding this comment: please, just keep a cool head and back off from the guy. I'd rather not see the disagreement escalate again. All we need do is perform the necessary reverts (keeping WP:3RR in mind), and the unusable image will eventually be deleted; as indicated here, an admin has undertaken to deal with that image page in a more permanent manner. Cheers. -- Mark H Wilkinson ( t, c) 16:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
i never ment to do anything roung i just didn't understand wat i was doin roung-- Kingdom of crash and spyro 12:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC).
well were not he moved from irishia(thats were irish peps come from right) to england.-- Kingdom of crash and spyro 15:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC).
what does sockpupitry mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdom of crash and spyro ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
hm.well no i dont do that "sockpupetry" thing,ok -- Kingdom of crash and spyro 14:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC).
Strictly speaking, #2 of unacceptable image use doesn't forbid cropping per se; it's more there assert that one couldn't use a portion of an image which is related to one subject in order to illustrate an article not directly related. There are, in fact, suitable cases when cropping is desirable from the POV of WP:NFCC #3 (b) ("The entire work is not used if a portion will suffice.").
However, in the case of Image:Crash titans 4.PNG, the rather amateurish nature of the cropping, to my mind, makes it unsuitable for encyclopaedic purposes. -- Mark H Wilkinson ( t, c) 15:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
im not but id be careful as soon as titans comes out millions of fans are gonna start doin it just saying. im not sure if im logged in its messed up for some reason.kingdom
thanks for helping dude -- Kingdom of crash and spyro 17:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for trying to fix my mistake, it wasn't my fault, honest! I guess we're both mess-ups ;)
anemone|
projectors 20:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
i will not pu cm on cttr links,but now its like wen i edit its removed-- Kingdom of crash and spyro 11:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uka Uka. Someone wants Uka Uka's article deleted for no apparant reason whatsoever. Feel free to post your opinions. CBFan ( talk) 11:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
There is absolutely no reason for you to replace the content on this page. There is no reason why an editor can't blank their own talk page. Please revert yourself. -- Onorem♠ Dil 05:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ctr boxart.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 08:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)