![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I've nominated on commons for deletion a first batch (took way to long to tag all of them, which is why this is just a subset of them) of the old style Israeli signs as since they aren't following the correct style, they should be deleted as to not be incorrectly used on articles. -- Gonnym ( talk) 12:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
As of today, a number of road articles are missing their shields. The infobox of Ontario Highway 68 has been disrupted after you changed the road type from "Hwy" to "ON 1960". As for the others, i do not know what is causing the problem. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the pages i have listed below. - Radiphus ( talk) 13:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
{{
Infobox road}}
(only Ontario and Thailand) that caused these. I reverted Ontario 68 and created the missing files for these Thailand articles. –
Fredddie
™
14:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Why did you revert my edit on the Module:Road data/strings/USA/GA page? You didn't leave an explanation in the edit summary. Did you make a change somewhere else that calls the Georgia State Bicycle Routes? Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) ( talk) 15:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
According to this picture [1] it is signed as business 7 so i was wondering how to make a SH-Bus Type for the template? Thanks. Bacardi379 ( talk) 23:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for making the set of 1920 route markers, they look great.
The image for 8 doesn't seem to be there, however, and it didn't appear with the rest of them when I completed the list. No rush on it of course, just letting you know. -- Sable232 ( talk) 22:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:County 65A square.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 23:30, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed a few your broken images on Ontario Highway articles and I think it was this edit you made that was the cause, So I thought I'd just flag them up....
Cheers KylieTastic ( talk) 11:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey Fredddie, do you mind taking a quick look at today's (May 21 2019) edits by the Anon IP here to ensure they are consistent with your Project's objectives, guidelines, etc. There appears to be multiple requests for file deletions. Thanks, Mercy11 ( talk) 03:06, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
Jct}}
and {{
Infobox road}}
. –
Fredddie
™
23:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
LOL! Thanks and I'm sorry. Yamil Rivera ( talk) 02:55, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Fredddie! The shields for some primary-numbered roads were correct. The idea is that people associate the number with their main network (Pri = 1-99, Sec = 100-299 and Ter = 300-9999) and then specify the other networks to which each road also belong. For that reason I took the liberty of adding some changes to your code. Maybe you and I are seeing the PR type in opposite ways. I suppose you see PR as Primary only and I see PR as Puerto Rico (the four networks put together) because the roads are identified as PR-XX. I'd like you to correct me if I'm wrong.
In relation to the word Ramal, in Puerto Rico it means both spur and loop roads. When the word Ramal is placed on top of the shield, the R suffix isn't placed on the number because it is redundant. There are also a few roads with the letter P as a suffix. The P means Paralela (parallel) and is usually seen in a downtown when the streets only have traffic in one direction. That is, the road makes its main route through one of the streets and the opposite direction is represented by the other street as parallel. If you want to make clear the distinction between spur and loop, you can keep Ramal for spurs and add Alt or any other word to loops. Yo can also add Peaje for those toll roads that aren't part of the Autopistas de Puerto Rico system.
If you think that it isn't necessary to maintain a primary shield for the roads you have edited, let me know your opinion. I'm willing to follow your recommendations. Regards. Yamil Rivera ( talk) 02:14, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:NYCint template tracking category requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
@ Fredddie: You helped us out before with shield problems on South African Highways and roads. Can you take a look at this R708 (South Africa) when you have time. Regards Paul Conlinp ( talk) 19:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
I wanted to discuss the correct way to display US 80 crossing the state line on the California/Arizona border. I understand the usual way to display a River crossing is the way you rearranged it, but the border situation near the Ocean to Ocean Bridge at the state line is an unusual one. Right at the western side of the bridge, the state border leaves the Colorado River and heads due north paralleling old US 80 for 0.04 miles north of the north end of the bridge. Approximately 0.04 miles north of the OOH Bridge, US 80 made a curve northwest and crossed into California right in front of an abandoned Agricultural Inspection Station. The crossing of the state border was on dry land and the entirety of the OOH Bridge on either side of the river is in Yuma County, Arizona and so is the small bend of the Colorado River it sits on. That's why I originally placed the Colorado River as a location inside Yuma County. The river itself isn't the border crossing. With that cleared up, should I leave the intersection table the way you left it? I don't want to jump the gun and make any changes without prior consultation. Thanks. - MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 23:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
I try the best I can to write good aeticles and provide good sourcing for any content I write. But it appears the articles I write or improve come up lackluster to standards I'm hoping to reach. I remember while I was writing U.S. Route 80 in Alabama, I worked very hard to create an A Class article right off the bat amd did my absolute best to make it meet as many standards as possible. At first, the article received a C Class rating despite the effort until you were able to raise it to B Class standards. I wanted to thank you for that by the way, it means a lot to me that at least three of my articles at least reach B Class. I was hoping, could you please give me some advice on what I could do to improve my writing style or methods so I could have a chance at writing A Class or higher? Thank you in advance and I appreciate the support and help you've given to me on occasion up tp this point. Especially with improving the U.S. Route 80 in Arizona article. I still go in amd try to further improve that one every day in hopes it'll better meet high standards. - MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 01:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
{{reflist}}
, and infobox go in the first edit and then I'll write the junction list. I do those first because they're going to be static for most of the process and it helps me find the natural splits in the route. If the highway is over 50 miles long, I'll split the route into three roughly equal sections (that's where the jct list helps). I'll just make a list in outline form. Longer routes, I might do three 3rd level headers and then split the subsections equally-ish. Dividing the article like this is a device I use to keep the prose moving once I start writing. Did I mention that I haven't actually done any writing at this point?|reassess=yes
to the talk page banner so another project member will take a look. You can also have
WP:GOCE look it over or ask someone whose opinion you trust. This is when the article starts to take on some shine. I used to think GAN was a big deal, as far as stepping stones to get to FAC, it's not that important. Sure, you'll get someone to review it again, but I've seen so many USRD Good Articles that weren't good articles (note the difference) that it's mostly a rubber stamp. The place to get the most rigorous review is
WP:HWY/ACR. We've changed the rules over the years, but you have to have a couple people give a formal review of the article, get a source review, and check the licensing on images before it becomes A-Class. The people who hang out at ACR know what reviewers at FAC look for, so we try to iron out those kinks before the article gets there. There is considerable rigor at FAC, but I (speaking only for myself) haven't had any antagonism directed at my work and it's been a generally positive experience.Thank you for your work on this template, the display is much better now. However, you overlooked one point: the overall icon height should be 12 pixels; your edits made the text height 12px. Hopefully it's not much more work to make the fix. Useddenim ( talk) 22:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
I am so glad that you found my "mistake" in the K-16 article and fixed it. But in the future dont add a comment in the description of changes that suggests im stupid or that I dont know how to write good articles, just fix the mistake. Thanks 420Traveler ( talk) 10:30, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey Fredddie, I noticed you modified the pages for LZ-1 and LZ-2; however, I'm not sure I fully agree with classifying them as and calling them "national roads". See my comments on Talk:LZ2_(Lanzarote) when you have a minute. Thanks. Vishal dh ( talk) 17:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elgin Bypass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fox River ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Just thought I'd update you and let you know I'm still working on a revised history section. It's going slowly though, which is why no huge changes have been made yet. Been following your outline that you gave me in the peer review. What I have so far is in my user sandbox. I hope you don't mind me asking something unrelated, but how can I get a Good Article nomination for US 80 in Arizona? I've been working hard to try and get it to Good Article status. - MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 02:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
{{subst:GAN|subtopic=Transport}}
on the talk page and that's it. It will probably take a while (there is a backlog of reviews) but someone will come along and review it. –
Fredddie
™
16:33, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Cards84664
(talk)
02:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Does the thmubnail of OSM map in infobox render for you currently? Seems it did for me when I edited the article yesterday (otherwise I would not have edited) but it does not today. Tried other browsers and also logged out and did not help. Somethimes the map thumbnail does not render (show) when I am logged in but not the case now. I am working with the author of Module:Mapframe on fixing module bugs for auto lat/lon and auto zoom.-- Kozuch ( talk) 10:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
I don't disagree that the thinner lines look better. For one, they make partially obscured city names more legible. But consistency is important. Editing Template:Maplink to use a thinner default line would be better. Redesigning the template to only allow selection from a very limited number of named fill/stroke styles (and deleting the override parameters) would be ideal. ― cobaltcigs 21:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Sorry - my edit summary got scrambled. Please see Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Mass nomination Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 15:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Fredddie,
you recently edited
Template: BAB-E.
Originally, only the road number sign was displayed, which was also a link. Currently the sign and the text link are displayed separately.
vs
E55
This leads to "weird" formatting in some infoboxes and tables. Here are some examples: A1 (Austria), A1 (Switzerland) or Highways in Slovakia
-- Krumpi ( talk) 15:36, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Here's another peer review to look at whenever you're available. ToThAc ( talk) 21:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
I've been hard at work over the last couple of months improving the quality of U.S. Route 66 in Arizona in hopes of eventually bringing it to GA status. I wanted to ask how it looks so far. I recently just finished re-writing or properly sourcing all the sections as well as making grammar corrections where needed. On a related note, I was wondering, how can I become qualified to assess an article rating? - MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 03:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:New York Roads portal waiting list requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:23, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Okay, what should I do if the number of coordinates is too large to create a proper map? I remember you encountering a problem like that for Interstate 10 in Texas, and it's something that needs to be addressed in U.S. Route 67 in Arkansas. ToThAc ( talk) 18:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
|raw={{Wikipedia:Map data/Wikipedia KML/U.S. Route 67 in Arkansas}}
with |from=U.S. Route 67 in Arkansas.map
.Please see my edit summary
Hey, I know you've been trying to get my attention. You got it, now leave me the fuck alone. – Fredddie ™ 02:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for updating me earlier on the changed MUTCD of TxDOT signs. I recently took a look at the current MUTCD signs and I believe I can make new SVG files for the changed sign designs, without having to update or change the Infobox shield templates.— MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 23:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Location | Foo |
---|
I'm puzzled by this edit - the ARDC document originally referenced states a length of 78 miles and indicates the extension to Gilbert both in text and on maps. Google Street View shows route markers along this extension (e.g. eastbound 135 just past the junction with 37). -- Sable232 ( talk) 23:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Hey Fredddie, not sure if this was meant and your planing on creating new images but your edits to Module:Road data/strings/CAN/ON appear to be the cause of about 100 articles flagged on CAT:MISSFILE and also issues on Template:ON former (and sub pages) from Category:Templates with missing files. Just thought id mention in case it wasn't intentional. Cheers KylieTastic ( talk) 21:09, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Fredddie, just a heads-up... it looks like your edits to Template:Infobox road/shield/BRA have caused number of issues ~180 to pop up on CAT:MISSFILE. Some look like valid names such as File:BR-287.svg on BR-287 which used to show File:BR-287.png, others now odd like File:¬-079.svg on SP-79 (which used to show File:SP-079.svg. Cheers KylieTastic ( talk) 09:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Fredddie! I would like you to add a parameter to the Template:PRint that includes |line=yes
between |km=
and |km2=
in concurrency situations to apply it to the intersection between
PR-2 and
PR-165 with a reference note. You can see
California State Route 33 as an example of what I would like to implement. TC!
Yamil Rivera (
talk)
04:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Freddie, thanks for fixing that on Arizona State Route 202. I was nowhere near sure how you fixed something like that, and I knew it was wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbl1975 ( talk • contribs) 09:46, December 30, 2019 (UTC)
{{
Jct}}
. –
Fredddie
™
23:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I've nominated on commons for deletion a first batch (took way to long to tag all of them, which is why this is just a subset of them) of the old style Israeli signs as since they aren't following the correct style, they should be deleted as to not be incorrectly used on articles. -- Gonnym ( talk) 12:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
As of today, a number of road articles are missing their shields. The infobox of Ontario Highway 68 has been disrupted after you changed the road type from "Hwy" to "ON 1960". As for the others, i do not know what is causing the problem. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the pages i have listed below. - Radiphus ( talk) 13:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
{{
Infobox road}}
(only Ontario and Thailand) that caused these. I reverted Ontario 68 and created the missing files for these Thailand articles. –
Fredddie
™
14:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Why did you revert my edit on the Module:Road data/strings/USA/GA page? You didn't leave an explanation in the edit summary. Did you make a change somewhere else that calls the Georgia State Bicycle Routes? Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) ( talk) 15:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
According to this picture [1] it is signed as business 7 so i was wondering how to make a SH-Bus Type for the template? Thanks. Bacardi379 ( talk) 23:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for making the set of 1920 route markers, they look great.
The image for 8 doesn't seem to be there, however, and it didn't appear with the rest of them when I completed the list. No rush on it of course, just letting you know. -- Sable232 ( talk) 22:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:County 65A square.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 23:30, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed a few your broken images on Ontario Highway articles and I think it was this edit you made that was the cause, So I thought I'd just flag them up....
Cheers KylieTastic ( talk) 11:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey Fredddie, do you mind taking a quick look at today's (May 21 2019) edits by the Anon IP here to ensure they are consistent with your Project's objectives, guidelines, etc. There appears to be multiple requests for file deletions. Thanks, Mercy11 ( talk) 03:06, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
Jct}}
and {{
Infobox road}}
. –
Fredddie
™
23:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
LOL! Thanks and I'm sorry. Yamil Rivera ( talk) 02:55, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Fredddie! The shields for some primary-numbered roads were correct. The idea is that people associate the number with their main network (Pri = 1-99, Sec = 100-299 and Ter = 300-9999) and then specify the other networks to which each road also belong. For that reason I took the liberty of adding some changes to your code. Maybe you and I are seeing the PR type in opposite ways. I suppose you see PR as Primary only and I see PR as Puerto Rico (the four networks put together) because the roads are identified as PR-XX. I'd like you to correct me if I'm wrong.
In relation to the word Ramal, in Puerto Rico it means both spur and loop roads. When the word Ramal is placed on top of the shield, the R suffix isn't placed on the number because it is redundant. There are also a few roads with the letter P as a suffix. The P means Paralela (parallel) and is usually seen in a downtown when the streets only have traffic in one direction. That is, the road makes its main route through one of the streets and the opposite direction is represented by the other street as parallel. If you want to make clear the distinction between spur and loop, you can keep Ramal for spurs and add Alt or any other word to loops. Yo can also add Peaje for those toll roads that aren't part of the Autopistas de Puerto Rico system.
If you think that it isn't necessary to maintain a primary shield for the roads you have edited, let me know your opinion. I'm willing to follow your recommendations. Regards. Yamil Rivera ( talk) 02:14, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:NYCint template tracking category requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
@ Fredddie: You helped us out before with shield problems on South African Highways and roads. Can you take a look at this R708 (South Africa) when you have time. Regards Paul Conlinp ( talk) 19:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
I wanted to discuss the correct way to display US 80 crossing the state line on the California/Arizona border. I understand the usual way to display a River crossing is the way you rearranged it, but the border situation near the Ocean to Ocean Bridge at the state line is an unusual one. Right at the western side of the bridge, the state border leaves the Colorado River and heads due north paralleling old US 80 for 0.04 miles north of the north end of the bridge. Approximately 0.04 miles north of the OOH Bridge, US 80 made a curve northwest and crossed into California right in front of an abandoned Agricultural Inspection Station. The crossing of the state border was on dry land and the entirety of the OOH Bridge on either side of the river is in Yuma County, Arizona and so is the small bend of the Colorado River it sits on. That's why I originally placed the Colorado River as a location inside Yuma County. The river itself isn't the border crossing. With that cleared up, should I leave the intersection table the way you left it? I don't want to jump the gun and make any changes without prior consultation. Thanks. - MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 23:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
I try the best I can to write good aeticles and provide good sourcing for any content I write. But it appears the articles I write or improve come up lackluster to standards I'm hoping to reach. I remember while I was writing U.S. Route 80 in Alabama, I worked very hard to create an A Class article right off the bat amd did my absolute best to make it meet as many standards as possible. At first, the article received a C Class rating despite the effort until you were able to raise it to B Class standards. I wanted to thank you for that by the way, it means a lot to me that at least three of my articles at least reach B Class. I was hoping, could you please give me some advice on what I could do to improve my writing style or methods so I could have a chance at writing A Class or higher? Thank you in advance and I appreciate the support and help you've given to me on occasion up tp this point. Especially with improving the U.S. Route 80 in Arizona article. I still go in amd try to further improve that one every day in hopes it'll better meet high standards. - MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 01:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
{{reflist}}
, and infobox go in the first edit and then I'll write the junction list. I do those first because they're going to be static for most of the process and it helps me find the natural splits in the route. If the highway is over 50 miles long, I'll split the route into three roughly equal sections (that's where the jct list helps). I'll just make a list in outline form. Longer routes, I might do three 3rd level headers and then split the subsections equally-ish. Dividing the article like this is a device I use to keep the prose moving once I start writing. Did I mention that I haven't actually done any writing at this point?|reassess=yes
to the talk page banner so another project member will take a look. You can also have
WP:GOCE look it over or ask someone whose opinion you trust. This is when the article starts to take on some shine. I used to think GAN was a big deal, as far as stepping stones to get to FAC, it's not that important. Sure, you'll get someone to review it again, but I've seen so many USRD Good Articles that weren't good articles (note the difference) that it's mostly a rubber stamp. The place to get the most rigorous review is
WP:HWY/ACR. We've changed the rules over the years, but you have to have a couple people give a formal review of the article, get a source review, and check the licensing on images before it becomes A-Class. The people who hang out at ACR know what reviewers at FAC look for, so we try to iron out those kinks before the article gets there. There is considerable rigor at FAC, but I (speaking only for myself) haven't had any antagonism directed at my work and it's been a generally positive experience.Thank you for your work on this template, the display is much better now. However, you overlooked one point: the overall icon height should be 12 pixels; your edits made the text height 12px. Hopefully it's not much more work to make the fix. Useddenim ( talk) 22:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
I am so glad that you found my "mistake" in the K-16 article and fixed it. But in the future dont add a comment in the description of changes that suggests im stupid or that I dont know how to write good articles, just fix the mistake. Thanks 420Traveler ( talk) 10:30, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey Fredddie, I noticed you modified the pages for LZ-1 and LZ-2; however, I'm not sure I fully agree with classifying them as and calling them "national roads". See my comments on Talk:LZ2_(Lanzarote) when you have a minute. Thanks. Vishal dh ( talk) 17:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elgin Bypass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fox River ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Just thought I'd update you and let you know I'm still working on a revised history section. It's going slowly though, which is why no huge changes have been made yet. Been following your outline that you gave me in the peer review. What I have so far is in my user sandbox. I hope you don't mind me asking something unrelated, but how can I get a Good Article nomination for US 80 in Arizona? I've been working hard to try and get it to Good Article status. - MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 02:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
{{subst:GAN|subtopic=Transport}}
on the talk page and that's it. It will probably take a while (there is a backlog of reviews) but someone will come along and review it. –
Fredddie
™
16:33, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Cards84664
(talk)
02:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Does the thmubnail of OSM map in infobox render for you currently? Seems it did for me when I edited the article yesterday (otherwise I would not have edited) but it does not today. Tried other browsers and also logged out and did not help. Somethimes the map thumbnail does not render (show) when I am logged in but not the case now. I am working with the author of Module:Mapframe on fixing module bugs for auto lat/lon and auto zoom.-- Kozuch ( talk) 10:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
I don't disagree that the thinner lines look better. For one, they make partially obscured city names more legible. But consistency is important. Editing Template:Maplink to use a thinner default line would be better. Redesigning the template to only allow selection from a very limited number of named fill/stroke styles (and deleting the override parameters) would be ideal. ― cobaltcigs 21:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Sorry - my edit summary got scrambled. Please see Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Mass nomination Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 15:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Fredddie,
you recently edited
Template: BAB-E.
Originally, only the road number sign was displayed, which was also a link. Currently the sign and the text link are displayed separately.
vs
E55
This leads to "weird" formatting in some infoboxes and tables. Here are some examples: A1 (Austria), A1 (Switzerland) or Highways in Slovakia
-- Krumpi ( talk) 15:36, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Here's another peer review to look at whenever you're available. ToThAc ( talk) 21:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
I've been hard at work over the last couple of months improving the quality of U.S. Route 66 in Arizona in hopes of eventually bringing it to GA status. I wanted to ask how it looks so far. I recently just finished re-writing or properly sourcing all the sections as well as making grammar corrections where needed. On a related note, I was wondering, how can I become qualified to assess an article rating? - MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 03:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:New York Roads portal waiting list requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:23, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Okay, what should I do if the number of coordinates is too large to create a proper map? I remember you encountering a problem like that for Interstate 10 in Texas, and it's something that needs to be addressed in U.S. Route 67 in Arkansas. ToThAc ( talk) 18:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
|raw={{Wikipedia:Map data/Wikipedia KML/U.S. Route 67 in Arkansas}}
with |from=U.S. Route 67 in Arkansas.map
.Please see my edit summary
Hey, I know you've been trying to get my attention. You got it, now leave me the fuck alone. – Fredddie ™ 02:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for updating me earlier on the changed MUTCD of TxDOT signs. I recently took a look at the current MUTCD signs and I believe I can make new SVG files for the changed sign designs, without having to update or change the Infobox shield templates.— MatthewAnderson707 ( talk| sandbox) 23:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Location | Foo |
---|
I'm puzzled by this edit - the ARDC document originally referenced states a length of 78 miles and indicates the extension to Gilbert both in text and on maps. Google Street View shows route markers along this extension (e.g. eastbound 135 just past the junction with 37). -- Sable232 ( talk) 23:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Hey Fredddie, not sure if this was meant and your planing on creating new images but your edits to Module:Road data/strings/CAN/ON appear to be the cause of about 100 articles flagged on CAT:MISSFILE and also issues on Template:ON former (and sub pages) from Category:Templates with missing files. Just thought id mention in case it wasn't intentional. Cheers KylieTastic ( talk) 21:09, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Fredddie, just a heads-up... it looks like your edits to Template:Infobox road/shield/BRA have caused number of issues ~180 to pop up on CAT:MISSFILE. Some look like valid names such as File:BR-287.svg on BR-287 which used to show File:BR-287.png, others now odd like File:¬-079.svg on SP-79 (which used to show File:SP-079.svg. Cheers KylieTastic ( talk) 09:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Fredddie! I would like you to add a parameter to the Template:PRint that includes |line=yes
between |km=
and |km2=
in concurrency situations to apply it to the intersection between
PR-2 and
PR-165 with a reference note. You can see
California State Route 33 as an example of what I would like to implement. TC!
Yamil Rivera (
talk)
04:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Freddie, thanks for fixing that on Arizona State Route 202. I was nowhere near sure how you fixed something like that, and I knew it was wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbl1975 ( talk • contribs) 09:46, December 30, 2019 (UTC)
{{
Jct}}
. –
Fredddie
™
23:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)