Thanks for creating NZOS 1-8, Fonsvr!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 19:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
|
Hi Fonsvr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC) |
The article Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unremarkable, individual locomotive.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. pseudonym
Jake Brockman
talk
07:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 16:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Bonner Strassenbahn ROSWINDIS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bonner Strassenbahn ROSWINDIS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonner Strassenbahn ROSWINDIS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 09:35, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Amsterdamsche Ballast Maatschappij 64 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication why this single locomotive would be notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fram (
talk)
14:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Degen und Wiegand KARL for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Degen und Wiegand KARL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Degen und Wiegand KARL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for creating NZOS 1-8, Fonsvr!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 19:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Fonsvr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC) |
The article Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unremarkable, individual locomotive.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. pseudonym
Jake Brockman
talk
07:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 16:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Bonner Strassenbahn ROSWINDIS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bonner Strassenbahn ROSWINDIS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonner Strassenbahn ROSWINDIS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 09:35, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Amsterdamsche Ballast Maatschappij 64 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication why this single locomotive would be notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fram (
talk)
14:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Degen und Wiegand KARL for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Degen und Wiegand KARL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Degen und Wiegand KARL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)