Your recent editing history at Asbjørn Gaarde shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Giant Snowman 21:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Gabriel Vargas (footballer) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 5#Gabriel Vargas (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
QuickQuokka [
talk •
contribs
14:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Done
Giant
Snowman
09:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barracas Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Solé.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Club de Gimnasia y Esgrima La Plata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Napolitano.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Matuko (
talk)
23:08, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Tomáš Lněnička has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article about non-notable footballer which fails WP:GNG. His single appearance in the Czech first league is not a presumption of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jogurney (
talk)
03:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for updating Florent Balmont. Could you explain why you removed his appearance for Dijon II from the infobox? It's reliably sourced in the stats table. Kind regards, Robby.is.on ( talk) 21:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
GiantSnowman. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Troels Kløve seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Giant
Snowman
15:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Sebastian Denius article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 15:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kristian Riis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meniscus.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Fodbold-fan. Thank you for creating Victor Bak Jensen. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Fodbold-fan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
17:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 17:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for this edit you made to Ottman Dadoune, it was constructive. Just one thing; although the source you used was good, it would be better if you cited it in a proper reference rather than just putting the url in an invisible comment. You can see more about this at WP:CITINGSOURCES. Thank you very much! Paul Vaurie ( talk) 06:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denmark national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Tobias Bech.
Giant
Snowman
19:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
David Turpel.
Giant
Snowman
21:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Fodbold-fan. Fupa is not a reliable source as it's user-generated. I've reverted your addition at Tobias Steffen. Kind regards, Robby.is.on ( talk) 20:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Fodbold-fan. At Thomas Bertels, where did you get the TuS Ehringhausen and VfB Schloß Holte numbers from? No source in the article seems to support them or even that he played for these clubs at all. Kind regards, Robby.is.on ( talk) 21:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind inquiry. Many other users (no names mentioned) could learn from this ;)You're welcome. I try hard to be patient. At the same time, please understand that it is frustrating for other editors when they get the impression they need to explain basic Wikipedia policies to an editor who has been around for a long time and violates them repeatedly. Robby.is.on ( talk) 17:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
There are tons of articles that haven't been updated in years.Realistically, it's rather unimportant and perhaps even WP:UNDUE where Thomas Bertels played after ending his professional career. We shouldn't feel obligated to include all information we can find.
Hello, Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Oscar Meedom. Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for writing articles. I have reviewed this article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Lightburst ( talk) 18:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Magnus Lysholm. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. Giant Snowman 18:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denmark national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ried.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Enock Otoo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Emile Chambo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Mikel Gogorza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cambalachero ( talk) 17:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Thanks for your contributions to Michael Opoku. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't really have anything to do with this, but would advise to add a non-primary source before hoping to get the draft accepted.
Geschichte (
talk)
08:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Fodbold-fan!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Vanderwaalforces (
talk)
10:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Hi Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Mike Themsen. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for the article
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Bruxton ( talk) 20:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vitória F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campeonato de Portugal.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piero Cabel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.JTtheOG ( talk) 00:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Dávila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.JTtheOG ( talk) 00:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This is not deemed to be reliable, please do not use it. Giant Snowman 15:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Asbjørn Gaarde shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Giant Snowman 21:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Gabriel Vargas (footballer) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 5#Gabriel Vargas (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
QuickQuokka [
talk •
contribs
14:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Done
Giant
Snowman
09:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barracas Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Solé.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Club de Gimnasia y Esgrima La Plata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Napolitano.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Matuko (
talk)
23:08, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Tomáš Lněnička has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article about non-notable footballer which fails WP:GNG. His single appearance in the Czech first league is not a presumption of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jogurney (
talk)
03:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for updating Florent Balmont. Could you explain why you removed his appearance for Dijon II from the infobox? It's reliably sourced in the stats table. Kind regards, Robby.is.on ( talk) 21:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
GiantSnowman. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Troels Kløve seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Giant
Snowman
15:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Sebastian Denius article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 15:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kristian Riis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meniscus.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Fodbold-fan. Thank you for creating Victor Bak Jensen. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Fodbold-fan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
17:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 17:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for this edit you made to Ottman Dadoune, it was constructive. Just one thing; although the source you used was good, it would be better if you cited it in a proper reference rather than just putting the url in an invisible comment. You can see more about this at WP:CITINGSOURCES. Thank you very much! Paul Vaurie ( talk) 06:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denmark national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Tobias Bech.
Giant
Snowman
19:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
David Turpel.
Giant
Snowman
21:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Fodbold-fan. Fupa is not a reliable source as it's user-generated. I've reverted your addition at Tobias Steffen. Kind regards, Robby.is.on ( talk) 20:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Fodbold-fan. At Thomas Bertels, where did you get the TuS Ehringhausen and VfB Schloß Holte numbers from? No source in the article seems to support them or even that he played for these clubs at all. Kind regards, Robby.is.on ( talk) 21:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind inquiry. Many other users (no names mentioned) could learn from this ;)You're welcome. I try hard to be patient. At the same time, please understand that it is frustrating for other editors when they get the impression they need to explain basic Wikipedia policies to an editor who has been around for a long time and violates them repeatedly. Robby.is.on ( talk) 17:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
There are tons of articles that haven't been updated in years.Realistically, it's rather unimportant and perhaps even WP:UNDUE where Thomas Bertels played after ending his professional career. We shouldn't feel obligated to include all information we can find.
Hello, Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Oscar Meedom. Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for writing articles. I have reviewed this article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Lightburst ( talk) 18:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Magnus Lysholm. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. Giant Snowman 18:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denmark national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ried.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Enock Otoo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Emile Chambo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Mikel Gogorza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cambalachero ( talk) 17:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Thanks for your contributions to Michael Opoku. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't really have anything to do with this, but would advise to add a non-primary source before hoping to get the draft accepted.
Geschichte (
talk)
08:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Fodbold-fan!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Vanderwaalforces (
talk)
10:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Hi Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Mike Themsen. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for the article
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Bruxton ( talk) 20:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vitória F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campeonato de Portugal.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piero Cabel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.JTtheOG ( talk) 00:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Dávila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.JTtheOG ( talk) 00:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This is not deemed to be reliable, please do not use it. Giant Snowman 15:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)