![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Why did you remove my edit for Carol Miller on the WWFS page? Carol happen to be a friend of mine. The Carol Miller linked on that page is NOT the same Carol Miller the famous DJ.Can't you realize that these are TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE WITH THE SAME NAME? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.83.59 ( talk) 08:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Not vandalism. I removed an unsourced/original research/blp violation sentence. -- 165.21.154.89 ( talk) 10:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
The user User:Blow of Light had posted unnecessary Amboxes on the Neale Donald Walsch page User:Blow of Light uses his user page for talk as stated in his talk page. He is biased on the spiritual beliefs of Neale Donald Walsch and his posting of multiple Amboxes should have been considered vandalism. i was letting him know, but you obviously don't want him to know and will not let users communicate with him.
Thank you for making a report on
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and
all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to
block users if they have received escalating warnings and then a recent final
warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you!
Seraphim♥
Whipp
11:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
On the Jimmy's Down removal... Why is the band/act not a relevant piece of information? Many people ask where the band name came from since it seems odd. If this is an information site then I do not understand why it is not relevant? Thanks-Frank
Just wondering why you don't help and show the editor how to properly cite the article rather than reverting the info he is putting in as vandalism. What the two of you are doing is not helping anything. Reverting back and forth as vandalism. You have tried to explain how to properly cite the article and that has not seemed to work, so why not show? Jons63 ( talk) 15:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I'd actually asked Krimpet to do that - we're trying to test something out on IRC. Thanks for the quick revert, though, all the same. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 04:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Just curious why you tagged this article for speedy under CSD G6? [1] I can't figure out what page move you're referring to. Neil916 ( Talk) 04:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my vandalism... it kinda hit close to home. Made me a lil sad when I saw what he wrote. Guess I shouldnt take it to heart and let it roll off, eh? Unforntunately thats exactly how people see me. Ol well... its the internet. Thanks again, babe. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 14:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Looks like this one is going to be a recurring vandal, though, based on its comments. Enigma message 05:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
An admin has gotten involved and is trying to assume good faith with the editor in question. Said admin put the article on the user's own page so the user could work on it there. Enigma message 06:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
08:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Why did you remove my edit for Carol Miller on the WWFS page? Carol happen to be a friend of mine. The Carol Miller linked on that page is NOT the same Carol Miller the famous DJ.Can't you realize that these are TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE WITH THE SAME NAME? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.83.59 ( talk) 08:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Not vandalism. I removed an unsourced/original research/blp violation sentence. -- 165.21.154.89 ( talk) 10:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
The user User:Blow of Light had posted unnecessary Amboxes on the Neale Donald Walsch page User:Blow of Light uses his user page for talk as stated in his talk page. He is biased on the spiritual beliefs of Neale Donald Walsch and his posting of multiple Amboxes should have been considered vandalism. i was letting him know, but you obviously don't want him to know and will not let users communicate with him.
Thank you for making a report on
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and
all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to
block users if they have received escalating warnings and then a recent final
warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you!
Seraphim♥
Whipp
11:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
On the Jimmy's Down removal... Why is the band/act not a relevant piece of information? Many people ask where the band name came from since it seems odd. If this is an information site then I do not understand why it is not relevant? Thanks-Frank
Just wondering why you don't help and show the editor how to properly cite the article rather than reverting the info he is putting in as vandalism. What the two of you are doing is not helping anything. Reverting back and forth as vandalism. You have tried to explain how to properly cite the article and that has not seemed to work, so why not show? Jons63 ( talk) 15:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I'd actually asked Krimpet to do that - we're trying to test something out on IRC. Thanks for the quick revert, though, all the same. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 04:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Just curious why you tagged this article for speedy under CSD G6? [1] I can't figure out what page move you're referring to. Neil916 ( Talk) 04:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my vandalism... it kinda hit close to home. Made me a lil sad when I saw what he wrote. Guess I shouldnt take it to heart and let it roll off, eh? Unforntunately thats exactly how people see me. Ol well... its the internet. Thanks again, babe. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 14:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Looks like this one is going to be a recurring vandal, though, based on its comments. Enigma message 05:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
An admin has gotten involved and is trying to assume good faith with the editor in question. Said admin put the article on the user's own page so the user could work on it there. Enigma message 06:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
08:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)