|
Is there a reason you blanked it or was it just for fun? <3 Clamster 02:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps you'll be interested in helping out here? -- Riffsyphon1024 04:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I would be 'someone' who turned the page into a 'stub' (which I didn't). The reason was that the page was poorly written, filled with duplicate, incorrect and un-cited information, and in cleaning it up to something that was verifiable, a lot of information had to be dumped. Per my edit summary cleaning up char info, removing speculation - Provide a citation! blending trivia into char info, moving leaving the show to the actor page
Please note: What I 'removed' was the totally unreferenced and speculative 'future appearances' section. I merged all the sub-sections into one concise section. I removed the needless trivia about what episodes she's not in, and put the discussion of why the actor left the show to the actor's page. This was all done carefully and thoughtfully. I can understand wanting to re-add information, but please, do it as a one at a time addition :) --
Ipstenu (
talk|
contribs)
20:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Why did you revert again? Look at that information! There are typos all over the place, much (if not all in some new form) of the information is there. Please review the information. You're not adding anything new, and in fact you revert pulled out information that had been added. -- Ipstenu ( talk| contribs) 21:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
And blanking the talk page would be vandalism. Please stop. -- Ipstenu ( talk| contribs) 00:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
About Two Nice People, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{
db-author}}.
B. Wolterding
18:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Republican (politician). Since you had some involvement with the Republican (politician) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 21:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|
Is there a reason you blanked it or was it just for fun? <3 Clamster 02:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps you'll be interested in helping out here? -- Riffsyphon1024 04:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I would be 'someone' who turned the page into a 'stub' (which I didn't). The reason was that the page was poorly written, filled with duplicate, incorrect and un-cited information, and in cleaning it up to something that was verifiable, a lot of information had to be dumped. Per my edit summary cleaning up char info, removing speculation - Provide a citation! blending trivia into char info, moving leaving the show to the actor page
Please note: What I 'removed' was the totally unreferenced and speculative 'future appearances' section. I merged all the sub-sections into one concise section. I removed the needless trivia about what episodes she's not in, and put the discussion of why the actor left the show to the actor's page. This was all done carefully and thoughtfully. I can understand wanting to re-add information, but please, do it as a one at a time addition :) --
Ipstenu (
talk|
contribs)
20:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Why did you revert again? Look at that information! There are typos all over the place, much (if not all in some new form) of the information is there. Please review the information. You're not adding anything new, and in fact you revert pulled out information that had been added. -- Ipstenu ( talk| contribs) 21:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
And blanking the talk page would be vandalism. Please stop. -- Ipstenu ( talk| contribs) 00:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
About Two Nice People, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{
db-author}}.
B. Wolterding
18:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Republican (politician). Since you had some involvement with the Republican (politician) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 21:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)