You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
July 2009 Ürümqi riots. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
rʨanaɢ
talk/
contribs
18:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Again, like I said, please do not
edit war.
This is now your fourth revert without discussion; technically you could be blocked for that, but I will let this one go since you seem to be new.
If you think your information should be included, please start a new discussion at
the talk page so we can discuss things. Discussing issues is always better than reverting each other back and forth. Thank you,
rʨanaɢ
talk/
contribs
18:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
rʨanaɢ
talk/
contribs
19:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the tips and the link to those discussions. I will check them out and see what was going on. I am not frustrated or trying to dispute the rules of wikipedia. I just want to know why it is decided this way. Personally, I do not see any problem with these numbers at all. Again, thank you for the help. First time again ( talk) 19:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Their language can never be neutral. At the begining, the Han Chinese group was discribed as "mobs" and the Uyghurs were called "demontrators". Is this some kind of inflammatory to the Ugyhur society? I never like the media, either Xinhua, CCTV or CNN, NYT, etc. but we have to live with them and extract information. I do not blame them so much, though we all claim we always try to be neutral, we can in fact only be a biased individual.
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
July 2009 Ürümqi riots. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
rʨanaɢ
talk/
contribs
18:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Again, like I said, please do not
edit war.
This is now your fourth revert without discussion; technically you could be blocked for that, but I will let this one go since you seem to be new.
If you think your information should be included, please start a new discussion at
the talk page so we can discuss things. Discussing issues is always better than reverting each other back and forth. Thank you,
rʨanaɢ
talk/
contribs
18:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
rʨanaɢ
talk/
contribs
19:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the tips and the link to those discussions. I will check them out and see what was going on. I am not frustrated or trying to dispute the rules of wikipedia. I just want to know why it is decided this way. Personally, I do not see any problem with these numbers at all. Again, thank you for the help. First time again ( talk) 19:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Their language can never be neutral. At the begining, the Han Chinese group was discribed as "mobs" and the Uyghurs were called "demontrators". Is this some kind of inflammatory to the Ugyhur society? I never like the media, either Xinhua, CCTV or CNN, NYT, etc. but we have to live with them and extract information. I do not blame them so much, though we all claim we always try to be neutral, we can in fact only be a biased individual.