Firelement85 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope you like it here and stick around. If you like, you can leave a note at Wikipedia:New user log to introduce yourself.
Before you start doing a lot of editing, you might want to take the Tutorial. It gives lots of basic information to help you to get oriented on Wikipedia.
You can sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (" ~~~~ ") for your username and a timestamp. If you have any other questions about the project, then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Help desk. Alternately, you may choose to send a message to my talk page.
Happy editing! Yuser31415 talk| contribs 06:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to post this here, but I could not find other proper place ... I was just wandering why do you this that the link * Mobile Dex and other free Romanian dictionaries for mobile devices in the Romanian_language is a spam? It is a link to a explicative dictionary(DEX) of the romanian language for mobile phones/devices —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.126.22.123 ( talk • contribs) 06:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
Before I take any further action, and as a courtesy to you, I want to know why you deleted the external links to our website morgansmaniacs.wetpaint.com.
Both jdmorgan.net and jeffreydeanmorganfans.com are EXACTLY the same type of site as ours, yet they remain untouched. Why?
Naughty007 10:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi! In response to your note, yeah, that image thing was really frustrating for me. If we adhere so strictly to the image policy, literally the only photo we could use is one taken by a fan who has allowed it to be "released" with no copyright. You'd think with biographical articles especially, a picture of the person in question would be important enough to be at least a little lenient with this. I would think image copyright holders would have bigger fish to fry than the likes of Wikipedia. I am sorry I uploaded those, but anything "unfree" that was there was bound to get taken down at some point. I actually know some people who have personal photos (that they themselves took) of both Jared and Jensen, but I'm not sure I want to ask them if one of their pictures could be used. According to policy Wikipedia doesn't even allow images that are released solely for use on this site (because a "more free" image hypothetically could be found), and I don't think these fans would want to give up all rights to their own pictures. So... it's a mess. :P Anyway, it hasn't driven me away from the articles at all, although I have become a bit disgruntled with the image nazis. :) Thanks for the note! — simpatico talk 08:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
cmon, firelement. You know Dan Brown's a pathetic writer. You could have left my well written slurs up for just a half hour or something. Just log enough for the other members of my creative writing class to see anyway... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.154.101 ( talk) 12:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok, sorry for the vandalism, however truthful it may have been. I'm not actually in a creative writing class, it was just for my own personal satisfaction. And satisfying it was! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.154.101 ( talk) 12:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you did a non-admin close at AfD and turned that article into a redirect? That was on day one of the discussion that you also took part in. Your part in that discussion was giving redirect as your solution. Then without so much as a comment from anyone else going and closing the discussion yourself and making the redirect. I don't know, but to me that seems like the wrong thing to do? I can appreciate there are cases for being bold but it seems to be a case of preempting the decision? Sting au Buzz Me... 06:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Firelement85 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope you like it here and stick around. If you like, you can leave a note at Wikipedia:New user log to introduce yourself.
Before you start doing a lot of editing, you might want to take the Tutorial. It gives lots of basic information to help you to get oriented on Wikipedia.
You can sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (" ~~~~ ") for your username and a timestamp. If you have any other questions about the project, then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Help desk. Alternately, you may choose to send a message to my talk page.
Happy editing! Yuser31415 talk| contribs 06:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to post this here, but I could not find other proper place ... I was just wandering why do you this that the link * Mobile Dex and other free Romanian dictionaries for mobile devices in the Romanian_language is a spam? It is a link to a explicative dictionary(DEX) of the romanian language for mobile phones/devices —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.126.22.123 ( talk • contribs) 06:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
Before I take any further action, and as a courtesy to you, I want to know why you deleted the external links to our website morgansmaniacs.wetpaint.com.
Both jdmorgan.net and jeffreydeanmorganfans.com are EXACTLY the same type of site as ours, yet they remain untouched. Why?
Naughty007 10:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi! In response to your note, yeah, that image thing was really frustrating for me. If we adhere so strictly to the image policy, literally the only photo we could use is one taken by a fan who has allowed it to be "released" with no copyright. You'd think with biographical articles especially, a picture of the person in question would be important enough to be at least a little lenient with this. I would think image copyright holders would have bigger fish to fry than the likes of Wikipedia. I am sorry I uploaded those, but anything "unfree" that was there was bound to get taken down at some point. I actually know some people who have personal photos (that they themselves took) of both Jared and Jensen, but I'm not sure I want to ask them if one of their pictures could be used. According to policy Wikipedia doesn't even allow images that are released solely for use on this site (because a "more free" image hypothetically could be found), and I don't think these fans would want to give up all rights to their own pictures. So... it's a mess. :P Anyway, it hasn't driven me away from the articles at all, although I have become a bit disgruntled with the image nazis. :) Thanks for the note! — simpatico talk 08:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
cmon, firelement. You know Dan Brown's a pathetic writer. You could have left my well written slurs up for just a half hour or something. Just log enough for the other members of my creative writing class to see anyway... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.154.101 ( talk) 12:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok, sorry for the vandalism, however truthful it may have been. I'm not actually in a creative writing class, it was just for my own personal satisfaction. And satisfying it was! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.154.101 ( talk) 12:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you did a non-admin close at AfD and turned that article into a redirect? That was on day one of the discussion that you also took part in. Your part in that discussion was giving redirect as your solution. Then without so much as a comment from anyone else going and closing the discussion yourself and making the redirect. I don't know, but to me that seems like the wrong thing to do? I can appreciate there are cases for being bold but it seems to be a case of preempting the decision? Sting au Buzz Me... 06:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)