This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 29 |
Hi Fetchcomms I will provide a standard request for permissions to Simonex4ever for forwarding to the photographer, so that OTRS approval may be obtained. I will send the form, tomorrow; and I will add the OTRS pending flag to the file description page. I am quite sure that the owner of the photo is willing to release. That particular step was missed in the process. Thank you for flagging it. Doc2234 ( talk) 00:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 ( talk) 15:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Echo (The Editor Formerly Known as Fetchcomms):
I quoted my quotation of your suggestion for an interaction ban again at my RfC.
Hypoeuphorically, Kiefer. Wolfowitz 19:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi again,
I really think that you need to look at the RfC and either endorse the use of your name made by the accusers or suggest some caveats.
For example, it is suggested that you did not suggest an interaction ban, but only provided technical advice on how to ask for an interaction ban. ( In reality, of course, you volunteered the suggestions of a 3-way interaction ban.)
Kiefer. Wolfowitz 13:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Nice idea. Shame it didn't work out. I won't take it as an insult if it's me he's trying to exorcise - it just enhances my reputation :) :) -- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 10:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
You want my cherry? Take a look at
User talk:SandyGeorgia and please block both of us for 2 days or more.
Kiefer.
Wolfowitz 21:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
You might want to try Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Logic#Principle_of_explosion_and_my_RfC. Or not. -- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 20:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Yo, Fetchcomms. You've got that Orange bar. So - you're going to block the next person over this dispute. Nice reasoning. So - where's my block? Pedro : Chat 21:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Getting bored now. Pedro : Chat 21:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm off for a ciggie. Kindly sort it out mate. Pedro : Chat 21:30, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
BANG BANG - anyone home? Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Have I made the point yet that blocking someone over the orange bar would be unbelievably unwise? Pedro : Chat 21:37, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fetchcomms. You participated in Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Standard of review for non admin closes, which was snowball closed. A subsection of the discussion has been created. Titled Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Non-AfD NACs, it pertains to {{ Request close}} and Category:Requests for Close, which were created after a discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 78#Template to request a discussion be closed. I have posed several questions there and am interested in your thoughts. Cunard ( talk) 06:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 06:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Fetchcomms/Archive 24! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Haven't been around for a while, nice to see that your userpage is still always changing. =) Res Mar 03:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have replied to your question at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29#Online_Status. Thank you for your opinion. Petrb ( talk) 20:21, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fetchcomms, when you have a moment could I get your opinion about these files and editor. I tagged the files a while back because they seem to be non-free but the editor says that their his, I'm not sure if further steps are needed.
Thanx for your anticipated input.
Mlpearc powwow 04:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
A while ago, you looked up whether or not Scientific American had renewed the copyright on a certain issue; would you mind saying something with regard to that here? Probably would be good to put something somewhere so that this stops being asked, but I'm not entirely sure what that would be. Anyhoo, thanks in advance. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 22:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is Hurricanehink ( submissions), who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009) and Sturmvogel_66 (2010). The final standings were as follows:
Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.
No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Wikipedia has benefitted massively from our content work.
Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Dear Fetchcomms,
Now that I have your attention, (yes, I read your little guide up top), do you forsee having any time in the near future to hop onto the IRC and talk with me for... oh... ten minutes? I'd appreciate it if you could.
Sincerely, Sven Manguard Wha? 13:31, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
P.S. What's with the User:Echo thing?
It was good to have you on board this time around- we hope you enjoyed the competition! In case you are interested, signups for next year are open. Thanks, J Milburn and The ed17 20:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 29 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 29 |
Hi Fetchcomms I will provide a standard request for permissions to Simonex4ever for forwarding to the photographer, so that OTRS approval may be obtained. I will send the form, tomorrow; and I will add the OTRS pending flag to the file description page. I am quite sure that the owner of the photo is willing to release. That particular step was missed in the process. Thank you for flagging it. Doc2234 ( talk) 00:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 ( talk) 15:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Echo (The Editor Formerly Known as Fetchcomms):
I quoted my quotation of your suggestion for an interaction ban again at my RfC.
Hypoeuphorically, Kiefer. Wolfowitz 19:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi again,
I really think that you need to look at the RfC and either endorse the use of your name made by the accusers or suggest some caveats.
For example, it is suggested that you did not suggest an interaction ban, but only provided technical advice on how to ask for an interaction ban. ( In reality, of course, you volunteered the suggestions of a 3-way interaction ban.)
Kiefer. Wolfowitz 13:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Nice idea. Shame it didn't work out. I won't take it as an insult if it's me he's trying to exorcise - it just enhances my reputation :) :) -- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 10:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
You want my cherry? Take a look at
User talk:SandyGeorgia and please block both of us for 2 days or more.
Kiefer.
Wolfowitz 21:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
You might want to try Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Logic#Principle_of_explosion_and_my_RfC. Or not. -- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 20:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Yo, Fetchcomms. You've got that Orange bar. So - you're going to block the next person over this dispute. Nice reasoning. So - where's my block? Pedro : Chat 21:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Getting bored now. Pedro : Chat 21:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm off for a ciggie. Kindly sort it out mate. Pedro : Chat 21:30, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
BANG BANG - anyone home? Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Still not blocked. Pedro : Chat 21:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Have I made the point yet that blocking someone over the orange bar would be unbelievably unwise? Pedro : Chat 21:37, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fetchcomms. You participated in Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Standard of review for non admin closes, which was snowball closed. A subsection of the discussion has been created. Titled Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Non-AfD NACs, it pertains to {{ Request close}} and Category:Requests for Close, which were created after a discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 78#Template to request a discussion be closed. I have posed several questions there and am interested in your thoughts. Cunard ( talk) 06:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 06:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Fetchcomms/Archive 24! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Haven't been around for a while, nice to see that your userpage is still always changing. =) Res Mar 03:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have replied to your question at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29#Online_Status. Thank you for your opinion. Petrb ( talk) 20:21, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fetchcomms, when you have a moment could I get your opinion about these files and editor. I tagged the files a while back because they seem to be non-free but the editor says that their his, I'm not sure if further steps are needed.
Thanx for your anticipated input.
Mlpearc powwow 04:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
A while ago, you looked up whether or not Scientific American had renewed the copyright on a certain issue; would you mind saying something with regard to that here? Probably would be good to put something somewhere so that this stops being asked, but I'm not entirely sure what that would be. Anyhoo, thanks in advance. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 22:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is Hurricanehink ( submissions), who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009) and Sturmvogel_66 (2010). The final standings were as follows:
Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.
No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Wikipedia has benefitted massively from our content work.
Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Dear Fetchcomms,
Now that I have your attention, (yes, I read your little guide up top), do you forsee having any time in the near future to hop onto the IRC and talk with me for... oh... ten minutes? I'd appreciate it if you could.
Sincerely, Sven Manguard Wha? 13:31, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
P.S. What's with the User:Echo thing?
It was good to have you on board this time around- we hope you enjoyed the competition! In case you are interested, signups for next year are open. Thanks, J Milburn and The ed17 20:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 29 |