Is there a way I can preview a SVG file with the Wikipedia renderer ? Or have I to real-upload it (and revert if I'm not happy with it) ? Is there a sandbox for that ? Can I use Image:CSS-shade.svg for my tests, or should I delete it (how, btw) ? -- Fenring 09:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I really do think we should be consistent with the other engines where possible. So in the Ecmascript Comparison page we should give the layout engines (which is WebCore for WebKit products) along with their associated JavaScript Engines (that are not part of the layout engine). We are technically incorrect, as one layout engine might (in theory) be combined with different Ecmascript Engines; however, this is not a concern right now, as the relationships between those engines tend to be exclusive. So, my question is, would you agree to having the "Engine" named WebCore throughout the series? -- Grey ( talk) 22:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
A more difficult problem would be the HTML5 article, but I think we should just stay consistent in naming with the HTML4 article, because the HTML4 spec is handling more than the layout engine part, too (for example, required UI-representation of longdesc). I don't know where this might lead us, but we end up facing the same problems regardless how we call the "framework". -- Grey ( talk) 22:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
My point was that there is a contradiction between "gecko is a layout engine" being extremely prevalent on the web and "gecko includes spidermonkey" which is also relatively popular. And that by doing what you propose, we're just carrying on the contradiction, instead of explaining/resolving it. I changed my mind though. I think Gecko, Presto, Trident are not layout engines (at least haven't been since considerable time). Thus I would like the layout engines article to be updated to say just that and moved to a better name (I propose "browser engine" instead of the overly complex "apllication framework", though...). I'd also start to actually do the renaming. Do you think we should discuss this on the pages' talk pages or just be bold and move them? -- Grey ( talk) 15:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
'Comparison of Ecmascript Engines' might be a good idea because every (relevant) engine has a name.
For something that doesn't have any "names" in and of itself, I thought "Standards support (Ecmascript)" might be a good idea for something completely loose from the browser-environment. We can also add more articles for different scripting languages or just about any standard with this naming scheme. The name also implies that it would be possible to write a "real" article about it, with sections such as "History of Ecmascript adoption", or something similar. That means, it need not be a pure comparison anymore. -- Grey ( talk) 03:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
It will be implemented by me in the articles of the collection. I took the libraries and plugins also in the boot and then I will be finished with these implementation, i start to collect data for the plugins (more on my own user page!) Mabdul ( talk) 03:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Mabdul ( talk) 03:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
please, take a look on this page and give your comment... User_talk:GreyWanderer Mabdul ( talk) 06:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
File:Opera logo.svg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Opera O.svg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Opera O.svg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 00:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Template:Percent to color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 16:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
mabdul 02:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Is there a way I can preview a SVG file with the Wikipedia renderer ? Or have I to real-upload it (and revert if I'm not happy with it) ? Is there a sandbox for that ? Can I use Image:CSS-shade.svg for my tests, or should I delete it (how, btw) ? -- Fenring 09:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I really do think we should be consistent with the other engines where possible. So in the Ecmascript Comparison page we should give the layout engines (which is WebCore for WebKit products) along with their associated JavaScript Engines (that are not part of the layout engine). We are technically incorrect, as one layout engine might (in theory) be combined with different Ecmascript Engines; however, this is not a concern right now, as the relationships between those engines tend to be exclusive. So, my question is, would you agree to having the "Engine" named WebCore throughout the series? -- Grey ( talk) 22:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
A more difficult problem would be the HTML5 article, but I think we should just stay consistent in naming with the HTML4 article, because the HTML4 spec is handling more than the layout engine part, too (for example, required UI-representation of longdesc). I don't know where this might lead us, but we end up facing the same problems regardless how we call the "framework". -- Grey ( talk) 22:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
My point was that there is a contradiction between "gecko is a layout engine" being extremely prevalent on the web and "gecko includes spidermonkey" which is also relatively popular. And that by doing what you propose, we're just carrying on the contradiction, instead of explaining/resolving it. I changed my mind though. I think Gecko, Presto, Trident are not layout engines (at least haven't been since considerable time). Thus I would like the layout engines article to be updated to say just that and moved to a better name (I propose "browser engine" instead of the overly complex "apllication framework", though...). I'd also start to actually do the renaming. Do you think we should discuss this on the pages' talk pages or just be bold and move them? -- Grey ( talk) 15:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
'Comparison of Ecmascript Engines' might be a good idea because every (relevant) engine has a name.
For something that doesn't have any "names" in and of itself, I thought "Standards support (Ecmascript)" might be a good idea for something completely loose from the browser-environment. We can also add more articles for different scripting languages or just about any standard with this naming scheme. The name also implies that it would be possible to write a "real" article about it, with sections such as "History of Ecmascript adoption", or something similar. That means, it need not be a pure comparison anymore. -- Grey ( talk) 03:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
It will be implemented by me in the articles of the collection. I took the libraries and plugins also in the boot and then I will be finished with these implementation, i start to collect data for the plugins (more on my own user page!) Mabdul ( talk) 03:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Mabdul ( talk) 03:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
please, take a look on this page and give your comment... User_talk:GreyWanderer Mabdul ( talk) 06:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
File:Opera logo.svg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Opera O.svg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Opera O.svg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 00:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Template:Percent to color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 16:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
mabdul 02:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)