![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | → | Archive 40 |
Please could you have a look at the last comment on my talk page? It isn't directed at me but another editor and I think it may constitute a personal attack? Sorry, you're the only Admin I can see online at the moment. SagaciousPhil - Chat 17:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Oh for crying out loud! How did this get so badly out of control? Hafspajen, please use your break to recuperate. The wonderful collegial atmosphere of Wikipedia evidently got to you, but all evidence to the contrary, the project needs contributors like you. Favonian ( ta[lk) 19:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
I noticed a similar pattern of editing on the Karim Khan and Zand dynasty articles.
Both appear to have the same fascination with Karim Khan, Zand dynasty, and Luri language. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 00:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I've left a comment at AIV but I thought I'd leave a message here too, to point out that the IP is misrepresenting the whole thing. Omniglott (www.omniglott.com) that the IP repeatedly links to is not a real encyclopaedia but a personal web site, a hobby page written and maintained by someone who is not an authority in the field, and thus not allowed per WP:ELNO. Which is why I reverted the edits and warned them for spamming. And it wouldn't surprise me the least if there's also a COI involved, considering how persistent the IP is. Thomas.W talk 17:34, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Kumioko has socked again with the IP, 96.255.237.170. I am only reporting it here because this IP has been blocked for block evasion thus there is no benefit in opening an SPI. Would you increase the block length of the main account Reguyla? This was third time that he violated the standard offer. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 23:53, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
What a cluster fuck! One editor goes somewhat bananas and gets blocked, and nobody seems inclined to take emphatic measures against the permapest. Favonian ( talk) 16:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Favonian,
What action would you suggest be taken to correct the lack of WP:NPOV in the Safety of electronic cigarettes article. There is one editor involved that rejects any attempt at reasoned discussion if it does not support their own bias (this can be seen throughout the talk pages). The pattern of behaviour continues their peculiar zealotry as demonstrated over time on topics such as chiropractic medicine and acupuncture.
Thanks for your time Lancer2K ( talk) 07:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Could you plase delete the revisions of the user Grupos Clarin as well as hiding the edit summary from the first edit? -- TL22 ( talk) 21:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
People get confused with his name. In this case WP:COMMONNAME doesn't work. I wanted to move it to "LEONARDO FIBONACCI", but only admins have the right do it. Can you move it? -- 115ash →(☏) 13:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
[1] Maybe semi-protect his targets if you can't block the underlying IP? -- NeilN talk to me 16:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Nobody can post a picture of god! That´s very disrespectful towards god, as nobody of us humans know how god look like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afrobreak ( talk • contribs) 10:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
User:Man from Nephew ? In ictu oculi ( talk) 12:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Infiniti c-r72Nr8A44 is the best car! has been created. I saw you blocked User:Infiniti c-r72Nr8A44 is my favorite car!. Corky | Chat? 20:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, you'll probably have seen that the links have been removed. I was about to block but you beat me to it! Dougweller ( talk) 12:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for sticking by my side! You deserve a cookie for your contributions! Storm Content 23:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hello. The recent activity on the article K2 needs some attention. A likely vandalism edit (which I eventually marked as "good faith") stood for hours. This in the middle of a content dispute that is getting very little response from anyone. You have warned user User:Anchan Balti about edit warring and I don't want to become guilty of it myself. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 15:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, I'm having trouble in regards to editing this article. I deleted a sentence that wasn't backed by sources yet explained why it should be deleted, nevertheless, there was a consensus conflict in regards to the article as it shows in the recent edit history [2]. I would appreciate your help greatly. ( N0n3up ( talk) 19:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC))
I don't understand, I provided sources why it should be removed, whereas the other user provided none and continues to edit without one. ( N0n3up ( talk) 20:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC))
Can you block this IP? He is ELreydeEspana. Matiia ( talk) 23:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
64.134.226.222 ( talk · contribs) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ararat arev. Dougweller ( talk) 13:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
@ Favonian, Bbb23, and DoRD: I'm pretty sure that banned user Sonny1998 returned once again, this time as Walknack (his contributions - [3]). Just for record, Favonian already banned his sock Favour1600 (his contributions - [4]) in March (as well as few other socks)... IMHO, this is a clear DUCK. -- Sundostund ( talk) 17:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I am User:AHLM13. You blocked me for two times. Of course not for my actions, but due to the hacker. You blocked my old account by writing "that's it". It was better if you wrote somethin like before, such as hacked account. Also, yesterday you reverted all vandalism done by the hacker, which was good of course, but can you tell me why did not you revert this? Yes, this was a userpage, but it do not take long to understand that it my account was hacked. I asked to check user to prove that I am inoocent. thanks -- Ahlm85 ( talk) 14:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
[5], [6] -- NeilN talk to me 20:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
User:NQ and User:NeilN, I apologise, although it was not me. Thanks. I am very sorry for that. -- Ahlm85 ( talk) 14:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Do you realise you dared to revert the addition of an ebook by the Rt. Rev. Count Ian Wesley Rice, Prince Primate Of The Rhine And Lord Abbot Of White Abbey.? [7] and [8]. Dougweller ( talk) 09:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I think we conflicted at WP:RPP earlier today. I decided that the article could survive without protection, at least for the minute, you semi-protected it for a year. That's quite a difference of opinion - maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle and semi-protected for a shorter duration? What do you think? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Favonian. I've filed another SPI against Tirgil34, including IP socks. Since you're a software architect and experienced with countering vandals on Wikipedia i would like to ask you a question. Last year, various IPs with the range 176.219... ( Istanbul) were socking on Karasuk culture with confirmed Tirgil34 sock Greentent. [9] [10] Recently, IPs of the very same range have been accusing others of being socks of Tirgil34 at my talk page. [11] Would you consider it likely that these IP's belong to the same person? Krakkos ( talk) 16:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I got my access back today after a week's suspension and wanted to resume on my edits made last on the topic Hera. I saw that you reverted them as not relevant but I still believe that those were minor changes and can be accommodated. I can add more relevant information to what I already had if need be. Please let me know if that's fine, I don't wanna get engaged in any violations or edit warring possibilities. Appreciate your help. Munchkin1230 ( talk) 20:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Where do suggest tbi long term services and supports go, before or after the research on medications that don't work? Your group wants the latter on as a government rip off gate or what? JARacino ( talk) 20:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)JARacino JARacino ( talk) 20:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
I think this may be another sock. I noticed some other IP edits in the last couple of days but just ignored them. Could you have a look at this one though, please? SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you blocked him/her, because s/he repeatedly disruptive editing especially Jealous (Nick Jonas song). 115.164.223.190 ( talk) 08:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Can you blocked him/her, because s/he repeatedly disruptive editing especially Jealous (Nick Jonas song). 115.164.223.190 ( talk) 08:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Just a Query, I haven't been on Wiki for years and a lot seems to have changed. I have a character that keeps following my every edit to undo it. It smacks of vandalism to me. What can I do to prevent someone cyber-stalking my edits and sending me repeated messages?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by *Castle&Gardens* ( talk • contribs) 23:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, Thanks to Sinebot, one of the edits by blocked user 131.179.38.238 is still visible on my talk page. Can it be struck out? -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 04:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
and also take a look at this IP. Babitaarora ( talk/ contribs) 12:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
@ Favonian, Bbb23, and DoRD: As it seems to me, banned user Sonny1998 returned once again, this time as ProjectRaw (his contributions - [26]). Favonian banned his sock Favour1600 (his contributions - [27]) in March (and I think several more of his socks)... It really look as a duck. -- Sundostund ( talk) 00:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Mr.Favonian, the page on Srinivasa Ramanujan has a factually incorrect sentence. Also,another sentence with same point exists right after it. My attempt to remove the redundant sentence has been met with your message of vandalism. Please allow me to edit it. -- Deepred12 ( talk) 09:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
[28]. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 18:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Protecting my talkpage? User talk:Knowledgekid87 - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 20:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Many thanks for reverting vandalism from my talk page - Enjoy!! Denisarona ( talk) 17:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC) |
Hi, in February of this year you protected the Excalibur article after it was under assault from an IP-shifting troll in Italy - well, the troll is still quite active on Wikipedia. He recently moved on to the Morgan Le Fay article (which also had to be locked down by an admin last month) and now he is attacking the Albion article. Would it be possible for you to lock that one down, too? Thanks. Cagwinn ( talk) 21:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Greetings... I noticed the protection on the page "Albion". I do not understand. But I opened a discussion on the Talk page.-- 151.46.63.109 ( talk) 15:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
You've edit this, not sure if it's on your watchlist. There's an editor there who maybe, just maybe, become a useful editor, but at the moment I doubt it. See [29] and the addition of what he considers the Median flag. He hasn't a clue about copyright, eg [30] which was a copy of [31] until someone else rewrote it. See his talk page. Tiring me out (pretty tired in any case, the anesthesia form my septoplasty 4 days ago is still affecting me). Thanks. Doug Weller ( talk) 15:23, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Can you apply a rangeblock to two IPs ranges in Quebec? This would be a follow-on to your indef block of Britneyspearsfan17. You can refer to the following related discussions:
This person has abused IPs in the ranges of 205.237.30.xx and 64.229.xx, especially the former. Thanks in advance! Binksternet ( talk) 18:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
@ Binksternet: I'm trying to monitor the two ranges – when the tool lets me. There hasn't been any activity since I blocked the "fan", but if it resumes I'll block an appropriate range, i.e. not the /16 one. Favonian ( talk) 20:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Could you have a look at these contributions and these, please? Perhaps it's just my imagination but they seem very similar? SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Oops, you left this grossly insulting edit of an IP not hidden for a few weeks. Would you hide it for me please? It deters everyone. As well as the edit summary. Eye snore ( pc) 18:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Could you check this user? Seems related to the AHLM13 saga. Mar4d ( talk) 07:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I thought you will check the details. In this talk page Talk:Kashmir conflict an Islamabad IP was contantly mentioning me about this discussion. The discussion recently mentioned about pakistan commando force check this They think we are a group to revert the 3 revert rule. I never thought about such a plan before. @ Kautilya3: is someone who disagrees with me 80% of time starting from 2002 Gujarat riots 1 and 2
I think they are the ones who are having off-wiki contact as they are talking about facebook, and the same thing was suggested by pakistan commnado force on Mar4d's talk page. Faizan, 39.47.50.14 , 115.186.146.225 (another Islambad Ip), 39.47.121.0 are supporting each other in Kashmir conflict. There is another User:PakSol who sounds like Pakistan Commnado force. Mar4d, TopGun and Faizan all are always together and they have interacted for a long time, and gained each other's trust. If they are having E-mail canvassing, we won't know. Pakistan Commando Force posted about some real life acquaintance. I googled search the place Pakistan commando force mentioned on Mar4d's talk page and this is what i got. Previously Mar4d always supported AHLM13 and he believed someone is posing as AHLM13. Why will he suddenly report a new user as AHLM13 to you. How was he so sure? AHLM13 has become a scapegoat. Cosmic Emperor 05:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, I wonder if you can advise on
Peter Birkett written and twice reinserted by user EducationHoM? It may be that an article on English school systems isn’t your cup of tea (coffee?) in which case I understand. I’ve described my own emotions on the talk page and all the sources I have used are
wp:rs.
Regards
JRPG (
talk)
20:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
So are you saying that Interman45, who says that they are not a sockpuppet, is a sockpuppet (and made disruptive edits to my user page)? Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
You beat me to speedy deletion tagging! Great job!! Iamahashtag ( talk) 18:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC) |
From /info/en/?search=Nobility
You said "looks like vandalism" but it is accurate history. Please explain your research methods? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LibertyTeeth ( talk • contribs) 00:47, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Hopefully the vandalism will stop - it's been protected for years.-- Glory of Space ( talk) 18:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Should this article be deleted, since it was created by a sockpuppet of LouisPhilippeCharles? It also appears to be a fork of Basilica of Superga. Your thoughts? -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 19:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Even before I finished writing my request at AN, you addressed the issue with speed and accuracy. Thanks for your industrious and untiring efforts. Faizan ( talk) 18:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC) |
Well thanks for getting this one out. Can it be over-sighted too? That's too abusive and incivil remark. Faizan ( talk) 18:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
What happened? I put a better word because the other guy was cussing ant swearing? MinecraftSkater ( talk) 14:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/87.6.124.66 perhaps? Dustin (talk) 19:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't know how to do articles. Can you show me? MinecraftSkater ( talk) 15:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
I see you're responsible for blocking user 86.5.161.217 - I'm a journalist and we're looking at doing a story on the user's weird beefing up of March 27. Curious what you know, if anything about the odd behaviour that has made March 27 the Wikipedia DOTY page with by far the most entries for both births and deaths. Would love to talk if you don't mind.
Itscoomy ( talk) 22:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
You blocked LivesOfFilth for copyvio on Beavis and Butt-head. While I agree that content doesn't belong, it doesn't look copy-pasted to me, at least not from here. I even checked that page's history via the Wayback Machine and didn't come up with that text, which seems to have been on Wikipedia since at least 2011, including highly peculiar wording such as "disdainful dislike of many bands from England" or "The duo showed some signs of intelligence". Now there's probably sockpuppetry going on, and re-adding that unreferenced screed over and over again is disruptive, but is there also a copyright issue I'm not seeing? Huon ( talk) 18:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, re this revert: at 20:12, 4 June 2015 you set protection as "[edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)[move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)" - the thing is, [move=autoconfirmed] is to all intents and purposes the same as no move protection, since unconfirmed users cannot move pages even if there is no prot on the page. The previous entry in the prot log is that of 22:03, 20 April 2015 when Tiptoety removed all protection; the entry previous to that, of 12:10, 31 May 2008, specifies "move=sysop", so my edit summary "prot lifted 22:03, 20 April 2015", which related to the move protection set seven years ago, was correct. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 20:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | → | Archive 40 |
Please could you have a look at the last comment on my talk page? It isn't directed at me but another editor and I think it may constitute a personal attack? Sorry, you're the only Admin I can see online at the moment. SagaciousPhil - Chat 17:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Oh for crying out loud! How did this get so badly out of control? Hafspajen, please use your break to recuperate. The wonderful collegial atmosphere of Wikipedia evidently got to you, but all evidence to the contrary, the project needs contributors like you. Favonian ( ta[lk) 19:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
I noticed a similar pattern of editing on the Karim Khan and Zand dynasty articles.
Both appear to have the same fascination with Karim Khan, Zand dynasty, and Luri language. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 00:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I've left a comment at AIV but I thought I'd leave a message here too, to point out that the IP is misrepresenting the whole thing. Omniglott (www.omniglott.com) that the IP repeatedly links to is not a real encyclopaedia but a personal web site, a hobby page written and maintained by someone who is not an authority in the field, and thus not allowed per WP:ELNO. Which is why I reverted the edits and warned them for spamming. And it wouldn't surprise me the least if there's also a COI involved, considering how persistent the IP is. Thomas.W talk 17:34, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Kumioko has socked again with the IP, 96.255.237.170. I am only reporting it here because this IP has been blocked for block evasion thus there is no benefit in opening an SPI. Would you increase the block length of the main account Reguyla? This was third time that he violated the standard offer. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 23:53, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
What a cluster fuck! One editor goes somewhat bananas and gets blocked, and nobody seems inclined to take emphatic measures against the permapest. Favonian ( talk) 16:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Favonian,
What action would you suggest be taken to correct the lack of WP:NPOV in the Safety of electronic cigarettes article. There is one editor involved that rejects any attempt at reasoned discussion if it does not support their own bias (this can be seen throughout the talk pages). The pattern of behaviour continues their peculiar zealotry as demonstrated over time on topics such as chiropractic medicine and acupuncture.
Thanks for your time Lancer2K ( talk) 07:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Could you plase delete the revisions of the user Grupos Clarin as well as hiding the edit summary from the first edit? -- TL22 ( talk) 21:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
People get confused with his name. In this case WP:COMMONNAME doesn't work. I wanted to move it to "LEONARDO FIBONACCI", but only admins have the right do it. Can you move it? -- 115ash →(☏) 13:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
[1] Maybe semi-protect his targets if you can't block the underlying IP? -- NeilN talk to me 16:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Nobody can post a picture of god! That´s very disrespectful towards god, as nobody of us humans know how god look like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afrobreak ( talk • contribs) 10:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
User:Man from Nephew ? In ictu oculi ( talk) 12:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Infiniti c-r72Nr8A44 is the best car! has been created. I saw you blocked User:Infiniti c-r72Nr8A44 is my favorite car!. Corky | Chat? 20:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, you'll probably have seen that the links have been removed. I was about to block but you beat me to it! Dougweller ( talk) 12:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for sticking by my side! You deserve a cookie for your contributions! Storm Content 23:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hello. The recent activity on the article K2 needs some attention. A likely vandalism edit (which I eventually marked as "good faith") stood for hours. This in the middle of a content dispute that is getting very little response from anyone. You have warned user User:Anchan Balti about edit warring and I don't want to become guilty of it myself. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 15:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, I'm having trouble in regards to editing this article. I deleted a sentence that wasn't backed by sources yet explained why it should be deleted, nevertheless, there was a consensus conflict in regards to the article as it shows in the recent edit history [2]. I would appreciate your help greatly. ( N0n3up ( talk) 19:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC))
I don't understand, I provided sources why it should be removed, whereas the other user provided none and continues to edit without one. ( N0n3up ( talk) 20:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC))
Can you block this IP? He is ELreydeEspana. Matiia ( talk) 23:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
64.134.226.222 ( talk · contribs) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ararat arev. Dougweller ( talk) 13:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
@ Favonian, Bbb23, and DoRD: I'm pretty sure that banned user Sonny1998 returned once again, this time as Walknack (his contributions - [3]). Just for record, Favonian already banned his sock Favour1600 (his contributions - [4]) in March (as well as few other socks)... IMHO, this is a clear DUCK. -- Sundostund ( talk) 17:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I am User:AHLM13. You blocked me for two times. Of course not for my actions, but due to the hacker. You blocked my old account by writing "that's it". It was better if you wrote somethin like before, such as hacked account. Also, yesterday you reverted all vandalism done by the hacker, which was good of course, but can you tell me why did not you revert this? Yes, this was a userpage, but it do not take long to understand that it my account was hacked. I asked to check user to prove that I am inoocent. thanks -- Ahlm85 ( talk) 14:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
[5], [6] -- NeilN talk to me 20:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
User:NQ and User:NeilN, I apologise, although it was not me. Thanks. I am very sorry for that. -- Ahlm85 ( talk) 14:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Do you realise you dared to revert the addition of an ebook by the Rt. Rev. Count Ian Wesley Rice, Prince Primate Of The Rhine And Lord Abbot Of White Abbey.? [7] and [8]. Dougweller ( talk) 09:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I think we conflicted at WP:RPP earlier today. I decided that the article could survive without protection, at least for the minute, you semi-protected it for a year. That's quite a difference of opinion - maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle and semi-protected for a shorter duration? What do you think? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Favonian. I've filed another SPI against Tirgil34, including IP socks. Since you're a software architect and experienced with countering vandals on Wikipedia i would like to ask you a question. Last year, various IPs with the range 176.219... ( Istanbul) were socking on Karasuk culture with confirmed Tirgil34 sock Greentent. [9] [10] Recently, IPs of the very same range have been accusing others of being socks of Tirgil34 at my talk page. [11] Would you consider it likely that these IP's belong to the same person? Krakkos ( talk) 16:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I got my access back today after a week's suspension and wanted to resume on my edits made last on the topic Hera. I saw that you reverted them as not relevant but I still believe that those were minor changes and can be accommodated. I can add more relevant information to what I already had if need be. Please let me know if that's fine, I don't wanna get engaged in any violations or edit warring possibilities. Appreciate your help. Munchkin1230 ( talk) 20:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Where do suggest tbi long term services and supports go, before or after the research on medications that don't work? Your group wants the latter on as a government rip off gate or what? JARacino ( talk) 20:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)JARacino JARacino ( talk) 20:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
I think this may be another sock. I noticed some other IP edits in the last couple of days but just ignored them. Could you have a look at this one though, please? SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you blocked him/her, because s/he repeatedly disruptive editing especially Jealous (Nick Jonas song). 115.164.223.190 ( talk) 08:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Can you blocked him/her, because s/he repeatedly disruptive editing especially Jealous (Nick Jonas song). 115.164.223.190 ( talk) 08:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Just a Query, I haven't been on Wiki for years and a lot seems to have changed. I have a character that keeps following my every edit to undo it. It smacks of vandalism to me. What can I do to prevent someone cyber-stalking my edits and sending me repeated messages?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by *Castle&Gardens* ( talk • contribs) 23:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, Thanks to Sinebot, one of the edits by blocked user 131.179.38.238 is still visible on my talk page. Can it be struck out? -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 04:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
and also take a look at this IP. Babitaarora ( talk/ contribs) 12:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
@ Favonian, Bbb23, and DoRD: As it seems to me, banned user Sonny1998 returned once again, this time as ProjectRaw (his contributions - [26]). Favonian banned his sock Favour1600 (his contributions - [27]) in March (and I think several more of his socks)... It really look as a duck. -- Sundostund ( talk) 00:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Mr.Favonian, the page on Srinivasa Ramanujan has a factually incorrect sentence. Also,another sentence with same point exists right after it. My attempt to remove the redundant sentence has been met with your message of vandalism. Please allow me to edit it. -- Deepred12 ( talk) 09:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
[28]. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 18:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Protecting my talkpage? User talk:Knowledgekid87 - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 20:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Many thanks for reverting vandalism from my talk page - Enjoy!! Denisarona ( talk) 17:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC) |
Hi, in February of this year you protected the Excalibur article after it was under assault from an IP-shifting troll in Italy - well, the troll is still quite active on Wikipedia. He recently moved on to the Morgan Le Fay article (which also had to be locked down by an admin last month) and now he is attacking the Albion article. Would it be possible for you to lock that one down, too? Thanks. Cagwinn ( talk) 21:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Greetings... I noticed the protection on the page "Albion". I do not understand. But I opened a discussion on the Talk page.-- 151.46.63.109 ( talk) 15:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
You've edit this, not sure if it's on your watchlist. There's an editor there who maybe, just maybe, become a useful editor, but at the moment I doubt it. See [29] and the addition of what he considers the Median flag. He hasn't a clue about copyright, eg [30] which was a copy of [31] until someone else rewrote it. See his talk page. Tiring me out (pretty tired in any case, the anesthesia form my septoplasty 4 days ago is still affecting me). Thanks. Doug Weller ( talk) 15:23, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Can you apply a rangeblock to two IPs ranges in Quebec? This would be a follow-on to your indef block of Britneyspearsfan17. You can refer to the following related discussions:
This person has abused IPs in the ranges of 205.237.30.xx and 64.229.xx, especially the former. Thanks in advance! Binksternet ( talk) 18:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
@ Binksternet: I'm trying to monitor the two ranges – when the tool lets me. There hasn't been any activity since I blocked the "fan", but if it resumes I'll block an appropriate range, i.e. not the /16 one. Favonian ( talk) 20:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Could you have a look at these contributions and these, please? Perhaps it's just my imagination but they seem very similar? SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Oops, you left this grossly insulting edit of an IP not hidden for a few weeks. Would you hide it for me please? It deters everyone. As well as the edit summary. Eye snore ( pc) 18:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Could you check this user? Seems related to the AHLM13 saga. Mar4d ( talk) 07:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I thought you will check the details. In this talk page Talk:Kashmir conflict an Islamabad IP was contantly mentioning me about this discussion. The discussion recently mentioned about pakistan commando force check this They think we are a group to revert the 3 revert rule. I never thought about such a plan before. @ Kautilya3: is someone who disagrees with me 80% of time starting from 2002 Gujarat riots 1 and 2
I think they are the ones who are having off-wiki contact as they are talking about facebook, and the same thing was suggested by pakistan commnado force on Mar4d's talk page. Faizan, 39.47.50.14 , 115.186.146.225 (another Islambad Ip), 39.47.121.0 are supporting each other in Kashmir conflict. There is another User:PakSol who sounds like Pakistan Commnado force. Mar4d, TopGun and Faizan all are always together and they have interacted for a long time, and gained each other's trust. If they are having E-mail canvassing, we won't know. Pakistan Commando Force posted about some real life acquaintance. I googled search the place Pakistan commando force mentioned on Mar4d's talk page and this is what i got. Previously Mar4d always supported AHLM13 and he believed someone is posing as AHLM13. Why will he suddenly report a new user as AHLM13 to you. How was he so sure? AHLM13 has become a scapegoat. Cosmic Emperor 05:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, I wonder if you can advise on
Peter Birkett written and twice reinserted by user EducationHoM? It may be that an article on English school systems isn’t your cup of tea (coffee?) in which case I understand. I’ve described my own emotions on the talk page and all the sources I have used are
wp:rs.
Regards
JRPG (
talk)
20:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
So are you saying that Interman45, who says that they are not a sockpuppet, is a sockpuppet (and made disruptive edits to my user page)? Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
You beat me to speedy deletion tagging! Great job!! Iamahashtag ( talk) 18:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC) |
From /info/en/?search=Nobility
You said "looks like vandalism" but it is accurate history. Please explain your research methods? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LibertyTeeth ( talk • contribs) 00:47, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Hopefully the vandalism will stop - it's been protected for years.-- Glory of Space ( talk) 18:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Should this article be deleted, since it was created by a sockpuppet of LouisPhilippeCharles? It also appears to be a fork of Basilica of Superga. Your thoughts? -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 19:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Even before I finished writing my request at AN, you addressed the issue with speed and accuracy. Thanks for your industrious and untiring efforts. Faizan ( talk) 18:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC) |
Well thanks for getting this one out. Can it be over-sighted too? That's too abusive and incivil remark. Faizan ( talk) 18:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
What happened? I put a better word because the other guy was cussing ant swearing? MinecraftSkater ( talk) 14:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/87.6.124.66 perhaps? Dustin (talk) 19:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't know how to do articles. Can you show me? MinecraftSkater ( talk) 15:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
I see you're responsible for blocking user 86.5.161.217 - I'm a journalist and we're looking at doing a story on the user's weird beefing up of March 27. Curious what you know, if anything about the odd behaviour that has made March 27 the Wikipedia DOTY page with by far the most entries for both births and deaths. Would love to talk if you don't mind.
Itscoomy ( talk) 22:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
You blocked LivesOfFilth for copyvio on Beavis and Butt-head. While I agree that content doesn't belong, it doesn't look copy-pasted to me, at least not from here. I even checked that page's history via the Wayback Machine and didn't come up with that text, which seems to have been on Wikipedia since at least 2011, including highly peculiar wording such as "disdainful dislike of many bands from England" or "The duo showed some signs of intelligence". Now there's probably sockpuppetry going on, and re-adding that unreferenced screed over and over again is disruptive, but is there also a copyright issue I'm not seeing? Huon ( talk) 18:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, re this revert: at 20:12, 4 June 2015 you set protection as "[edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)[move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)" - the thing is, [move=autoconfirmed] is to all intents and purposes the same as no move protection, since unconfirmed users cannot move pages even if there is no prot on the page. The previous entry in the prot log is that of 22:03, 20 April 2015 when Tiptoety removed all protection; the entry previous to that, of 12:10, 31 May 2008, specifies "move=sysop", so my edit summary "prot lifted 22:03, 20 April 2015", which related to the move protection set seven years ago, was correct. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 20:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)