Hey Fatima, I think the lead section in the parenting article could be better represented. For one, a header with the general parenting topic could be added in bold and made more appealing for those who click on the article. From what I see in the introduction it lacks depth and I think could easily be improved upon aesthetically and also in a literary sense. Under the "practice" section there also appears to be sources that are dead or outdated, I think improving upon these sources may improve reliability and offer a more solid foundation for the rest of the article. One more thing would be to update the "parent training" section, as it appears to have little to no content and only 1 sentence and source. Garrett GartholomuleIII ( talk) 20:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey Fatima, I think the lead section in the parenting article could be better represented. For one, a header with the general parenting topic could be added in bold and made more appealing for those who click on the article. From what I see in the introduction it lacks depth and I think could easily be improved upon aesthetically and also in a literary sense. Under the "practice" section there also appears to be sources that are dead or outdated, I think improving upon these sources may improve reliability and offer a more solid foundation for the rest of the article. One more thing would be to update the "parent training" section, as it appears to have little to no content and only 1 sentence and source. Garrett GartholomuleIII ( talk) 20:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)