As already explained, I am in practise with Farenhorst, who was wrongly banned as a sockpuppet of Voice of Britain. At this moment, "the" Farenhorst is confirming that Happy Camper's checkuser showed no relation between himself and "Voice". Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Happy Camper II
I request an immediate unblock. Kind Regards, O. Farenhorst ( talk) 15:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
FarenhorstO ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As above. I am editing from the same location as Farenhorst, but I am not the same person. Also, as I have observed, the link between Farenhorst and Voice was false, and never shown publically. An administrator assumed that there was checkuser evidence and then blocked him. A later checkuser on Happy Camper II did not show any relation between them. And don't tell me this is an "arbcom" issue. This is a technical error and a failure to understand the relationship between me and Farenhorst.
Decline reason:
Clearly editing on behalf of Farenhorst. Almost identical username, similar edits. You don't have to be the same person to be a sockpuppet. As to whether or not Farenhorst should be unblocked, that is not relevant to this unblock request. Farenhorst is free to request an unblock if he or she wishes. — Yamla ( talk) 16:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- The editor said that they were in practise with Farehnorst. Why, then should they not have their own opinions on the issue of child sexual abuse? They also said that they were in bondage (marriage?) with Farenhorst, thus justifying the name. The user also dismissed the need to unblock Farenhorst, as taken up by user:Homologeo. I think that your reasons are invalid. Lambton T/ C 16:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
As already explained, I am in practise with Farenhorst, who was wrongly banned as a sockpuppet of Voice of Britain. At this moment, "the" Farenhorst is confirming that Happy Camper's checkuser showed no relation between himself and "Voice". Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Happy Camper II
I request an immediate unblock. Kind Regards, O. Farenhorst ( talk) 15:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
FarenhorstO ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As above. I am editing from the same location as Farenhorst, but I am not the same person. Also, as I have observed, the link between Farenhorst and Voice was false, and never shown publically. An administrator assumed that there was checkuser evidence and then blocked him. A later checkuser on Happy Camper II did not show any relation between them. And don't tell me this is an "arbcom" issue. This is a technical error and a failure to understand the relationship between me and Farenhorst.
Decline reason:
Clearly editing on behalf of Farenhorst. Almost identical username, similar edits. You don't have to be the same person to be a sockpuppet. As to whether or not Farenhorst should be unblocked, that is not relevant to this unblock request. Farenhorst is free to request an unblock if he or she wishes. — Yamla ( talk) 16:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- The editor said that they were in practise with Farehnorst. Why, then should they not have their own opinions on the issue of child sexual abuse? They also said that they were in bondage (marriage?) with Farenhorst, thus justifying the name. The user also dismissed the need to unblock Farenhorst, as taken up by user:Homologeo. I think that your reasons are invalid. Lambton T/ C 16:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)