Don't modify guidelines against consensus. Every responding editor at WT:Record charts told you that you were wrong. All of them told you that it was a ringtone chart, not a digital chart. Every single one. Yet, you went ahead and added it to WP:GOODCHARTS. This is a pretty serious problem. Do not repeat it.— Kww( talk) 14:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Please be aware that the song "Search and Destroy" fails the necesary inclusion criteria at WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. This is not my opinion. It is simple fact. As a consequence, and as according to WP:MUSIC, the article is redircted to an appropriate album article. See "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article", "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts ... are probably notable. Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album". Note that having charted does not make the song inherently notable or worthy of an article. It must still include sufficien reliable sourced information to be considered a more detailed article. That is not the case in this instance. Now, stop being disruptive and leave the redirect alone. Nouse4aname ( talk) 09:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Don't modify guidelines against consensus. Every responding editor at WT:Record charts told you that you were wrong. All of them told you that it was a ringtone chart, not a digital chart. Every single one. Yet, you went ahead and added it to WP:GOODCHARTS. This is a pretty serious problem. Do not repeat it.— Kww( talk) 14:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Please be aware that the song "Search and Destroy" fails the necesary inclusion criteria at WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. This is not my opinion. It is simple fact. As a consequence, and as according to WP:MUSIC, the article is redircted to an appropriate album article. See "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article", "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts ... are probably notable. Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album". Note that having charted does not make the song inherently notable or worthy of an article. It must still include sufficien reliable sourced information to be considered a more detailed article. That is not the case in this instance. Now, stop being disruptive and leave the redirect alone. Nouse4aname ( talk) 09:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)