Hello, Facts00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jytdog ( talk) 21:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Paleolithic diet. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Joe ( talk) 18:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey respect that fact that hardcore wiki contributors are going to follow everything in wiki world. I am not going to read thousands of posts in regards to what is fad or not fad. I have been in the fitness/health industry for over 25 years, read thousands of articles, scientific journals ect ect ect. I understand the necessity of citing for everything, but you are citing junk, not actual scientific fact. There is not science calling paleo a fad, and we can argue about what is fad and not, but at the end of the day but saying or citing that it is indeed a fad, you (and not you personally or specifically) are creating a falsehood based on nothing. Facts00 ( talk) 22:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
not to mention the ridiculous "fact" stating that paleo diet can lead to calcium deficiency, are you serious??????????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Facts00 ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Well there are ways around if I want to place that much time and energy into it, not now to many things. Sad, though, really. I have always gone to wiki for sources of info and have stuck up for it when others for this very reason have vowed never to use.
Your simply citing things that are not factually true, and its a shame thats its up here and people will read and believe. Hope you do some good scientific research and realize the errors you are making. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Facts00 ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Quick note on the logistics of discussing things on Talk pages (like this one), which are essential for everything that happens here. In Talk page discussions, we "thread" comments by indenting - when you reply to someone, you put a colon ":" in front of your comment, and the WP software converts that into an indent; if the other person has indented once, then you indent twice by putting two colons "::" which the WP software converts into two indents, and when that gets ridiculous you reset back to the margin (or "outdent") by putting this {{od}} in front of your comment. This also allows you to make it clear if you are also responding to something that someone else responded to if there are more than two people in the discussion; in that case you would indent the same amount as the person just above you in the thread. I hope that all makes sense. And at the end of the comment, please "sign" by typing exactly four (not 3 or 5) tildas "~~~~" which the WP software converts into a date stamp and links to your talk and user pages. That is how we know who said what. I know this is insanely archaic and unwieldy, but this is the software environment we have to work on. Jytdog ( talk) 23:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Facts00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jytdog ( talk) 21:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Paleolithic diet. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Joe ( talk) 18:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey respect that fact that hardcore wiki contributors are going to follow everything in wiki world. I am not going to read thousands of posts in regards to what is fad or not fad. I have been in the fitness/health industry for over 25 years, read thousands of articles, scientific journals ect ect ect. I understand the necessity of citing for everything, but you are citing junk, not actual scientific fact. There is not science calling paleo a fad, and we can argue about what is fad and not, but at the end of the day but saying or citing that it is indeed a fad, you (and not you personally or specifically) are creating a falsehood based on nothing. Facts00 ( talk) 22:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
not to mention the ridiculous "fact" stating that paleo diet can lead to calcium deficiency, are you serious??????????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Facts00 ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Well there are ways around if I want to place that much time and energy into it, not now to many things. Sad, though, really. I have always gone to wiki for sources of info and have stuck up for it when others for this very reason have vowed never to use.
Your simply citing things that are not factually true, and its a shame thats its up here and people will read and believe. Hope you do some good scientific research and realize the errors you are making. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Facts00 ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Quick note on the logistics of discussing things on Talk pages (like this one), which are essential for everything that happens here. In Talk page discussions, we "thread" comments by indenting - when you reply to someone, you put a colon ":" in front of your comment, and the WP software converts that into an indent; if the other person has indented once, then you indent twice by putting two colons "::" which the WP software converts into two indents, and when that gets ridiculous you reset back to the margin (or "outdent") by putting this {{od}} in front of your comment. This also allows you to make it clear if you are also responding to something that someone else responded to if there are more than two people in the discussion; in that case you would indent the same amount as the person just above you in the thread. I hope that all makes sense. And at the end of the comment, please "sign" by typing exactly four (not 3 or 5) tildas "~~~~" which the WP software converts into a date stamp and links to your talk and user pages. That is how we know who said what. I know this is insanely archaic and unwieldy, but this is the software environment we have to work on. Jytdog ( talk) 23:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)