Who exactly is the warning from? Last time I checked, Xyrael originally posted it, not you. Not to sound rude or anything, but unless you asked or told them to post a warning on my talk page, I'd rather you didn't get involved, otherwise you're going to confuse me. -- JD talk email 17:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
(complete revert to 9cds - who broke the page?)
I think that might have been me! Seems to be my edit was the one that done it. I was trying to add housemate images, but for ages I was getting edit conflicts. Is it worth trying again? Celardore 16:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
how did you manage to evict sezer that quickly on all 3 pages????? Ellisjm 20:28 UTC 2 June 06
Yeah I did it on the table and the chronology page admittedly I got the column width a bit wrong on the table. And when I was editing the nomination twist bit on the table I too had the page preprepared which is why the table looked messed up afterwards as I had to revert all of the extra parts I had put on Sezer's row. -- JAB [T] [C] 20:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip I usually would but I heard it on the show and thought I might forget it but yeah I'll remember that in future. Cheers. -- JAB [T] [C] 20:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Why was the Staredit.net Wikipedia article removed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.184.160.23 ( talk • contribs) .
pgk and I both indef'd Griffjam, you had blocked for 1 month, just wanted to make sure there was no rationale for a less than indef block -- Tawker 19:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() | Thank you for your vote in my recent RFA. At 43/43/14, I decided it was best to withdraw. I will wait until another time for an RFA. Thanks again, ILovePlankton 03:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC) |
Hi. I picked your name at random from the list of admins, and have come to ask you to please delete a page, so I may move another in its place. Here is what happened: the page SBC (1984-2005) should be replaced by the page SBC Communications, as there was never nother SBC (destroying the need to give the dates in the title.) So, because both articles are identical, and I want credit for creating the original article ( SBC (1984-2005)), could you please delete the page SBC Communications so I can move ( SBC (1984-2005)) into its place? Thanks a lot. Please leave any questions you may have about this on my talk page. aido2002 20:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
I know you can't remove votes. But tell me this: has anyone ever called it spam to put something likt that on a talk page? I've seen it done, and nobody was angry. If a vote says something that is liebel, it should be removed. aido2002 20:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Even when I try not to vandalise it. It is not fair. Jamie 14:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Its alright, I would come up with an excuse to if I went to that kind of page :P The King of Kings 21:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey FireFox. I just came in to ask you if you could possibly just choose one signature? Because if this:
{{#switch:{{CURRENTDAYNAME}} | Monday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#3971DE">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#3971DE">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Tuesday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#00FF00">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#00FF00">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Wednesday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#000000">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#000000">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Thursday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#9A32CD">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#9A32CD">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Friday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#D41A1F">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#D41A1F">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Saturday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#EE7600">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#EE7600">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Sunday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#6B6B6B">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#6B6B6B">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 }}
Is going to pop-up everytime you leave a message on a users' page, that wouldn't be good. I've seen people, good users too, blocked for signatures shorter than this. Could you please consider it? I don't want to see you blocked. -- from The King of Kings 04:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok try this:
In your preferences type:
{{Subst:User:FireFox/Sig2}} {{subst:CURRENTTIME}} {{subst:CURRENTDAY2}} {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} '06
Make sure Raw signature box is checked
I believe it not being checked was one of the problems you had. The FireFox/Sig2 has the template FireFox/Sig in it so when it subst's, it only leaves the second template which contains the sig. The problem I got first the template not substituting right and then the timestamp thing. The thing with the Current date and everything was confusing :-(
Another important thing is now you only have to type three ~~~ to make your sig and timestamp.
If you type in three tiles it should turn out like this:
Make sure not to merge or delete User:FireFox/Sig2 or User:FireFox/Sig.' Hey, I even got the daily rotating sig in. ;-) The only potential problem I see arriving from this the template inside the template will never get substitiued, which would be a lot of links after a while, but I guess thats a problem for the future. ;-) Hope this helps -- from The King of Kings 21:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
I took me another hour, but I got the exact way Haza has his signature. I had to restart your other sig subpages though. Now it substitutes it and everything is great! (Although, I still like my original idea with the template inside a template :()
Copy and paste the following, lengthy code to the nickname box on My preferences:
{{subst:#switch:{{SUBST:CURRENTDAYNAME}} | Monday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig2}} | Tuesday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig3}} | Wednesday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig4}} | Thursday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig5}} | Friday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig6}} | Saturday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig7}} | Sunday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig8}} }} {{subst:CURRENTTIME}} {{subst:CURRENTDAY2}} {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} '06
Sorry for making your talk page long width-wise. ;-) But, this is neat. I finally was able to do this kind thing (assistance to an user, not only a user but admin), that was actually of use. ;-)
You basically don't need User:FireFox/Sig anymore because all you need is the code in your signature box and the other subpages and you'll be fine.
If you type three ~~~ it should turn out like this now:
Copy and paste the code into the box and tell my how it is. Hopefully this shall be the end of your signature search. ;-) -- from The King of Kings 22:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
He put in the wrong place, and I am tired of having users put in the wrong place and they could always read the directions. ForestH2
After I talked with him. And I saw full reason to do it. --ForestH2
O.K. --ForestH2
Pardon, but they are all synonymously used names. I ought to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gzlfb ( talk • contribs)
That's how some found my site; I even sign my Usenet Posts with that full name. Do some research before you bother sending me any bullshit. Or do I have to say bullpoopie here?
-- G-Spot 11:18, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
You could go after this entire database as being unreliable here and there; admins will never admit their failures because they control the power, but. I am a watch dog, I don't need this, I can web master; I can write articles on the outside. -- G-Spot 12:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
That's sensable, millions of other searches are not, even massive ad searches like Yahoo and Google and Pay-Per-Inclusions as well no doubt. Mass Market is fine I guess, I am defending not attacking just in case it needs spelling out. -- G-Spot 12:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Who banned Scroogle, Google Watch, Wikipedia Watch, etc... outside URL links? What happens to them? Google to Yahoo to Jayde Search are okayed links, but Scroogle is spam? Criticism of this is spam?
Cults have been described as groups where criticism of the Leaders (or Administrators in this case) or Group can not be criticized. That seems to exist here, especially with the smap policy.
-- G-Spot 14:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Still this must bring some suspicion to Wikipedia itself, who possibly breaks it's own rules, by picking on Wikipedia Watch am I right? --G-Spot 15:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you deleted the article ฅนตัดหญ้า. I don't have anything to do with the article, but I wanted to let you know that it's in Thai, and the Thai Wikipedia has an article under the same name at th:ฅนตัดหญ้า. I can't read Thai, but you might consider restoring the article and asking someone who reads Thai to translate it. Or you could post a message on the author's talk page asking him or her to try to translate it into English or find someone willing to translate the article. TruthbringerToronto 18:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
How are you, and hows the sig working for ya? — The King of Kings 19:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you would like to be a designer in this project. You would be perfect for it, so leave me a message on your thoughts on my talk page. Thetruthbelow 03:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
In all truth I'd rather the template were in use, but if all of one people think it shouldn't be used, then you may as well delete it. And as for 9cds's comment, why should he post on my talk page when I asked him not to unless it was necessary, and when it's likely to cause arguments or whatever? -- JD talk email 15:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Are there any repercussions for choosing to ignore somebody? -- JD talk email 16:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay then. -- JD talk email 17:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Can something be done about the constant reversions of the Buzz Out Loud article. I removed a bunch of unessary links which were not needed and possibly spam and 2 anoymnous users (perhaps 1 under 2 ips) keep reverting it? Can something be done perhaps semi-protection? - Mike Beckham 23:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Are you able to delete images I have uploaded at my request? If so, could you delete this one please? It's not being used on the article I uploaded it for, as I managed to upload a better one. -- JD talk email 07:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me translate Spanish technical gibberish into English technical gibberish :D --
Firi
e
n
§
13:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
9cds and I are having another argument on Talk:Big Brother Australia series 6. I don't know if you want to get involved, or if you would even stay impartial or whatever, but he's insistent that the removal of the table on the article's main page must be. Could you try mediate it or whatever please? I'm trying my best to "stay civil", as you all keep putting it. -- JD talk email 19:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for voting! Hello 49TL/Archive/June 2006, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
-- Pilot| guy 22:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Re accidental deletion (as per User_talk:David_McCormick#Edit_to_.5B.5BGeoff_Hurst.5D.5D): Whoops, definitely accidental. Odd, I normally check afterwards too, but I must have been in a rush for some reason. Apologies, and will try to be more careful. (Question: Is the usual practice in discussions such as this to reply on your own talk page, under the comment written by the other person (as I first did), or to reply like this on the other person's talk page? I'm still a newbie really.) Thanks. David McCormick 17:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Please share your opinion on the spliting of a section at Talk:Windows Live Messenger Matthew Fenton [ t/ c 20:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi FireFox! Can you please give me some feedback on Image:EmailGHe.png? As long as it's readable, it should be fine. :P Otherwise, please let me know. Thanks! G. H e 00:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, — Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, I've just been lurking around for a few years, usually while not logged in. :P Finally decided to fix up my page. Anyway, hello! :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firefox ( talk • contribs)
My intention wasn't to hoard the article. I've gone and unprotected Doomsday. :). Oh, and how have your exams been? Will ( message me!) 19:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey. I don't think we have talked before but I'd like to ask you a question. I understand you a member of Esperanza. I'm interested in joining but I'm unsure of what exactly I could do to help the project. I understand that it is about helping the community but in what way could I do this? Normy 132 07:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I am just posting to say good luck to you in the upcoming Esperanza elections, and I shall enjoy campaigning against you - you are a worthy opponent, as it were! All the best, and may the best man/woman/thing win! King fish erswift 16:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I would just like to point out this from Help:Talk page#Etiquette. "However, reverting such removals or redirects is not proper and may result in a block for edit warring." -- Lorian T C 19:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Greetings; I left this note on the AfD discussion page for the University of Miami 2006 custodial workers' strike. "I would also like to hereby ask an administrator for advice on what to do if (when) DSJ2 nominates this article for deletion a third time without providing any new reasons, for I am sad to report that I expect this to happen. Thanks!" Universitytruth 13:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey, thanks much for the speedy reply. So we can send a user himself to deletion review? Cool. I'll be ready for that discussion, should it come up. Best wishes, Universitytruth 13:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Who exactly is the warning from? Last time I checked, Xyrael originally posted it, not you. Not to sound rude or anything, but unless you asked or told them to post a warning on my talk page, I'd rather you didn't get involved, otherwise you're going to confuse me. -- JD talk email 17:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
(complete revert to 9cds - who broke the page?)
I think that might have been me! Seems to be my edit was the one that done it. I was trying to add housemate images, but for ages I was getting edit conflicts. Is it worth trying again? Celardore 16:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
how did you manage to evict sezer that quickly on all 3 pages????? Ellisjm 20:28 UTC 2 June 06
Yeah I did it on the table and the chronology page admittedly I got the column width a bit wrong on the table. And when I was editing the nomination twist bit on the table I too had the page preprepared which is why the table looked messed up afterwards as I had to revert all of the extra parts I had put on Sezer's row. -- JAB [T] [C] 20:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip I usually would but I heard it on the show and thought I might forget it but yeah I'll remember that in future. Cheers. -- JAB [T] [C] 20:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Why was the Staredit.net Wikipedia article removed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.184.160.23 ( talk • contribs) .
pgk and I both indef'd Griffjam, you had blocked for 1 month, just wanted to make sure there was no rationale for a less than indef block -- Tawker 19:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() | Thank you for your vote in my recent RFA. At 43/43/14, I decided it was best to withdraw. I will wait until another time for an RFA. Thanks again, ILovePlankton 03:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC) |
Hi. I picked your name at random from the list of admins, and have come to ask you to please delete a page, so I may move another in its place. Here is what happened: the page SBC (1984-2005) should be replaced by the page SBC Communications, as there was never nother SBC (destroying the need to give the dates in the title.) So, because both articles are identical, and I want credit for creating the original article ( SBC (1984-2005)), could you please delete the page SBC Communications so I can move ( SBC (1984-2005)) into its place? Thanks a lot. Please leave any questions you may have about this on my talk page. aido2002 20:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
I know you can't remove votes. But tell me this: has anyone ever called it spam to put something likt that on a talk page? I've seen it done, and nobody was angry. If a vote says something that is liebel, it should be removed. aido2002 20:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Even when I try not to vandalise it. It is not fair. Jamie 14:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Its alright, I would come up with an excuse to if I went to that kind of page :P The King of Kings 21:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey FireFox. I just came in to ask you if you could possibly just choose one signature? Because if this:
{{#switch:{{CURRENTDAYNAME}} | Monday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#3971DE">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#3971DE">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Tuesday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#00FF00">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#00FF00">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Wednesday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#000000">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#000000">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Thursday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#9A32CD">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#9A32CD">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Friday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#D41A1F">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#D41A1F">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Saturday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#EE7600">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#EE7600">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 | Sunday=— '''''[[User:FireFox|<span style="color:#6B6B6B">Fire</span>]][[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:#6B6B6B">Fox</span>]]''''' • 17:58, 08 June '06 }}
Is going to pop-up everytime you leave a message on a users' page, that wouldn't be good. I've seen people, good users too, blocked for signatures shorter than this. Could you please consider it? I don't want to see you blocked. -- from The King of Kings 04:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok try this:
In your preferences type:
{{Subst:User:FireFox/Sig2}} {{subst:CURRENTTIME}} {{subst:CURRENTDAY2}} {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} '06
Make sure Raw signature box is checked
I believe it not being checked was one of the problems you had. The FireFox/Sig2 has the template FireFox/Sig in it so when it subst's, it only leaves the second template which contains the sig. The problem I got first the template not substituting right and then the timestamp thing. The thing with the Current date and everything was confusing :-(
Another important thing is now you only have to type three ~~~ to make your sig and timestamp.
If you type in three tiles it should turn out like this:
Make sure not to merge or delete User:FireFox/Sig2 or User:FireFox/Sig.' Hey, I even got the daily rotating sig in. ;-) The only potential problem I see arriving from this the template inside the template will never get substitiued, which would be a lot of links after a while, but I guess thats a problem for the future. ;-) Hope this helps -- from The King of Kings 21:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
I took me another hour, but I got the exact way Haza has his signature. I had to restart your other sig subpages though. Now it substitutes it and everything is great! (Although, I still like my original idea with the template inside a template :()
Copy and paste the following, lengthy code to the nickname box on My preferences:
{{subst:#switch:{{SUBST:CURRENTDAYNAME}} | Monday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig2}} | Tuesday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig3}} | Wednesday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig4}} | Thursday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig5}} | Friday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig6}} | Saturday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig7}} | Sunday=— {{subst:User:FireFox/Sig8}} }} {{subst:CURRENTTIME}} {{subst:CURRENTDAY2}} {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} '06
Sorry for making your talk page long width-wise. ;-) But, this is neat. I finally was able to do this kind thing (assistance to an user, not only a user but admin), that was actually of use. ;-)
You basically don't need User:FireFox/Sig anymore because all you need is the code in your signature box and the other subpages and you'll be fine.
If you type three ~~~ it should turn out like this now:
Copy and paste the code into the box and tell my how it is. Hopefully this shall be the end of your signature search. ;-) -- from The King of Kings 22:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
He put in the wrong place, and I am tired of having users put in the wrong place and they could always read the directions. ForestH2
After I talked with him. And I saw full reason to do it. --ForestH2
O.K. --ForestH2
Pardon, but they are all synonymously used names. I ought to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gzlfb ( talk • contribs)
That's how some found my site; I even sign my Usenet Posts with that full name. Do some research before you bother sending me any bullshit. Or do I have to say bullpoopie here?
-- G-Spot 11:18, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
You could go after this entire database as being unreliable here and there; admins will never admit their failures because they control the power, but. I am a watch dog, I don't need this, I can web master; I can write articles on the outside. -- G-Spot 12:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
That's sensable, millions of other searches are not, even massive ad searches like Yahoo and Google and Pay-Per-Inclusions as well no doubt. Mass Market is fine I guess, I am defending not attacking just in case it needs spelling out. -- G-Spot 12:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Who banned Scroogle, Google Watch, Wikipedia Watch, etc... outside URL links? What happens to them? Google to Yahoo to Jayde Search are okayed links, but Scroogle is spam? Criticism of this is spam?
Cults have been described as groups where criticism of the Leaders (or Administrators in this case) or Group can not be criticized. That seems to exist here, especially with the smap policy.
-- G-Spot 14:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Still this must bring some suspicion to Wikipedia itself, who possibly breaks it's own rules, by picking on Wikipedia Watch am I right? --G-Spot 15:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you deleted the article ฅนตัดหญ้า. I don't have anything to do with the article, but I wanted to let you know that it's in Thai, and the Thai Wikipedia has an article under the same name at th:ฅนตัดหญ้า. I can't read Thai, but you might consider restoring the article and asking someone who reads Thai to translate it. Or you could post a message on the author's talk page asking him or her to try to translate it into English or find someone willing to translate the article. TruthbringerToronto 18:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
How are you, and hows the sig working for ya? — The King of Kings 19:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you would like to be a designer in this project. You would be perfect for it, so leave me a message on your thoughts on my talk page. Thetruthbelow 03:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
In all truth I'd rather the template were in use, but if all of one people think it shouldn't be used, then you may as well delete it. And as for 9cds's comment, why should he post on my talk page when I asked him not to unless it was necessary, and when it's likely to cause arguments or whatever? -- JD talk email 15:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Are there any repercussions for choosing to ignore somebody? -- JD talk email 16:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay then. -- JD talk email 17:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Can something be done about the constant reversions of the Buzz Out Loud article. I removed a bunch of unessary links which were not needed and possibly spam and 2 anoymnous users (perhaps 1 under 2 ips) keep reverting it? Can something be done perhaps semi-protection? - Mike Beckham 23:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Are you able to delete images I have uploaded at my request? If so, could you delete this one please? It's not being used on the article I uploaded it for, as I managed to upload a better one. -- JD talk email 07:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me translate Spanish technical gibberish into English technical gibberish :D --
Firi
e
n
§
13:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
9cds and I are having another argument on Talk:Big Brother Australia series 6. I don't know if you want to get involved, or if you would even stay impartial or whatever, but he's insistent that the removal of the table on the article's main page must be. Could you try mediate it or whatever please? I'm trying my best to "stay civil", as you all keep putting it. -- JD talk email 19:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for voting! Hello 49TL/Archive/June 2006, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
-- Pilot| guy 22:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Re accidental deletion (as per User_talk:David_McCormick#Edit_to_.5B.5BGeoff_Hurst.5D.5D): Whoops, definitely accidental. Odd, I normally check afterwards too, but I must have been in a rush for some reason. Apologies, and will try to be more careful. (Question: Is the usual practice in discussions such as this to reply on your own talk page, under the comment written by the other person (as I first did), or to reply like this on the other person's talk page? I'm still a newbie really.) Thanks. David McCormick 17:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Please share your opinion on the spliting of a section at Talk:Windows Live Messenger Matthew Fenton [ t/ c 20:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi FireFox! Can you please give me some feedback on Image:EmailGHe.png? As long as it's readable, it should be fine. :P Otherwise, please let me know. Thanks! G. H e 00:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, — Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, I've just been lurking around for a few years, usually while not logged in. :P Finally decided to fix up my page. Anyway, hello! :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firefox ( talk • contribs)
My intention wasn't to hoard the article. I've gone and unprotected Doomsday. :). Oh, and how have your exams been? Will ( message me!) 19:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey. I don't think we have talked before but I'd like to ask you a question. I understand you a member of Esperanza. I'm interested in joining but I'm unsure of what exactly I could do to help the project. I understand that it is about helping the community but in what way could I do this? Normy 132 07:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I am just posting to say good luck to you in the upcoming Esperanza elections, and I shall enjoy campaigning against you - you are a worthy opponent, as it were! All the best, and may the best man/woman/thing win! King fish erswift 16:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I would just like to point out this from Help:Talk page#Etiquette. "However, reverting such removals or redirects is not proper and may result in a block for edit warring." -- Lorian T C 19:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Greetings; I left this note on the AfD discussion page for the University of Miami 2006 custodial workers' strike. "I would also like to hereby ask an administrator for advice on what to do if (when) DSJ2 nominates this article for deletion a third time without providing any new reasons, for I am sad to report that I expect this to happen. Thanks!" Universitytruth 13:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey, thanks much for the speedy reply. So we can send a user himself to deletion review? Cool. I'll be ready for that discussion, should it come up. Best wishes, Universitytruth 13:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)