Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Bank. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Please also note that user or user talk pages can't be used as soap boxes to argue a point of view. See this page for more information. Thanks. bonadea contributions talk 08:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did with
this edit to
Bank. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Jim1138 (
talk)
08:46, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Please explain to me what is personal commentary in that article. Haven't i cited a reference to explain what is fractional reserve banking. Can you not see the glaring error in the way it is explained and the way it is actually defined?
What about the definition of fractional reserve banking can't you see the glaring error. Or don't you want to?
Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. This is an encyclopedia, so remember to include references listing websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted if unreferenced or referenced poorly. See: Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information.-- Moxy ( talk) 17:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, you may be
blocked from editing.
The rules are the same as they were in November. Unsourced opinions cannot be added as facts to Wikipedia articles. bonadea contributions talk 19:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Bank. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Please also note that user or user talk pages can't be used as soap boxes to argue a point of view. See this page for more information. Thanks. bonadea contributions talk 08:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did with
this edit to
Bank. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Jim1138 (
talk)
08:46, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Please explain to me what is personal commentary in that article. Haven't i cited a reference to explain what is fractional reserve banking. Can you not see the glaring error in the way it is explained and the way it is actually defined?
What about the definition of fractional reserve banking can't you see the glaring error. Or don't you want to?
Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. This is an encyclopedia, so remember to include references listing websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted if unreferenced or referenced poorly. See: Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information.-- Moxy ( talk) 17:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, you may be
blocked from editing.
The rules are the same as they were in November. Unsourced opinions cannot be added as facts to Wikipedia articles. bonadea contributions talk 19:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)