![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Can you close this PR as the article is nominated for Good Topic? I would have closed it, only I don't know how. --Legolas (talk2me) 11:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey Explicit (is this the best way for me to refer to you?), Thanks for the heads up. Yes im aware he was banned because i was one of the many editors who took an ANI out against him and requested him to be blocked for WP:3R. I did not act upon the IP's request because someone had tagged its page with concern that he was a sock of Tremanshoe. I will be more observant in future though. Once again thanks for the heads up. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 16:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
I've taken out a Socket puppet investigation for TrEeMaNsHoE with the accused account User talk:68.248.73.190. He/she is showing classic behaviour which i have seen before. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 21:11, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi explicit. i think we gace another sock. I discovered 68.219.138.43 making very subtle edits to articles like removing additional details or unnecessarily changing things. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 20:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi explicit. i think i've encountered another sock today. Just take a look at this edit history for Ride (Ciara song), here. there's 5 swift edits including 4 reverts. Notice when i reverted his the edit with an edit summary here there was two mass reverts from here with no explaination. I then left this message on his talk page User talk: Rib Lover and the article was then reverted with a ridiculous fan comment here which i've heard from Tremanshoe before. im 75% sure that User:Rib Lover is a sock of tremanshoe? Lil-unique1 ( talk) 02:23, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have been granted permission by the owner to use the abovementioned image on Edward Boustead, please refer to Ticket#2010042010010782 and do not tag the image for deletion, thank you very much!
Athenak ( talk) 09:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I am authorized by Kerry Holton President of The Delaware Nation, an American Indian Tribe, located at Anadarko, OK to upload their logo in the wikicommons file. Please assist us to restore this image into the article ASAP. If you have any doubt you can call me at 678-755-8652.
Thanks in Advance
Carlos A. Torres Fletcher Ambassador-at-Large for Latin America The Delaware Nation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cartof ( talk • contribs) 19:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Yesterday User:Lukek26 was banned following a detailed length ANI over long term abuse of changing sourced information etc. Today i discovered one of 'his' target articles Number Ones (Janet Jackson album) had the following edits made [1] by IP 189.32.253.82 which exactly mirror the information that User:Lukek26 was trying to add into the article previously and which coincidently i removed only yesterday [2]. Im wondering if this is an incident of sock puppetry especially since i've realised this ip is also editing Discipline (Janet Jackson album) in the same way? Lil-unique1 ( talk) 03:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
I was in the middle of updating this file and you deleted it. Can you please put it back and let me know what it is wrong before simply removing it? I do not think it is fair that you remove a file hours after it has been added. Please let me know what is wrong with it and i will fix it.
As it stands I was just about to add a License for "Non-free logo" to it but you removed it and now I am unable to fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poccuo ( talk • contribs) 20:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Just because someone is banned doesn't mean they can't make an edit request. (as you did in Talk:Ride (Ciara song)) Spitfire19 ( Talk) 00:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
I was not aware that users like the one above could put a message on their user page stating that i quote: "This user acts like he/she is an administrator on the English Wikipedia but really isn't." I was under the impression that only administrators had the power to grant edit requests? Additionally this user appears to have been issuing lots of warnings (some unfounded) on his/her talk page. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 00:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Piper Alpha 1988.png May I ask what was wrong with the copyright?-- The Navigators ( talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 12:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my talk page, I won't finish removing all from the category tonight, but I have a note of all the songs if you want to delete the category now. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 22:16, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Man, I just read the rules now and got the reference, see the article =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.101.134.133 ( talk) 00:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
I need your help, blogs in the rules no are valid, the more I saw on a blog ... if u want to remove the 139 000 copies while we decided this is the will =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneInAMillion96 ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Explic, for ridding me of some of those heavy subpages that I presently marked w/ {{db-self}}. Now I feel lighter! ;}. Hamamelis ( talk) 05:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
User ܥܝܪܐܩ appeared on wikipedia less than two months ago, yet he is since then busy pushing for his ideological "anti-assyrianist" agenda by igniting edit wars and vandalizing numerous Iraq- or Assyrian-related articles. Have a look at the edits history of e.g. Assyrian Evangelical Church, Assyrian Patriotic Party, Assyrian Socialist Party or any other "contribution" User ܥܝܪܐܩ. I think an administrator should intervene not only on one or another edit, but more generally on the mala fide practices of User ܥܝܪܐܩ, one of which is deleting large parts of a stub, including its bibliography, then asking for the speedy deletion of the remaining one-sentence article. Such people make wikipedia a quite inhospitable place and put the whole project at risk of becoming a mere battleground for activists of various species. -- Pylambert ( talk) 21:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong with applying rigorous scrutiny to nationalist articles. There is however something very wrong with making numerous personal attacks: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19], restoring abuse to peoples' talk pages: [20] [21] [22] [23], refusing to discuss anything on article talk pages, and canvassing for admins: [24] [25] [26] [27]. I believe users are allowed to remove personal attacks, which is what I have done at Talk:Assyrian Socialist Party. His response was not a reply to my discussion of the article but a personal attack on me. I would urge Explicit to take these facts into account, after having being spammed by Pylambert. For my part, I explained the edits I made, I used the talk pages to discuss matters where required, I didn't respond with personal attacks, and I then decided to leave the articles which had irked Pylambert alone, some of which; as a result of my scrutiny have motivated improvements by Pylambert. ܥܝܪܐܩ ( talk) 22:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
I really don't think the uploader is getting the message. He added File:Chrisjer.jpg to Slammy Award without an FUR and its use there was purely decorative so it breached WP:NFCC. He's been warned numerous times and was recently blocked at commons because he just won't get the message. [28] -- AussieLegend ( talk) 00:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
AussieLegend you could just simply explain to me the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria like ξ xplicit did ,as i clearly wasn't fully understood of the image/media policy here on Wikipedia considering the fact that i did mentioned a source and a license for the image but i didn't know of the "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, etc.." part ,so thanks for your Patience and warnings hopefully i wont violate any more rules here on Wikipedia , and about WikipediaCommons i didn't know how to upload locally so i guess commons was a wrong way for me but now i learned to --- TC --Joseþhero 10:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephero ( talk • contribs)
Howdy. With regards to this FFD, did you believe that the file was not a two dimensional work art? Or, did you concur it was a two dimensional work of art but did not fall under this, or was the deletion for a different reason?-- Rockfang ( talk) 06:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting the Wiz Khalifa article. IMHO any BLP should be protected by default until flagged revisions are in place, but thanks nonetheless. JBsupreme ( talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 02:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
I need your help on page Mýa discography is there a conflict, his albums never sold more than 1 million copies, but got someone is littering and causing a mess, you could block the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneInAMillion96 ( talk • contribs) 16:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I'd love for you to review the article I wrote up on the band doublethink at the link below so it can properly go live! If you think it does not qualify please let me know what you think should be changed before putting it to deletion as I really want to make sure the page gets on there. Thanks!
Strippedman ( talk) 17:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing! I updated the page by not using the band's MySpace page at all, and didn't use the band's website where applicable. However, the only source to assert what organizations they support and what organizations support them is their own site obviously, so I left those references alone. Unless you might suggest a better way to cite those facts without using their website as the reference? Thanks for your help! Strippedman ( talk) 19:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Terrific, thanks. I'll get some more reviews and get rid of that watermark thing at the top! Thanks again. Strippedman ( talk) 19:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Delete Talk:Lady Gaga/GA2 please. New user crap. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:52, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Quick question: is there a speedy delete criteria for useless redirects? I ask because Pens and White Lines is a redirect to a user page, created by said user. It serves no useful purpose. Cheers! --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 00:03, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. Thanks for closing this CfD. Could you please ask Cydebot to merge Category:English Formula One people and Category:Scottish Formula One people into Category:Formula One people as well? The intent of the CfD was to include all national subcategories; I must have missed those two when I raised it. Thanks DH85868993 ( talk) 00:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
221.206.103.59 has created a series of user accounts, all of which start with Mbt, and then fills the user page or user talk page with gibberish, the only commonality being imbedded links to mbt shoes. I blanked the first couple, but more have been created since. Is this a problem I should take to ANI or to AIV? --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 03:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
What do I have to do to get this photo to not be deleted? I have permission from the owner and everything, and labeled the photo as such with the owner's name and the site it was taken from. What am I missing? Strippedman ( talk) 14:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks You are correct that I have created a number of album categories (possibly a majority of them at this point, including over a dozen today) and I have an interest in this categorization scheme, but I'm not sure if I have anything to add to the discussion. Simply put, I think you're on the right track about (e.g.) Category:American albums being tricky. Where these recorded by American artists, recorded in America, or released to the American audience? Tough to say. It seems like Category:Albums by American musicians might be desirable (and the only one of those three options that is appropriate for categorization), but I don't know that I have more to add than that. Thanks again for the heads-up. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Replied. — ξ xplicit 19:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Looks like this was aimed at you? Just thought I'd let you know. Chzz ► 22:55, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi. This was on my watchlist and went red. All these official seals are PD per Indonesian Law. It would fall under Commons:Template:PD-IDGov (although this was here, I know). Anyway, it broke a lot of stuff and people will unlink it all and the structure will be lost. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 01:45, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I think that file was probably uploaded by Tecmobowl ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who was banned nearly 3 years ago. That would account for why nothing was done about the sourcing. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
How did this violate non free criteria. It was used as Fair use and a reference and is not replaceable Gnevin ( talk) 14:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
::Expect for the fact the image also served as a reference
Gnevin (
talk) 22:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC) Sorry . Your correct
Gnevin (
talk) 22:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I took the picture File:PalagoGreenYellow.gif and added it to the Palago page. I later got a msg that it was going to be deleted because of improper permision. I thought I went in and added the correct permission but the pic was deleted anyway. Can you please tell me what I missed.
thanks, RexJacobus —Preceding unsigned comment added by RexJacobus ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Well sorry about the 3 revert thing but he needs to stop taking huge sections off the page for no good reason. And he has done another revert. His removing content is jepordising a correct AfD decision on the topic. STAT- Verse 03:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Well I left a thing at WP:ANI and I have left a note at the AfD. STAT- Verse 03:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
As someone active on ANI and experienced with BLPs, please would you take a look at this (centred on this person)? Thank you. 92.30.111.99 ( talk) 04:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for using the template {{ G8-exempt}} to preserve this Talk page. I was concerned that the discussion would disappear along with the image. (If you wish to respond, please do so here.) HairyWombat ( talk) 04:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
There is some even more substantive discussion here. HairyWombat ( talk) 06:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you blocked JohnnyCalifornia4Life ( talk · contribs), a new user has popped up MiamiFloridaBabii ( talk · contribs), appears to be a sock. - Regancy42 ( talk) 13:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi i am Larbi Tadlaoui and i would like to know why you have deleted the article over my racing career please clarify asap many thanks in advance ,kind regards Bilarone /Larbi Tadlaoui —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilarone ( talk • contribs) 22:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Explicit—I wish to challenge the result of the deletion discussion of the said image, and WP:DRV requires that I chat to you about it first. I very broadly agree with your result of "no consensus" – but WP:FFD clearly states, "Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for deletion if there is no clear consensus in favour of keeping them."
The result of "no consensus" should, therefore, be an impossible result for an FfD discussion: or rather, where there is no real consensus, the presumption is to delete the image.
I would welcome your comments as soon as possible. Best, ╟─ Treasury Tag► sundries─╢ 06:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:The Time of Angels illustrative image.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ╟─ Treasury Tag► Speaker─╢ 08:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Whoops! I'm not really sure how I missed that. You have my go-ahead to overturn, adjust, or leave the block as you see fit. Sorry about that. - Vianello ( Talk) 20:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
User STATicVerseatide keeps vandalizing the Murda-Man Flocka by reverting my constructive edits and replacing them with poorly sourced claims. I ask you to please warn this user since he clearly doesn't listen to the warnings of his peers and continues to vandalize pages such as the aforementioned album. Thank you. Str8cash ( talk) 02:36, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Please see here Based on your feedback to my talk page, I thought this might be of interest to you. Please add any insight you have. Thanks. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 16:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Since you recently promoted Aaliyah to FA, would you like to comment on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Madonna (entertainer)/archive1 and give some of your input? Thanks in advance, --Legolas (talk2me) 13:25, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I would like your opinion about the following issue:
As im sure you're aware and encountered before many articles about albums cite Hits Daily Double as a source for sales. However the following error has occured.
Does this prove what i've suspected all along that in fact HDD is not a good source and not credible as well as factually inaccurate. if so what do we do about it's massive use on here?.
Thanks – Lil-unique1 ( talk) 17:48, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi my page for J Carter marketing was deleted because of advertising promotions...But I wasn't finished. it was going to be an entire history on the company. They've been around for 10+ years. Is history mixed with what they do (pretty innovative stuff) not allowed on Wiki? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.66.240 ( talk) 14:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Please undo this player from Steaua II, he debut tonight for the first team in Liga I. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.234.101 ( talk) 20:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
For all of these the talk page was tagged with the rename template. Does that count? I'm not sure if it does ... Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:15, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey Explict i don't know if you remember but not too long ago you blocked RyanG222 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) thanks to an ANI i filed. Well it looks like he could possibly editing through an IP address now. Although the IP was active before we was blocked the editing pattern and overlap of editing the same articles in the same way is highly suspicious. I filed at SPI against the IP here but as the blocking admin i thought you'd want a heads up on it. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 23:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Fair play. I just thought it was odd how the editing appeared to overlap. Perhaps the SPI should then be closed as not likely? Lil-unique1 ( talk) 23:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Heads up again, i think we have another TremanShoe sock in the form of Leavemeforever ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)? He made requests to edit on my talk page [40]. – Lil-unique1 ( talk) 14:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately I've only noticed this CFD after CydeBot is going through eliminating all the members. I think it should have been closed as no consensus - default to keep, or perhaps renamed to "Video games with female main characters" (though protagonist works just as well). Thoughts? – xeno talk 19:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
I've made some changes to Cydebot that should address the deletion summary issue (specifically, the lack of a correct link to the per-day discussion page in some instances). Please keep your eyes peeled for any remaining issues. More information is here. -- Cyde Weys 21:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Explicit,
I tracked you down in regards to a image you deleted [41]. The same person uploaded it [42] under different licensing. I was wondering if you remember it or have any insight of its origins. It looks like an obvious fake, probably a comical Christmas card going by the date. I know that wouldn't be a reason to delete it, but it could help me in removing it from the Tea Party article. I've searched forums where misspelled tea party signs are posted, there are lots of them. I could not find this image or anything half as ridiculous. I just don't think someones satire picture should be presented as a 'typical protester'. I would have gone to the author for answers, but his summaries while posting it leads me to believe he/she wouldn't be very sympathetic to my concerns [43] [44]. I don't know how long it lasted the first time, but nearing two weeks is surprising. Thank you. ( That is Fake ( talk) 04:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC))
Hello, I am writing you to ask about the file that I uploaded. You have removed it citing Wikipedia policy. But I do not understand this. First of all, I should have been notified so that there could have been a dicussion on the rationale of the upload. I do not agree with the deletion for a number of important reasons: - The copyright holder does not object because he considers it a good example of his work, that is why it was presented there - It is original artwork that was used on a magazine cover. It is not in the magazine article bcause it is not a scan of the magazine cover. - The proper route I feel, should have been that we had a discussion about the licensing.
I realise that in the current Wikipedia safeguarding proper use is a difficult task. But I write in the Wikipedia to educate and inform. There is a certain deltionist attitude on the Wikipedia that seems to lack direction. This will drive serious contributors away. JHvW ( talk) 06:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Ok im not sure whats going on but there is definately some sock puppetry going on here. It might be related to Brexx or Tremanshoe or both or a seperate sockpuppet issue but i believe there's a connection between the following users:
Now my thoughts are that CiaraFan4Ever might be the sock master here or alternatively the other two accounts are linked to Brexx or Tremanshoe. Or maybe neither... it just seems suspicious. – Lil-unique1 ( talk) 16:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Some thing I don't like about Wikipedia is that it isn't very new-user-friendly. Just my opinion.
I still don't understand what qualifies as non-free content, even though I read through F7 at least three times. It's a government-owned building, so how could taking a picture of it not qualify as non-free? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericleb01 ( talk • contribs) 03:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Be done against the continuous addition of extra album covers, which do not have any rationale, except for decoration in The Remix? This user is keeping on adding the same album cover, even when the previous one was deleted. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
I would like to thank you on the edit protection you imposed on Saudi Arabia. How long will the ban be? I am a frequent editor of Middle Easter related articles. Thank you for your time. Dhulfiqar 12:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spine.Cleaver ( talk • contribs)
Hi there, Thanks for closing this AfD. Can you speedily move the connected categories, I.E. Category:Major League Baseball players from California to the broader categories discussed in the AfD Category:American baseball players from California? Thanks for your help.-- TM 00:10, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Unless I mistagged it, this had an OTRS permission attached. Ironholds ( talk) 09:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
I would like to ask. Do you have ANY guideline that says that bullets should not be used in singles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by STATicVerseatide ( talk • contribs) 19:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
I Explicit. The picture of Paula White was taken during a church service. I don't know how else you want me to prove it. It's plan and simple at the time I didn't have a good camera and I did my best with what I had. I no longer have the picture on my laptop because it crashed and I lose everything. Can the picture be savaged? Mcelite ( talk) 22:46, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Those two photos were given to me. So authentically no they are not mine but were given to me. Whenever I uploaded them which was a while ago. It was difficult to get the picture and I'm very frustrated that the decision was made in a day. I clearly stated where the picture was taken the only way you will find a picture that can match that is if someone was taking a picture at the same time as me or took if off of wikipedia when I uploaded it. Mcelite ( talk) 08:05, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
See here Thanks. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi.. The photograph you deleted File:Mino Argento in 1977 is unique historic from 1977 from Catologo One man show in New York Betty Parsons Gallery... please can you tell me the reason is deleted. i will be happy Upload file:Mino Argento in 1977! Thank you( MA3ARG ( talk) 04:16, 27 May 2010 (UTC))
An editor has asked for a deletion review see Categories:American Jews/Jewish people by fooian descent. Because you evidently closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. IZAK ( talk) 06:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit: There is now a DRV for 24 categories of Jews at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 28#Categories:American Jews/Jewish people by fooian descent. You have recently speedy deleted Category:Romanian-American Jews [49], based on speedy delete nominations but an admin at DRV, User Stifle ( talk · contribs) has requested [50], [51] more information and input from those involved in the deletions and what they based themselves on. Since you have been involved with deleting and discussing these, could you respond ASAP at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 28#Categories:American Jews/Jewish people by fooian descent and help us out tracing who nominated and supported the Jews' categories in question for speedy renaming and why it was done so that the monitoring and closing admins at the DRV can know the starting point of the DRV in question. Thanks for helping us out here. IZAK ( talk) 03:28, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Missed this one. Was it, indeed, bad enough for a speedy? DG is quite a reasonable and charismatic chap, not the kind of man who easily provokes attack pages. East of Borschov ( talk) 19:15, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit: Wasn’t the intention following discussion (now archived) that all airfields in Category:Airfields of the United States Army Air Forces by state should be moved to the category for the appropriate state and the category (which replaced "in New England" etc) could then be deleted (presumably moving each one needs to be done manually). If so, could I put a notice on this page to stop it being added to? These airfields will then all be in a subcat of Category:Airfields of the United States Army Air Forces in the United States by state Hugo999 ( talk) 03:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Centralized discussion regarding my closure here, awaiting comments from Headbomb ( talk · contribs), Black Falcon ( talk · contribs) and Izno ( talk · contribs). Just a note, I'll be heading to bed after posting this, so it may take me a while to respond. — ξ xplicit 08:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm having a really difficult conversation with User:Egard89 who believes he is the creator of the image here. He's removed the tag requiring evidence of permission. I'm tired of arguing with him about the images - in fact, copyright and permissions are not my forte. Is there somewhere or someone who can look into this? Many thanks -- Merbabu ( talk) 15:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Can you close this PR as the article is nominated for Good Topic? I would have closed it, only I don't know how. --Legolas (talk2me) 11:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey Explicit (is this the best way for me to refer to you?), Thanks for the heads up. Yes im aware he was banned because i was one of the many editors who took an ANI out against him and requested him to be blocked for WP:3R. I did not act upon the IP's request because someone had tagged its page with concern that he was a sock of Tremanshoe. I will be more observant in future though. Once again thanks for the heads up. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 16:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
I've taken out a Socket puppet investigation for TrEeMaNsHoE with the accused account User talk:68.248.73.190. He/she is showing classic behaviour which i have seen before. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 21:11, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi explicit. i think we gace another sock. I discovered 68.219.138.43 making very subtle edits to articles like removing additional details or unnecessarily changing things. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 20:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi explicit. i think i've encountered another sock today. Just take a look at this edit history for Ride (Ciara song), here. there's 5 swift edits including 4 reverts. Notice when i reverted his the edit with an edit summary here there was two mass reverts from here with no explaination. I then left this message on his talk page User talk: Rib Lover and the article was then reverted with a ridiculous fan comment here which i've heard from Tremanshoe before. im 75% sure that User:Rib Lover is a sock of tremanshoe? Lil-unique1 ( talk) 02:23, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have been granted permission by the owner to use the abovementioned image on Edward Boustead, please refer to Ticket#2010042010010782 and do not tag the image for deletion, thank you very much!
Athenak ( talk) 09:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I am authorized by Kerry Holton President of The Delaware Nation, an American Indian Tribe, located at Anadarko, OK to upload their logo in the wikicommons file. Please assist us to restore this image into the article ASAP. If you have any doubt you can call me at 678-755-8652.
Thanks in Advance
Carlos A. Torres Fletcher Ambassador-at-Large for Latin America The Delaware Nation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cartof ( talk • contribs) 19:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Yesterday User:Lukek26 was banned following a detailed length ANI over long term abuse of changing sourced information etc. Today i discovered one of 'his' target articles Number Ones (Janet Jackson album) had the following edits made [1] by IP 189.32.253.82 which exactly mirror the information that User:Lukek26 was trying to add into the article previously and which coincidently i removed only yesterday [2]. Im wondering if this is an incident of sock puppetry especially since i've realised this ip is also editing Discipline (Janet Jackson album) in the same way? Lil-unique1 ( talk) 03:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
I was in the middle of updating this file and you deleted it. Can you please put it back and let me know what it is wrong before simply removing it? I do not think it is fair that you remove a file hours after it has been added. Please let me know what is wrong with it and i will fix it.
As it stands I was just about to add a License for "Non-free logo" to it but you removed it and now I am unable to fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poccuo ( talk • contribs) 20:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Just because someone is banned doesn't mean they can't make an edit request. (as you did in Talk:Ride (Ciara song)) Spitfire19 ( Talk) 00:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
I was not aware that users like the one above could put a message on their user page stating that i quote: "This user acts like he/she is an administrator on the English Wikipedia but really isn't." I was under the impression that only administrators had the power to grant edit requests? Additionally this user appears to have been issuing lots of warnings (some unfounded) on his/her talk page. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 00:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Piper Alpha 1988.png May I ask what was wrong with the copyright?-- The Navigators ( talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 12:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my talk page, I won't finish removing all from the category tonight, but I have a note of all the songs if you want to delete the category now. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 22:16, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Man, I just read the rules now and got the reference, see the article =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.101.134.133 ( talk) 00:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
I need your help, blogs in the rules no are valid, the more I saw on a blog ... if u want to remove the 139 000 copies while we decided this is the will =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneInAMillion96 ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Explic, for ridding me of some of those heavy subpages that I presently marked w/ {{db-self}}. Now I feel lighter! ;}. Hamamelis ( talk) 05:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
User ܥܝܪܐܩ appeared on wikipedia less than two months ago, yet he is since then busy pushing for his ideological "anti-assyrianist" agenda by igniting edit wars and vandalizing numerous Iraq- or Assyrian-related articles. Have a look at the edits history of e.g. Assyrian Evangelical Church, Assyrian Patriotic Party, Assyrian Socialist Party or any other "contribution" User ܥܝܪܐܩ. I think an administrator should intervene not only on one or another edit, but more generally on the mala fide practices of User ܥܝܪܐܩ, one of which is deleting large parts of a stub, including its bibliography, then asking for the speedy deletion of the remaining one-sentence article. Such people make wikipedia a quite inhospitable place and put the whole project at risk of becoming a mere battleground for activists of various species. -- Pylambert ( talk) 21:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong with applying rigorous scrutiny to nationalist articles. There is however something very wrong with making numerous personal attacks: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19], restoring abuse to peoples' talk pages: [20] [21] [22] [23], refusing to discuss anything on article talk pages, and canvassing for admins: [24] [25] [26] [27]. I believe users are allowed to remove personal attacks, which is what I have done at Talk:Assyrian Socialist Party. His response was not a reply to my discussion of the article but a personal attack on me. I would urge Explicit to take these facts into account, after having being spammed by Pylambert. For my part, I explained the edits I made, I used the talk pages to discuss matters where required, I didn't respond with personal attacks, and I then decided to leave the articles which had irked Pylambert alone, some of which; as a result of my scrutiny have motivated improvements by Pylambert. ܥܝܪܐܩ ( talk) 22:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
I really don't think the uploader is getting the message. He added File:Chrisjer.jpg to Slammy Award without an FUR and its use there was purely decorative so it breached WP:NFCC. He's been warned numerous times and was recently blocked at commons because he just won't get the message. [28] -- AussieLegend ( talk) 00:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
AussieLegend you could just simply explain to me the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria like ξ xplicit did ,as i clearly wasn't fully understood of the image/media policy here on Wikipedia considering the fact that i did mentioned a source and a license for the image but i didn't know of the "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, etc.." part ,so thanks for your Patience and warnings hopefully i wont violate any more rules here on Wikipedia , and about WikipediaCommons i didn't know how to upload locally so i guess commons was a wrong way for me but now i learned to --- TC --Joseþhero 10:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephero ( talk • contribs)
Howdy. With regards to this FFD, did you believe that the file was not a two dimensional work art? Or, did you concur it was a two dimensional work of art but did not fall under this, or was the deletion for a different reason?-- Rockfang ( talk) 06:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting the Wiz Khalifa article. IMHO any BLP should be protected by default until flagged revisions are in place, but thanks nonetheless. JBsupreme ( talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 02:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
I need your help on page Mýa discography is there a conflict, his albums never sold more than 1 million copies, but got someone is littering and causing a mess, you could block the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneInAMillion96 ( talk • contribs) 16:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I'd love for you to review the article I wrote up on the band doublethink at the link below so it can properly go live! If you think it does not qualify please let me know what you think should be changed before putting it to deletion as I really want to make sure the page gets on there. Thanks!
Strippedman ( talk) 17:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing! I updated the page by not using the band's MySpace page at all, and didn't use the band's website where applicable. However, the only source to assert what organizations they support and what organizations support them is their own site obviously, so I left those references alone. Unless you might suggest a better way to cite those facts without using their website as the reference? Thanks for your help! Strippedman ( talk) 19:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Terrific, thanks. I'll get some more reviews and get rid of that watermark thing at the top! Thanks again. Strippedman ( talk) 19:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Delete Talk:Lady Gaga/GA2 please. New user crap. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:52, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Quick question: is there a speedy delete criteria for useless redirects? I ask because Pens and White Lines is a redirect to a user page, created by said user. It serves no useful purpose. Cheers! --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 00:03, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. Thanks for closing this CfD. Could you please ask Cydebot to merge Category:English Formula One people and Category:Scottish Formula One people into Category:Formula One people as well? The intent of the CfD was to include all national subcategories; I must have missed those two when I raised it. Thanks DH85868993 ( talk) 00:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
221.206.103.59 has created a series of user accounts, all of which start with Mbt, and then fills the user page or user talk page with gibberish, the only commonality being imbedded links to mbt shoes. I blanked the first couple, but more have been created since. Is this a problem I should take to ANI or to AIV? --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 03:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
What do I have to do to get this photo to not be deleted? I have permission from the owner and everything, and labeled the photo as such with the owner's name and the site it was taken from. What am I missing? Strippedman ( talk) 14:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks You are correct that I have created a number of album categories (possibly a majority of them at this point, including over a dozen today) and I have an interest in this categorization scheme, but I'm not sure if I have anything to add to the discussion. Simply put, I think you're on the right track about (e.g.) Category:American albums being tricky. Where these recorded by American artists, recorded in America, or released to the American audience? Tough to say. It seems like Category:Albums by American musicians might be desirable (and the only one of those three options that is appropriate for categorization), but I don't know that I have more to add than that. Thanks again for the heads-up. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Replied. — ξ xplicit 19:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Looks like this was aimed at you? Just thought I'd let you know. Chzz ► 22:55, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi. This was on my watchlist and went red. All these official seals are PD per Indonesian Law. It would fall under Commons:Template:PD-IDGov (although this was here, I know). Anyway, it broke a lot of stuff and people will unlink it all and the structure will be lost. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 01:45, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I think that file was probably uploaded by Tecmobowl ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who was banned nearly 3 years ago. That would account for why nothing was done about the sourcing. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
How did this violate non free criteria. It was used as Fair use and a reference and is not replaceable Gnevin ( talk) 14:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
::Expect for the fact the image also served as a reference
Gnevin (
talk) 22:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC) Sorry . Your correct
Gnevin (
talk) 22:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I took the picture File:PalagoGreenYellow.gif and added it to the Palago page. I later got a msg that it was going to be deleted because of improper permision. I thought I went in and added the correct permission but the pic was deleted anyway. Can you please tell me what I missed.
thanks, RexJacobus —Preceding unsigned comment added by RexJacobus ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Well sorry about the 3 revert thing but he needs to stop taking huge sections off the page for no good reason. And he has done another revert. His removing content is jepordising a correct AfD decision on the topic. STAT- Verse 03:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Well I left a thing at WP:ANI and I have left a note at the AfD. STAT- Verse 03:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
As someone active on ANI and experienced with BLPs, please would you take a look at this (centred on this person)? Thank you. 92.30.111.99 ( talk) 04:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for using the template {{ G8-exempt}} to preserve this Talk page. I was concerned that the discussion would disappear along with the image. (If you wish to respond, please do so here.) HairyWombat ( talk) 04:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
There is some even more substantive discussion here. HairyWombat ( talk) 06:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you blocked JohnnyCalifornia4Life ( talk · contribs), a new user has popped up MiamiFloridaBabii ( talk · contribs), appears to be a sock. - Regancy42 ( talk) 13:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi i am Larbi Tadlaoui and i would like to know why you have deleted the article over my racing career please clarify asap many thanks in advance ,kind regards Bilarone /Larbi Tadlaoui —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilarone ( talk • contribs) 22:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Explicit—I wish to challenge the result of the deletion discussion of the said image, and WP:DRV requires that I chat to you about it first. I very broadly agree with your result of "no consensus" – but WP:FFD clearly states, "Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for deletion if there is no clear consensus in favour of keeping them."
The result of "no consensus" should, therefore, be an impossible result for an FfD discussion: or rather, where there is no real consensus, the presumption is to delete the image.
I would welcome your comments as soon as possible. Best, ╟─ Treasury Tag► sundries─╢ 06:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:The Time of Angels illustrative image.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ╟─ Treasury Tag► Speaker─╢ 08:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Whoops! I'm not really sure how I missed that. You have my go-ahead to overturn, adjust, or leave the block as you see fit. Sorry about that. - Vianello ( Talk) 20:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
User STATicVerseatide keeps vandalizing the Murda-Man Flocka by reverting my constructive edits and replacing them with poorly sourced claims. I ask you to please warn this user since he clearly doesn't listen to the warnings of his peers and continues to vandalize pages such as the aforementioned album. Thank you. Str8cash ( talk) 02:36, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Please see here Based on your feedback to my talk page, I thought this might be of interest to you. Please add any insight you have. Thanks. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 16:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Since you recently promoted Aaliyah to FA, would you like to comment on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Madonna (entertainer)/archive1 and give some of your input? Thanks in advance, --Legolas (talk2me) 13:25, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I would like your opinion about the following issue:
As im sure you're aware and encountered before many articles about albums cite Hits Daily Double as a source for sales. However the following error has occured.
Does this prove what i've suspected all along that in fact HDD is not a good source and not credible as well as factually inaccurate. if so what do we do about it's massive use on here?.
Thanks – Lil-unique1 ( talk) 17:48, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi my page for J Carter marketing was deleted because of advertising promotions...But I wasn't finished. it was going to be an entire history on the company. They've been around for 10+ years. Is history mixed with what they do (pretty innovative stuff) not allowed on Wiki? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.66.240 ( talk) 14:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Please undo this player from Steaua II, he debut tonight for the first team in Liga I. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.234.101 ( talk) 20:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
For all of these the talk page was tagged with the rename template. Does that count? I'm not sure if it does ... Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:15, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey Explict i don't know if you remember but not too long ago you blocked RyanG222 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) thanks to an ANI i filed. Well it looks like he could possibly editing through an IP address now. Although the IP was active before we was blocked the editing pattern and overlap of editing the same articles in the same way is highly suspicious. I filed at SPI against the IP here but as the blocking admin i thought you'd want a heads up on it. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 23:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Fair play. I just thought it was odd how the editing appeared to overlap. Perhaps the SPI should then be closed as not likely? Lil-unique1 ( talk) 23:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Heads up again, i think we have another TremanShoe sock in the form of Leavemeforever ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)? He made requests to edit on my talk page [40]. – Lil-unique1 ( talk) 14:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately I've only noticed this CFD after CydeBot is going through eliminating all the members. I think it should have been closed as no consensus - default to keep, or perhaps renamed to "Video games with female main characters" (though protagonist works just as well). Thoughts? – xeno talk 19:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
I've made some changes to Cydebot that should address the deletion summary issue (specifically, the lack of a correct link to the per-day discussion page in some instances). Please keep your eyes peeled for any remaining issues. More information is here. -- Cyde Weys 21:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Explicit,
I tracked you down in regards to a image you deleted [41]. The same person uploaded it [42] under different licensing. I was wondering if you remember it or have any insight of its origins. It looks like an obvious fake, probably a comical Christmas card going by the date. I know that wouldn't be a reason to delete it, but it could help me in removing it from the Tea Party article. I've searched forums where misspelled tea party signs are posted, there are lots of them. I could not find this image or anything half as ridiculous. I just don't think someones satire picture should be presented as a 'typical protester'. I would have gone to the author for answers, but his summaries while posting it leads me to believe he/she wouldn't be very sympathetic to my concerns [43] [44]. I don't know how long it lasted the first time, but nearing two weeks is surprising. Thank you. ( That is Fake ( talk) 04:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC))
Hello, I am writing you to ask about the file that I uploaded. You have removed it citing Wikipedia policy. But I do not understand this. First of all, I should have been notified so that there could have been a dicussion on the rationale of the upload. I do not agree with the deletion for a number of important reasons: - The copyright holder does not object because he considers it a good example of his work, that is why it was presented there - It is original artwork that was used on a magazine cover. It is not in the magazine article bcause it is not a scan of the magazine cover. - The proper route I feel, should have been that we had a discussion about the licensing.
I realise that in the current Wikipedia safeguarding proper use is a difficult task. But I write in the Wikipedia to educate and inform. There is a certain deltionist attitude on the Wikipedia that seems to lack direction. This will drive serious contributors away. JHvW ( talk) 06:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Ok im not sure whats going on but there is definately some sock puppetry going on here. It might be related to Brexx or Tremanshoe or both or a seperate sockpuppet issue but i believe there's a connection between the following users:
Now my thoughts are that CiaraFan4Ever might be the sock master here or alternatively the other two accounts are linked to Brexx or Tremanshoe. Or maybe neither... it just seems suspicious. – Lil-unique1 ( talk) 16:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Some thing I don't like about Wikipedia is that it isn't very new-user-friendly. Just my opinion.
I still don't understand what qualifies as non-free content, even though I read through F7 at least three times. It's a government-owned building, so how could taking a picture of it not qualify as non-free? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericleb01 ( talk • contribs) 03:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Be done against the continuous addition of extra album covers, which do not have any rationale, except for decoration in The Remix? This user is keeping on adding the same album cover, even when the previous one was deleted. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
I would like to thank you on the edit protection you imposed on Saudi Arabia. How long will the ban be? I am a frequent editor of Middle Easter related articles. Thank you for your time. Dhulfiqar 12:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spine.Cleaver ( talk • contribs)
Hi there, Thanks for closing this AfD. Can you speedily move the connected categories, I.E. Category:Major League Baseball players from California to the broader categories discussed in the AfD Category:American baseball players from California? Thanks for your help.-- TM 00:10, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Unless I mistagged it, this had an OTRS permission attached. Ironholds ( talk) 09:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
I would like to ask. Do you have ANY guideline that says that bullets should not be used in singles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by STATicVerseatide ( talk • contribs) 19:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
I Explicit. The picture of Paula White was taken during a church service. I don't know how else you want me to prove it. It's plan and simple at the time I didn't have a good camera and I did my best with what I had. I no longer have the picture on my laptop because it crashed and I lose everything. Can the picture be savaged? Mcelite ( talk) 22:46, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Those two photos were given to me. So authentically no they are not mine but were given to me. Whenever I uploaded them which was a while ago. It was difficult to get the picture and I'm very frustrated that the decision was made in a day. I clearly stated where the picture was taken the only way you will find a picture that can match that is if someone was taking a picture at the same time as me or took if off of wikipedia when I uploaded it. Mcelite ( talk) 08:05, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
See here Thanks. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi.. The photograph you deleted File:Mino Argento in 1977 is unique historic from 1977 from Catologo One man show in New York Betty Parsons Gallery... please can you tell me the reason is deleted. i will be happy Upload file:Mino Argento in 1977! Thank you( MA3ARG ( talk) 04:16, 27 May 2010 (UTC))
An editor has asked for a deletion review see Categories:American Jews/Jewish people by fooian descent. Because you evidently closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. IZAK ( talk) 06:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit: There is now a DRV for 24 categories of Jews at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 28#Categories:American Jews/Jewish people by fooian descent. You have recently speedy deleted Category:Romanian-American Jews [49], based on speedy delete nominations but an admin at DRV, User Stifle ( talk · contribs) has requested [50], [51] more information and input from those involved in the deletions and what they based themselves on. Since you have been involved with deleting and discussing these, could you respond ASAP at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 28#Categories:American Jews/Jewish people by fooian descent and help us out tracing who nominated and supported the Jews' categories in question for speedy renaming and why it was done so that the monitoring and closing admins at the DRV can know the starting point of the DRV in question. Thanks for helping us out here. IZAK ( talk) 03:28, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Missed this one. Was it, indeed, bad enough for a speedy? DG is quite a reasonable and charismatic chap, not the kind of man who easily provokes attack pages. East of Borschov ( talk) 19:15, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit: Wasn’t the intention following discussion (now archived) that all airfields in Category:Airfields of the United States Army Air Forces by state should be moved to the category for the appropriate state and the category (which replaced "in New England" etc) could then be deleted (presumably moving each one needs to be done manually). If so, could I put a notice on this page to stop it being added to? These airfields will then all be in a subcat of Category:Airfields of the United States Army Air Forces in the United States by state Hugo999 ( talk) 03:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Centralized discussion regarding my closure here, awaiting comments from Headbomb ( talk · contribs), Black Falcon ( talk · contribs) and Izno ( talk · contribs). Just a note, I'll be heading to bed after posting this, so it may take me a while to respond. — ξ xplicit 08:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm having a really difficult conversation with User:Egard89 who believes he is the creator of the image here. He's removed the tag requiring evidence of permission. I'm tired of arguing with him about the images - in fact, copyright and permissions are not my forte. Is there somewhere or someone who can look into this? Many thanks -- Merbabu ( talk) 15:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |