![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi
I am editing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Country_Club_India_Ltd and it was declined as it looked ‘more like an advertisement’.
I request you to look at the following link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_Mahindra_Holidays
I feel my contents are in the same line. Also, more or less, any article related to a commercial establishment does look like an ‘advertisement’ as it provides basic information about the company/organization.
Request you to kindly approve my articles. Else, please let me know how can I make it more ‘wiki friendly’.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikijaykay ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial,
Thanks for your first message, I've gone added links and references to the aFe page. My user name is Indikawijesekera. Please let me know if the revised is acceptable.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AFe Power ( talk • contribs) 23:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
The reply was at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Striking_inside_Angola_with_32_Battalion_(Book)
I need to get this going as this article serves as a link to a number of other important articles.
Further, by accepting my article, I can start with a building process to expand the article and include photo material and very important maps (historical). The research had already been done and was already published by a respectable international publisher.
If I can not get started and I have no guarantee that my article shall be published, I may have wasted my time and rather go to another platform.
Please advise.
Marius Scheepers
mariusscheepers@irodo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strikinginsideangola ( talk • contribs) 08:09, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial,
Thank you for providing feedback for the page I am creating on the Financial Services Institute. I just had a quick question in hopes that the page gets approved as I've put quite a bit of time and research into it.
My username is Washingtondc1234 and the link to my page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Financial_Services_Institute
I guess my big question is rather general, but this is the second time that I have been denied due to the page reading like an advertisement. Can you provide specific examples where this is the case? I've tried to cite everything that I've gathered from the sources listed to give credit and am just simply not sure where to go next. Is it the general tone or are there specific words I should avoid? Any specific advice I would greatly appreciate.
Thank you!
Not sure what I should be referencing or citing on my Naalaria page. It is a fictional world that I created for my homebrew D&D games. Please help. Lonesouldier ( talk) 14:50, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial - as I understand it, you rejected my article because it wasn't sufficiently supported by reliable sources. There is a company that is similar to WhiteBoard that has an entry called Worrell. It does not cite any sources for its entry at all. There is another one called Synapse Product Development and they mostly cite their own web cite as a source. I used these as a point of reference to write my entry. Can you help me understand why those two are okay, but my entry is not?
There was an article written about WhiteBoard in 2005, when it was still called Leisure, in a magazine called Twin Cities Business Monthly. It is not available on line, but I could email a copy to you. If I reference that article will it be sufficient to get the entry published?
Thanks. Fritz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clevegd ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Good morinig there! Dear Excirial, can you rereview my article, and maybe point out mistakes. I think i submitted that article once more few days ago. Thank you And how much articles per day do you look? (wondering) Anyway, thank you and good luck! =) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksa757 ( talk • contribs) 10:56, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Good day
Please assist me with the following, I username (group comms) recently made changes to the (liberty group holdings) page but this was declined (too commercial). The company (Liberty) instructed me to post the new copy as is (they wrote the copy because they wanted to refresh the first couple of lines on their page), I was merely posting it on their behalf. My question is how do I ensure that the copy gets published?
Group comms ( talk) 07:10, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
hello. Hebb studios was a business run by my parents Ralph And Jean Walker in the 1940s in Brookvale Sydney Australia. I attempted to create an article (see above link) for wikki. which was rejected on the grounds of inadequate supporting references. - Fair enough. I am very new to all of this, thus, i am not familiar with the process of quoting a reference, nor what reference would qualify. I will attempt to compile some references in the next few days, and (if is ok with you) will ask for your assistance to quote them correctly. Rohan Walker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohan Walker ( talk • contribs) 06:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
You recently rejected a submission regarding Judith Glaser saying that it was empty when it was not..can you please help me get this article up> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpiedmont ( talk • contribs) 13:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial
I am the author of an article for creation on the Church of Belief Science. Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Church_of_Belief_Science
You edited it and gave some good advice. So I've made some changes. I am new to this. I have only done one other page. So your help is appreciated. Here's what I've done to address your concerns. I edited down the section on the Church Canons, abbreviating them to save space and to make it more readable. I also added a section entitled "Criticisms" with references. I think this answers your concerns. I was confused to your mention of some catch phrases, and I guess you mean the ones that are bolded. Feel free to unbold or remove quotes around any terms that you feel are meant to be catchy rather than informative. I would appreciate anything you can do to finish this article. Send me a note if there are other concerns or if I didn't adequately address your issues.
MarkPopeEDD ( talk) 02:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Excirial reviewer,
Greetings from Egypt! I have recently written an article about Egyptian artist Dr. Farid Fadel, however it did not go through. Here is the link you asked for : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Farid_Fadel
I made some amendments to have it written more academically, however I would appreciate more specific comments as to how I could make it "wikipedia" material. I would also like to include pictures I took of Dr. Farid Fadel's paintings but do not know how to do that. I assure you Excirial, Dr. Fadel is a worthy personage to have on wiki. His biography was included in the "Who's Who" of intellectuals published by Cambridge in 1988 and has been a key public figure in Egyptian contemporary art (do google him and see his paintings).
thank you for your cooperation and hard work.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
yours truly,
Dalia — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaliaFFH ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
I notice you declined the Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Larson that a new editor submitted. I understand the issues with this original version but I have the feeling that I can help make this a worthwhile article, but it may take some time. I'm not that familiar with 'Articles for creation' . . . will this article stay on this page indefinitely so either the original submitter or others can work on the article? Thanks, 72Dino ( talk) 21:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Last month, you were processing AfC submissions, and you found a grotesquely obscene page describing the sexual activities and proclivities of someone far too young to legally talk about in such terms; much personally-identifying information was included.
You looked at this content, and then marked it as "Declining submission: subject appears to be a non-notable person". If I had not happened to find this material while patrolling the far end of the userpage queue, this content would still be publicly viewable, and available for content scrapers to grab for their mirror sites.
When you find such material in the AfC queue, please send it to Oversight rather than simply marking it as 'declined'. DS ( talk) 15:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Related section in
archive 19
ok...I havent seen anything in a magazine or newspaper but the FOX website does list her on the roster for the prime time show, and she's been on the whole season now (boo she got a date this week though). Even the show has it's own wikipedia page. They list her age and hometown. Was that not good enough? :( — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Fellowponylover (
talk •
contribs)
06:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I have completed the edits to the article and added reliable sources. Thanks for your assistance in this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taylorjarrold ( talk • contribs) 15:20, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Copyover from
external talk page
Hiyas there Gardevoir,
I have noticed your work on AFC patrol, and for most part i would say you are doing a decent job (Also - thanks for chipping away at the backlog, less articles there is always better). What i did notice however, is that you do at times accept article's which shouldn't be accepted because they lack reliable sources. An example is Oliver Grose, which is currently heading for removal at AFD. If you hav a look at the sources, you will notice that (While there are many of them), half of them don't even mention the article's subject, while the others fail the WP:SIGCOV requirement.
Another article i noticed is Robert Rocco Cottone, whose editor happened to contact me about another article he wrote. The article is sourced, but every single reference is written by "Cottone, R. R", or Robert Rocco Cottone himself. Which, of course, means that it is entirely supported by non acceptable self published references.
In other words: Your doing fine work, but be a tad carefull and make sure to check the references while accepting an article :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 13:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, RE: Submission of Article: Sant Baba Amar Singh ji Thank you for your reply regarding the above matter. I am emailing to make a humble request for the approval of the above submission. All the material has been taken from Nanaksar Trust Group websites. These websites are designed and implemented by the IT team – Nanaksar Trust Group. I am the Group IT administrator and copyright holder of this content. Information provided in this submission is with reference to our Chairman and Founder and activities of the Group. The reason for submission is to create awareness and fill the void on Wikipedia. I have also included the detailed references in my submission. I hope you find my request reasonable and will kindly grant permission for submission. Please feel free to contact me directly on ksingh@nanaksar.org.au. I look forward for your positive response. Thanks in advance. Regards, Kamalpreet
Hello,
This was my first attempt and want to get this entry right and accepted. Briefly, I am the former President of HTCIA, which is a non-profit professional organization, which marked 25 years in existence last year. I was asked by HTCIA leadership to do this.
You noted that it was not in a formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article and entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources.
I can tone down the peacock terms, but the "independent, reliable, published sources", is going to be a bit tough. Our members know about HTCIA, Others know about it as they had attended training or received an award, like the Case of the Year winners. We will have a Membership book up and running...but that will be published by us. Much of the information is only kept by HTCIA, on its website, prior conference sites, and is not a published source. Or the material is from long ago. I can point to individual members being quoted I suppose but for details about HTCIA that is going to be lacking, except from us.
In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfraGard, which is also a non-profit, they refer to their own website frequently for citations. I can give our website and the pages as well as archieved material over the years, but to point to an article about HTCIA is not going to be possible.
I appreciate your time in looking at this. HTCIA is a 25 yr old non-profit, who has one full time employee (not me).
Thanks
Art Bowker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abowker ( talk • contribs) 20:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial,
It looks like you reviewed the above article and the one I found which was a cut and paste into Main space. I moved it back into AfC without a problem because the editor changed the name also. I have already done touch up on
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hope For Children UNCRC Policy Centre. Other than my touch up and the title, I think they are identical. Should probably blow one of them away. It's your call as to which one. This is happening more an more often lately. :-( We need a Wiki
rack or something equally painful for these editors.
Regards, :- ) Don 01:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
User:Amisera7's article on Reykjavik Geothermal contains material that I really should delete, probably rev/del, as a quick Google search quickly brought up the original text which had been only slightly paraphrased from the sources. I see it's been resubmitted for a third time. Dougweller ( talk) 16:11, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for all of your suggestions and comments for improvement. I wanted to get some input from you about how I can improve the article for The Plaza 'Live' Orlando. You mentioned that it has too much of an advertising tone. What specific types of changes should be made on the article to keep it neutral? Thanks!!!!
Here is the link to the article! Thanks!
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Plaza 'Live' Theatre (Orlando) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.43.69.162 ( talk) 20:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
Please take a look at the article on "Jenny Eakin Delony. It is not a copy and paste. LHBaker has made the necessary changes. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmwydra ( talk • contribs) 22:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi and thank you for your response to my submission.
I am totally unsure of what to edit. I have looked everywhere and feel i havent a clue on what to do next to re-submit and have it accepted. The person i am writing about is doing great things and many for charity. I feel he deserves a place on the world best wall!
Please help
Thanks
James — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesRJames ( talk • contribs) 12:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey Excirial, So here is the thing about my page, it isn't meant to be educational or something anyone can learn from. I had the young lass named Marnina for Ritual in a show we did together, if you don't know it's kinda like a secret santa type gift giving to help cast bonding. Part of my gift was making her a wikipage that everyone could contribute to. I understand you are doing your job but PLEEEEEEEEAAAASE you would make my life if you could possibly just send this one through. There are worse things on wikipedia and this is for a close friend of mine. I would be forever in your debt. Thank you for reading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach2hansen ( talk • contribs) 07:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Dear Excirial
I want your help so that I can make my idea/suggestion/comment (under the title “GOD Particle : Higgs-Boson or N.H. Particle ?” on GOD particle, especially after the CERN announcement of discovery of Boson-like particles, rewritten below for your ready reference) known to the world through Wikipedia.
It depends on how one looks at it. One may consider it as an essay or write-up. I have written it as my idea/suggestion/comment written in a very positive attitude and with a neutral point of view, supported by due authentic references.
My idea/suggestion/comment may appear very simple. But let me humbly say that a strong science back ground is required to appreciate the essence of my idea/suggestion/comment. In disguise, it involves the question of rewriting many topics of Physics text book before one starts to try to unveil the mysteries of the creation. Please do not show me the path of journals etc. I want your help to inform the world at large and the concerned people simply from the very beginning for a better understanding. I expect this will prove fruitful especially with the progress of discussions and criticisms. The basic aim of all this is for benefit of mankind.
Frankly speaking, I am quite tired of Western people’s nepotism and racism (I can cite examples with due proof, if you like). They try to shy away with some kind of ready plea when it comes to giving substantial credit to Eastern people especially of developing countries, in their efforts to keep their supremacy and dominance. I am ready to contribute if you open a dialogue on the topic of “Western nepotism and racism”.
Nazmul Huda
Copypaste of an essay
|
---|
………………………………………………………………………………………… GOD Particle : Higgs-Boson or N.H. Particle ? Last Wednesday (04 July), scientists of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), announced in separate press conferences in UK and Geneva , the success of the discovery of Higgs-Boson like particles which are popularly known as GOD particles. However, the scientists are not sure whether their discovered particles are Higgs-Boson particles (named after the British Scientist Peter Higgs and a Bangali Scientist Sattendranath Bose), or some other particles. In 2010, CERN in an underground tunnel near Geneva, caused a mini Big-bang. An experiment was conducted for one nano second in the 27 kilometer tunnel with seven billion electron-volts. In the Higgs-Boson theory, it was indicated that the Higgs-Boson particles (later on known as GOD particles) played the main role in creating the universe after the Big-bang super explosion. It was opined that these particles only are responsible for mass creation and conveyance of force. Had the new particles not been discovered during this time, scientists would have started thinking of abandoning this theory and started rewriting text books. The new success turned the anxiety into encouragement. As a scientist, I wish to sincerely congratulate the concerned scientists and workers of CERN for their credible success and say a few words. According to scientific definition a mass must have weight, which is a matter of gravitational/gravity force, where it is said that bodies attract each other due to that force. But is it really true? In the chapters concerning force and motion of Physics text books, it is said that force causes / accelerates (or retards) the motion of bodies. But is it really true? In publication No. WO 2004/019476 dt.22.04.2004 (priority date 21.08.02) of World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), an organization under the UN, the best authority in the world for patents, the detailed description of Pressure Motion Equivalence (PME) theory can be found in the 44-page story along with diagrams. The publication has been officially sent by WIPO to all its members which includes all the developed countries of the world. According to the PME theory, pressure and not force causes motion, no matter if that pressure is linear, rotational, electric/magnetic or whatever. Pressure and motion are the same things. What is pressure is motion and what is motion is pressure. It has been explained with practical examples that the cause behind motion or current is pressure. In a direction, if the pressure is less there will not be any motion even if the force is more. Some sort of pressure particles are believed to be the cause of motion or pressure. These particles have been named as N.H. particles after the name of the founder of this opinion. Publication No WO 2004/019476 of WIPO is basically a patent paper, where the scope of theoretical discussion of N.H. particles is limited. But the background and the reasoning behind the PME theory and the particles have been duly explained. However, to make his patent paper acceptable to all scientists, the inventor and founder, though himself a staunch believer in the Almighty Creator, never mentions the Creator in his patent paper, although he himself sees no difference between science and nature, creation and the Creator. This is the reason why he himself does not introduce his particles as GOD particles, even though he believes that the discovery of N.H. particles would unveil many mysteries of nature, especially those on the root of energy. In one of his published write-ups later on, he was optimistic about plenty of research in the 21st century on his theory of PME and the particle theory. Like everybody else, scientists too dream. Some dreams are realized after a lot of hard work and perseverance. If the starting point of scientific dreams is close to the truths of nature, success comes more easily. This is why I believe, the work on the basis of the PME and the N.H. particle theories, instead of force based mass, gravitation or energy, is expected to bring success. Some people may discard the idea as rubbish, by explaining that force and pressure is the same thing. But this is not at all true. To make the idea clearer, it must be said that force is at best two dimensional, whereas pressure is at least three dimensional (the possibility of being more dimensional in actual discovery is high). The nature of the particle that the CERN scientists have discovered is not yet completely known, it might be the very same N.H. particle also. If the latter proves to be true, it would really be a milestone in unveiling the mysteries of nature and creation. It is to be noted that the inventor of the PME and N.H. particle theories is a Bangladeshi. But so what? Science is in the search for truths in nature, where nobody should undermine the contribution of anybody irrespective of religion, caste or creed. After all science knows no political and religious boundaries, but is based on progress involving contributions from each and everyone. |
Nazmul Huda nazinvbd@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazmulkhokon ( talk • contribs) 00:13, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh.. Wikipedia's reviewing process is very long.. Will you review my article as soon as possible..! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Muhammad_Arshad_Khan I have modified my article fully and the references are now powerful. Regards, ARK ( talk) 09:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
I created three wiki pages by accident that were the same. and now they are all down do I have to make a whole new one?
Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkinsk ( talk • contribs) 17:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
{{
Peacock}}
though since there are some rather non neutral words; Besides that the sourcing isn't exactly that great but its decent enough not to tag it for removal. Considering this one done as can be.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
19:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Exciral, Please help I have repeatedly done what was asked of me to provide references and I have been task to create a wikipedia page and I'm getting denied continuiously please give me a concrete answer on what I need to do to get this resolved. There are other commands that are just like mine like COMSUBPAC in the Navy and they are on Wikipedia. Please tell me exactly what I need to do to resolve this issue. Thank You for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Primatoff ( talk • contribs) 16:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Dear Excirial,
I feel that I addressed all of your concerns regarding the above article and event consulted with other Wikipedia editors regarding use of citations and other requirements. I feel that I tone of the article is quite formal and balanced. I was meticulous with citations and updated or removed all useless ones. Nevertheless, the article was rejected by IceUnshattered who simply sent the exact comment as yours. This is a clear indication that he/she did not read the first and second articles to see the changes. Can you please check the latest article and give me your feedback. I believe that the article is acceptable but I will make more changes if you feel they are necessary. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planktonium ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Stivemeister ( talk) 20:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)July 28, 2012
I understand that you are the latest editor to reject the article on Ward Morehouse III. After several sessions with the previous editor, I thought that all of the obstacles had been overcome. Would you please detail to me exactly you have feel is the reason this article is now being rejected by you?
Thanks,
Stivemeister Stivemeister ( talk) 20:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
I am a little puzzled at your having declined the AfC with the reason " The content of this submission includes material that meets Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you." with the contradictory and incompatible edit summary "Declining submission: submission lacks inline citations " I can think of several reasons for declining this article, including the unlikelihood of encyclopedic notability , but I do not see how citation format is a reason for declining this or any other article, considering that except for special cases such as potentially negative BLP, there is no requirement for ay specific citation format. I agree the way the references are presented in this article is confusing and ought to be fixed--the references at the bottom are most of them not at all to the point in any case--but I dod not see this as a reason for declining the article.
I am concerned not about hte article per se, but in our giving correct advice to beginners. DGG ( talk ) 08:11, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
You declined this AfC submission as needing reliable sources and reading like an advertisement. However, with further inspection, I discovered that the article was a blatant copy violation of the group's website. For the future, please copy a portion of the text and use a search engine to verify that the content isn't a copy violation. As with mainspace, users may use AfC space for copy violations as well, perhaps believing that AfC reviewers won't scan the content for violations. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 19:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
I remarked that one of your figures is present in a scientific research paper (you can read it here for example).
Can you confirm the authors of this paper have copied your figure with no respect for the licence associated to it?
Thank you.
193.190.193.2 ( talk) 09:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC) Mathieu Goeminne
I made changes to the Screen Protector page. As the original Inventor of the screen protector. The description you have is not accurate. It is a non licensed reference to there product. I have original timelines of the actual creation along with the meetings that took place in Arlington VA at the US patent and Trademark office. Regarding the screen Protectors.
The only other page I made is on a page listed under Schulmiester. Which was a family member. Either or both pages was corrected only for accuracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inventorb ( talk • contribs) 17:37, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi you have just declined my article on the above subject stating its a blank document. However if you see the link : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Kaal_Madhumas_-_(film) (My Project Page), it does have an article included. I am not sure how to submit this properly. This is my first article and therefore apologies for the added problem. Abhirup.roy1983 ( talk) 11:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC) Abhirup
Hello,
I received a message that my article for Rising Leaders Academy has been rejected because the information was taken from the Rising Leaders Academy website. I am the founder of the school and created the website. I agree for Wikipedia to have the same information as that on my website. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuhaAJaber ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Excirial, I feel and request the "Aon Creative" line I added be reinserted on the Aon page to help readers understand the difference between Aon Inc. the Insurance Company and Aon Creative the Marketing Design company. They have an internal creative services department which some individuals get confused with Aon Creative. Having no external link is ok with Aon Creative. paul@aoncreative.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.132.177.3 ( talk) 15:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
CURTAINTOAD!
TALK! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hey Excirial! Wishing you a very happy New Year :) CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 09:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Gareth Griffith-Jones
– The WelshBuzzard – is wishing you
the season's greetings.
Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus,
or the
Saturnalia,
this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.
Hi
About the copyright issue. I used the information from there as I am good friends with the blogs owner, and in far edited several sections of the blog, including all the history sections. Not sure how to proceed, but could Lesley email you with permission providing in affect creative Commons? I only did the work because she doesn't have a wiki account or experience to create such a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Privatehudson ( talk • contribs) 15:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Dear Madam, Sir, I am living in the Netherlands and new on Wikipedia English version. The article of Bettie de Jong was made for the dutch version of Wikipedia. Please see http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bettie_de_Jong. This was done because Bettie de Jong is well known in the modern dance business. I had many times contact with John Tomlinson, Executive Director Paul Taylor Dance Company and with Bettie de Jong (my aunt) herselve. After I put it on the dutch version I have translated the article in English and have put it on the internet. I dont realy understand why you declined the article. I read that the content has unreliable recources. Could you please tell me which of the content you mean, because I want to make the corrections. Excuse me for my english, I am not very experienced with that. I am looking foreward to your reaction. Kind regards, Willem van Iterson-- 87.211.183.169 ( talk) 10:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
Thanks very much for your review - hoping you can help me get a good friend up on wiki for an act heroism. Given the existing wiki page on Eric Fortier:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Éric_Fortier
Please let me know how I can improve the Mathew Daley page to ensure its inclusion.
Thank you very much, London1950 — Preceding unsigned comment added by London1950 ( talk • contribs) 19:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi
I am editing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Country_Club_India_Ltd and it was declined as it looked ‘more like an advertisement’.
I request you to look at the following link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_Mahindra_Holidays
I feel my contents are in the same line. Also, more or less, any article related to a commercial establishment does look like an ‘advertisement’ as it provides basic information about the company/organization.
Request you to kindly approve my articles. Else, please let me know how can I make it more ‘wiki friendly’.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikijaykay ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial,
Thanks for your first message, I've gone added links and references to the aFe page. My user name is Indikawijesekera. Please let me know if the revised is acceptable.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AFe Power ( talk • contribs) 23:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
The reply was at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Striking_inside_Angola_with_32_Battalion_(Book)
I need to get this going as this article serves as a link to a number of other important articles.
Further, by accepting my article, I can start with a building process to expand the article and include photo material and very important maps (historical). The research had already been done and was already published by a respectable international publisher.
If I can not get started and I have no guarantee that my article shall be published, I may have wasted my time and rather go to another platform.
Please advise.
Marius Scheepers
mariusscheepers@irodo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strikinginsideangola ( talk • contribs) 08:09, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial,
Thank you for providing feedback for the page I am creating on the Financial Services Institute. I just had a quick question in hopes that the page gets approved as I've put quite a bit of time and research into it.
My username is Washingtondc1234 and the link to my page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Financial_Services_Institute
I guess my big question is rather general, but this is the second time that I have been denied due to the page reading like an advertisement. Can you provide specific examples where this is the case? I've tried to cite everything that I've gathered from the sources listed to give credit and am just simply not sure where to go next. Is it the general tone or are there specific words I should avoid? Any specific advice I would greatly appreciate.
Thank you!
Not sure what I should be referencing or citing on my Naalaria page. It is a fictional world that I created for my homebrew D&D games. Please help. Lonesouldier ( talk) 14:50, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial - as I understand it, you rejected my article because it wasn't sufficiently supported by reliable sources. There is a company that is similar to WhiteBoard that has an entry called Worrell. It does not cite any sources for its entry at all. There is another one called Synapse Product Development and they mostly cite their own web cite as a source. I used these as a point of reference to write my entry. Can you help me understand why those two are okay, but my entry is not?
There was an article written about WhiteBoard in 2005, when it was still called Leisure, in a magazine called Twin Cities Business Monthly. It is not available on line, but I could email a copy to you. If I reference that article will it be sufficient to get the entry published?
Thanks. Fritz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clevegd ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Good morinig there! Dear Excirial, can you rereview my article, and maybe point out mistakes. I think i submitted that article once more few days ago. Thank you And how much articles per day do you look? (wondering) Anyway, thank you and good luck! =) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksa757 ( talk • contribs) 10:56, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Good day
Please assist me with the following, I username (group comms) recently made changes to the (liberty group holdings) page but this was declined (too commercial). The company (Liberty) instructed me to post the new copy as is (they wrote the copy because they wanted to refresh the first couple of lines on their page), I was merely posting it on their behalf. My question is how do I ensure that the copy gets published?
Group comms ( talk) 07:10, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
hello. Hebb studios was a business run by my parents Ralph And Jean Walker in the 1940s in Brookvale Sydney Australia. I attempted to create an article (see above link) for wikki. which was rejected on the grounds of inadequate supporting references. - Fair enough. I am very new to all of this, thus, i am not familiar with the process of quoting a reference, nor what reference would qualify. I will attempt to compile some references in the next few days, and (if is ok with you) will ask for your assistance to quote them correctly. Rohan Walker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohan Walker ( talk • contribs) 06:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
You recently rejected a submission regarding Judith Glaser saying that it was empty when it was not..can you please help me get this article up> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpiedmont ( talk • contribs) 13:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial
I am the author of an article for creation on the Church of Belief Science. Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Church_of_Belief_Science
You edited it and gave some good advice. So I've made some changes. I am new to this. I have only done one other page. So your help is appreciated. Here's what I've done to address your concerns. I edited down the section on the Church Canons, abbreviating them to save space and to make it more readable. I also added a section entitled "Criticisms" with references. I think this answers your concerns. I was confused to your mention of some catch phrases, and I guess you mean the ones that are bolded. Feel free to unbold or remove quotes around any terms that you feel are meant to be catchy rather than informative. I would appreciate anything you can do to finish this article. Send me a note if there are other concerns or if I didn't adequately address your issues.
MarkPopeEDD ( talk) 02:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Excirial reviewer,
Greetings from Egypt! I have recently written an article about Egyptian artist Dr. Farid Fadel, however it did not go through. Here is the link you asked for : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Farid_Fadel
I made some amendments to have it written more academically, however I would appreciate more specific comments as to how I could make it "wikipedia" material. I would also like to include pictures I took of Dr. Farid Fadel's paintings but do not know how to do that. I assure you Excirial, Dr. Fadel is a worthy personage to have on wiki. His biography was included in the "Who's Who" of intellectuals published by Cambridge in 1988 and has been a key public figure in Egyptian contemporary art (do google him and see his paintings).
thank you for your cooperation and hard work.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
yours truly,
Dalia — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaliaFFH ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
I notice you declined the Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Larson that a new editor submitted. I understand the issues with this original version but I have the feeling that I can help make this a worthwhile article, but it may take some time. I'm not that familiar with 'Articles for creation' . . . will this article stay on this page indefinitely so either the original submitter or others can work on the article? Thanks, 72Dino ( talk) 21:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Last month, you were processing AfC submissions, and you found a grotesquely obscene page describing the sexual activities and proclivities of someone far too young to legally talk about in such terms; much personally-identifying information was included.
You looked at this content, and then marked it as "Declining submission: subject appears to be a non-notable person". If I had not happened to find this material while patrolling the far end of the userpage queue, this content would still be publicly viewable, and available for content scrapers to grab for their mirror sites.
When you find such material in the AfC queue, please send it to Oversight rather than simply marking it as 'declined'. DS ( talk) 15:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Related section in
archive 19
ok...I havent seen anything in a magazine or newspaper but the FOX website does list her on the roster for the prime time show, and she's been on the whole season now (boo she got a date this week though). Even the show has it's own wikipedia page. They list her age and hometown. Was that not good enough? :( — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Fellowponylover (
talk •
contribs)
06:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I have completed the edits to the article and added reliable sources. Thanks for your assistance in this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taylorjarrold ( talk • contribs) 15:20, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Copyover from
external talk page
Hiyas there Gardevoir,
I have noticed your work on AFC patrol, and for most part i would say you are doing a decent job (Also - thanks for chipping away at the backlog, less articles there is always better). What i did notice however, is that you do at times accept article's which shouldn't be accepted because they lack reliable sources. An example is Oliver Grose, which is currently heading for removal at AFD. If you hav a look at the sources, you will notice that (While there are many of them), half of them don't even mention the article's subject, while the others fail the WP:SIGCOV requirement.
Another article i noticed is Robert Rocco Cottone, whose editor happened to contact me about another article he wrote. The article is sourced, but every single reference is written by "Cottone, R. R", or Robert Rocco Cottone himself. Which, of course, means that it is entirely supported by non acceptable self published references.
In other words: Your doing fine work, but be a tad carefull and make sure to check the references while accepting an article :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 13:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, RE: Submission of Article: Sant Baba Amar Singh ji Thank you for your reply regarding the above matter. I am emailing to make a humble request for the approval of the above submission. All the material has been taken from Nanaksar Trust Group websites. These websites are designed and implemented by the IT team – Nanaksar Trust Group. I am the Group IT administrator and copyright holder of this content. Information provided in this submission is with reference to our Chairman and Founder and activities of the Group. The reason for submission is to create awareness and fill the void on Wikipedia. I have also included the detailed references in my submission. I hope you find my request reasonable and will kindly grant permission for submission. Please feel free to contact me directly on ksingh@nanaksar.org.au. I look forward for your positive response. Thanks in advance. Regards, Kamalpreet
Hello,
This was my first attempt and want to get this entry right and accepted. Briefly, I am the former President of HTCIA, which is a non-profit professional organization, which marked 25 years in existence last year. I was asked by HTCIA leadership to do this.
You noted that it was not in a formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article and entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources.
I can tone down the peacock terms, but the "independent, reliable, published sources", is going to be a bit tough. Our members know about HTCIA, Others know about it as they had attended training or received an award, like the Case of the Year winners. We will have a Membership book up and running...but that will be published by us. Much of the information is only kept by HTCIA, on its website, prior conference sites, and is not a published source. Or the material is from long ago. I can point to individual members being quoted I suppose but for details about HTCIA that is going to be lacking, except from us.
In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfraGard, which is also a non-profit, they refer to their own website frequently for citations. I can give our website and the pages as well as archieved material over the years, but to point to an article about HTCIA is not going to be possible.
I appreciate your time in looking at this. HTCIA is a 25 yr old non-profit, who has one full time employee (not me).
Thanks
Art Bowker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abowker ( talk • contribs) 20:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Excirial,
It looks like you reviewed the above article and the one I found which was a cut and paste into Main space. I moved it back into AfC without a problem because the editor changed the name also. I have already done touch up on
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hope For Children UNCRC Policy Centre. Other than my touch up and the title, I think they are identical. Should probably blow one of them away. It's your call as to which one. This is happening more an more often lately. :-( We need a Wiki
rack or something equally painful for these editors.
Regards, :- ) Don 01:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
User:Amisera7's article on Reykjavik Geothermal contains material that I really should delete, probably rev/del, as a quick Google search quickly brought up the original text which had been only slightly paraphrased from the sources. I see it's been resubmitted for a third time. Dougweller ( talk) 16:11, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for all of your suggestions and comments for improvement. I wanted to get some input from you about how I can improve the article for The Plaza 'Live' Orlando. You mentioned that it has too much of an advertising tone. What specific types of changes should be made on the article to keep it neutral? Thanks!!!!
Here is the link to the article! Thanks!
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Plaza 'Live' Theatre (Orlando) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.43.69.162 ( talk) 20:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
Please take a look at the article on "Jenny Eakin Delony. It is not a copy and paste. LHBaker has made the necessary changes. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmwydra ( talk • contribs) 22:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi and thank you for your response to my submission.
I am totally unsure of what to edit. I have looked everywhere and feel i havent a clue on what to do next to re-submit and have it accepted. The person i am writing about is doing great things and many for charity. I feel he deserves a place on the world best wall!
Please help
Thanks
James — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesRJames ( talk • contribs) 12:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey Excirial, So here is the thing about my page, it isn't meant to be educational or something anyone can learn from. I had the young lass named Marnina for Ritual in a show we did together, if you don't know it's kinda like a secret santa type gift giving to help cast bonding. Part of my gift was making her a wikipage that everyone could contribute to. I understand you are doing your job but PLEEEEEEEEAAAASE you would make my life if you could possibly just send this one through. There are worse things on wikipedia and this is for a close friend of mine. I would be forever in your debt. Thank you for reading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach2hansen ( talk • contribs) 07:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Dear Excirial
I want your help so that I can make my idea/suggestion/comment (under the title “GOD Particle : Higgs-Boson or N.H. Particle ?” on GOD particle, especially after the CERN announcement of discovery of Boson-like particles, rewritten below for your ready reference) known to the world through Wikipedia.
It depends on how one looks at it. One may consider it as an essay or write-up. I have written it as my idea/suggestion/comment written in a very positive attitude and with a neutral point of view, supported by due authentic references.
My idea/suggestion/comment may appear very simple. But let me humbly say that a strong science back ground is required to appreciate the essence of my idea/suggestion/comment. In disguise, it involves the question of rewriting many topics of Physics text book before one starts to try to unveil the mysteries of the creation. Please do not show me the path of journals etc. I want your help to inform the world at large and the concerned people simply from the very beginning for a better understanding. I expect this will prove fruitful especially with the progress of discussions and criticisms. The basic aim of all this is for benefit of mankind.
Frankly speaking, I am quite tired of Western people’s nepotism and racism (I can cite examples with due proof, if you like). They try to shy away with some kind of ready plea when it comes to giving substantial credit to Eastern people especially of developing countries, in their efforts to keep their supremacy and dominance. I am ready to contribute if you open a dialogue on the topic of “Western nepotism and racism”.
Nazmul Huda
Copypaste of an essay
|
---|
………………………………………………………………………………………… GOD Particle : Higgs-Boson or N.H. Particle ? Last Wednesday (04 July), scientists of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), announced in separate press conferences in UK and Geneva , the success of the discovery of Higgs-Boson like particles which are popularly known as GOD particles. However, the scientists are not sure whether their discovered particles are Higgs-Boson particles (named after the British Scientist Peter Higgs and a Bangali Scientist Sattendranath Bose), or some other particles. In 2010, CERN in an underground tunnel near Geneva, caused a mini Big-bang. An experiment was conducted for one nano second in the 27 kilometer tunnel with seven billion electron-volts. In the Higgs-Boson theory, it was indicated that the Higgs-Boson particles (later on known as GOD particles) played the main role in creating the universe after the Big-bang super explosion. It was opined that these particles only are responsible for mass creation and conveyance of force. Had the new particles not been discovered during this time, scientists would have started thinking of abandoning this theory and started rewriting text books. The new success turned the anxiety into encouragement. As a scientist, I wish to sincerely congratulate the concerned scientists and workers of CERN for their credible success and say a few words. According to scientific definition a mass must have weight, which is a matter of gravitational/gravity force, where it is said that bodies attract each other due to that force. But is it really true? In the chapters concerning force and motion of Physics text books, it is said that force causes / accelerates (or retards) the motion of bodies. But is it really true? In publication No. WO 2004/019476 dt.22.04.2004 (priority date 21.08.02) of World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), an organization under the UN, the best authority in the world for patents, the detailed description of Pressure Motion Equivalence (PME) theory can be found in the 44-page story along with diagrams. The publication has been officially sent by WIPO to all its members which includes all the developed countries of the world. According to the PME theory, pressure and not force causes motion, no matter if that pressure is linear, rotational, electric/magnetic or whatever. Pressure and motion are the same things. What is pressure is motion and what is motion is pressure. It has been explained with practical examples that the cause behind motion or current is pressure. In a direction, if the pressure is less there will not be any motion even if the force is more. Some sort of pressure particles are believed to be the cause of motion or pressure. These particles have been named as N.H. particles after the name of the founder of this opinion. Publication No WO 2004/019476 of WIPO is basically a patent paper, where the scope of theoretical discussion of N.H. particles is limited. But the background and the reasoning behind the PME theory and the particles have been duly explained. However, to make his patent paper acceptable to all scientists, the inventor and founder, though himself a staunch believer in the Almighty Creator, never mentions the Creator in his patent paper, although he himself sees no difference between science and nature, creation and the Creator. This is the reason why he himself does not introduce his particles as GOD particles, even though he believes that the discovery of N.H. particles would unveil many mysteries of nature, especially those on the root of energy. In one of his published write-ups later on, he was optimistic about plenty of research in the 21st century on his theory of PME and the particle theory. Like everybody else, scientists too dream. Some dreams are realized after a lot of hard work and perseverance. If the starting point of scientific dreams is close to the truths of nature, success comes more easily. This is why I believe, the work on the basis of the PME and the N.H. particle theories, instead of force based mass, gravitation or energy, is expected to bring success. Some people may discard the idea as rubbish, by explaining that force and pressure is the same thing. But this is not at all true. To make the idea clearer, it must be said that force is at best two dimensional, whereas pressure is at least three dimensional (the possibility of being more dimensional in actual discovery is high). The nature of the particle that the CERN scientists have discovered is not yet completely known, it might be the very same N.H. particle also. If the latter proves to be true, it would really be a milestone in unveiling the mysteries of nature and creation. It is to be noted that the inventor of the PME and N.H. particle theories is a Bangladeshi. But so what? Science is in the search for truths in nature, where nobody should undermine the contribution of anybody irrespective of religion, caste or creed. After all science knows no political and religious boundaries, but is based on progress involving contributions from each and everyone. |
Nazmul Huda nazinvbd@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazmulkhokon ( talk • contribs) 00:13, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh.. Wikipedia's reviewing process is very long.. Will you review my article as soon as possible..! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Muhammad_Arshad_Khan I have modified my article fully and the references are now powerful. Regards, ARK ( talk) 09:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
I created three wiki pages by accident that were the same. and now they are all down do I have to make a whole new one?
Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkinsk ( talk • contribs) 17:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
{{
Peacock}}
though since there are some rather non neutral words; Besides that the sourcing isn't exactly that great but its decent enough not to tag it for removal. Considering this one done as can be.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
19:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Exciral, Please help I have repeatedly done what was asked of me to provide references and I have been task to create a wikipedia page and I'm getting denied continuiously please give me a concrete answer on what I need to do to get this resolved. There are other commands that are just like mine like COMSUBPAC in the Navy and they are on Wikipedia. Please tell me exactly what I need to do to resolve this issue. Thank You for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Primatoff ( talk • contribs) 16:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Dear Excirial,
I feel that I addressed all of your concerns regarding the above article and event consulted with other Wikipedia editors regarding use of citations and other requirements. I feel that I tone of the article is quite formal and balanced. I was meticulous with citations and updated or removed all useless ones. Nevertheless, the article was rejected by IceUnshattered who simply sent the exact comment as yours. This is a clear indication that he/she did not read the first and second articles to see the changes. Can you please check the latest article and give me your feedback. I believe that the article is acceptable but I will make more changes if you feel they are necessary. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planktonium ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Stivemeister ( talk) 20:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)July 28, 2012
I understand that you are the latest editor to reject the article on Ward Morehouse III. After several sessions with the previous editor, I thought that all of the obstacles had been overcome. Would you please detail to me exactly you have feel is the reason this article is now being rejected by you?
Thanks,
Stivemeister Stivemeister ( talk) 20:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
I am a little puzzled at your having declined the AfC with the reason " The content of this submission includes material that meets Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you." with the contradictory and incompatible edit summary "Declining submission: submission lacks inline citations " I can think of several reasons for declining this article, including the unlikelihood of encyclopedic notability , but I do not see how citation format is a reason for declining this or any other article, considering that except for special cases such as potentially negative BLP, there is no requirement for ay specific citation format. I agree the way the references are presented in this article is confusing and ought to be fixed--the references at the bottom are most of them not at all to the point in any case--but I dod not see this as a reason for declining the article.
I am concerned not about hte article per se, but in our giving correct advice to beginners. DGG ( talk ) 08:11, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
You declined this AfC submission as needing reliable sources and reading like an advertisement. However, with further inspection, I discovered that the article was a blatant copy violation of the group's website. For the future, please copy a portion of the text and use a search engine to verify that the content isn't a copy violation. As with mainspace, users may use AfC space for copy violations as well, perhaps believing that AfC reviewers won't scan the content for violations. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 19:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
I remarked that one of your figures is present in a scientific research paper (you can read it here for example).
Can you confirm the authors of this paper have copied your figure with no respect for the licence associated to it?
Thank you.
193.190.193.2 ( talk) 09:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC) Mathieu Goeminne
I made changes to the Screen Protector page. As the original Inventor of the screen protector. The description you have is not accurate. It is a non licensed reference to there product. I have original timelines of the actual creation along with the meetings that took place in Arlington VA at the US patent and Trademark office. Regarding the screen Protectors.
The only other page I made is on a page listed under Schulmiester. Which was a family member. Either or both pages was corrected only for accuracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inventorb ( talk • contribs) 17:37, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi you have just declined my article on the above subject stating its a blank document. However if you see the link : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Kaal_Madhumas_-_(film) (My Project Page), it does have an article included. I am not sure how to submit this properly. This is my first article and therefore apologies for the added problem. Abhirup.roy1983 ( talk) 11:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC) Abhirup
Hello,
I received a message that my article for Rising Leaders Academy has been rejected because the information was taken from the Rising Leaders Academy website. I am the founder of the school and created the website. I agree for Wikipedia to have the same information as that on my website. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuhaAJaber ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Excirial, I feel and request the "Aon Creative" line I added be reinserted on the Aon page to help readers understand the difference between Aon Inc. the Insurance Company and Aon Creative the Marketing Design company. They have an internal creative services department which some individuals get confused with Aon Creative. Having no external link is ok with Aon Creative. paul@aoncreative.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.132.177.3 ( talk) 15:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
CURTAINTOAD!
TALK! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hey Excirial! Wishing you a very happy New Year :) CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 09:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Gareth Griffith-Jones
– The WelshBuzzard – is wishing you
the season's greetings.
Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus,
or the
Saturnalia,
this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.
Hi
About the copyright issue. I used the information from there as I am good friends with the blogs owner, and in far edited several sections of the blog, including all the history sections. Not sure how to proceed, but could Lesley email you with permission providing in affect creative Commons? I only did the work because she doesn't have a wiki account or experience to create such a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Privatehudson ( talk • contribs) 15:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Dear Madam, Sir, I am living in the Netherlands and new on Wikipedia English version. The article of Bettie de Jong was made for the dutch version of Wikipedia. Please see http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bettie_de_Jong. This was done because Bettie de Jong is well known in the modern dance business. I had many times contact with John Tomlinson, Executive Director Paul Taylor Dance Company and with Bettie de Jong (my aunt) herselve. After I put it on the dutch version I have translated the article in English and have put it on the internet. I dont realy understand why you declined the article. I read that the content has unreliable recources. Could you please tell me which of the content you mean, because I want to make the corrections. Excuse me for my english, I am not very experienced with that. I am looking foreward to your reaction. Kind regards, Willem van Iterson-- 87.211.183.169 ( talk) 10:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
Thanks very much for your review - hoping you can help me get a good friend up on wiki for an act heroism. Given the existing wiki page on Eric Fortier:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Éric_Fortier
Please let me know how I can improve the Mathew Daley page to ensure its inclusion.
Thank you very much, London1950 — Preceding unsigned comment added by London1950 ( talk • contribs) 19:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC)