Hi, I'm EuroHorrorGuy. Feel free to contact me here if you have something to say. EuroHorrorGuy ( talk) 21:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi EuroHorrorGuy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC) |
Please note that disambiguation pages like Trilby (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:
Thank you. Leschnei ( talk) 00:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
|
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1911 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Nichols.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
ok I fixed it. Thanks. EuroHorrorGuy ( talk) 14:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{ cite web}} template to cite a web page:
Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.
which displays inline in the running text of the article as:
and displays under References as:
If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 19:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Mario Bava, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 00:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. This in response to your edit on Shéhérazade (film) here Andrzejbanas ( talk) 20:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. I have to ask. Why do you think As stated above, why did you think FilmAffinity, Rate Your Music or Pinterest were acceptable sources? You had previously discussed with me how you found one book unreliable, but then went for user-submitted content on Pinterest and FilmAffinity and RateYourMusic. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 20:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Can someone please help me to unblock my wikipedia account? Someone reported me for being a sockpuppet, and now my account is blocked. EuroHorrorGuy is my only account, I do not have multiple accounts. I haven't been accused of violating wikipedia rules. There has been a misunderstanding here, or else someone is maliciously trying to block me from editing. Please help?? See my editing history to see how long I have contributed to editing wikipedia and I have not been accused of any wrongdoing. EuroHorrorGuy ( talk) 21:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
EuroHorrorGuy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Can someone please help me to unblock my wikipedia account? Someone reported me for being a sockpuppet, and now my account is blocked. EuroHorrorGuy is my only account, I do not have multiple accounts. I haven't been accused of violating any wikipedia rules. There has been a misunderstanding here, or else someone is maliciously trying to block me from editing. Please help?? See my editing history to see how long I have contributed to editing wikipedia and I have not been accused of any wrongdoing. Awhile back, I lost the use of my personal computer and a local bookstore was nice enough to allow me to use their public computer to access wikipedia. I only have one account, so this sockpuppet accusation is totally false. User:Andrzejbanas has been after me to quit wikipedia for quite some time now, and he is falsifying this sockpuppet accusation now to get rid of me. He is very hostile toward competing editors, just look at his history of harassing any editors who try to edit his favorite subjects. It is harassment like this that dissuades people from contributing to wikipedia by making them feel unappreciated. EuroHorrorGuy ( talk) 18:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's not false, once one user on a computer is blocked, others making similar edits on that computer are blocked. This is called meat puppetry. The originally blocked user has requested unblock, that will probably need to be resolved first. 331dot ( talk) 18:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi, I'm EuroHorrorGuy. Feel free to contact me here if you have something to say. EuroHorrorGuy ( talk) 21:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi EuroHorrorGuy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC) |
Please note that disambiguation pages like Trilby (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:
Thank you. Leschnei ( talk) 00:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
|
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1911 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Nichols.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
ok I fixed it. Thanks. EuroHorrorGuy ( talk) 14:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{ cite web}} template to cite a web page:
Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.
which displays inline in the running text of the article as:
and displays under References as:
If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 19:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Mario Bava, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 00:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. This in response to your edit on Shéhérazade (film) here Andrzejbanas ( talk) 20:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. I have to ask. Why do you think As stated above, why did you think FilmAffinity, Rate Your Music or Pinterest were acceptable sources? You had previously discussed with me how you found one book unreliable, but then went for user-submitted content on Pinterest and FilmAffinity and RateYourMusic. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 20:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Can someone please help me to unblock my wikipedia account? Someone reported me for being a sockpuppet, and now my account is blocked. EuroHorrorGuy is my only account, I do not have multiple accounts. I haven't been accused of violating wikipedia rules. There has been a misunderstanding here, or else someone is maliciously trying to block me from editing. Please help?? See my editing history to see how long I have contributed to editing wikipedia and I have not been accused of any wrongdoing. EuroHorrorGuy ( talk) 21:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
EuroHorrorGuy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Can someone please help me to unblock my wikipedia account? Someone reported me for being a sockpuppet, and now my account is blocked. EuroHorrorGuy is my only account, I do not have multiple accounts. I haven't been accused of violating any wikipedia rules. There has been a misunderstanding here, or else someone is maliciously trying to block me from editing. Please help?? See my editing history to see how long I have contributed to editing wikipedia and I have not been accused of any wrongdoing. Awhile back, I lost the use of my personal computer and a local bookstore was nice enough to allow me to use their public computer to access wikipedia. I only have one account, so this sockpuppet accusation is totally false. User:Andrzejbanas has been after me to quit wikipedia for quite some time now, and he is falsifying this sockpuppet accusation now to get rid of me. He is very hostile toward competing editors, just look at his history of harassing any editors who try to edit his favorite subjects. It is harassment like this that dissuades people from contributing to wikipedia by making them feel unappreciated. EuroHorrorGuy ( talk) 18:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's not false, once one user on a computer is blocked, others making similar edits on that computer are blocked. This is called meat puppetry. The originally blocked user has requested unblock, that will probably need to be resolved first. 331dot ( talk) 18:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.