![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Hi, Erik! I asked you this once before and you never responded. How is it you happen to see comments on my talk page? I certainly have no objection to your participating in a discussion on it, but I'm curious what it is that draws you there at all. Do you have it on your watchlist? Thanks (and good luck with the election!) . . . LiteraryMaven ( talk) 18:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, I copied it (substituting LiteraryMaven for Erik, of course), and when I tested it my signature looked like —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:LiteraryMaven|LiteraryMaven]]</font> ([[User talk:LiteraryMaven|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LiteraryMaven|contrib]]) (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC). I am so computer illiterate when it comes to the technical side of things! LiteraryMaven ( talk) 20:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
OK, I figured it out. I needed to check the box that says "Raw Signature." Remember to always tell a computer moron every step he needs to take to accomplish something because sometimes the obvious isn't! :) Now . . . where do I find a list of different fonts I can use so we don't look like twins? And why is this comment appearing to the right of your cookie instead of under it? (Sorry if I'm being a pest!!!) LiteraryMaven ( talk • contrib) 20:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! For your help, feel free to take a bite from Erik's cookie. LiteraryMaven ( talk • contrib) 20:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Erik, long time since we exchanged posts. Hope you are doing well! per your post in the WikiProject Film article. I'd be interested in offering a support to including information. While I do make an effort to avoid editors who strongly and loudly remove information, I am most willing to supply a support posting for information such as "See also" sections, or film ratings. If you create a RfC, or write up a proposal page somewhere, I'd be more than happy to chip in my humble opinion. Just drop me a line anytime, let me know where the page/proposal is - and I'll be there. ;) — Ched ~ (yes?)/ © 18:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting this (though you may not have noticed yet). Filminformation.blogspot.com is a redirect site for filmtaka.com. The latter was already blacklisted here on en.wikipedia as it was inappropriately pushed by a handful of sockpuppets. When it was not removed from the blacklist, they started to circumvent the blacklist. I have now updated the talkpages of all the editors involved, and blacklisted filminformation.blogspot.com. I also de-linked it on your page. Thanks again! -- Dirk Beetstra T C 20:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey Erik, I wanted to ask you for a big favor. I'm dealing with some major off-Wiki personal problems right now, and thus can't devote much time to Wikipedia right now (even when I can, it's hard for me to get in the mood to edit a lot). I wanted to ask if you could watch and maintain Watchmen for the forseeable future; it's one of the most taxing articles I work on, and since you were an essential part of the FAR rewrite, you would be well-suited to keeping it in shape. In return, once I am back to full Wiki-editing capacity I offer to help you bring the article of your choice to FA-quality standards. Let me know on my talk page if you can keep a eye on the article. Thanks. WesleyDodds ( talk) 07:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I need to rely on your expertise yet again. Is it acceptable to quote liberally from this source [1] in the article Design for Living? On my discussion page, User:Ssilvers supports doing so with the comment "It is ABSOLUTELY OK to give a SOURCE's POV, just not our own, as long as attribution is given. If you have more than one POV from multiple sources, you can say "Critic X says it's the greatest thing ever, but Critic Y says it sucks." It is useful to tell readers what commentators believe about the work of art." While I agree quoting a critical review is not only acceptable but expected, I'm not sure if that's the same as quoting the unidentified individual who wrote the analysis I referenced above. I'm uncertain whether the statement "Lubitsch made Paramount the ne plus ultra of sophisticated sexiness" can be considered a fact or one man's POV, and if it's the latter, do we need to know exactly who it is before we quote him? Also, are descriptions like "versatile Paramount contract player Fredric March" and "handsome Gary Cooper" OK? Feeling I'm on unsure footing, I don't want to engage in a discussion with SSilvers, especially if I'm mistaken, so your guidance is appreciated. Thank you. LiteraryMaven ( talk • contrib) 14:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Many sources that I've seen imply that Cooper's appearance was the reason that he was cast, and I added a specific citation about Cooper's handsomeness to the article after you wrote this, that LiteraryMaven has deleted. Would you kindly take a look? I think the quote that I had added helps to explain why Cooper was cast in the role. I leave it to you; I can't argue about this any more - it has really ruined my whole day. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! I created a new article for the TV concert film Liza with a Z today, and - as you're a co-ordinator for the films WikiProject - I was wondering if you can take a quick look at it for me? I'm also not sure how to get it to show up in the page for the WikiProject's new articles. I very rarely create new pages, so I hope it's ok. Many thanks Howie ☎ 16:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Erik, I don't know if you go in for these, but...
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Just to say a big thank you for your valued and informative feedback when helping me write the Liza with a Z article Howie ☎ 22:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC) |
When asking for an image to upload to Wikimedia Commons, it has to have a certain license or it will be deleted. Currently, Commons will accept public domain, GFDL, Creative Commons Attribution, or Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike. I usually ask the author if they are willing to release it under the last three licenses as it will include their names. I provide links to these licenses for them to take a look at it (which can be found GFDL, CC-BY, and CC-BY-SA). I point out that their image will be seen by thousands (possibly more) and that a link can be provided back to their website from the image's page. In order to prevent the image from being deleted, make sure the author sends back a message stating which image(s) (either by their file name, description, or the url they are located at) as well as what license they want the image(s) to be released under. I usually ask for "Let me know if the image can be used for the free encyclopedia whenever it is convenient for you. If you do choose so, please reply back saying "I agree to release the image "IMAGE NAME" under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, the Creative Commons Attribution, or the Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike." (whichever one of the three licenses you want to pick)." Make sure that the author does not say that the image can only be used for Wikipedia, as the image could be used on other websites and possibly even commercially if released under these above licenses (I've seen some of my images used in online newspapers and even a cruise ship brochure). You are also trying to convince the author to let us use their image, and although some are eager to allow the use for Wikipedia, some sell their work or are just not interested. Don't be discouraged if they don't reply back, I've sent out dozens to hundreds of requests that went unanswered or were rejected. Let me know if you need further clarification or if you'd like me to e-mail you a form message I use. -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 20:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
But why? It's to illustrate the article. Every film deserves to have a poster.
World Cinema Writer ( talk) 07:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Ebert's review is his opinion. The film may well have received more moderate reviews elsewhere, but you should not exclude the review because it was positive - this way the article is being drawn towards a bias viewpoint. Also, I think you'll find that the reviewer from the paper is actually a male, seeing as I know them. 143.167.224.155 ( talk) 13:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey User:Erik,
I was wondering if you could give me some advice, regarding the "reception" section and some other quality information, because I want to help it be nominated for the
WP:GAN.
Besides the two construction signs I put up, which I am still working.
Also, I have a question. I nominated
The Naked Brothers Band: The Movie article and it got a C Class grade.
Since I worked on it some more and it improved way more since then; could I re-nominate the article?
Thanx!
ATC .
Talk
21:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
and |date=
(
help)Why can't he edit the language edition of Wiki he's actually fluent in? He obviously doesn't understand WP:NFF due to language barriers. Alientraveller ( talk) 09:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I only just checked here. For some reason I thought the election had one more week to run (might be an idea to post an announcement to WT:FILM with the results?). I see you've been elected as lead coordinator, and that you've actually accepted the position this time! Congratulations; I can't think of an editor who'd be more thorough and dedicated to this kind of role. Steve T • C 21:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 00:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello there. If you have the time and will, I'm moving on from Star Trek I to new film articles and was wondering if you could grab some possible sources for Star Trek: First Contact and Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (mmm... Peter Weir...) Thanks, -- Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk) 00:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for stopping by. I responded to your comments, and have removed the "year in"/"television in" links. I didn't remove the green yeses yet as I want to ensure that there is consensus (since other FLs that have passed have used it with no problems). Anyway, please see my comments there and let me know if you notice anything else. Thanks again. -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 03:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I'd try Wikipedia:Non-free content review? that might be the best place, or at least the best place to get referred to the best place. ThuranX ( talk) 04:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I have started the discussion there now. — Mythdon ( talk) 04:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I took a look through your thoughts and although I would like to respond in more detail I have a class I need to get to in about 20 minutes, which gives me precious little time to reply. On your first point, I have seen very little of WP:FILMS. Truth be told I almost didn't leave a message, but after thinking it through I decided that it would be best to do so since your project is principly concerned with film article on Wikipedia and thus in a better position to address concerns to a film article's layout if issues arise. I will need to catch up with FILM policy to better handle issues related to film articles. On the issue of advice, although it relates principally to milhist, there are a collection of essays with advice to coordinators from current and past coordinators located about half way down this page. These essays provide our milhist coordinators with advice and guidance on coordinatorship, and may be of use to you and your staff for the upcoming term.
On the other matter: I am spellogically challenged, so any post of mine in an article or elsewhere should be copyeditted asap. As luck would have it though I am big on thinking and have in the past been responisble for some of the big changes at milhist, like our use of star insignias to the coordinators and the initial idea to have the chevron w/oak leaves award handed out by coordinators for our project. I am fairly certain that I can suggest a few things for your project's betterment as well once I get a feel for how things are done, although the desiscion to implement will be left to your projects major contributors. At any rate, thanks for the welcome, and I hope that I will not let your down. TomStar81 ( Talk) 22:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
No idea, never seen it before. Looking at the talk page it seems like it may be inactive and have a number of issues. If I get chance I may download it and have a play. PC78 ( talk) 11:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to let you know I've responded to your aforementioned query. Regards, – Juliancolton | Talk 14:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Erik, you seem to be the perfect person to whom to ask my burning question.
For over 3 years now ( Courtens ( talk) 18:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)) (I) have been adding links to the Wikipedia website about upcoming movies on the Radiolinkshollywood.comwebsite. Each time, about 2 months later after adding the link, the link gets removed. And not too long ago, a link was removed by you.
What is the reason for these links being removed? I think the added links provide valuable and needed information about the movies.
The MP3 clips, which are only accessible through the links I post, are produced by Lori Lerner. The MP3 clips are always approved by the studios (the distribution companies) before they get posted on Lori's website. Her website is not a membership-only website and provides the service of listening to "behind-the-scenes" audio features of upcoming movies. They are much like an "audio trailer" with added commentary by Lori.
Do you have have access to my sandbox? There I started a draft about Radiolinkshollywood.com much like Imdb or Rotten Tomatoes has, but there I provided more information about her services and her contributions. Lori Lerner's website provides similar information as the above mentioned websites -- but obviously on a different level and scale. When I published the article about Radiolinkshollywood.com, the Wikipedia editors rejected it!
Will you please help me? Your suggestions and help will be greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Courtens ( talk • contribs) 14:02, April 3, 2009
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. |
Hey, when you get a chance, can you weigh in over here? I got into a bit of a tiff with another editor, going back and forth with various references, and I'm trying to take a step back... Thanks. – Fierce Beaver ( talk) 20:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations on assuming leadership of WP:FILM. I'm pleased to say you had my support! Wildhartlivie ( talk) 23:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Informing everyone who participated in the AFD for Ferris Beuller's Day Off in popular culture that a merge discussion is now underway concerning the same material. Please share your comments here Dream Focus 04:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering if adding the table in cast section is alright?. I don't remember this but i have seen it somewhere that adding tables is wrong.-- SkyWalker ( talk) 02:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
That's pretty much the idea, yes. I imagine tagging in just ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:American films would take care of most articles. PC78 ( talk) 16:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Seriously, we should file a complaint to block him. How many times is he pointed to WP:NFF. He's not illiterate, he just doesn't care. He recreated The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader although filming doesn't start until July. Alientraveller ( talk) 17:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
I may be out of line here, but if you guys are considering an image for a userbox why not pick something entirely different from the film reel used by the members? Speaking for myself, when I selected the 5 and 6 star ensignias for the milhist coordinators it was due to the signifigance of the five and six star positions in the US military and the honor and respect such positions commanded internationally. Perhaps instead of a modified film reel for a coordinator user box you and your cabinent might consider reaching out to the actual awards given to movies by film bodies and embracing them as a form of coordinator ensignia; such as golden globes for the coordinators and, an academy award for the lead coordinator. Its just something to think about, but it may be more of a hit with your project, and if the ensignia is unique in nature it may encourage others to run for coordinator next time around. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
You did a great job re-editing that entry on the article - thanks for showing me a great alternative way to handle things in an article :) RyanGFilm ( talk) 12:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Just a note to let you know how pleased I am to have you continuing as a film project coordinator and to reiterate how much I appreciate your patience and assistance. LiteraryMaven ( talk • contrib) 19:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
This discussion may interest you in your official capacity, specifically the discussion that follows these examples. Fowler&fowler ( talk · contribs) bemoans editors' concentrating on "low-importance" articles at the expense of core subjects, and it's a good point to make; Wikiproject Film's members are adept at making high-quality individual film articles, yet we leave core articles such as Film and Filmmaking to languish, as their improvement would require more attention than one editor is likely able to devote alone. I thought the discussion might be a relevant one for you, as I know you've been keen to encourage more collaboration among WP:FILM's members, and might be able to use aspects of the discussion in any future deliberations on the matter. Steve T • C 11:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Noticed this. Haven't watched it myself, but did you see the Under the Hood "documentary" yet? It really nailed the tone of the book in a way that the film didn't; that grounding in reality and the fact that these "superheroes" are very human and not a little pathetic. Half made me wish the makers of that had been given a shot at the film (which I enjoyed a lot, but perhaps despite Snyder rather than because of him). Steve T • C 17:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. Yes, absolutely, I would like to be included in WikiProject Film. LA Movie Buff ( talk) 15:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
My face is looking increasingly Decepticonish these days with WP:NFF violators everywhere and people using piracy. Mind undoing the addition of Patrick Stewart to X-Men (film series) (just check the history) since I've reached three reverts? Alientraveller ( talk) 17:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
So, what are your thoughts on Jackie Earle playing Freddy Krueger in the Nightmare remake? BIGNOLE (Contact me) 18:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Erik,
I think it would be good to have the editors write in such a way that the end of a movie is not exposed in the first few lines. In any forum, on IMDB or elsewhere, it would be considered very bad form to do so without any warning. In the "Wake of the Red Witch", the editor(s) say in the first paragraph that the main character will die. I would now think twice about consulting any movie page beforehand.
Thanks for all your work!
Philippe 114.158.62.71 ( talk) 12:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Erik,
If you remove detail from a page in order to redirect to the film adaptation's page, please add (appropriately) the material you've removed to the new page. For example, you removed cast listings as well as production information and none of that has appeared on the film adaptation page. Additionally, it is helpful to include a sentence or so in the lead for the comic page stating that a film adaptation is in production and possibly notable actors/directors/staff contributing to the effort, as it lends further notability to the original topic. Thanks for the work! Luminum ( talk) 21:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Eh, might be considered cherry picking, but I could see an argument for only having his featured films. I'd highly recommend that when you rewrite Singer's article, the difference in importance between the two is clearly outlined when discussing Singer's career. In any case, I would direct this question to WT:FTQ, where you can get feedback from the FTC regulars. Cheers, — sephiroth bcr ( converse) 03:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I see you already did it, no objections. Cirt ( talk) 14:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Okay no worries. Thanks again for all the great work you do on the project on films. Cirt ( talk) 14:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi mate, in case you're wondering I believe 5 days is an acceptable length of time for a merge discussion run (re; Ferris Bueller). Ryan4314 ( talk) 16:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I think I'm going to write a plot summary for The Court Martial of Billy Mitchell. The Wurdulak ( talk) 00:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
What you have looks fine. Any thoughts I have on specific objectives are probably best saved for WT:FILMC. Regards. PC78 ( talk) 16:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Besides not clearly stating the thrust of the problem, that pesky little request that commenters vote to keep the section or get rid of it was the main thrust of my concern. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 18:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey again. I was wondering what are the sites that are considered reliable to add it in film soundtrack. It is pretty hard to find a decent sources for film soundtracks. Can you help me with this. I found out that majority of Wikipedians does not like film soundtracks. Either they want the article to be deleted for notability or they want it to be redirected to the main article. In one case Dragonball Evolution had a separate soundtrack after that the article was redirected to the main article for notability issues and then i later added the tracklist to the main article and it was removed by same user. Though i don't understand that user mentality. Why can't the soundtrack either have a separate article or remain in the main article. The main issue iam having is finding the notability. Thanks again. -- SkyWalker ( talk) 03:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I've lurked a bit and have made minor contributions to Wikipedia, but when I recently tried to use the site for some research in creating a small history of film scores, I was appalled to find the terrible shape of that section. At first there seemed to be an effort to work on it, but I also discovered signs that stated the discussions were historical archives. This was very confusing.
Eventually I found a link to the WikiProject Films pages, and it appeared that the effort to fix the scoring section was adopted by your project, but the project pages do not seem to contain any information about the scoring articles.
Having been a collector for 30+ years and having written on the subject, I'd like to be involved with any effort to fix the scoring pages. Can you help guide me in the right direction?
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by ADWNSW ( talk • contribs) 05:12, April 13, 2009
Hi User:Erik,
Regarding what you said, I was wondering if you could give me step-by-step directions for the citenews tags.
I pretty much could copy and paste, and fill in the blanks, but when it comes to the ref names, which I might of duplicated twice with different names, e.g. NYTimes or TVFamily or NYTimes2, it gets confusing, what I named what, and then its all over the article, and then I have to remember what came from where.
Thanx!
ATC .
Talk
16:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, do ya, punk? Lol.
Seriously, I thought I would extend an invitation to help cut down the plot section of an article I threw together over the past two days,
Born to Run (Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles). It's over by about 200 words and, as I wrote it, i think I'mtoo close to do some cutting. It's going to be mighty hard to do so while retaining the elements of the very dense plotline. Bignole, Alientraveller, please consider this inviation extended to you as well. :) -
Arcayne
(cast a spell)
22:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, thanks! I'm glad I thought of it - been working on film articles for a while and hadn't joined until now. -- A talk/ contribs 15:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this. I am just getting used to dealing with all the wiki tags. TriiipleThreat ( talk) 13:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey there, Erik. I've been working on cleaning up The Rescuers film page, following the task list you put together. I believe everything on the list is completed. See what you think... and if there's anything else I can do to help, let me know! Cactusjump ( talk) 17:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Sayerslle here, thanks for inviting me to join wiki project films. I have a question about notability please, - I created a page on one of Julien Duviviers films ' Marie-Octobre', I just had a go at translating the french wiki article really and it has got tagged for 'notability'. I kind of figure that if a director is notable, then he's notable because of his films , so they must be notable also. I would like for Duvivier, for practically all of his films to have a page of their own so that a visitor to the Duvivier page could click on the film titles and quickly discover the cast, themes , and critical reaction to each of his films. I should like this to be true for each of the films of two of my favourite actresses also, Catherine Mouchet, and Sylvie Testud. Again, if they are notable actresses, then most of their films should be notable too. Is my logic flawed? will I be always tagged for 'not notable' if I create pages for Duvivier, Mouchet, Testud films. And how long do I have to leave it tagged, before I can assume , since the article has not been deleted, it has passed the notability test. Sorry about all these questions.Thanks Sayerslle ( talk) 00:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding what we discussed about "Reception";
Common Sense Media has a review on
The Naked Brothers Band: The Movie.
I was wondering if you could explain to me about reception and help me add it.
Thanx!
ATC .
Talk
21:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Guidance Barnstar | |
For your continued, invaluable advice throughout the development of Changeling (film), which helped the article become as good as it could be. Steve T • C 08:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
Yeah, this is random and stalkerish, but trust me when I have a reason for asking: where do you edit from? (City and country would be nice, but the country is really all I need.) You can just shoot me an email, or reply here, or via my talk. It's for a project I have to do involving Wikipedia articles and editing patterns, nothing special, but I'll let you see it when I'm finished :) -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 22:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Look 'ere Mr. Erik. If you want to go to hell take the highway man. Being dragged is gonna hurt. Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Just wondering what your current thinking is on this, since the discussion at WT:FILM kinda trailed off. To be honest I don't think that list articles need tagging at all, as any information about upcoming films will be pretty minimal. I'd be happy to restrict {{ future film}} to actual articles about upcoming films. PC78 ( talk) 23:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, it is true 2012 is released on a friday 13th. Don't see why it can't be added by coincidance Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I thought FU images were to be used a minimum of once, as per NFC#7. That's why I recycled the image in Watchmen. Additionally, it exemplifies that Watchmensch is indeed a parody, also fulfilling NFC#8. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 17:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome. :) Erwin Springer [ talk] 20:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 07:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey Erik,
I've added a comment at the above discussion, would you mind commenting?
Regards,
B G 7even 11:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey Erik, With all the work we've done in collaboration of fixing The Rescuers film page, I was wondering if we could protect it? It's been vandalized in the past, and recent changes have been superfluous. See what you think... Cactusjump ( talk) 19:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Hi, Erik! I asked you this once before and you never responded. How is it you happen to see comments on my talk page? I certainly have no objection to your participating in a discussion on it, but I'm curious what it is that draws you there at all. Do you have it on your watchlist? Thanks (and good luck with the election!) . . . LiteraryMaven ( talk) 18:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, I copied it (substituting LiteraryMaven for Erik, of course), and when I tested it my signature looked like —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:LiteraryMaven|LiteraryMaven]]</font> ([[User talk:LiteraryMaven|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LiteraryMaven|contrib]]) (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC). I am so computer illiterate when it comes to the technical side of things! LiteraryMaven ( talk) 20:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
OK, I figured it out. I needed to check the box that says "Raw Signature." Remember to always tell a computer moron every step he needs to take to accomplish something because sometimes the obvious isn't! :) Now . . . where do I find a list of different fonts I can use so we don't look like twins? And why is this comment appearing to the right of your cookie instead of under it? (Sorry if I'm being a pest!!!) LiteraryMaven ( talk • contrib) 20:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! For your help, feel free to take a bite from Erik's cookie. LiteraryMaven ( talk • contrib) 20:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Erik, long time since we exchanged posts. Hope you are doing well! per your post in the WikiProject Film article. I'd be interested in offering a support to including information. While I do make an effort to avoid editors who strongly and loudly remove information, I am most willing to supply a support posting for information such as "See also" sections, or film ratings. If you create a RfC, or write up a proposal page somewhere, I'd be more than happy to chip in my humble opinion. Just drop me a line anytime, let me know where the page/proposal is - and I'll be there. ;) — Ched ~ (yes?)/ © 18:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting this (though you may not have noticed yet). Filminformation.blogspot.com is a redirect site for filmtaka.com. The latter was already blacklisted here on en.wikipedia as it was inappropriately pushed by a handful of sockpuppets. When it was not removed from the blacklist, they started to circumvent the blacklist. I have now updated the talkpages of all the editors involved, and blacklisted filminformation.blogspot.com. I also de-linked it on your page. Thanks again! -- Dirk Beetstra T C 20:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey Erik, I wanted to ask you for a big favor. I'm dealing with some major off-Wiki personal problems right now, and thus can't devote much time to Wikipedia right now (even when I can, it's hard for me to get in the mood to edit a lot). I wanted to ask if you could watch and maintain Watchmen for the forseeable future; it's one of the most taxing articles I work on, and since you were an essential part of the FAR rewrite, you would be well-suited to keeping it in shape. In return, once I am back to full Wiki-editing capacity I offer to help you bring the article of your choice to FA-quality standards. Let me know on my talk page if you can keep a eye on the article. Thanks. WesleyDodds ( talk) 07:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I need to rely on your expertise yet again. Is it acceptable to quote liberally from this source [1] in the article Design for Living? On my discussion page, User:Ssilvers supports doing so with the comment "It is ABSOLUTELY OK to give a SOURCE's POV, just not our own, as long as attribution is given. If you have more than one POV from multiple sources, you can say "Critic X says it's the greatest thing ever, but Critic Y says it sucks." It is useful to tell readers what commentators believe about the work of art." While I agree quoting a critical review is not only acceptable but expected, I'm not sure if that's the same as quoting the unidentified individual who wrote the analysis I referenced above. I'm uncertain whether the statement "Lubitsch made Paramount the ne plus ultra of sophisticated sexiness" can be considered a fact or one man's POV, and if it's the latter, do we need to know exactly who it is before we quote him? Also, are descriptions like "versatile Paramount contract player Fredric March" and "handsome Gary Cooper" OK? Feeling I'm on unsure footing, I don't want to engage in a discussion with SSilvers, especially if I'm mistaken, so your guidance is appreciated. Thank you. LiteraryMaven ( talk • contrib) 14:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Many sources that I've seen imply that Cooper's appearance was the reason that he was cast, and I added a specific citation about Cooper's handsomeness to the article after you wrote this, that LiteraryMaven has deleted. Would you kindly take a look? I think the quote that I had added helps to explain why Cooper was cast in the role. I leave it to you; I can't argue about this any more - it has really ruined my whole day. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! I created a new article for the TV concert film Liza with a Z today, and - as you're a co-ordinator for the films WikiProject - I was wondering if you can take a quick look at it for me? I'm also not sure how to get it to show up in the page for the WikiProject's new articles. I very rarely create new pages, so I hope it's ok. Many thanks Howie ☎ 16:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Erik, I don't know if you go in for these, but...
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Just to say a big thank you for your valued and informative feedback when helping me write the Liza with a Z article Howie ☎ 22:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC) |
When asking for an image to upload to Wikimedia Commons, it has to have a certain license or it will be deleted. Currently, Commons will accept public domain, GFDL, Creative Commons Attribution, or Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike. I usually ask the author if they are willing to release it under the last three licenses as it will include their names. I provide links to these licenses for them to take a look at it (which can be found GFDL, CC-BY, and CC-BY-SA). I point out that their image will be seen by thousands (possibly more) and that a link can be provided back to their website from the image's page. In order to prevent the image from being deleted, make sure the author sends back a message stating which image(s) (either by their file name, description, or the url they are located at) as well as what license they want the image(s) to be released under. I usually ask for "Let me know if the image can be used for the free encyclopedia whenever it is convenient for you. If you do choose so, please reply back saying "I agree to release the image "IMAGE NAME" under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, the Creative Commons Attribution, or the Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike." (whichever one of the three licenses you want to pick)." Make sure that the author does not say that the image can only be used for Wikipedia, as the image could be used on other websites and possibly even commercially if released under these above licenses (I've seen some of my images used in online newspapers and even a cruise ship brochure). You are also trying to convince the author to let us use their image, and although some are eager to allow the use for Wikipedia, some sell their work or are just not interested. Don't be discouraged if they don't reply back, I've sent out dozens to hundreds of requests that went unanswered or were rejected. Let me know if you need further clarification or if you'd like me to e-mail you a form message I use. -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 20:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
But why? It's to illustrate the article. Every film deserves to have a poster.
World Cinema Writer ( talk) 07:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Ebert's review is his opinion. The film may well have received more moderate reviews elsewhere, but you should not exclude the review because it was positive - this way the article is being drawn towards a bias viewpoint. Also, I think you'll find that the reviewer from the paper is actually a male, seeing as I know them. 143.167.224.155 ( talk) 13:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey User:Erik,
I was wondering if you could give me some advice, regarding the "reception" section and some other quality information, because I want to help it be nominated for the
WP:GAN.
Besides the two construction signs I put up, which I am still working.
Also, I have a question. I nominated
The Naked Brothers Band: The Movie article and it got a C Class grade.
Since I worked on it some more and it improved way more since then; could I re-nominate the article?
Thanx!
ATC .
Talk
21:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
and |date=
(
help)Why can't he edit the language edition of Wiki he's actually fluent in? He obviously doesn't understand WP:NFF due to language barriers. Alientraveller ( talk) 09:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I only just checked here. For some reason I thought the election had one more week to run (might be an idea to post an announcement to WT:FILM with the results?). I see you've been elected as lead coordinator, and that you've actually accepted the position this time! Congratulations; I can't think of an editor who'd be more thorough and dedicated to this kind of role. Steve T • C 21:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 00:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello there. If you have the time and will, I'm moving on from Star Trek I to new film articles and was wondering if you could grab some possible sources for Star Trek: First Contact and Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (mmm... Peter Weir...) Thanks, -- Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk) 00:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for stopping by. I responded to your comments, and have removed the "year in"/"television in" links. I didn't remove the green yeses yet as I want to ensure that there is consensus (since other FLs that have passed have used it with no problems). Anyway, please see my comments there and let me know if you notice anything else. Thanks again. -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 03:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I'd try Wikipedia:Non-free content review? that might be the best place, or at least the best place to get referred to the best place. ThuranX ( talk) 04:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I have started the discussion there now. — Mythdon ( talk) 04:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I took a look through your thoughts and although I would like to respond in more detail I have a class I need to get to in about 20 minutes, which gives me precious little time to reply. On your first point, I have seen very little of WP:FILMS. Truth be told I almost didn't leave a message, but after thinking it through I decided that it would be best to do so since your project is principly concerned with film article on Wikipedia and thus in a better position to address concerns to a film article's layout if issues arise. I will need to catch up with FILM policy to better handle issues related to film articles. On the issue of advice, although it relates principally to milhist, there are a collection of essays with advice to coordinators from current and past coordinators located about half way down this page. These essays provide our milhist coordinators with advice and guidance on coordinatorship, and may be of use to you and your staff for the upcoming term.
On the other matter: I am spellogically challenged, so any post of mine in an article or elsewhere should be copyeditted asap. As luck would have it though I am big on thinking and have in the past been responisble for some of the big changes at milhist, like our use of star insignias to the coordinators and the initial idea to have the chevron w/oak leaves award handed out by coordinators for our project. I am fairly certain that I can suggest a few things for your project's betterment as well once I get a feel for how things are done, although the desiscion to implement will be left to your projects major contributors. At any rate, thanks for the welcome, and I hope that I will not let your down. TomStar81 ( Talk) 22:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
No idea, never seen it before. Looking at the talk page it seems like it may be inactive and have a number of issues. If I get chance I may download it and have a play. PC78 ( talk) 11:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to let you know I've responded to your aforementioned query. Regards, – Juliancolton | Talk 14:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Erik, you seem to be the perfect person to whom to ask my burning question.
For over 3 years now ( Courtens ( talk) 18:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)) (I) have been adding links to the Wikipedia website about upcoming movies on the Radiolinkshollywood.comwebsite. Each time, about 2 months later after adding the link, the link gets removed. And not too long ago, a link was removed by you.
What is the reason for these links being removed? I think the added links provide valuable and needed information about the movies.
The MP3 clips, which are only accessible through the links I post, are produced by Lori Lerner. The MP3 clips are always approved by the studios (the distribution companies) before they get posted on Lori's website. Her website is not a membership-only website and provides the service of listening to "behind-the-scenes" audio features of upcoming movies. They are much like an "audio trailer" with added commentary by Lori.
Do you have have access to my sandbox? There I started a draft about Radiolinkshollywood.com much like Imdb or Rotten Tomatoes has, but there I provided more information about her services and her contributions. Lori Lerner's website provides similar information as the above mentioned websites -- but obviously on a different level and scale. When I published the article about Radiolinkshollywood.com, the Wikipedia editors rejected it!
Will you please help me? Your suggestions and help will be greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Courtens ( talk • contribs) 14:02, April 3, 2009
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. |
Hey, when you get a chance, can you weigh in over here? I got into a bit of a tiff with another editor, going back and forth with various references, and I'm trying to take a step back... Thanks. – Fierce Beaver ( talk) 20:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations on assuming leadership of WP:FILM. I'm pleased to say you had my support! Wildhartlivie ( talk) 23:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Informing everyone who participated in the AFD for Ferris Beuller's Day Off in popular culture that a merge discussion is now underway concerning the same material. Please share your comments here Dream Focus 04:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering if adding the table in cast section is alright?. I don't remember this but i have seen it somewhere that adding tables is wrong.-- SkyWalker ( talk) 02:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
That's pretty much the idea, yes. I imagine tagging in just ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:American films would take care of most articles. PC78 ( talk) 16:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Seriously, we should file a complaint to block him. How many times is he pointed to WP:NFF. He's not illiterate, he just doesn't care. He recreated The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader although filming doesn't start until July. Alientraveller ( talk) 17:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
I may be out of line here, but if you guys are considering an image for a userbox why not pick something entirely different from the film reel used by the members? Speaking for myself, when I selected the 5 and 6 star ensignias for the milhist coordinators it was due to the signifigance of the five and six star positions in the US military and the honor and respect such positions commanded internationally. Perhaps instead of a modified film reel for a coordinator user box you and your cabinent might consider reaching out to the actual awards given to movies by film bodies and embracing them as a form of coordinator ensignia; such as golden globes for the coordinators and, an academy award for the lead coordinator. Its just something to think about, but it may be more of a hit with your project, and if the ensignia is unique in nature it may encourage others to run for coordinator next time around. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
You did a great job re-editing that entry on the article - thanks for showing me a great alternative way to handle things in an article :) RyanGFilm ( talk) 12:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Just a note to let you know how pleased I am to have you continuing as a film project coordinator and to reiterate how much I appreciate your patience and assistance. LiteraryMaven ( talk • contrib) 19:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
This discussion may interest you in your official capacity, specifically the discussion that follows these examples. Fowler&fowler ( talk · contribs) bemoans editors' concentrating on "low-importance" articles at the expense of core subjects, and it's a good point to make; Wikiproject Film's members are adept at making high-quality individual film articles, yet we leave core articles such as Film and Filmmaking to languish, as their improvement would require more attention than one editor is likely able to devote alone. I thought the discussion might be a relevant one for you, as I know you've been keen to encourage more collaboration among WP:FILM's members, and might be able to use aspects of the discussion in any future deliberations on the matter. Steve T • C 11:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Noticed this. Haven't watched it myself, but did you see the Under the Hood "documentary" yet? It really nailed the tone of the book in a way that the film didn't; that grounding in reality and the fact that these "superheroes" are very human and not a little pathetic. Half made me wish the makers of that had been given a shot at the film (which I enjoyed a lot, but perhaps despite Snyder rather than because of him). Steve T • C 17:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. Yes, absolutely, I would like to be included in WikiProject Film. LA Movie Buff ( talk) 15:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
My face is looking increasingly Decepticonish these days with WP:NFF violators everywhere and people using piracy. Mind undoing the addition of Patrick Stewart to X-Men (film series) (just check the history) since I've reached three reverts? Alientraveller ( talk) 17:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
So, what are your thoughts on Jackie Earle playing Freddy Krueger in the Nightmare remake? BIGNOLE (Contact me) 18:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Erik,
I think it would be good to have the editors write in such a way that the end of a movie is not exposed in the first few lines. In any forum, on IMDB or elsewhere, it would be considered very bad form to do so without any warning. In the "Wake of the Red Witch", the editor(s) say in the first paragraph that the main character will die. I would now think twice about consulting any movie page beforehand.
Thanks for all your work!
Philippe 114.158.62.71 ( talk) 12:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Erik,
If you remove detail from a page in order to redirect to the film adaptation's page, please add (appropriately) the material you've removed to the new page. For example, you removed cast listings as well as production information and none of that has appeared on the film adaptation page. Additionally, it is helpful to include a sentence or so in the lead for the comic page stating that a film adaptation is in production and possibly notable actors/directors/staff contributing to the effort, as it lends further notability to the original topic. Thanks for the work! Luminum ( talk) 21:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Eh, might be considered cherry picking, but I could see an argument for only having his featured films. I'd highly recommend that when you rewrite Singer's article, the difference in importance between the two is clearly outlined when discussing Singer's career. In any case, I would direct this question to WT:FTQ, where you can get feedback from the FTC regulars. Cheers, — sephiroth bcr ( converse) 03:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I see you already did it, no objections. Cirt ( talk) 14:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Okay no worries. Thanks again for all the great work you do on the project on films. Cirt ( talk) 14:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi mate, in case you're wondering I believe 5 days is an acceptable length of time for a merge discussion run (re; Ferris Bueller). Ryan4314 ( talk) 16:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I think I'm going to write a plot summary for The Court Martial of Billy Mitchell. The Wurdulak ( talk) 00:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
What you have looks fine. Any thoughts I have on specific objectives are probably best saved for WT:FILMC. Regards. PC78 ( talk) 16:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Besides not clearly stating the thrust of the problem, that pesky little request that commenters vote to keep the section or get rid of it was the main thrust of my concern. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 18:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey again. I was wondering what are the sites that are considered reliable to add it in film soundtrack. It is pretty hard to find a decent sources for film soundtracks. Can you help me with this. I found out that majority of Wikipedians does not like film soundtracks. Either they want the article to be deleted for notability or they want it to be redirected to the main article. In one case Dragonball Evolution had a separate soundtrack after that the article was redirected to the main article for notability issues and then i later added the tracklist to the main article and it was removed by same user. Though i don't understand that user mentality. Why can't the soundtrack either have a separate article or remain in the main article. The main issue iam having is finding the notability. Thanks again. -- SkyWalker ( talk) 03:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I've lurked a bit and have made minor contributions to Wikipedia, but when I recently tried to use the site for some research in creating a small history of film scores, I was appalled to find the terrible shape of that section. At first there seemed to be an effort to work on it, but I also discovered signs that stated the discussions were historical archives. This was very confusing.
Eventually I found a link to the WikiProject Films pages, and it appeared that the effort to fix the scoring section was adopted by your project, but the project pages do not seem to contain any information about the scoring articles.
Having been a collector for 30+ years and having written on the subject, I'd like to be involved with any effort to fix the scoring pages. Can you help guide me in the right direction?
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by ADWNSW ( talk • contribs) 05:12, April 13, 2009
Hi User:Erik,
Regarding what you said, I was wondering if you could give me step-by-step directions for the citenews tags.
I pretty much could copy and paste, and fill in the blanks, but when it comes to the ref names, which I might of duplicated twice with different names, e.g. NYTimes or TVFamily or NYTimes2, it gets confusing, what I named what, and then its all over the article, and then I have to remember what came from where.
Thanx!
ATC .
Talk
16:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, do ya, punk? Lol.
Seriously, I thought I would extend an invitation to help cut down the plot section of an article I threw together over the past two days,
Born to Run (Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles). It's over by about 200 words and, as I wrote it, i think I'mtoo close to do some cutting. It's going to be mighty hard to do so while retaining the elements of the very dense plotline. Bignole, Alientraveller, please consider this inviation extended to you as well. :) -
Arcayne
(cast a spell)
22:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, thanks! I'm glad I thought of it - been working on film articles for a while and hadn't joined until now. -- A talk/ contribs 15:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this. I am just getting used to dealing with all the wiki tags. TriiipleThreat ( talk) 13:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey there, Erik. I've been working on cleaning up The Rescuers film page, following the task list you put together. I believe everything on the list is completed. See what you think... and if there's anything else I can do to help, let me know! Cactusjump ( talk) 17:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Sayerslle here, thanks for inviting me to join wiki project films. I have a question about notability please, - I created a page on one of Julien Duviviers films ' Marie-Octobre', I just had a go at translating the french wiki article really and it has got tagged for 'notability'. I kind of figure that if a director is notable, then he's notable because of his films , so they must be notable also. I would like for Duvivier, for practically all of his films to have a page of their own so that a visitor to the Duvivier page could click on the film titles and quickly discover the cast, themes , and critical reaction to each of his films. I should like this to be true for each of the films of two of my favourite actresses also, Catherine Mouchet, and Sylvie Testud. Again, if they are notable actresses, then most of their films should be notable too. Is my logic flawed? will I be always tagged for 'not notable' if I create pages for Duvivier, Mouchet, Testud films. And how long do I have to leave it tagged, before I can assume , since the article has not been deleted, it has passed the notability test. Sorry about all these questions.Thanks Sayerslle ( talk) 00:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding what we discussed about "Reception";
Common Sense Media has a review on
The Naked Brothers Band: The Movie.
I was wondering if you could explain to me about reception and help me add it.
Thanx!
ATC .
Talk
21:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Guidance Barnstar | |
For your continued, invaluable advice throughout the development of Changeling (film), which helped the article become as good as it could be. Steve T • C 08:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
Yeah, this is random and stalkerish, but trust me when I have a reason for asking: where do you edit from? (City and country would be nice, but the country is really all I need.) You can just shoot me an email, or reply here, or via my talk. It's for a project I have to do involving Wikipedia articles and editing patterns, nothing special, but I'll let you see it when I'm finished :) -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 22:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Look 'ere Mr. Erik. If you want to go to hell take the highway man. Being dragged is gonna hurt. Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Just wondering what your current thinking is on this, since the discussion at WT:FILM kinda trailed off. To be honest I don't think that list articles need tagging at all, as any information about upcoming films will be pretty minimal. I'd be happy to restrict {{ future film}} to actual articles about upcoming films. PC78 ( talk) 23:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, it is true 2012 is released on a friday 13th. Don't see why it can't be added by coincidance Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I thought FU images were to be used a minimum of once, as per NFC#7. That's why I recycled the image in Watchmen. Additionally, it exemplifies that Watchmensch is indeed a parody, also fulfilling NFC#8. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 17:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome. :) Erwin Springer [ talk] 20:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 07:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey Erik,
I've added a comment at the above discussion, would you mind commenting?
Regards,
B G 7even 11:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey Erik, With all the work we've done in collaboration of fixing The Rescuers film page, I was wondering if we could protect it? It's been vandalized in the past, and recent changes have been superfluous. See what you think... Cactusjump ( talk) 19:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)