From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2016

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eraplackal ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

It appears clearly from this user, he has some personal vendetta against the business entity. The only user who is controlling this page. Need immediate assistance from Wiki community. The comments are made in a very personal and subjective way - Usage of English is not anything where you can judge the user credibility. This user must be blocked immediately with his conflict of interest with brand and attacking someone personally, and influencing others without providing any significant proof or points of discussion. The user is blocking people by being a judge on Wikipedia. Eraplackal 09:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We don't unblock sock accounts, so if you want to request unblock you will need to do so from your main account - using WP:UTRS if you want to appeal before your current block, with talk page access revoked, expires. Oh, and I've now removed your ability to edit this page too, as you are using it to continue the same personal attacks as on your main account talk page. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 11:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2016

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eraplackal ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

It appears clearly from this user, he has some personal vendetta against the business entity. The only user who is controlling this page. Need immediate assistance from Wiki community. The comments are made in a very personal and subjective way - Usage of English is not anything where you can judge the user credibility. This user must be blocked immediately with his conflict of interest with brand and attacking someone personally, and influencing others without providing any significant proof or points of discussion. The user is blocking people by being a judge on Wikipedia. Eraplackal 09:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We don't unblock sock accounts, so if you want to request unblock you will need to do so from your main account - using WP:UTRS if you want to appeal before your current block, with talk page access revoked, expires. Oh, and I've now removed your ability to edit this page too, as you are using it to continue the same personal attacks as on your main account talk page. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 11:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook