In regard to the claims of association of persons committing crimes in the Czech Republic and the Grail Movement, I am now in possession of and can supply a certified translation of the Prague Court findings of 27th October 2009, that confirm that press articles stating this association existed and/or played a role in this crime were falsifications.As such, any references to this association to that crime would be false and should not be permitted to be added to the Grail Movement or any other Wikipedia pages that refer to the Grail Movement or associated publication, entities or activities. Emmisgood ( talk) 04:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC) emmisgood
There is a discussion about your edits at WP:RSN. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 17:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Emmisgood. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 16:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Reformulated:
Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children). Tgeorgescu ( talk) 20:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
In regard to the claims of association of persons committing crimes in the Czech Republic and the Grail Movement, I am now in possession of and can supply a certified translation of the Prague Court findings of 27th October 2009, that confirm that press articles stating this association existed and/or played a role in this crime were falsifications.As such, any references to this association to that crime would be false and should not be permitted to be added to the Grail Movement or any other Wikipedia pages that refer to the Grail Movement or associated publication, entities or activities. Emmisgood ( talk) 04:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC) emmisgood
There is a discussion about your edits at WP:RSN. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 17:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Emmisgood. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 16:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Reformulated:
Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children). Tgeorgescu ( talk) 20:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)