Hello, I'm
Blaze Wolf. I noticed that in
this edit to
Kisii people, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
13:26, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Kisii people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
14:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
If you persist in removing sourced content from the Kisii people article, without adequate explanation, you are liable to have your editing privileges revoked. The article has a talk page, and if you have serious concerns about the content, you should discuss the matter there. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 13:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm actually removing false information. The article doesn't represent correct information about my people. It literally contradicts from other credible sources Emman.nya ( talk) 14:04, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
If you cared to research the content that was previously there you would find that the reference given are not even related to the information added Please check it out It's mostly false information and I know this because it's about my own people Emman.nya ( talk) 14:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Okay then I will do my research and give sources as long you accept it as the facts it is Emman.nya ( talk) 14:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
What do you mean by discuss on the talk page? Emman.nya ( talk) 14:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
😂😂this definitely wired to be impossible how can I come into an agreement with someone who added false information and even his sources aren't related to what he wrote It's okay I guess people are still gonna see false information on Wikipedia, not very reliable and accurate of you Wikipedia is it? Emman.nya ( talk) 14:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Kinda makes me start to second guess Wikipedia even though it's been my source of information for a while now, I guess false information gets a pass Anyways it's fine Emman.nya ( talk) 14:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Blaze Wolf. I noticed that in
this edit to
Kisii people, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
13:26, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Kisii people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
14:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
If you persist in removing sourced content from the Kisii people article, without adequate explanation, you are liable to have your editing privileges revoked. The article has a talk page, and if you have serious concerns about the content, you should discuss the matter there. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 13:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm actually removing false information. The article doesn't represent correct information about my people. It literally contradicts from other credible sources Emman.nya ( talk) 14:04, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
If you cared to research the content that was previously there you would find that the reference given are not even related to the information added Please check it out It's mostly false information and I know this because it's about my own people Emman.nya ( talk) 14:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Okay then I will do my research and give sources as long you accept it as the facts it is Emman.nya ( talk) 14:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
What do you mean by discuss on the talk page? Emman.nya ( talk) 14:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
😂😂this definitely wired to be impossible how can I come into an agreement with someone who added false information and even his sources aren't related to what he wrote It's okay I guess people are still gonna see false information on Wikipedia, not very reliable and accurate of you Wikipedia is it? Emman.nya ( talk) 14:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Kinda makes me start to second guess Wikipedia even though it's been my source of information for a while now, I guess false information gets a pass Anyways it's fine Emman.nya ( talk) 14:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)