- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Closed. Article created. Vegaswikian ( talk) 21:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
User:Em Arzo/Autograph Keys → Autograph Keys — New Article Creation. Em Arzo ( talk) 10:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
-- Em Arzo ( talk) 10:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The article Autograph Keys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable software
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
De728631 (
talk) 18:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for my late reply but you could have easily prevented the deletion of this article just by removing the deletion template from the article's page (as has already been explained above). If the only purpose of Autograph keys is to render the Dram sign then you should better present that fact in the main article Armenian dram sign instead of writing an article about Autograph keys. And as to significance and notability, Wikipedia reports only what other sources have investigated before, so the claim that this software is unique in a way should have been backed up but reliable external sources such as magazine articles. A claim by the editor that something is important is not enough to have an article, even if that is eventually right – it must be proven though. Please note also that I did not delete the article but it was an administrator who obviously thought it was not worth keeping. De728631 ( talk) 15:57, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Closed. Article created. Vegaswikian ( talk) 21:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
User:Em Arzo/Autograph Keys → Autograph Keys — New Article Creation. Em Arzo ( talk) 10:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
-- Em Arzo ( talk) 10:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The article Autograph Keys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable software
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
De728631 (
talk) 18:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for my late reply but you could have easily prevented the deletion of this article just by removing the deletion template from the article's page (as has already been explained above). If the only purpose of Autograph keys is to render the Dram sign then you should better present that fact in the main article Armenian dram sign instead of writing an article about Autograph keys. And as to significance and notability, Wikipedia reports only what other sources have investigated before, so the claim that this software is unique in a way should have been backed up but reliable external sources such as magazine articles. A claim by the editor that something is important is not enough to have an article, even if that is eventually right – it must be proven though. Please note also that I did not delete the article but it was an administrator who obviously thought it was not worth keeping. De728631 ( talk) 15:57, 12 August 2011 (UTC)