|
I am really glad you started this article. It was long overdue. I toyed witht he idea of starting it myself, but always seemed to get waylaid by some other thing. Thanks! Orbicle 18:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Editors are split on whether accents and diacritic marks should be used on the English language wikipedia. There is at this time no consensus, although more people think accents should be used. This isn't applied to all projects but we often do in cycling articles. There should only be one page and article for each subject, so you should move Eugene Christophe to Eugène Christophe. This then keeps the edit history intact which helps with the GNU licensing. Eugene Christophe automatically becomes a redirect to Eugène Christophe. Names with diacritic marks in them should always have redirects from the plain letters due to the limitations of people's keyboards. My belief is that references to people or events or whatever which have wikipedia articles should use the name the article uses (or did contemporary, if a name has changed) - the discussion on the particular name can go at that page and everything else can follow (take a look on the discussion of how to spell Magnus Bäckstedt). If I move something, I use AutoWikiBrowser, but this one only has a handful of pages so not too much work to do manually! Hope this helps, if I haven't answered you please don't hesitate to ask again! Severo 10:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up towards memoire-du-cyclisme.net - it should give me something to get started with, although I'm not sure how much it is a reliable source? The UCI don't seem to want to promote the history of cycling so pre-1998 they are useless. I can't find anything about the World Cup between 1993 and 1997 at the moment apart from mentions on third-party websites :( Regards, Severo Talk 09:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your sandbox pages for Duo Normand and Trofeo Baracchi - do you mind if I move them to mainspace and "finish" them to normal levels? Severo T C 16:05, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
User:Elwood90/Sandbox/Bert Oosterbosch, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Elwood90/Sandbox/Bert Oosterbosch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Elwood90/Sandbox/Bert Oosterbosch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis ( talk) 08:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
|
I am really glad you started this article. It was long overdue. I toyed witht he idea of starting it myself, but always seemed to get waylaid by some other thing. Thanks! Orbicle 18:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Editors are split on whether accents and diacritic marks should be used on the English language wikipedia. There is at this time no consensus, although more people think accents should be used. This isn't applied to all projects but we often do in cycling articles. There should only be one page and article for each subject, so you should move Eugene Christophe to Eugène Christophe. This then keeps the edit history intact which helps with the GNU licensing. Eugene Christophe automatically becomes a redirect to Eugène Christophe. Names with diacritic marks in them should always have redirects from the plain letters due to the limitations of people's keyboards. My belief is that references to people or events or whatever which have wikipedia articles should use the name the article uses (or did contemporary, if a name has changed) - the discussion on the particular name can go at that page and everything else can follow (take a look on the discussion of how to spell Magnus Bäckstedt). If I move something, I use AutoWikiBrowser, but this one only has a handful of pages so not too much work to do manually! Hope this helps, if I haven't answered you please don't hesitate to ask again! Severo 10:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up towards memoire-du-cyclisme.net - it should give me something to get started with, although I'm not sure how much it is a reliable source? The UCI don't seem to want to promote the history of cycling so pre-1998 they are useless. I can't find anything about the World Cup between 1993 and 1997 at the moment apart from mentions on third-party websites :( Regards, Severo Talk 09:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your sandbox pages for Duo Normand and Trofeo Baracchi - do you mind if I move them to mainspace and "finish" them to normal levels? Severo T C 16:05, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
User:Elwood90/Sandbox/Bert Oosterbosch, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Elwood90/Sandbox/Bert Oosterbosch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Elwood90/Sandbox/Bert Oosterbosch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis ( talk) 08:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)