An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000s in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daughtry.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Before an edit war ensue, please have a discussion on this on the Talk Page. You are the only verified editor who keeps focusing on that topic so far. Maxen Embry ( talk) 01:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Matty Healy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Maxen Embry ( talk) 13:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Elttaruuu, please avoid casting aspersions about other editors, and remain civil in discussing your concerns. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard regarding a
BLP issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
The article about Matty Healy, again. Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 14:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 13:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 15:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Arabic pop music into
2000s in music. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk) 20:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000s in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daughtry.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Before an edit war ensue, please have a discussion on this on the Talk Page. You are the only verified editor who keeps focusing on that topic so far. Maxen Embry ( talk) 01:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Matty Healy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Maxen Embry ( talk) 13:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Elttaruuu, please avoid casting aspersions about other editors, and remain civil in discussing your concerns. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard regarding a
BLP issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
The article about Matty Healy, again. Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 14:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 13:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 15:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Arabic pop music into
2000s in music. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk) 20:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging