Thanks for contributing to the article
King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be
verifiable through
reliable sources, preferably using
inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see
here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at
Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the
Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you.
Dormskirk (
talk)
16:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Hanukkah. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
ZimZalaBim
talk
19:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
22:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)ElephantElephant2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was not making disruptive edits, my additions were being deleted with snide comments, not with any evidence to contradict the cited changes. It would be unjust to punish someone adding uncontroversial, well cited edits to an article. ElephantElephant2 ( talk) 01:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you see nothing disuptive about your actions, there are no grounds to remove the block. I might also suggest that you read WP:EXPERT. 331dot ( talk) 08:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I've placed your statement within the request as intended, it should go where the words "your reason here" are. 331dot ( talk) 08:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Thank you, I understand. Still new to all of this.
Appellant needs to seriously reconsider their approach. And adjust the unblock request to address the reasons for their block. I see this user a WP:NOTCOMPATIBLE, but maybe some light will dawn after my decline. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 02:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article
King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be
verifiable through
reliable sources, preferably using
inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see
here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at
Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the
Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you.
Dormskirk (
talk)
16:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Hanukkah. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
ZimZalaBim
talk
19:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
22:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)ElephantElephant2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was not making disruptive edits, my additions were being deleted with snide comments, not with any evidence to contradict the cited changes. It would be unjust to punish someone adding uncontroversial, well cited edits to an article. ElephantElephant2 ( talk) 01:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you see nothing disuptive about your actions, there are no grounds to remove the block. I might also suggest that you read WP:EXPERT. 331dot ( talk) 08:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I've placed your statement within the request as intended, it should go where the words "your reason here" are. 331dot ( talk) 08:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Thank you, I understand. Still new to all of this.
Appellant needs to seriously reconsider their approach. And adjust the unblock request to address the reasons for their block. I see this user a WP:NOTCOMPATIBLE, but maybe some light will dawn after my decline. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 02:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)