Hi El Chivo 2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan ( I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 20:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC) reply

As a courtesy to other contributors could you please explain controversial or complicated edits on the talk page -- not in your edit summary?

You made what seemed to me to be a controversial edit to Raymond Allen Davis -- that you explained only in your edit summary.

As I explained on Talk:Raymond Allen Davis, complicated or controversial edits, that are explained only in an edit summary are the most common trigger for edit warring.

I request you go to the talk page and offer a fuller explanation.

Thanks Geo Swan ( talk) 09:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC) reply

the edit summary is just that, a summary. but, you can see the details of the change by clicking the "prev" link on the left side of the summary. -- El Chivo 2 ( talk) 22:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC) reply

• And, as I explained, it is a technique that triggers edit wars. I avoided the trigger to edit warring. Instead I have asked you to explain why you think Al Jazeera's English language service is not an "impartial source". I really think you should make that effort. Geo Swan ( talk) 05:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Al Jazeera controversies and criticism El Chivo 2 ( talk) 06:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, I just undid this edit of yours. See wp:DABREF. - DVdm ( talk) 15:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for letting me know about that policy. El Chivo 2 ( talk) 17:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply