Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in
Water fluoridation. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. The
three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
In particular, the Water fluoridation article is not the right place to talk about a particular 1973 court decision in the Netherlands. That article is global in scope, and doesn't really have the space to discuss the hundreds of court decisions that have taken place all over the world. Another editor already moved that discussion to Fluoridation by country #Netherlands, and this is a better place for this level of detail.
As a general matter, it's better to discuss potentially-controversial edits like this (it's clearly controversial, as a similar edit was already reverted) on the talk page first. Please try to do that here. Eubulides ( talk) 21:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in
Water fluoridation. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. The
three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
In particular, the Water fluoridation article is not the right place to talk about a particular 1973 court decision in the Netherlands. That article is global in scope, and doesn't really have the space to discuss the hundreds of court decisions that have taken place all over the world. Another editor already moved that discussion to Fluoridation by country #Netherlands, and this is a better place for this level of detail.
As a general matter, it's better to discuss potentially-controversial edits like this (it's clearly controversial, as a similar edit was already reverted) on the talk page first. Please try to do that here. Eubulides ( talk) 21:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)