|
Hi Eimerbatine! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kavdiamanju, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
SmartSE ( talk) 21:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~
Rob13
Talk
17:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Proposed deletion of Sean O’Neal (photographer)
The article Sean O’Neal (photographer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Originally created as a largely promotional piece by an editor now blocked as an undisclosed paid editor. Highly questionable notability; most references are only tangentially related or focus on the relation to other notable people, not this person's work.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ~
Rob13
Talk
17:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Eimerbatine! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kavdiamanju, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
SmartSE ( talk) 21:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~
Rob13
Talk
17:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Proposed deletion of Sean O’Neal (photographer)
The article Sean O’Neal (photographer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Originally created as a largely promotional piece by an editor now blocked as an undisclosed paid editor. Highly questionable notability; most references are only tangentially related or focus on the relation to other notable people, not this person's work.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ~
Rob13
Talk
17:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)