This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thanks for reviewing Dr. Finian Tan, Eeekster.

Unfortunately War wizard90 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

No tags, page does not conform to Wikipedia standards (i.e. it's not wikified). Not sure why you marked it as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on War wizard90's talk page.

Nevermind, I just realized what happened (creator deleted speedy tag), please disregard. War wizard90 ( talk) 03:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Regarding your warning of blocking for persistent copyright violation [1] on Almighty Chief Keef Sosa's talk page, I just wanted to point out that further discussion shows that this user did not know how copyright works. They've shown a genuine interest in learning and changing their behaviour, I think. Just wanted you to know, so that the user doesn't suffer any unfortunate repercussions, as it's quite possible further violations will come to light, stemming from edits made before they were aware of the problem. My two cents. Willondon ( talk) 09:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, please. They've been warned and talked to and still continue the same behavior. I see little chance of his changing. Eeekster ( talk) 10:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

I am not familiar with this editor beyond a small window that I happened to pass by. I may be naive or uninformed, but I'm not disingenuous. I would appreciate your accepting my edit above in good faith. Beyond that, I really only had the two cents to offer. Willondon ( talk) 01:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Actually that last time, I thought I had added the correct copyright information. But apparently I didn't. Finally, I've decided to completely cease editing anything involving the input of copyright information. My apologies for this inconvenience goes to you guys. Sorry admins. Almighty Chief Keef Sosa ( talk) 16:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Greetings Eeekster. My apologies for uploading a picture of Marco Johnson ( /info/en/?search=User:Lighthouselane/sandbox) that broke Wikipedia rules. I am using the sandbox to write the article before I submit it for review. I used the "upload image wizard" to upload an image of Marco and answered all of the questions honestly and truthfully. How can I upload a picture that doesn't break any rules? Can you please provide tips? I've read many Wikipedia articles on copyright rules and agree to them all. Lighthouselane ( talk) 16:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

The best place to get that kind of help is at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Eeekster ( talk) 23:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Would like to change to free image. What do I do now?-- A21sauce ( talk) 23:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Not sure what you are asking. Eeekster ( talk) 23:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Asking where to put

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/CC-BY-SA-4.0Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0truetrue This template should only be used on file pages.

on the image I uploaded so we don't have the one we have now. Please be clear. I've been an editor for years and the photo part is REALLY confusing.-- A21sauce ( talk) 00:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

The Edit button doesn't work for you? Eeekster ( talk) 01:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

No need to be rude, dude. Your edit of my Incheon photo was over the top when all the data was there AND I said it was confusing. Being kinder would make you a more effective editor.-- A21sauce ( talk) 18:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your Incheon photo is still up for deletion. Instead of throwing aspersions at me, your time would be better spent correcting the issue. If you don't, it'll be deleted. Eeekster ( talk) 21:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I already add the image description for Redmi 1S.jpg so I removed the tag. Are you a human or bot? Angsanley ( talk) 08:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

And now I've added a deletion tag for the copyright violation. Please stop lying about file licenses. Eeekster ( talk) 08:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok you can remove the file, so how about I get the picture myself? Do I violate the license? Angsanley ( talk) 08:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Eeekster, thank you for patroll this article. This is my first English article, I am Spanish Wikipedia editor. I am suprised because I had two warnings in the article during the first minutes of my edition. Have I do anything wrong?.

If you could help me I could finish the article. I need to mark the article from the public domain (US Gov).

Thank you for your work. -- Nachosan ( talk) 00:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

I didn't see anything wrong other than it'd be nice to have more sources. Eeekster ( talk) 00:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

How could you say File:IAI Ghost Rotary Mini UAS.jpg is not fair use? According to Israeli Copyright Act - 2007, fair use is permitted. -- Anton ^Talk 04:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Because it exists and a free picture can be taken. Eeekster ( talk) 23:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

But the act permits to use. -- Anton ^Talk 04:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

But Wikipedia does not. Eeekster ( talk) 04:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Eeekster, you have marked one of my photos ( File:Solace of Requiem2013.jpg) for speedy deletion. Update: the photo is now deleted. You claimed it was taken from "pest webzine" ( http://pestwebzine.com/index/solace_of_requiem/0-944) and is copyright infringement but I don't believe this is so. Pest webzine took the files from the band's webpage or facebook (or asked that they send them some pictures when they were doing the article on them). I don't believe it's infringement because Pest Webzine did not take the pictures nor do I believe they own them. I contacted the band in regards to using a picture and even which one they would like me to use, so I know that it is a promo picture that the band has either taken themselves or paid to have taken for them. Is there a better way I can upload it? Do I need a picture that has never been used anywhere on the internet before? I'm still new to wikipedia but I've done quite a bit of research, only am still confused as to the best way to upload a photo of the band without it being marked for speedy deletion.

Here is the photo, it even says who took and edited the picture: https://www.facebook.com/solaceofrequiem/photos/pb.172317499459059.-2207520000.1422067889./602787976412007/?type=3&theater

Rapeseeed ( talk) 02:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Since it has been published, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions on how to proceed. Eeekster ( talk) 18:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Manc86 ( talk)

It is always hard to establish the notability of a primarily live act on an underground music scene. I am updating the article to include the group's brushes with the art establishment. References to the group being chosen to perform at the Tate Britain, on Arts Council funded radio station, Resonance FM, and at Subscuta, an arts festival in Portugal, are now included. I have also included their involvement with events run by more established artists, including the Dr. Strangely Strange (managed and produced by Joe Boyd), and cult figure, Tymon Dogg. I will be adding such references as exist online. It should all be done this evening. Obviously, if this still doesn't meet with Wikipedia's requirements, I totally understand. However, I feel that the combination of attracting the attention of organisations like the Tate Gallery, and ten years of reviews which consistently describe the group as unique, is probably enough notability. If there are specific problems after this, just let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manc86 ( talk • contribs) 20:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

The Wiki page Artur Pawlowski has a "promotes the subject" flag. I have made several edits in an attempt to present a more strictly factual presentation of Mr. Pawlowski. Could you please tell me if it is okay now, or if not, could you please tell me what specifically you would like me to address (specific quotes you have problems with). I don't have time to fiddle with this. I need to finish and move onto other work. I have already spent considerable time getting the page up.

Thank you for your time.

Bushost ( talk) 08:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't see any improvement. Eeekster ( talk) 20:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

That's not at all helpful, I have made many edits and revised the content considerably, so for you to say you don't see any improvement, that is a particularly unhelpful comment. Could you please cite the specific comments or paragraphs you are taking issue with? A little help would be appreciated since you were the one that raised the concerns. Thanks in advance for your careful attention to addressing my questions. Bushost ( talk) 08:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but the entire article reads like a promotion. Is that so hard to see? Eeekster ( talk) 19:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia team, The mentioned page Ashfaq_Chishti is about the biography of Rising poet Ashfaq Chishti belongs to Budaun District in India. He is genuine Urdu poet and lyricist. So, please I request you it should not be deleted. It is Genuine page and encyclopedia. Hope it gives knowledge about poet to his followers and fans. Regards, Author — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashfaq.chisthi ( talk • contribs) 21:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

There is no copyright because I ME AND ME alone made that version of the picture so it's my copyright! Do not delete the Markley file please it is legitimate.