This user may have left Wikipedia. Edwy has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives |
---|
Hello, Edwy. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image ( Image:Enlarged0777.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Edwy/Archive2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 03:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards Gryffindor 19:00, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
Hi!! :)) Bitola 18:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
A study was made by the best historians in Belgrade to research where we, Yugoslavs have made errors and how the Greeks superbly evaded all Balkan controversies, so much that Greece practicly isn't a Balkan country. And I was horrified by the result. -- HolyRomanEmperor 20:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. -- CBDunkerson 20:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy. Just a quick note to thank you for your support in my RfA, which recently passed 62/13/6. I will do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please let me know if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers TigerShark 03:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
Read the article history -- and note who first deleted the item. Read the item in question. Read the links to the alleged violations being "reported". If any of that is unclear after that, let me know. -- Calton | Talk 11:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Further point: Nochop ( talk · contribs), the bogus 3RR reporter and reverter, is also at 3 reverts. Yet, oddly, you did not see fit to warn him. Why would that be? -- Calton | Talk 11:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Sent you an e-mail as well. -- Avg 13:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, thanks to
Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Roitr, all his bots are now summarily exec... I mean, banned ;) La-la-la... I keep watching the pages he's obsessed with, but it seems like his activity is fading and he's probably close to give it up.
I've actually come across your talk archive some days ago when I was searching "What links here" for
User:Roitr/sockpuppetry etc., but decided not to disclose your identity because you probably had a reason to change it ;) --
Dmitry
15:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, but the article refers about the presence... I think it's anti- Orthodox propaganda, but hey, what do I know? -- HolyRomanEmperor 17:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Dear Edwy,
Earlier today, you reverted the
Rajput article back to the last version saved by
User:ImpuMozhi, and you left a note in your edit summary that I think was meant to be directed at me. Your wrote "
WP:POINT, Bhola". First of all, I'd like to know why you took ImpuMozhi's side in the revert and counter-revert ping-pong. And secondly, I'd like to know what you meant by your note to me. Were you accusing me of being disruptive to Wikipedia? If so, I'd like an explanation, because I don't believe that I deserve it. If it wasn't meant as an accusation, then just what did it mean?--
Bhola
20:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks again fo another quick reply. Your advice doesn't sound very different from what I was doing. I was trying to avoid being heavy-handed. As I said before, I put up those tags precisely in order to give other editors a chance to supply citations, but instead the other editor ImpuMozhi just deleted the tags and accused me of vandalism.-- Bhola 21:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Should I place the {Welcome} tag to you? NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 20:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, apropos your message to him, "rather new" User:Bhola is not: after 11 edits in July/05, he chose to vanish until Feb/17, exactly the day the arbcom decision was finalized, when he made a thundering return to take over the Rajput page and push his own agenda there, after the Singh trolls were banned. Obviously he was following events, and his facility with WP suggests experience; I am wondering whether you could get a sock test done on him. He has done very little indeed since returning, except troll the Rajput page, and he is proving a serious nuisance. I also urge you to continue to help limit his damage. This statement puts my position succinctly, I think it is fair, Bhola wants absolute statements in Wikipedia's voice, affirming his POV. Regards, ImpuMozhi 05:22, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Ok, thanks Bitola 16:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy, I appreciate your intervention. I've sent you an email as well.-- Avg 17:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Ma sou esteila email den eftase?-- Avg 17:20, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Pistepse me den eimai ethnikisths, tous misw tous ethnikistes. Alla mh mou les na tous lew kai opws theloun. De tha ta exoun ola dika tous. Eygeneia den einai na katsw na me barane kiolas! (gia na mhn to pw me thn allh ekfrash) -- Avg 17:30, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy. I am a little confused, as your comments on the WP:PAIN thread seem to be supporting User:Avg and you appear to claim that you do not think that they are making personal attacks. Could you please clarify who you think should be banned and try to sum up why (with diffs if possible). Thanks TigerShark 22:49, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Based on the googling I did when I was trying to figure out the Athanasios article, it seems the current archbishop, Chrysostomos, is retiring due to health, and there will be a gathering after Easter to select the new one, who in fact might be Athanasios.
Unfortunately my ability to decipher a few words of Greek here and there is based on my high school studies of Attic Greek, so I wouldn't be a good choice to try to help out in this. Fan1967 02:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy. You might or might not want to add some input here, where I am broaching the topic of a new policy regarding appropriate user names: Wikipedia talk:Username#Names of countries, or of large or disputed regions. Thank you. Alexander 007 07:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Re sy m'aresei poly h kainourgia bersion kai paideytika arketa gia na th ftia3w. Ti se enoxlei, h emfanish h' o magalos (htan TERAS) kwdikas? (you can help ston kwdika) Lew na kanw ena atypo poll sth selida mou gia plaka... NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 09:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
He he, an 8es na gelaseis koita
ayto.
NikoSilver
(T)
@
(C)
20:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC) (<-KAI YPOGRAFH DEN ALLAZW EIPA)
I've checked my e-mail but there's nothing in it. Rewrite your message. Aeternus 18:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again, Mark83 10:52, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
phres to shmerino gramma pou sou esteila kata tis 4 ellados? An oxi, prepei na tsekaroume ti problhma yparxei... NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 14:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for helping with Roitr. It seems there are some new sockpuppets he registered:
but I am not 100% sure.
BTW, what about Latinus account? Will it be ever revived?-- Nixer 18:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
...kai exeis kai gramma pou xrizei epeigousas apanthshs... NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 16:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Mhpws 8a eprepe na pshfiseis kapote? NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 23:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Edwy, please see Talk:Ancient Egypt#Mangled reversions. Last month, you attempted to revert some vandalism at the Ancient Egypt article, but somehow you removed important sections of text in doing so. [1] It looks as if you attempted to undo the vandalism manually; from now on, please revert changes by:
This way, all the changes are reverted for sure. In any event, thanks for the many contributions you've made to the project. The article still hasn't been fixed completely: after your reversion, others went in and removed or commented out footnotes, thinking that they were never used in the article. So if you've got some time, feel free to dredge through the page history and help fix things up.
– Minh Nguyễn ( talk, contribs) 07:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
...is going to succeed after all. -- HolyRomanEmperor 14:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy, I may have found a technical way to circumvent that stupid "related ethnic groups" entry on the Template:Infobox Ethnic group. Want to have a look? ( Template talk:Infobox Ethnic group). I hope I got it right technically, at least it seems to be working on my test page. Lukas (T.| @) 18:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
HolyRomanEmperor has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!
Greetings. I am HRE's cousin. I have a sad news to announce (as per his brother's wish) - my dear brother-by-aunt is no more in the world of the living... It pains me enough to write this - so I'm just going to point you to HRE's talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HolyRomanEmperor#As_per_Your_.28Our.29_brother.27s_request. -- Sad News 21:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Category:Members of the pre-1707 English Parliament, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 19:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Category:Mental illness diagnosis by DSM and ICD, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Music from Liverpool, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 21:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Pro-choice organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:38, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. Edwy has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives |
---|
Hello, Edwy. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image ( Image:Enlarged0777.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Edwy/Archive2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 03:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards Gryffindor 19:00, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
Hi!! :)) Bitola 18:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
A study was made by the best historians in Belgrade to research where we, Yugoslavs have made errors and how the Greeks superbly evaded all Balkan controversies, so much that Greece practicly isn't a Balkan country. And I was horrified by the result. -- HolyRomanEmperor 20:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. -- CBDunkerson 20:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy. Just a quick note to thank you for your support in my RfA, which recently passed 62/13/6. I will do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please let me know if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers TigerShark 03:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
Read the article history -- and note who first deleted the item. Read the item in question. Read the links to the alleged violations being "reported". If any of that is unclear after that, let me know. -- Calton | Talk 11:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Further point: Nochop ( talk · contribs), the bogus 3RR reporter and reverter, is also at 3 reverts. Yet, oddly, you did not see fit to warn him. Why would that be? -- Calton | Talk 11:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Sent you an e-mail as well. -- Avg 13:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, thanks to
Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Roitr, all his bots are now summarily exec... I mean, banned ;) La-la-la... I keep watching the pages he's obsessed with, but it seems like his activity is fading and he's probably close to give it up.
I've actually come across your talk archive some days ago when I was searching "What links here" for
User:Roitr/sockpuppetry etc., but decided not to disclose your identity because you probably had a reason to change it ;) --
Dmitry
15:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, but the article refers about the presence... I think it's anti- Orthodox propaganda, but hey, what do I know? -- HolyRomanEmperor 17:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Dear Edwy,
Earlier today, you reverted the
Rajput article back to the last version saved by
User:ImpuMozhi, and you left a note in your edit summary that I think was meant to be directed at me. Your wrote "
WP:POINT, Bhola". First of all, I'd like to know why you took ImpuMozhi's side in the revert and counter-revert ping-pong. And secondly, I'd like to know what you meant by your note to me. Were you accusing me of being disruptive to Wikipedia? If so, I'd like an explanation, because I don't believe that I deserve it. If it wasn't meant as an accusation, then just what did it mean?--
Bhola
20:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks again fo another quick reply. Your advice doesn't sound very different from what I was doing. I was trying to avoid being heavy-handed. As I said before, I put up those tags precisely in order to give other editors a chance to supply citations, but instead the other editor ImpuMozhi just deleted the tags and accused me of vandalism.-- Bhola 21:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Should I place the {Welcome} tag to you? NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 20:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, apropos your message to him, "rather new" User:Bhola is not: after 11 edits in July/05, he chose to vanish until Feb/17, exactly the day the arbcom decision was finalized, when he made a thundering return to take over the Rajput page and push his own agenda there, after the Singh trolls were banned. Obviously he was following events, and his facility with WP suggests experience; I am wondering whether you could get a sock test done on him. He has done very little indeed since returning, except troll the Rajput page, and he is proving a serious nuisance. I also urge you to continue to help limit his damage. This statement puts my position succinctly, I think it is fair, Bhola wants absolute statements in Wikipedia's voice, affirming his POV. Regards, ImpuMozhi 05:22, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Ok, thanks Bitola 16:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy, I appreciate your intervention. I've sent you an email as well.-- Avg 17:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Ma sou esteila email den eftase?-- Avg 17:20, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Pistepse me den eimai ethnikisths, tous misw tous ethnikistes. Alla mh mou les na tous lew kai opws theloun. De tha ta exoun ola dika tous. Eygeneia den einai na katsw na me barane kiolas! (gia na mhn to pw me thn allh ekfrash) -- Avg 17:30, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy. I am a little confused, as your comments on the WP:PAIN thread seem to be supporting User:Avg and you appear to claim that you do not think that they are making personal attacks. Could you please clarify who you think should be banned and try to sum up why (with diffs if possible). Thanks TigerShark 22:49, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Based on the googling I did when I was trying to figure out the Athanasios article, it seems the current archbishop, Chrysostomos, is retiring due to health, and there will be a gathering after Easter to select the new one, who in fact might be Athanasios.
Unfortunately my ability to decipher a few words of Greek here and there is based on my high school studies of Attic Greek, so I wouldn't be a good choice to try to help out in this. Fan1967 02:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy. You might or might not want to add some input here, where I am broaching the topic of a new policy regarding appropriate user names: Wikipedia talk:Username#Names of countries, or of large or disputed regions. Thank you. Alexander 007 07:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Re sy m'aresei poly h kainourgia bersion kai paideytika arketa gia na th ftia3w. Ti se enoxlei, h emfanish h' o magalos (htan TERAS) kwdikas? (you can help ston kwdika) Lew na kanw ena atypo poll sth selida mou gia plaka... NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 09:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
He he, an 8es na gelaseis koita
ayto.
NikoSilver
(T)
@
(C)
20:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC) (<-KAI YPOGRAFH DEN ALLAZW EIPA)
I've checked my e-mail but there's nothing in it. Rewrite your message. Aeternus 18:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again, Mark83 10:52, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
phres to shmerino gramma pou sou esteila kata tis 4 ellados? An oxi, prepei na tsekaroume ti problhma yparxei... NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 14:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for helping with Roitr. It seems there are some new sockpuppets he registered:
but I am not 100% sure.
BTW, what about Latinus account? Will it be ever revived?-- Nixer 18:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
...kai exeis kai gramma pou xrizei epeigousas apanthshs... NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 16:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Mhpws 8a eprepe na pshfiseis kapote? NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 23:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Edwy, please see Talk:Ancient Egypt#Mangled reversions. Last month, you attempted to revert some vandalism at the Ancient Egypt article, but somehow you removed important sections of text in doing so. [1] It looks as if you attempted to undo the vandalism manually; from now on, please revert changes by:
This way, all the changes are reverted for sure. In any event, thanks for the many contributions you've made to the project. The article still hasn't been fixed completely: after your reversion, others went in and removed or commented out footnotes, thinking that they were never used in the article. So if you've got some time, feel free to dredge through the page history and help fix things up.
– Minh Nguyễn ( talk, contribs) 07:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
...is going to succeed after all. -- HolyRomanEmperor 14:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Edwy, I may have found a technical way to circumvent that stupid "related ethnic groups" entry on the Template:Infobox Ethnic group. Want to have a look? ( Template talk:Infobox Ethnic group). I hope I got it right technically, at least it seems to be working on my test page. Lukas (T.| @) 18:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
HolyRomanEmperor has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!
Greetings. I am HRE's cousin. I have a sad news to announce (as per his brother's wish) - my dear brother-by-aunt is no more in the world of the living... It pains me enough to write this - so I'm just going to point you to HRE's talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HolyRomanEmperor#As_per_Your_.28Our.29_brother.27s_request. -- Sad News 21:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Category:Members of the pre-1707 English Parliament, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 19:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Category:Mental illness diagnosis by DSM and ICD, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Music from Liverpool, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 21:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Pro-choice organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:38, 23 May 2019 (UTC)