![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey, Edgarde. Just wanted to say thanks for your help to User:I. Khider and myself. I've tried to point out some Wikipedia policies and guidelines to I. Khider, and he/she seems to have taken this as some kind of criticism or attack. Hopefully things'll get straightened out soon. I don't intend to do any more work on Muslimgauze or to have any more contact with I. Khider except as such communication should arise through normal Wikipedia activities. -- 201.37.230.43 ( talk) 14:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello Edgarde,
I replied 'Scholarly Jihad' is 'scholarly struggle' I. Khider ( talk) 04:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Suggest you remove th field in all the relevant articles then, ad another user was doing. Otherewise someone will re-fix the tempalte. Rich Farmbrough, 17:49 22 January 2009 (UTC).
In the Spock article. I immediately noted my error, and was fixing it, but you got to it first. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 15:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Momentary Lapse US-250.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Div-bell-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
For my part, I liked (an agreed with) your comments in the deletion debate. I saw where someone responded to it with "WP:CIVIL please" and I can say that he's wrong. WP:CIVIL does not apply to statements made about an article, or to arguments, or to a line of thought. It does apply, of course, to statements directed toward a specific individual, such as calling someone "a big crybaby" in response to something they've just written, or saying "What the hell are you talking about", etc. There is no bar against humor (or, for those British people "humour") in discussions about the quality of what's on Wikipedia. Don't let someone's self-righteous comments deter you from speaking your mind. Mandsford ( talk) 17:13, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I never made that edit! And I certainly would have remembered this page! Someone's scarffed my IP Yak! Larrry2 ( talk)
Why did you first Prod an article, then add a rescue tag to the article? Ikip ( talk) 22:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
I've opened a merge discussion at the above-mentioned location. Please consider participating if you are interested. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
As of now, I'm trying to deactivate my account, so can you remove all or your comments on my talk page. Thanks. I don't want anything appearing on my talk page anymore. Thanks. Cobenobo ( talk) 22:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not keep information used to mock or disparage your colleagues in your userspace. Doing so is unconstructive and not conducive to a collegial editing environment. Keeping sections of pages to mock other editors is unacceptable per Wikipedia:User page ("What may I not have on my user page?...Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws" and "If the community lets you know that they would rather you delete some content from your user space, you should consider doing so — such content is only permitted with the consent of the community.") I shouldn't have to request an admin delete it or nominate it for deletion. For the same reason why I do not keep information used negatively against eidtors with whom I disagree in my userspace, I expect the same from you. Moreover, I have asked editors not to refer to my old username due to real world concerns, which DGG and Randomran can confirm really have happened. Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 17:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
if you want a user RFC or an RFAR that can't help referring to your previous usernames, this is the right way to go about it
discussion of a user's conduct is not in itself a personal attack when done in the appropriate forum for such discussion
I have deleted your attack userbox. Please use wikipedia's dispute resolution processes to handle further content and/or policy issues. Continued denigration or harassment of other users is against wikipedia policy, and may result in measures being taken to protect the project. Thank you. -- Avi ( talk) 19:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, I've already undeleted them all and re-opened the AfD, because I closed it early by mistake. Black Kite 20:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Your edits to Bad Lieutenant and Smoke Some Kill re: Signifying Rapper ... I'm not so sure it wasn't a sample. Can you cite some info that it is NOT a sample? You link to the AV Club's interview with Ferrara but that doesn't prove that it wasn't a sample.
From my limited knowledge of how these things work, if it wasn't a sample, there wouldn't have been clearance issues in using it on the album or the film. If it was a new interpolation played by studio musicians, Page wouldn't have been able to force its removal. ExampleOfHumanBeing ( talk) 14:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
the fleshlight article has some external links but some affiliate deleted the links and replaced the last one there with his affiliate code, please do something —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh2xx ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, if you're around, would you mind commenting on the debate(s) going on on the Quagmire page? Thanks! DP76764 ( Talk) 20:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
It's been two and a half days since I last touched
that page and besides, here's the remark I left when I stopped reverting:
I don't want to edit war so I'll leave it as is for now. However, as the decision to exclude that category was bold, I thought I was allowed to revert as per
WP:BRD.
Please explain why you completely ignored the
WP:BRD cycle, yet you're giving me the {{3RR}} template almost 60 hours later.
87.69.177.35 (
talk)
06:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
no age for the first 6 seasons, but in Season 7 his age is given as 61 (with his driver's license giving "1948" as his year of birth).
Can you agree on this wording?
# Talk:Glenn Quagmire#Age Disagreement on what constitutes WP:OR (or WP:SYN), whether a television character's age stated in a late episode is important (or even exists) in earlier episodes, and if the evidence need be treated differently because it is supposedly in a joke. (Apologies for piling it on.) 17:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Please take a look at
this diff here and tell me this is not pure original research on your end. Let me even quote the exact words from your edit summary:
...based on situations that were probably intended at jokes since they are *contrary* to Q's character.
Are you saying it's OK for you to decide what MacFarlane and the gang intended? I'm all up for common sense, but this is actually overboard even for me. This is your interpretation. Here's mine:
These situations are intended to portray Quagmire's sensitive side, as opposed to what we are used to — him being a conscienceless sex maniac.
Now how in God's name is your interpretation better than mine?
87.69.177.35 (
talk)
21:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Reasons given for removing OR are not themselves OR because they are not being published as article content.Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought
Why are you doing a request for comments? This IP is being ridiculous in wanting to get his/her way. The user clearly needs to realize that the current consensus is not to list Quagmire's age. CTJF83 Talk 15:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
LOL, has it gotten that bad? That is a lovely bunch of ducks though =) DP76764 ( Talk) 17:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
87.69.177.35 ( talk) 17:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I cannot move that for a simple reason: there must be a clear separation between who was involved and who was not. If I relocate the thread to where you want, there are great chances of the whole situation getting mixed up and unbalanced as far as the definition of third party regarding this whole affair. 87.69.177.35 ( talk) 19:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
87.69.177.35 ( talk) 23:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I removed the notice since I realized nobody will be reading it. People will go straight to the point where they intend to insert the age. A notice like that would only be effective if it is placed somewhere near the point in which people wants to add the text.
I think [6] is almost a good compromise. I would keep "To match the retro character, the episode FOX-y Lady reveals Quagmire's birth year to be 1948" and not mention "making him 61 years old at the time, much to the surprise of his friends." I don't want to mention that he is 61, because that age is obviously going to be outdated as times go by. The last part is just indiscriminate plot detail. -- Maitch ( talk) 20:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
You've changed some Personnel sections, removing "Personnel per ..." comments that have a source.
I use that model and it was probably me that created those statements. (I didn't check and it isn't important.) I agree that source details belong in cites and thus in the Notes section. With a list of items, such as the Personnel section, adding a citation that appears after the last entry is misleading. It looks like the last entry comes from the source, and not all the entries. also, adding the "Personnel per" statement is akin to adding the name of a person who is quoted.
Can we discuss this before you make further changes? Perhaps there is a solution that avoids something drastic and ugly like adding the same citation to every item in the list. — John Cardinal ( talk) 17:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons, the Wikimedia central media repository for all free media. The image was either individually tagged or was in a category tagged with the {{ Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:Karen S. Evans-100.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#F8. Cheers! -- Captain-tucker ( talk) 01:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Can you comment here about listing two original air dates. Thank you, CTJF83 Talk 22:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Relics01-b-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 04:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1996RelicsLP-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 04:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
If covers can have their own page, don't worry, I will move the Madonna part in " American Pie". But if not, we'll just have to leave it that way. Alecsdaniel ( talk) 20:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Howdy! Let's talk: WP:COVERDISCUSS. - eo ( talk) 12:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the axe to this one -- it was very necessary. I suspect that the IP editors will be back though. – ukexpat ( talk) 18:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
I disagree very strongly with the need to create a spinoff article such as Sexual abuse scandal in Roman Catholic Diocese of Fairbanks; such an article would be created under the terms of WP:SUMMARY. I also don't see a problem with these sources, two from newspapers and one from Catholic News Agency. Unless someone can make suggestions for improving this, I would like to restore this information. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
The reason I felt it might be appropriate to create such an article is that the Fairbanks scandal was perhaps among the worst in all the United States. There are some pretty grim sources that describe the local parishes as a kind of pedophile paradise, a deliberate dumping ground for sexually deviant priests. [8] [9] ADM ( talk) 21:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Can you provide input for this, please? CTJF83 Talk 23:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry if this seems pedantic, but I nominated Kristin Maguire for deletion at the redirects for deletion page. I'm open to persuasion though... the more I think about it the more confused I am. -- Sancho Mandoval ( talk) 02:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Mslatif is back. Please use the proper template to warn/block him. -- Marawe ( talk) 04:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
{{subst:uw-spam2}} -- ~~~~
Thanks for letting me know about the recently deleted article CyanogenMod. I have requested Casliber ( talk · contribs) to Userify it to User:Virdi/CyanogenMod
Can you help me make Family Guy a GA. -- Pedro J. the rookie 12:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Look i am try in to get you may now kiss the guy who recives in to GA so can you help me. -- Pedro J. the rookie 23:14, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
In this section, do you think OR about when the episodes will air is ok? Grande13 feels the need to add episode titles with out official Fox press releases, based on the OR of Adult Swim airing one week after Fox. Please comment here. CTJF83 chat 17:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
The Family Guy characters webpage change did not violate Wikipedia's no original research policy. One word was removed and still remained correct as to the description. However, if you do wish to delete that sentence, that is your business. USN1977 ( talk) 15:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I know I should explain things a little better in edit summaries, but it gets a little tedious sometimes, ya know? I think most of the recent additions have been from different IPs, so you know they probably aren't looking at the edit history. Will try to be more thorough with the summaries though. Thanks! DP76764 ( Talk) 17:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't think I full understand this. Like you mentioned, that Lois isn't a Jewish in the first 127 episodes, so we shouldn't list her as Jewish, right? I always try to remove any info that is only from one single episode, such as that. Is that pretty much what the In U guidelines mean? CTJF83 chat 01:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing |
Actually, I only removed 1 alt description, on 1 occasion. After seeing the reason it was added, I fully support the use of alt descriptions. DP76764 ( Talk) 22:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I proposed merging Seth & Alex's Almost Live Comedy Show with Family Guy 3 weeks ago, and haven't had much feedback, so I'm requesting your opinion (along with other major project members) on whether the page should be merged or not. Thank you, CTJF83 chat 09:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Pink Floyd A Collection of Great Dance Songs 1997 Remastered CD-300.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 08:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Many thanks for your warning / suggestion. Will follow your advice in future Annette46 ( talk) 21:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey, Edgarde. Just wanted to say thanks for your help to User:I. Khider and myself. I've tried to point out some Wikipedia policies and guidelines to I. Khider, and he/she seems to have taken this as some kind of criticism or attack. Hopefully things'll get straightened out soon. I don't intend to do any more work on Muslimgauze or to have any more contact with I. Khider except as such communication should arise through normal Wikipedia activities. -- 201.37.230.43 ( talk) 14:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello Edgarde,
I replied 'Scholarly Jihad' is 'scholarly struggle' I. Khider ( talk) 04:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Suggest you remove th field in all the relevant articles then, ad another user was doing. Otherewise someone will re-fix the tempalte. Rich Farmbrough, 17:49 22 January 2009 (UTC).
In the Spock article. I immediately noted my error, and was fixing it, but you got to it first. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 15:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Momentary Lapse US-250.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Div-bell-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
For my part, I liked (an agreed with) your comments in the deletion debate. I saw where someone responded to it with "WP:CIVIL please" and I can say that he's wrong. WP:CIVIL does not apply to statements made about an article, or to arguments, or to a line of thought. It does apply, of course, to statements directed toward a specific individual, such as calling someone "a big crybaby" in response to something they've just written, or saying "What the hell are you talking about", etc. There is no bar against humor (or, for those British people "humour") in discussions about the quality of what's on Wikipedia. Don't let someone's self-righteous comments deter you from speaking your mind. Mandsford ( talk) 17:13, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I never made that edit! And I certainly would have remembered this page! Someone's scarffed my IP Yak! Larrry2 ( talk)
Why did you first Prod an article, then add a rescue tag to the article? Ikip ( talk) 22:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
I've opened a merge discussion at the above-mentioned location. Please consider participating if you are interested. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
As of now, I'm trying to deactivate my account, so can you remove all or your comments on my talk page. Thanks. I don't want anything appearing on my talk page anymore. Thanks. Cobenobo ( talk) 22:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not keep information used to mock or disparage your colleagues in your userspace. Doing so is unconstructive and not conducive to a collegial editing environment. Keeping sections of pages to mock other editors is unacceptable per Wikipedia:User page ("What may I not have on my user page?...Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws" and "If the community lets you know that they would rather you delete some content from your user space, you should consider doing so — such content is only permitted with the consent of the community.") I shouldn't have to request an admin delete it or nominate it for deletion. For the same reason why I do not keep information used negatively against eidtors with whom I disagree in my userspace, I expect the same from you. Moreover, I have asked editors not to refer to my old username due to real world concerns, which DGG and Randomran can confirm really have happened. Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 17:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
if you want a user RFC or an RFAR that can't help referring to your previous usernames, this is the right way to go about it
discussion of a user's conduct is not in itself a personal attack when done in the appropriate forum for such discussion
I have deleted your attack userbox. Please use wikipedia's dispute resolution processes to handle further content and/or policy issues. Continued denigration or harassment of other users is against wikipedia policy, and may result in measures being taken to protect the project. Thank you. -- Avi ( talk) 19:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, I've already undeleted them all and re-opened the AfD, because I closed it early by mistake. Black Kite 20:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Your edits to Bad Lieutenant and Smoke Some Kill re: Signifying Rapper ... I'm not so sure it wasn't a sample. Can you cite some info that it is NOT a sample? You link to the AV Club's interview with Ferrara but that doesn't prove that it wasn't a sample.
From my limited knowledge of how these things work, if it wasn't a sample, there wouldn't have been clearance issues in using it on the album or the film. If it was a new interpolation played by studio musicians, Page wouldn't have been able to force its removal. ExampleOfHumanBeing ( talk) 14:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
the fleshlight article has some external links but some affiliate deleted the links and replaced the last one there with his affiliate code, please do something —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh2xx ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, if you're around, would you mind commenting on the debate(s) going on on the Quagmire page? Thanks! DP76764 ( Talk) 20:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
It's been two and a half days since I last touched
that page and besides, here's the remark I left when I stopped reverting:
I don't want to edit war so I'll leave it as is for now. However, as the decision to exclude that category was bold, I thought I was allowed to revert as per
WP:BRD.
Please explain why you completely ignored the
WP:BRD cycle, yet you're giving me the {{3RR}} template almost 60 hours later.
87.69.177.35 (
talk)
06:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
no age for the first 6 seasons, but in Season 7 his age is given as 61 (with his driver's license giving "1948" as his year of birth).
Can you agree on this wording?
# Talk:Glenn Quagmire#Age Disagreement on what constitutes WP:OR (or WP:SYN), whether a television character's age stated in a late episode is important (or even exists) in earlier episodes, and if the evidence need be treated differently because it is supposedly in a joke. (Apologies for piling it on.) 17:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Please take a look at
this diff here and tell me this is not pure original research on your end. Let me even quote the exact words from your edit summary:
...based on situations that were probably intended at jokes since they are *contrary* to Q's character.
Are you saying it's OK for you to decide what MacFarlane and the gang intended? I'm all up for common sense, but this is actually overboard even for me. This is your interpretation. Here's mine:
These situations are intended to portray Quagmire's sensitive side, as opposed to what we are used to — him being a conscienceless sex maniac.
Now how in God's name is your interpretation better than mine?
87.69.177.35 (
talk)
21:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Reasons given for removing OR are not themselves OR because they are not being published as article content.Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought
Why are you doing a request for comments? This IP is being ridiculous in wanting to get his/her way. The user clearly needs to realize that the current consensus is not to list Quagmire's age. CTJF83 Talk 15:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
LOL, has it gotten that bad? That is a lovely bunch of ducks though =) DP76764 ( Talk) 17:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
87.69.177.35 ( talk) 17:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I cannot move that for a simple reason: there must be a clear separation between who was involved and who was not. If I relocate the thread to where you want, there are great chances of the whole situation getting mixed up and unbalanced as far as the definition of third party regarding this whole affair. 87.69.177.35 ( talk) 19:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
87.69.177.35 ( talk) 23:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I removed the notice since I realized nobody will be reading it. People will go straight to the point where they intend to insert the age. A notice like that would only be effective if it is placed somewhere near the point in which people wants to add the text.
I think [6] is almost a good compromise. I would keep "To match the retro character, the episode FOX-y Lady reveals Quagmire's birth year to be 1948" and not mention "making him 61 years old at the time, much to the surprise of his friends." I don't want to mention that he is 61, because that age is obviously going to be outdated as times go by. The last part is just indiscriminate plot detail. -- Maitch ( talk) 20:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
You've changed some Personnel sections, removing "Personnel per ..." comments that have a source.
I use that model and it was probably me that created those statements. (I didn't check and it isn't important.) I agree that source details belong in cites and thus in the Notes section. With a list of items, such as the Personnel section, adding a citation that appears after the last entry is misleading. It looks like the last entry comes from the source, and not all the entries. also, adding the "Personnel per" statement is akin to adding the name of a person who is quoted.
Can we discuss this before you make further changes? Perhaps there is a solution that avoids something drastic and ugly like adding the same citation to every item in the list. — John Cardinal ( talk) 17:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons, the Wikimedia central media repository for all free media. The image was either individually tagged or was in a category tagged with the {{ Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:Karen S. Evans-100.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#F8. Cheers! -- Captain-tucker ( talk) 01:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Can you comment here about listing two original air dates. Thank you, CTJF83 Talk 22:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Relics01-b-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 04:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1996RelicsLP-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 04:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
If covers can have their own page, don't worry, I will move the Madonna part in " American Pie". But if not, we'll just have to leave it that way. Alecsdaniel ( talk) 20:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Howdy! Let's talk: WP:COVERDISCUSS. - eo ( talk) 12:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the axe to this one -- it was very necessary. I suspect that the IP editors will be back though. – ukexpat ( talk) 18:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
I disagree very strongly with the need to create a spinoff article such as Sexual abuse scandal in Roman Catholic Diocese of Fairbanks; such an article would be created under the terms of WP:SUMMARY. I also don't see a problem with these sources, two from newspapers and one from Catholic News Agency. Unless someone can make suggestions for improving this, I would like to restore this information. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
The reason I felt it might be appropriate to create such an article is that the Fairbanks scandal was perhaps among the worst in all the United States. There are some pretty grim sources that describe the local parishes as a kind of pedophile paradise, a deliberate dumping ground for sexually deviant priests. [8] [9] ADM ( talk) 21:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Can you provide input for this, please? CTJF83 Talk 23:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry if this seems pedantic, but I nominated Kristin Maguire for deletion at the redirects for deletion page. I'm open to persuasion though... the more I think about it the more confused I am. -- Sancho Mandoval ( talk) 02:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Mslatif is back. Please use the proper template to warn/block him. -- Marawe ( talk) 04:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
{{subst:uw-spam2}} -- ~~~~
Thanks for letting me know about the recently deleted article CyanogenMod. I have requested Casliber ( talk · contribs) to Userify it to User:Virdi/CyanogenMod
Can you help me make Family Guy a GA. -- Pedro J. the rookie 12:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Look i am try in to get you may now kiss the guy who recives in to GA so can you help me. -- Pedro J. the rookie 23:14, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
In this section, do you think OR about when the episodes will air is ok? Grande13 feels the need to add episode titles with out official Fox press releases, based on the OR of Adult Swim airing one week after Fox. Please comment here. CTJF83 chat 17:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
The Family Guy characters webpage change did not violate Wikipedia's no original research policy. One word was removed and still remained correct as to the description. However, if you do wish to delete that sentence, that is your business. USN1977 ( talk) 15:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I know I should explain things a little better in edit summaries, but it gets a little tedious sometimes, ya know? I think most of the recent additions have been from different IPs, so you know they probably aren't looking at the edit history. Will try to be more thorough with the summaries though. Thanks! DP76764 ( Talk) 17:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't think I full understand this. Like you mentioned, that Lois isn't a Jewish in the first 127 episodes, so we shouldn't list her as Jewish, right? I always try to remove any info that is only from one single episode, such as that. Is that pretty much what the In U guidelines mean? CTJF83 chat 01:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing |
Actually, I only removed 1 alt description, on 1 occasion. After seeing the reason it was added, I fully support the use of alt descriptions. DP76764 ( Talk) 22:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I proposed merging Seth & Alex's Almost Live Comedy Show with Family Guy 3 weeks ago, and haven't had much feedback, so I'm requesting your opinion (along with other major project members) on whether the page should be merged or not. Thank you, CTJF83 chat 09:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Pink Floyd A Collection of Great Dance Songs 1997 Remastered CD-300.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 08:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Many thanks for your warning / suggestion. Will follow your advice in future Annette46 ( talk) 21:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)