![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for cleaning up The Sherman and fixing up the template - I will make sure to follow your example with that. I've been looking for anyone to help out, so anything is great - particularly when its useful! Thanks again. - Freechild 13:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lauroroger, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lauroroger is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lauroroger, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lauroroger itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lenny23165971, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lenny23165971 is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lenny23165971, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lenny23165971 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Linker2000, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Linker2000 is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Linker2000, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Linker2000 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of MangonelMan, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of MangonelMan is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of MangonelMan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of MangonelMan itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Map inc, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Map inc is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Map inc, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Map inc itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
OH NO, look what I've done to your talk page! My eyebrows were getting higher with every sockpuppet "article"! Seriously though, apology accepted, no harm done.
--
Smokizzy (
talk)
02:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for redirecting that. I was not sure what the correct procedure was for misspelt pages. Beast of traal 23:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Beast of traal
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Old Jail, by
Haemo, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Old Jail fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Old Jail, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Old Jail itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
The latest "Ron Liebman" sockpuppet has a sense of humor, or something, having chosen an ID that's similar to yours. Baseball Bugs 17:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered on 16:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 16:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there,
I put up a video of Danny Glover and Felix Justice on Danny Glover's page as it is a free video of him, something that wikipedia does not offer. I thought this might be of interest to readers as it is a performance that he loves to do and cares a lot about. But you pulled it down. It also says you pulled down other videos I posted. These are simply videos for users to understand more about the person. Yesterday another administrator pulled one I put down of Christopher Hitchens, but after review put it back up as he said it should be included.
Can you please explain?
Thank-you!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.50.133.66 ( talk • contribs) 15:20, June 6, 2007.
A full explanation, better than I could do, is available at Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming. - Ebyabe 19:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
But, these video links have been approved by other admins, why did you take them off if they have been approved at closer look. I know in the past this IP has been flagged as spammers, but in this case it has been approved. Please explain or reverse your action as other admins have. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.50.133.66 ( talk • contribs) 15:57, June 6, 2007.
The answer looks to be, "Yes, he will never learn." d:) Baseball Bugs 23:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ebyabe
The stub categories you mentioned have all been renamed by WP:WSS. I've posted a list on Wikipedia talk:Special:Wantedcategories. Happy editing. Valentinian T / C 16:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
cool, I'll help get this done over the course of the next week. Very cool.
I'm just doing it now I just created about 7 new articles with their pretty pictures - I'm doing the Kelly Slater one now ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 20:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed the red dot on the map for Blackwood-Harwood Plantations Cemetery was in Alabama, so I adjusted the x and y coordinates by hand to make it closer to Tallahassee. Then I noticed the same error in Caroline Brevard Grammar School, so I figured something was up. I think the coordinates used to be correct, but the image on the new template is now a different size, so they all appear shifted. I'm not sure how many articles are affected or what to do about it, so I'm just alerting other people to the problem. — Keenan Pepper 00:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you've been reverting user 68.60.137.139's edits on Hayden Christensen for awhile. He continually reverts my cleanup work on the article as well with no explanation. Maybe article semi-protection is in order? Rito Revollto 06:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I've anonblocked 65.88.88.153 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) for 1 week. I hesitate to block it for any longer for now because it's registered to the New York Public Library and a longer block would inevitably cause collateral damage, or Ron could probably hop onto another workstation. -- Netsnipe ► 19:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Another new one today, User:Swerdlick. Baseball Bugs 18:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
I finally completed the long-term abuse report page entry: Wikipedia:Long term abuse#Baseball Vandal aka Ron liebman Feel free to add on or improve as needed. Georgewilliamherbert 19:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Stop Erasing Hayden Christensen Personal Life Leave It Alone And Don't Touch It —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.60.137.139 ( talk • contribs).
hey, thanks for fixing those red links in the Categories box in those Spanish wine articles. It's been driving me crazy!! I'm still kinda new here so I didn't know how to fix them myself! -- BodegasAmbite 08:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Ah a friendly voice from afar. You know how to pick you're reading my friend. 66% support right now, most don't pass without 70% or more, even then it can be iffy. You're right though. And whatever happens happens. IvoShandor 16:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
A lot of these are pretty decent articles, more than stubs (except for maybe one or two), John S. Van Bergen is probably close to GA right now as are a couple others. All of those have photos that I have done, but I am running out of Wright photos! Soon I will have to take another Frank Lloyd Wright adventure day, woo hoo! His house is amazing btw. Oh, you'll love this, I have begun the National Register of Historic Places nomination process for the Andrew O. Anderson House. Woot. : ) IvoShandor 17:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
(undent)I like that, parapgraph. Ha again. IvoShandor 19:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
this has to be the funniest description for the edit comment that I've ever seen, rofl - Mike Payne 19:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my recent, unsuccessful RfA. It's much appreciated. I figured I could count on you for support despite the fact that I look insane at a glance. IvoShandor 16:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I think the part about dentistry was true. I'll try to remember to check my copy of Stengel's autobiography. Meanwhile, I see that Ronny is back, including hitting up some pages that went off protection. Baseball Bugs 16:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I found the book. He talks about his troubles trying to extract teeth. Sufficient to make you cringe a bit and be glad (for the sake of others) that he never took up dentistry. It also elaborates on his nickname a bit. It was partly from K.C. and partly from Casey of Casey at the Bat, due to Stengel racking up a few too many "K's", see? d:) Baseball Bugs 23:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Why did you take out Streisand's pro-choice category. It's a fact (and in my mind, a reputable one). Bellagio99 21:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ebyabe. Since you created this template is has been used on some articles I have seen, but the naval ship templates also continue to be used. Possibly it is because your new template is not listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ships/Tables. Do you think your template should be added there? Kablammo 05:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Is Cjamieson ( talk · contribs) a sock? I'm not familiar with the case, but the edit pattern looks the same. -- Wafulz 15:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Another one ( User:149.4.108.51) has popped up. It looks like a whole subnet someplace, based on some of the other IPs in his sockpuppet category. Neier 22:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Quit vandalizing the Joy Behar page. It's pissing me off ExcellentEditor 18:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanx for the mama's family edit compromise thing. Maybe you're not such a bad guy after all :) ExcellentEditor 20:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
yea, i checked out the mama's family page and wikitweak was right so I reverted your work. you and excellenteditor love to vandlize pages, don't you. PlayGuy107 12:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Another one: User:Richard neer. He claims he isn't. But it's the same bogus claim about Matsui's games streak. I don't see why anybody cares. 518 or 519, either way, it's over. It would only matter if he had come back the next day and "continued" (or not) the streak. Baseball Bugs 15:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I thought this one had been blocked, but apparently not: [2] Baseball Bugs 18:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Oh dear, a new sockpuppet maybe? If so, his grasp of geography is as good as the one he has on baseball! *lol* - Ebyabe 19:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Voodooacademy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 18:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
I am somewhat confused by the architecture tag on the talk page of the above - you might not wish to see my irreverent comments there. Its all a bit dead parrot stuff to me Satu Suro 12:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
I got an e-mail back from him. He's the guy. He wants to be reinstated. He also said a lot of the recent edits by red-links and IP addresses are copycats. I explained in some detail that he needs to provide documentary evidence, along with some suggestions on how to do it. I said if he promises to do that, I will see what I can do about getting him reinstated. Baseball Bugs 00:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
He is best known as a writer. Can you please change the stub category? Zigzig20s 06:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you were the creater of the NRHP wikiproject, I was wondering if you considered bulk stubbing the entries with infoboxes and other info since there seems to be a ton of missing articles from the register? I downloaded the database and have been playing around with it some, I could probably put the pieces together, but I'm semi new to wikipedia, so I'm not sure how this type of thing is viewed. pw 16:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for cleaning up The Sherman and fixing up the template - I will make sure to follow your example with that. I've been looking for anyone to help out, so anything is great - particularly when its useful! Thanks again. - Freechild 13:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lauroroger, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lauroroger is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lauroroger, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lauroroger itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lenny23165971, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lenny23165971 is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lenny23165971, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lenny23165971 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Linker2000, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Linker2000 is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Linker2000, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Linker2000 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of MangonelMan, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of MangonelMan is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of MangonelMan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of MangonelMan itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Map inc, by
Smokizzy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Map inc is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Map inc, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Map inc itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
OH NO, look what I've done to your talk page! My eyebrows were getting higher with every sockpuppet "article"! Seriously though, apology accepted, no harm done.
--
Smokizzy (
talk)
02:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for redirecting that. I was not sure what the correct procedure was for misspelt pages. Beast of traal 23:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Beast of traal
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Old Jail, by
Haemo, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Old Jail fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Old Jail, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Old Jail itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
The latest "Ron Liebman" sockpuppet has a sense of humor, or something, having chosen an ID that's similar to yours. Baseball Bugs 17:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered on 16:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 16:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there,
I put up a video of Danny Glover and Felix Justice on Danny Glover's page as it is a free video of him, something that wikipedia does not offer. I thought this might be of interest to readers as it is a performance that he loves to do and cares a lot about. But you pulled it down. It also says you pulled down other videos I posted. These are simply videos for users to understand more about the person. Yesterday another administrator pulled one I put down of Christopher Hitchens, but after review put it back up as he said it should be included.
Can you please explain?
Thank-you!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.50.133.66 ( talk • contribs) 15:20, June 6, 2007.
A full explanation, better than I could do, is available at Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming. - Ebyabe 19:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
But, these video links have been approved by other admins, why did you take them off if they have been approved at closer look. I know in the past this IP has been flagged as spammers, but in this case it has been approved. Please explain or reverse your action as other admins have. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.50.133.66 ( talk • contribs) 15:57, June 6, 2007.
The answer looks to be, "Yes, he will never learn." d:) Baseball Bugs 23:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ebyabe
The stub categories you mentioned have all been renamed by WP:WSS. I've posted a list on Wikipedia talk:Special:Wantedcategories. Happy editing. Valentinian T / C 16:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
cool, I'll help get this done over the course of the next week. Very cool.
I'm just doing it now I just created about 7 new articles with their pretty pictures - I'm doing the Kelly Slater one now ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 20:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed the red dot on the map for Blackwood-Harwood Plantations Cemetery was in Alabama, so I adjusted the x and y coordinates by hand to make it closer to Tallahassee. Then I noticed the same error in Caroline Brevard Grammar School, so I figured something was up. I think the coordinates used to be correct, but the image on the new template is now a different size, so they all appear shifted. I'm not sure how many articles are affected or what to do about it, so I'm just alerting other people to the problem. — Keenan Pepper 00:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you've been reverting user 68.60.137.139's edits on Hayden Christensen for awhile. He continually reverts my cleanup work on the article as well with no explanation. Maybe article semi-protection is in order? Rito Revollto 06:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I've anonblocked 65.88.88.153 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) for 1 week. I hesitate to block it for any longer for now because it's registered to the New York Public Library and a longer block would inevitably cause collateral damage, or Ron could probably hop onto another workstation. -- Netsnipe ► 19:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Another new one today, User:Swerdlick. Baseball Bugs 18:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
I finally completed the long-term abuse report page entry: Wikipedia:Long term abuse#Baseball Vandal aka Ron liebman Feel free to add on or improve as needed. Georgewilliamherbert 19:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Stop Erasing Hayden Christensen Personal Life Leave It Alone And Don't Touch It —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.60.137.139 ( talk • contribs).
hey, thanks for fixing those red links in the Categories box in those Spanish wine articles. It's been driving me crazy!! I'm still kinda new here so I didn't know how to fix them myself! -- BodegasAmbite 08:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Ah a friendly voice from afar. You know how to pick you're reading my friend. 66% support right now, most don't pass without 70% or more, even then it can be iffy. You're right though. And whatever happens happens. IvoShandor 16:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
A lot of these are pretty decent articles, more than stubs (except for maybe one or two), John S. Van Bergen is probably close to GA right now as are a couple others. All of those have photos that I have done, but I am running out of Wright photos! Soon I will have to take another Frank Lloyd Wright adventure day, woo hoo! His house is amazing btw. Oh, you'll love this, I have begun the National Register of Historic Places nomination process for the Andrew O. Anderson House. Woot. : ) IvoShandor 17:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
(undent)I like that, parapgraph. Ha again. IvoShandor 19:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
this has to be the funniest description for the edit comment that I've ever seen, rofl - Mike Payne 19:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my recent, unsuccessful RfA. It's much appreciated. I figured I could count on you for support despite the fact that I look insane at a glance. IvoShandor 16:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I think the part about dentistry was true. I'll try to remember to check my copy of Stengel's autobiography. Meanwhile, I see that Ronny is back, including hitting up some pages that went off protection. Baseball Bugs 16:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I found the book. He talks about his troubles trying to extract teeth. Sufficient to make you cringe a bit and be glad (for the sake of others) that he never took up dentistry. It also elaborates on his nickname a bit. It was partly from K.C. and partly from Casey of Casey at the Bat, due to Stengel racking up a few too many "K's", see? d:) Baseball Bugs 23:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Why did you take out Streisand's pro-choice category. It's a fact (and in my mind, a reputable one). Bellagio99 21:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ebyabe. Since you created this template is has been used on some articles I have seen, but the naval ship templates also continue to be used. Possibly it is because your new template is not listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ships/Tables. Do you think your template should be added there? Kablammo 05:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Is Cjamieson ( talk · contribs) a sock? I'm not familiar with the case, but the edit pattern looks the same. -- Wafulz 15:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Another one ( User:149.4.108.51) has popped up. It looks like a whole subnet someplace, based on some of the other IPs in his sockpuppet category. Neier 22:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Quit vandalizing the Joy Behar page. It's pissing me off ExcellentEditor 18:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanx for the mama's family edit compromise thing. Maybe you're not such a bad guy after all :) ExcellentEditor 20:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
yea, i checked out the mama's family page and wikitweak was right so I reverted your work. you and excellenteditor love to vandlize pages, don't you. PlayGuy107 12:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Another one: User:Richard neer. He claims he isn't. But it's the same bogus claim about Matsui's games streak. I don't see why anybody cares. 518 or 519, either way, it's over. It would only matter if he had come back the next day and "continued" (or not) the streak. Baseball Bugs 15:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I thought this one had been blocked, but apparently not: [2] Baseball Bugs 18:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Oh dear, a new sockpuppet maybe? If so, his grasp of geography is as good as the one he has on baseball! *lol* - Ebyabe 19:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Voodooacademy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 18:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
I am somewhat confused by the architecture tag on the talk page of the above - you might not wish to see my irreverent comments there. Its all a bit dead parrot stuff to me Satu Suro 12:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
I got an e-mail back from him. He's the guy. He wants to be reinstated. He also said a lot of the recent edits by red-links and IP addresses are copycats. I explained in some detail that he needs to provide documentary evidence, along with some suggestions on how to do it. I said if he promises to do that, I will see what I can do about getting him reinstated. Baseball Bugs 00:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
He is best known as a writer. Can you please change the stub category? Zigzig20s 06:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you were the creater of the NRHP wikiproject, I was wondering if you considered bulk stubbing the entries with infoboxes and other info since there seems to be a ton of missing articles from the register? I downloaded the database and have been playing around with it some, I could probably put the pieces together, but I'm semi new to wikipedia, so I'm not sure how this type of thing is viewed. pw 16:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)