This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Ebyabe. I hope that you are well. Does this looke familiar? Especially this. best regards to ya! MarnetteD| Talk 21:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I like to edit random articles, I'm not the same user your looking for. I'm just trying to fix some mistakes in some articles. Some information on her is incorrect, and I'm correcting it. 71.232.184.131 ( talk) 22:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "VIncent D'Onofrio - Marriage to Greta Scacchi - information has been correct for years, suddenly its getting edited again.". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 September 2015.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee. 00:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. I have requested remediation (I hope went about it the right way). Many years ago I had a similar struggle on wiki with this page. You can read the entire progression on the talk part of the page. Could you explain why you feel that what was resolved many years ago, needed to be undone? In the end it doesn't really matter what a webpage says or doesn't say. Yet, this is supposed to be Wikipedia and considered accurate by most. Any new news articles will use wiki as a scourse, perpetuating the mis-information. All the best, Carin Cvanderdonk ( talk) 10:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_D%27Onofrio#/talk/6 Cvanderdonk ( talk) 10:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
What copyright images are you talking about — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbzmaster45 ( talk • contribs) 11:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The Iron Man 3 poster, for one. You own the copyright for that? Also, other images you uploaded were from Getty images. Those cannot be uploaded here, as the belong to Getty. I'm not the only one who removed images, btw. --‖ Ebyabe talk - State of the Union ‖ 14:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning VIncent D'Onofrio - Marriage to Greta Scacchi - information has been correct for years, suddenly its getting edited again., to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK) 14:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Thank for dealing with that IP troll from SoftLayer on my user page and the fat acceptance movement page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 04:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC) |
Hi there! This has become a very difficult change to submit. Marianne Kirby and Lesley Kinzel have created a YouTube channel called Lounging with Pizza, and during their first video they talk about the errors I'm trying to correct on wikipedia's Fat Acceptance movement page. Lesley Kinzel's blog is currently called Two Whole Cakes, but she is originally from Fatshionista, and was co-founder of the Fatshionista livejournal that is linked to in the references, not Marianne Kirby. Additionally, Marianne Kirby is from The Rotund. You can see examples of this by going to therotund.com (which will redirect you to mariannekirby.com, which will show you that Marianne Kirby is The Rotund) and fatshionista.com (which will redirect you to blog.twowholecakes.com, where it shows that it is written by Lesley Kinzel "previously of fatshionista.com"). Can you tell me how to make these corrections in a manner that will not have them reverted for the fourth time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.205.47 ( talk) 05:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Sorry about that, you had just said to message you on your talk page if I thought the reversion was an error. Will continue any further discussion at the appropriate page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.205.47 ( talk) 16:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
At what age did you discover you were a huge fag0t? Be honest pls this is for science. 168.1.75.51 ( talk) 04:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Concerning your compulsive reversions of my edits to Regeneration (Doctor Who), I appear to have encountered that unfortunate combination of spin-off loather and non-registered user hater (you have a userbox to that effect; you believe that all users ought to be forced to register). Tell me, why do you loath spin-off material? Also, I saw no original research in my edits, contrary to your absurd and prejudiced claims. 5.69.65.122 ( talk) 19:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Not threatening, just following procedures. I'm sorry you find my actions disgusting, but that's all on you mate. You can always report me at WP:ANI. Cheers. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 20:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hi Ebyabe, I'm so sorry for reverting you - I went to click on an article history in my watchlist and next thing I know I've somehow used rollback on you, I honestly have no idea how it happened - Think my mouse's haunted , Anyway sorry, Happy editing :) – Davey2010 Talk 23:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the message, Ebyabe. I was just coming back to delete what I'd added to the Judy Carne page (because I found out the source was unreliable) and saw you had done it for me. I'm new to this so I will be more thoughtful in the future. Thanks for not beating me up!
Brendles1 ( talk) 14:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello E. I wanted to let you know that this started up today. Only one week to new Who!! MarnetteD| Talk 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for creating National Register of Historic Places listings in Franklin County, Missouri. Do you think you could help me figure out if this mansion is listed? It doesn't seem to be, but I find that odd. Zigzig20s ( talk) 20:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Ebyabe.
I received your message about my Continuity entries for "The Magician's Apprentice", and I have to disagree with their removal, at least partly.
Most Continuity sections for Doctor Who episodes, both Classic and New, have no citations, and they have been accepted and left alone for years without dispute. Too, similar entries like my entry for Davros' showing the Doctor his past talks with him dot the entire Wiki Who article landscape. As user AlexTheWhovian notes in the History, "Such reappearances are extremely important and also sourced". As examples, just look at the entries for "Evolution of the Daleks" and "Death in Heaven".
As for my other entry about the Doctor's mentioning his prior selves' fashion choice, that, I concede, is just trivia, something any fan of the series would pick up on.
Please review my examples and other Who articles, and you'll see I'm right. Not all Continuity entries need outside sourcing, but can be considered sourced as long as the proper prior episodes are cited, as was mine.
Ooznoz ( talk) 23:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Ooznoz
I went by to try to figure out Wild Heron. I don't believe the house you photographed is the one in the NRHP nomination form. I didn't find the correct house. I've looked at Google Maps and Google Earth. The aerial view shows a house with three dormers in the front and back, but the one in the NRHP photos has three dormers on the front side only.
But doing a street view of that house
shows the one you photographed. I wonder if the old house was torn down and replaced. Or maybe it is around there someplace. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 21:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 04:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Bubba73 ( talk) 00:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Ebyabe. I hope that you are well. Does this looke familiar? Especially this. best regards to ya! MarnetteD| Talk 21:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I like to edit random articles, I'm not the same user your looking for. I'm just trying to fix some mistakes in some articles. Some information on her is incorrect, and I'm correcting it. 71.232.184.131 ( talk) 22:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "VIncent D'Onofrio - Marriage to Greta Scacchi - information has been correct for years, suddenly its getting edited again.". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 September 2015.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee. 00:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. I have requested remediation (I hope went about it the right way). Many years ago I had a similar struggle on wiki with this page. You can read the entire progression on the talk part of the page. Could you explain why you feel that what was resolved many years ago, needed to be undone? In the end it doesn't really matter what a webpage says or doesn't say. Yet, this is supposed to be Wikipedia and considered accurate by most. Any new news articles will use wiki as a scourse, perpetuating the mis-information. All the best, Carin Cvanderdonk ( talk) 10:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_D%27Onofrio#/talk/6 Cvanderdonk ( talk) 10:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
What copyright images are you talking about — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbzmaster45 ( talk • contribs) 11:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The Iron Man 3 poster, for one. You own the copyright for that? Also, other images you uploaded were from Getty images. Those cannot be uploaded here, as the belong to Getty. I'm not the only one who removed images, btw. --‖ Ebyabe talk - State of the Union ‖ 14:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning VIncent D'Onofrio - Marriage to Greta Scacchi - information has been correct for years, suddenly its getting edited again., to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK) 14:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Thank for dealing with that IP troll from SoftLayer on my user page and the fat acceptance movement page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 04:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC) |
Hi there! This has become a very difficult change to submit. Marianne Kirby and Lesley Kinzel have created a YouTube channel called Lounging with Pizza, and during their first video they talk about the errors I'm trying to correct on wikipedia's Fat Acceptance movement page. Lesley Kinzel's blog is currently called Two Whole Cakes, but she is originally from Fatshionista, and was co-founder of the Fatshionista livejournal that is linked to in the references, not Marianne Kirby. Additionally, Marianne Kirby is from The Rotund. You can see examples of this by going to therotund.com (which will redirect you to mariannekirby.com, which will show you that Marianne Kirby is The Rotund) and fatshionista.com (which will redirect you to blog.twowholecakes.com, where it shows that it is written by Lesley Kinzel "previously of fatshionista.com"). Can you tell me how to make these corrections in a manner that will not have them reverted for the fourth time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.205.47 ( talk) 05:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Sorry about that, you had just said to message you on your talk page if I thought the reversion was an error. Will continue any further discussion at the appropriate page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.205.47 ( talk) 16:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
At what age did you discover you were a huge fag0t? Be honest pls this is for science. 168.1.75.51 ( talk) 04:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Concerning your compulsive reversions of my edits to Regeneration (Doctor Who), I appear to have encountered that unfortunate combination of spin-off loather and non-registered user hater (you have a userbox to that effect; you believe that all users ought to be forced to register). Tell me, why do you loath spin-off material? Also, I saw no original research in my edits, contrary to your absurd and prejudiced claims. 5.69.65.122 ( talk) 19:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Not threatening, just following procedures. I'm sorry you find my actions disgusting, but that's all on you mate. You can always report me at WP:ANI. Cheers. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 20:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hi Ebyabe, I'm so sorry for reverting you - I went to click on an article history in my watchlist and next thing I know I've somehow used rollback on you, I honestly have no idea how it happened - Think my mouse's haunted , Anyway sorry, Happy editing :) – Davey2010 Talk 23:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the message, Ebyabe. I was just coming back to delete what I'd added to the Judy Carne page (because I found out the source was unreliable) and saw you had done it for me. I'm new to this so I will be more thoughtful in the future. Thanks for not beating me up!
Brendles1 ( talk) 14:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello E. I wanted to let you know that this started up today. Only one week to new Who!! MarnetteD| Talk 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for creating National Register of Historic Places listings in Franklin County, Missouri. Do you think you could help me figure out if this mansion is listed? It doesn't seem to be, but I find that odd. Zigzig20s ( talk) 20:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Ebyabe.
I received your message about my Continuity entries for "The Magician's Apprentice", and I have to disagree with their removal, at least partly.
Most Continuity sections for Doctor Who episodes, both Classic and New, have no citations, and they have been accepted and left alone for years without dispute. Too, similar entries like my entry for Davros' showing the Doctor his past talks with him dot the entire Wiki Who article landscape. As user AlexTheWhovian notes in the History, "Such reappearances are extremely important and also sourced". As examples, just look at the entries for "Evolution of the Daleks" and "Death in Heaven".
As for my other entry about the Doctor's mentioning his prior selves' fashion choice, that, I concede, is just trivia, something any fan of the series would pick up on.
Please review my examples and other Who articles, and you'll see I'm right. Not all Continuity entries need outside sourcing, but can be considered sourced as long as the proper prior episodes are cited, as was mine.
Ooznoz ( talk) 23:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Ooznoz
I went by to try to figure out Wild Heron. I don't believe the house you photographed is the one in the NRHP nomination form. I didn't find the correct house. I've looked at Google Maps and Google Earth. The aerial view shows a house with three dormers in the front and back, but the one in the NRHP photos has three dormers on the front side only.
But doing a street view of that house
shows the one you photographed. I wonder if the old house was torn down and replaced. Or maybe it is around there someplace. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 21:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 04:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Bubba73 ( talk) 00:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)