![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
I was just trying to wikify the article. I find it unnecessary of yours to revert my edits. My edits were in good faith.
Learnerktm 16:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
I got it. Thanks
Learnerktm 12:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Ally's birthday IS january, 1998 according to her agency — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.179.62.178 ( talk) 15:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
If you are interested in following and/or commenting: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Requesting a block of a user. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 05:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Transit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Stefan2 ( talk) 00:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on the St. George's article. Is there any way to change the visibility of that edit so that the libelous accusation is no longer visible? It is demonstrably untrue; Eric Peterson's son didn't go to Lawrence Academy. Thanks. 67.197.243.87 ( talk) 14:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
@ Ebyabe: Yes, you made a mistake for removing my edit on the article "Rose Tyler", because she was actually the War Doctor's companion in the episode "Day of the Doctor ", they even put Billie Piper in the cast. I put the edit back because I have proof that Rose was a companion of the War Doctor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolsuguessedit ( talk • contribs) 15:15, April 5, 2015
I did recently post an edit on the Kent Hovind article. I corrected a personal bias, and I removed false information. I do believe that the removal of this edit was a mistake and I would ask for you to revise this removal. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob A. Henderson ( talk • contribs) 09:33, April 15, 2015
I made a change to the notable alumni section of this article and you removed it because I did not cite my sources. Please review it as I went back and added the sources. Thanks. (Also, he has a pending wiki article of his own that meets all notable eligibility requirements. Please reference Draft:J.R. VanHoose Kaylamoore ( talk) 16:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC) User:kaylamoore
You claim that I am taking material directly from the museum's website and that is copyright infringement, yet you do not provide solid examples and proceed to delete everything I have edited. In regards to the copyright infringement, the article should be covered under the fair use clauses of copyright laws, in addition to that I have received express permission to update the Wikipedia page for the museum. I have been trying to incorporate primary source material into the page so as to reflect the status of the museum today. I have also been trying to remain impartial to my editing of the museum page so that it is up to Wikipedia's standards.
If it is a problem with the language used in the sections, I would really appreciate you to mark them so I can edit them. I hope to improve the page with constructive criticism because I believe the form of the article is fairly consistent with Wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinna17 ( talk • contribs) 22:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
I would request an indefinite semi. It's what a lot of us who are afflicted by vandals have. -- NeilN talk to me 03:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello E. Thanks for trying to explain things. You may have seen that FF2 just removed your post on Lukeno94 talk page. Even though it happened four minutes after your post I'm sure that FF2 will claim that it was an accident. If you are okay with it then no worries. Cheers and enjoy your week. MarnetteD| Talk 20:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
I did remove it by mistake, I didn't see it, please don't report it. As I said before and I will say it again, I am, am am, listening to what you guy's are saying to me. But lease, now after all this, no more, please. Because I'm going to a rough time right now, and I don't want anyone to give me a hard time anymore.... FrozenFan2 ( talk) 20:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm a first time Wikipedia editor. I made a sentence about the Coconut Grove Bed Race to to the "Coconut Grove" page and you reverted it which is fine... I'd just like to understand why.
You're feedback was "Only events with wikipedia articles pls." However, the article also has a reference to The Coconut Grove Arts festival which has an external link (e.g. it's not a wikipedia article) and this seems to be OK. What is the difference between the way The Coconut Grove Arts festival and The Coconut Grove Bed Race were referenced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stacyhallman ( talk • contribs) 00:47, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Yulee, Florida may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
There has been a conflict in preference over the use of image in the Jamie Dornan page, I'm hoping that a vote for which image might be preferable would settle the dispute. I am therefore writing to those who have edited Jamie Dornan page to voice their opinion in the Jamie Dornan Talk page so we can reach a consensus. I would welcome your opinion. Hzh ( talk) 11:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The problem I have is that anyone can claim they are the "tea party" There is no evidence in my opinion to say that the Koch Brothers made the first tea party page in 2002. Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
The fringe left is inserting absolute non-sense into the article. The claim that the koch bros made the first tea party website is absolutely false. They removed the old introduction that was there for over 9 months! Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
I wasn't talking about a new editor on may 30th. There is a serious war going on this page...the whole thing needs to be reverted back before april and locked.
alright, I understand. Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:32, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Just so you know, the old intro was this:
The origins of the current Tea Party movement can be traced back to circa 2007. The movement's beginnings were kick-started by Republican Congressman Dr. Ron Paul in 2007. His GOP presidential campaign received a 24-hour, record breaking, money bomb on December 16, 2007;[22] which is the 234th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party. This event directly contributed to creating a libertarian revival and divide in the Republican Party.[23][24][25] Ron Paul continues to be a prominent force in the Tea Party movement, such as endorsing Tea party candidates,[26] and also giving talks and speeches alongside prominent Tea party activist, and 2008 Vice Presidential candidate, Sarah Palin.[27][28] Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:42, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Maybe the old intro could have been improved, but i think replacing that with koch bros, is just stupid imo. it's a 180 degree turn. Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:43, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I've seen you reverted my recent edit on Harry Shum's article regarding his maternal last name.
The alleged source ( this) is a searchable database belonging to the Costa Rican Supreme Court of Elections, and therefore the page belongs to the Costa Rican government. The database gathers the data of all the people born in Costa Rican soil. Since Harry Shum, Jr. was born in this country, his data must be into the database. Searching for Harry Shum leaves an only result that matches the singer's date of birth and has "Kwan" as his maternal family name. Since there isn't any other result in the search, there's (theorically) no room for confusion, as no other man has been registered with that name in the country.
Of course, as an unexperienced contributor, I may be leaving something "uncertain" (as stated in your edition). Please let me know if there is anything wrong.
-- AndSalx95 ( talk) 06:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hmm, I'm sorry. This is not the first time I got into a debate due to the original research thing. I have read the article regarding both reliable sources and original research, and despite I'm still a little bit confused about it, I think I understand the reason of the reverted edition.
-- AndSalx95 ( talk) 19:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey! I'm not sure if you saw my last message, but I was wondering why you deleted this sentence "In that vein, the city was named 2014’s Best U.S. City to Start a Career by the personal finance site, WalletHub[113]" from the Economy section of the Washington, D.C. entry? I provided the primary source ( http://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-cities-to-start-a-career/3626/), which is supported by news coverage ( http://www.usnews.com/news/slideshows/the-top-10-best-cities-to-start-a-career), so I just wanted to see if I made a procedural mistake or something! Please let me know so I can fix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarabas ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I followed your instructions and even showed you the addition before I did it, and you still took it down! Do you need more news stories about the study? Because there are many. Could we maybe get other people's opinions as well? It seems like a legitimate addition to me. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sarabas (
talk •
contribs)
01:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Do you have something against me, because yes i sockpocketed account Tommyjourney in February of 2014 16 months ago. If I wanted to make an unblocked request I can't because my user talk is BLOCKED so I have to use my IP address account, that's all I said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.48.201.72 ( talk) 13:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
My point is I sockpocketed 16 months ago I was told to use the Standard Offer which is wait six months to make an appeal by another user, that user blocked my talk page for too many block envasions. My point is I waited 22 months since I got blocked the first time, but you or any other user are just saying f 71.48.201.72 ( talk) you don't belong here. At least I'm telling the truth about what I done instead of lieing and make it worse. Does that not count for something. — Preceding undated comment added 15:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm incredibly new to wikipedia, but I've just had Ansel Elgort personally ask me if I could change his user photo to one of him preferably from the Oscars. I find that I'm not allowed to upload images (and I don't know if I could do it right even if I tried) so I thought it would be much safer to just inquire if you would be willing to attempt it? I would give him your twitter username if you happen to be on there (if that even means anything to you, I'm sorry if it doesn't, it's just that that's his main social media outlet) so he could thank you himself.
Thank you for taking the time and I'll totally understand if you just delete this whole thing!
Jaime Balaban Jackeloper ( talk) 22:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
No, but I used google's search tools to specify images only "labeled for reuse" and hopefully this one meets their standards? You would know more about it than me, I'm sure. He's kind of... I don't want to actually say vain but that's really the best word for it. He wouldn't want anyone to know it, which is why he didn't tweet about it in general this time like he did when he wanted someone to get "model" out of his list of jobs.
It's from here http://todateen.uol.com.br/tt/wp-content/uploads/galerias/gatos-oscar-2015/
And it's this image specifically http://todateen.uol.com.br/tt/wp-content/uploads/galerias/gatos-oscar-2015/ansel.jpg Jackeloper ( talk) 22:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
If there's any way I could get a photo from him, one he took or his father, the problem would still be that I wouldn't be able to upload it. Even if he made his own account he wouldn't be able to upload it without having edited 10 pages or something like that. Oiy vey, what a headache. Thank you for your help, anyways! Jackeloper ( talk) 23:05, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
I'd say it was very likely. There are a number of similarities in their editing. If they continue to edit war and make unsourced changes, I might start an SPI. Thanks for your thoughts - we'll see how it goes. Cheers, Bretonbanquet ( talk) 20:23, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
You restored unsourced information on this page with no new or additional sources. Please do not repeat this action and rather include sources. Your statement that the information is already sourced is entirely incorrect. No sources exist on the page regarding DJ names along with the other information you attempted to restore without due cause.The Probability Wizard 17:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Probability Wizard ( talk • contribs)
Hello Ebyabe. Given Probability Wizard's comments at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aurora_Prince, they are openly evading a block and (per WP:EVASION) can be reverted on sight "without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule". They'll likely be blocked as soon as the SPI is reviewed. -- McGeddon ( talk) 18:00, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I wanted to let you know that I've reverted an edit of yours on Matthew Gray Gubler. You reverted an unsourced IP address edit, but that IP address edit had actually itself reverted an unsourced IP address edit which deliberately added factually incorrect information. It seems like the anonymous user whose edit you reverted did not adequately explain their rationale in the edit summary, but it is clear from the edit history that they reverted vandalism. I also did a web search, and 1980 appears to be the correct date as per sources such as: [1]. If you think I've made a mistake or would like to discuss this, feel free to respond here or on my talk page. Thanks for your contributions! ~ Rob Talk 02:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Regarding this revert, pls note Lucretius is perhaps the earliest and greatest atheist in the world. He is the author of De rerum natura which is perhaps the only materialist/atheist poem in Latin. I categorized A.E. Stallings as atheist as she is the English translator of De rerum natura and seems to agree with Lucretius' worldview. But since she has not overtly declared herself an atheist I will not revert that. But I am reverting the Lucretius edit. And about your other reverts, yes, it is not mentioned in the articles of these writers but anyone who has read them knows that they are writing from an atheistic/rationalistic viewpoint. But since this is open to debate I will not revert them. But it is hard to find RS to establish the atheism of these non-English writers on the web. - Mohanbhan ( talk) 15:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
I was just trying to wikify the article. I find it unnecessary of yours to revert my edits. My edits were in good faith.
Learnerktm 16:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
I got it. Thanks
Learnerktm 12:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Ally's birthday IS january, 1998 according to her agency — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.179.62.178 ( talk) 15:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
If you are interested in following and/or commenting: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Requesting a block of a user. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 05:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Transit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Stefan2 ( talk) 00:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on the St. George's article. Is there any way to change the visibility of that edit so that the libelous accusation is no longer visible? It is demonstrably untrue; Eric Peterson's son didn't go to Lawrence Academy. Thanks. 67.197.243.87 ( talk) 14:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
@ Ebyabe: Yes, you made a mistake for removing my edit on the article "Rose Tyler", because she was actually the War Doctor's companion in the episode "Day of the Doctor ", they even put Billie Piper in the cast. I put the edit back because I have proof that Rose was a companion of the War Doctor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolsuguessedit ( talk • contribs) 15:15, April 5, 2015
I did recently post an edit on the Kent Hovind article. I corrected a personal bias, and I removed false information. I do believe that the removal of this edit was a mistake and I would ask for you to revise this removal. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob A. Henderson ( talk • contribs) 09:33, April 15, 2015
I made a change to the notable alumni section of this article and you removed it because I did not cite my sources. Please review it as I went back and added the sources. Thanks. (Also, he has a pending wiki article of his own that meets all notable eligibility requirements. Please reference Draft:J.R. VanHoose Kaylamoore ( talk) 16:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC) User:kaylamoore
You claim that I am taking material directly from the museum's website and that is copyright infringement, yet you do not provide solid examples and proceed to delete everything I have edited. In regards to the copyright infringement, the article should be covered under the fair use clauses of copyright laws, in addition to that I have received express permission to update the Wikipedia page for the museum. I have been trying to incorporate primary source material into the page so as to reflect the status of the museum today. I have also been trying to remain impartial to my editing of the museum page so that it is up to Wikipedia's standards.
If it is a problem with the language used in the sections, I would really appreciate you to mark them so I can edit them. I hope to improve the page with constructive criticism because I believe the form of the article is fairly consistent with Wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinna17 ( talk • contribs) 22:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
I would request an indefinite semi. It's what a lot of us who are afflicted by vandals have. -- NeilN talk to me 03:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello E. Thanks for trying to explain things. You may have seen that FF2 just removed your post on Lukeno94 talk page. Even though it happened four minutes after your post I'm sure that FF2 will claim that it was an accident. If you are okay with it then no worries. Cheers and enjoy your week. MarnetteD| Talk 20:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
I did remove it by mistake, I didn't see it, please don't report it. As I said before and I will say it again, I am, am am, listening to what you guy's are saying to me. But lease, now after all this, no more, please. Because I'm going to a rough time right now, and I don't want anyone to give me a hard time anymore.... FrozenFan2 ( talk) 20:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm a first time Wikipedia editor. I made a sentence about the Coconut Grove Bed Race to to the "Coconut Grove" page and you reverted it which is fine... I'd just like to understand why.
You're feedback was "Only events with wikipedia articles pls." However, the article also has a reference to The Coconut Grove Arts festival which has an external link (e.g. it's not a wikipedia article) and this seems to be OK. What is the difference between the way The Coconut Grove Arts festival and The Coconut Grove Bed Race were referenced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stacyhallman ( talk • contribs) 00:47, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Yulee, Florida may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
There has been a conflict in preference over the use of image in the Jamie Dornan page, I'm hoping that a vote for which image might be preferable would settle the dispute. I am therefore writing to those who have edited Jamie Dornan page to voice their opinion in the Jamie Dornan Talk page so we can reach a consensus. I would welcome your opinion. Hzh ( talk) 11:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The problem I have is that anyone can claim they are the "tea party" There is no evidence in my opinion to say that the Koch Brothers made the first tea party page in 2002. Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
The fringe left is inserting absolute non-sense into the article. The claim that the koch bros made the first tea party website is absolutely false. They removed the old introduction that was there for over 9 months! Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
I wasn't talking about a new editor on may 30th. There is a serious war going on this page...the whole thing needs to be reverted back before april and locked.
alright, I understand. Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:32, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Just so you know, the old intro was this:
The origins of the current Tea Party movement can be traced back to circa 2007. The movement's beginnings were kick-started by Republican Congressman Dr. Ron Paul in 2007. His GOP presidential campaign received a 24-hour, record breaking, money bomb on December 16, 2007;[22] which is the 234th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party. This event directly contributed to creating a libertarian revival and divide in the Republican Party.[23][24][25] Ron Paul continues to be a prominent force in the Tea Party movement, such as endorsing Tea party candidates,[26] and also giving talks and speeches alongside prominent Tea party activist, and 2008 Vice Presidential candidate, Sarah Palin.[27][28] Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:42, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Maybe the old intro could have been improved, but i think replacing that with koch bros, is just stupid imo. it's a 180 degree turn. Catsmeow8989 ( talk) 16:43, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I've seen you reverted my recent edit on Harry Shum's article regarding his maternal last name.
The alleged source ( this) is a searchable database belonging to the Costa Rican Supreme Court of Elections, and therefore the page belongs to the Costa Rican government. The database gathers the data of all the people born in Costa Rican soil. Since Harry Shum, Jr. was born in this country, his data must be into the database. Searching for Harry Shum leaves an only result that matches the singer's date of birth and has "Kwan" as his maternal family name. Since there isn't any other result in the search, there's (theorically) no room for confusion, as no other man has been registered with that name in the country.
Of course, as an unexperienced contributor, I may be leaving something "uncertain" (as stated in your edition). Please let me know if there is anything wrong.
-- AndSalx95 ( talk) 06:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hmm, I'm sorry. This is not the first time I got into a debate due to the original research thing. I have read the article regarding both reliable sources and original research, and despite I'm still a little bit confused about it, I think I understand the reason of the reverted edition.
-- AndSalx95 ( talk) 19:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey! I'm not sure if you saw my last message, but I was wondering why you deleted this sentence "In that vein, the city was named 2014’s Best U.S. City to Start a Career by the personal finance site, WalletHub[113]" from the Economy section of the Washington, D.C. entry? I provided the primary source ( http://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-cities-to-start-a-career/3626/), which is supported by news coverage ( http://www.usnews.com/news/slideshows/the-top-10-best-cities-to-start-a-career), so I just wanted to see if I made a procedural mistake or something! Please let me know so I can fix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarabas ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I followed your instructions and even showed you the addition before I did it, and you still took it down! Do you need more news stories about the study? Because there are many. Could we maybe get other people's opinions as well? It seems like a legitimate addition to me. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sarabas (
talk •
contribs)
01:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Do you have something against me, because yes i sockpocketed account Tommyjourney in February of 2014 16 months ago. If I wanted to make an unblocked request I can't because my user talk is BLOCKED so I have to use my IP address account, that's all I said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.48.201.72 ( talk) 13:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
My point is I sockpocketed 16 months ago I was told to use the Standard Offer which is wait six months to make an appeal by another user, that user blocked my talk page for too many block envasions. My point is I waited 22 months since I got blocked the first time, but you or any other user are just saying f 71.48.201.72 ( talk) you don't belong here. At least I'm telling the truth about what I done instead of lieing and make it worse. Does that not count for something. — Preceding undated comment added 15:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm incredibly new to wikipedia, but I've just had Ansel Elgort personally ask me if I could change his user photo to one of him preferably from the Oscars. I find that I'm not allowed to upload images (and I don't know if I could do it right even if I tried) so I thought it would be much safer to just inquire if you would be willing to attempt it? I would give him your twitter username if you happen to be on there (if that even means anything to you, I'm sorry if it doesn't, it's just that that's his main social media outlet) so he could thank you himself.
Thank you for taking the time and I'll totally understand if you just delete this whole thing!
Jaime Balaban Jackeloper ( talk) 22:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
No, but I used google's search tools to specify images only "labeled for reuse" and hopefully this one meets their standards? You would know more about it than me, I'm sure. He's kind of... I don't want to actually say vain but that's really the best word for it. He wouldn't want anyone to know it, which is why he didn't tweet about it in general this time like he did when he wanted someone to get "model" out of his list of jobs.
It's from here http://todateen.uol.com.br/tt/wp-content/uploads/galerias/gatos-oscar-2015/
And it's this image specifically http://todateen.uol.com.br/tt/wp-content/uploads/galerias/gatos-oscar-2015/ansel.jpg Jackeloper ( talk) 22:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
If there's any way I could get a photo from him, one he took or his father, the problem would still be that I wouldn't be able to upload it. Even if he made his own account he wouldn't be able to upload it without having edited 10 pages or something like that. Oiy vey, what a headache. Thank you for your help, anyways! Jackeloper ( talk) 23:05, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
I'd say it was very likely. There are a number of similarities in their editing. If they continue to edit war and make unsourced changes, I might start an SPI. Thanks for your thoughts - we'll see how it goes. Cheers, Bretonbanquet ( talk) 20:23, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
You restored unsourced information on this page with no new or additional sources. Please do not repeat this action and rather include sources. Your statement that the information is already sourced is entirely incorrect. No sources exist on the page regarding DJ names along with the other information you attempted to restore without due cause.The Probability Wizard 17:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Probability Wizard ( talk • contribs)
Hello Ebyabe. Given Probability Wizard's comments at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aurora_Prince, they are openly evading a block and (per WP:EVASION) can be reverted on sight "without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule". They'll likely be blocked as soon as the SPI is reviewed. -- McGeddon ( talk) 18:00, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I wanted to let you know that I've reverted an edit of yours on Matthew Gray Gubler. You reverted an unsourced IP address edit, but that IP address edit had actually itself reverted an unsourced IP address edit which deliberately added factually incorrect information. It seems like the anonymous user whose edit you reverted did not adequately explain their rationale in the edit summary, but it is clear from the edit history that they reverted vandalism. I also did a web search, and 1980 appears to be the correct date as per sources such as: [1]. If you think I've made a mistake or would like to discuss this, feel free to respond here or on my talk page. Thanks for your contributions! ~ Rob Talk 02:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Regarding this revert, pls note Lucretius is perhaps the earliest and greatest atheist in the world. He is the author of De rerum natura which is perhaps the only materialist/atheist poem in Latin. I categorized A.E. Stallings as atheist as she is the English translator of De rerum natura and seems to agree with Lucretius' worldview. But since she has not overtly declared herself an atheist I will not revert that. But I am reverting the Lucretius edit. And about your other reverts, yes, it is not mentioned in the articles of these writers but anyone who has read them knows that they are writing from an atheistic/rationalistic viewpoint. But since this is open to debate I will not revert them. But it is hard to find RS to establish the atheism of these non-English writers on the web. - Mohanbhan ( talk) 15:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC)