This user may have left Wikipedia. Easter Monkey has not edited Wikipedia since 28 March 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I see nobody have welcomed you yet. Well, WELCOME to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. You are doing great so I won't give you a bunch of links to get you started. I will just say: thank you and stick around. We need every had we can get ;) Renata3 13:18, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your copyediting!
As quite some parts of the original article have been moved to Status of religious freedom in France that article could probably also profit from your English. Irmgard 13:37, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Hey, it looks like somebody already redirected it to the main Onion article, which IMO is probably the best thing. It just didn't seem like it was definitely a speedy to me, and outright deletion under such circumstances is sometimes condemned by other editors as "unilateralism". I agree there was too much content for it all to be merged, but the nice thing is, with a redirect, as much or as little as desired can be merged. It's possible someone else would have decided to delete it, but I generally prefer other options in cases that may be considered questionable. Friday (talk) 13:43, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
The Bronze Star was awarded to him posthumously by his commanders and they nominated him for the Medal of Honor. The Medal of Honor nomination has to go through a much more complicated process. The action has to be reviewed by the President and Congress. The Bronze Star can be awarded by a consensus of his division's high command. At least that's how I understand it. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 13:53, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Regarding the peanut gallery on Khmer Rouge, the only one I take with any seriousness is Adam Carr, who is a longtime user, and would have been an admin long ago if he wanted to be. That's not to say everything he does is correct, he has been criticized by ArbCom for certain things he tends to do.
Anyhow, I actually have more sources for the Lon Nol thing on the CPK page. As you can see, I had already posted the source on the page, but no one bothered to look (you're new to the page, they saw it before and didn't care). I repost it but they take it out anyway. They don't care, in fact, several of the peanut gallery on that page are sock puppets, and haven't tried that hard to hide that fact. No matter what proof and whatnot I post it's never good enough. They don't care how much research I do, how many sources are cited and whatnot, "they" (they in quotes due to the sock puppets) simply want to revert.
I actually have several sources for the coup, but since things are as they are, I only tend to put up stuff that is iron-clad, and Samuel Thornton is a pretty iron-clad source. Believe him or not, he is someone to be listened to. I didn't say what he said was true, I just mentioned what he said, which is of course relevant, but "they" removed it.
But back to my point, I have several sources. As I said, due to the circumstances, I only put up iron-clad stuff, if I put up what I have now it would be torn to shreds. Not that I should have to, there's no reason for Samuel Thornton to not be mentioned. In fact, if I recall correctly, I believe Adam Carr does not have a big problem with saying the US was involved with the coup.
Allusions to US involvement in the coup are made by the "official" scholars of the CPK such as Chandler and Kiernan. I believe Carr is who put them in the article, but I am not sure about that, I do know that I didn't cite them, someone else put it in. But if I recall correctly, one of them was kind of vague about it. And there are other sources about it. The problem is I have to do research for it. Which would be on top of the dozens of hours of research down the drain I've done on this. I have to do days of research and then fight weeks to months to get a milquetoast sentence in, while in the meantime a ridiculous POV paragraph, or picture with a graph of deaths (I'm accused of being an "apologist for the Khmer Rouge", but not mentioned is that the graph is an apologist for the US carpet bombing of Cambodia, as it assumes almost no one was killed by that) or whatnot. Plus I am very busy in real life. Anyhow, I will probably fight over the sentence and Thornton for a while (who is iron-clad), but I do have other sources alluding to US involvement in the coup, which I will bring forward in the coming weeks. Ruy Lopez 04:09, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Apparently, Lopez believes everybody who disagrees with him is a sockpuppet. CJK 22:04, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Funny how you haven't been here more than six months. Bjorn made his second edit two months ago. And that proves... nothing. CJK 20:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello, I've been lurking here on Wikipedia for a long time now. I've made some annonymous minor edits to many pages, suggested some changes and new articles and a few months ago decided that, for as much time as I spend here, I should take the plunge and create an account. So although, I may appear as a "newbie", I would like to, with Easter Monkey's indulgence (this is HIS talk page), weigh in on Ruy Lopez and the Khmer Rouge article. First of all, like Easter Monkey, I am intimate with the Culture and People of Cambodia, both in Cambodia and those in exile in Boston, MA and here where I now live in California. In addition, I have done much study on South East Asia and the VietNam War in general and the politics of Cambodia in particular.
I feel I must preface this by saying that Ruy Lopez and people like him almost make me long for the "good-ole-days" of the McCarthy Hearings. While I personally believe Ruy's claim that the US played a part (albeit minor) in overthrowing Sihanouk has some merit, that is still no justification for his blatant POV pro-Khmer Rouge, Anti-American ranting and raving. My wife's brother was killed by the Khmer Rouge for not working hard enough, her mother was seperated from her children and sent by the Khmer Rouge to work in a rock quarry, breaking massive rocks sun-up to sun-down with a small hammer and nothing to eat but one small rationed bowl of watery rice. My best friend's father was killed because he wasn't pure Khmer, his grandfather was Cham. Monks, village chiefs, and educated professionals were tortured and killed in full view of the public, with children given front-row seats to the spectacle. I could go on and on with first-hand accounts but this isn't the place.
It's widely known that the French-installed Sihanouk spent all his time on wine, womem and his own movie production company and had little personal interest in suppressing the communist insurgency led by the French/Algerian educated Saloth Sar (Pol Pot), Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary and others. Although there are no legitimate sources to prove it, most scholars and practically every Cambodian believe that while the coup was largely concieved by Lon Nol and his supporters, the US helped indirectly by advising and providing intelligence because they recognized he would be better for Cambodia and a better ally against the communists. While all of this MAY be true, it is UNDISPUTED FACT that the Khmer Rouge leaders were evil personified, comparable to Hitler, Stalin, Mousilinni and the like. The possible US involvement in the coup in no way excuses these paranoid megalomaniacs bent on domination and power who wrapped their ambitions in a Utopian Philosophy to brainwash their disillusioned followers. Ruy you are a sad, sad man whose POV is dangerous to the world and to the America I will leave to my children and I will fight people like you whenever and wherever I find them. That's my POV. WilliamThweatt 03:16, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks very much for translating German articles! Punkmorten 22:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, if you don't mind, here's a load of prominent names I copied from 80's championships: de:Jürgen Hingsen de:Siegfried Wentz de:Werner Schildhauer de:Hansjörg Kunze de:Detlef Michel de:Boris Henry de:Udo Beyer de:Ines Müller de:Helga Radtke de:Ronald Weigel de:Torsten Voss de:Christine Wachtel de:Cornelia Oschkenat de:Kirsten Emmelmann de:Petra Felke de:Martina Hellmann de:Kathrin Neimke de:Diana Gansky de:Steffi Nerius de:Claudia Losch and also de:Tamara Press and de:Tamara Bykowa (must be Tamara Bykova).
Of course you don't have to do this, but you did ask for it :) Thank you and happy editing, Punkmorten 21:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
the German Wikipedias are based on translations of each other. Therefore, when we translate an article we should always note that (a) it was a translation and (b) where it was translated from. This has the result of people not needing to check facts again, because they were already checked in the source wiki. I've put the "translation" note back into the article for that reason. -- Mmounties ( Talk) 14:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
The Rosetta Barnstar | ||
For your efforts I award you the The Rosetta Barnstar. Punkmorten 05:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
Hi again! Thanks for doing all the translations!
If you want to translate more, there are always Stephan Freigang, Karen Forkel, Lutz Dombrowski, Evelin Jahl, Siegfried Stark, Uwe Hohn, Sabine Busch, Ilona Slupianek, Melanie Paschke, Heinz Weis, Hildegard Falck, Heide Rosendahl, Sabine John, Ellen Fiedler, Gloria Siebert, Kerstin Behrendt, Beate Anders, Peter Frenkel, Dieter Lindner, Hans-Georg Reimann, Roland Wieser, Hartwig Gauder, Bernd Kannenberg, Gerd Wessig and also Jüri Tarmak, Ernesto Canto and Daniel Bautista. But if you want I can post the translation request elsewhere :) Regards, Punkmorten 05:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Your edits of "Loung Ung" are not acceptable to me. If you care to argue, I will gladly take the argument to arbitration. -- RogerK 01:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting the spelling, it was a mistake. As I said I wrote it rather quickly, just to get something up. I didn't purposefully use the UK English. It's ironic because I've been trying to keep up with User:Hintha's constant attempts to change all the spellings in the Cambodia article (and others as well) to British English.-- WilliamThweatt 18:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, you've been interested in Sanssouci in the past. The page has now been much altered, and the FAC page is again back in business. Perhaps you would now like to review the page. This is not meant to be a soliciting spam, I'm just contacting those few who have already shown an interest, as I'm just concerned that people may not realise, the FAC is back and running. Thanks. Giano | talk 16:55, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my userpage. :-) Agathoclea 12:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi EM :). I've put this article up for peer review, and would very much like your opinion; I enjoy working with you. Thanks in advance, my friend -- RogerK 04:06, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Placed it in peer review. I know you have something worthwhile to say. Would appreciate it. -- RogerK 06:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
As you speak Arabic, I'd like to ask if you could comment on this deletion request for an Arabic article - nobody knows what it is about. Kusma (討論) 01:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Easter! I, too, am very interested in these subjects. Thanks for your kind reply. Let me try to make some sensible explanation of myself.
Hmm. Reading over this I can see that I've rambled on for a good deal more than I should. I always overwrite this late at night; my apologies. All the best, Kasreyn 08:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
I enjoyed your "words to live by". I'm very fond of collecting quotes myself. I have been putting a few of my favorites online at my user page: tell me what you think. :) Kasreyn 22:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Another page in Arabic, could you have a look? You might want to check this version instead of the current one. Please comment at WP:PNT#Futureal. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 02:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
hey, I've made a few changes to the vonnegut template ( template:vonnegut), as well as a few comments on its talk page. I see that you've been a frequent editor (perhaps creator) of the the page, so I thought I'd notify you. JianLi 18:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
How could I be offended with you? Quite the opposite. I think you make a lot of sense. I never get offended with anyone. As far as I am concerned, people can say whatever they like. As my wife says "you can do anything, as long as it doesn't frighten the animals". I sometimes have heavy debates with people, as they sometimes have to unlearn what they were taught at school. I had to learn the hard way at university. I was told not to give my opinions in essays, but to say what happened without the commentary of why I think it happened, ie, without editorial bias. As they say, the facts usually speak for themselves. Wallie 19:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Would you also be able to support us on the wording of the introduction. The vote is tied 3/3 at the moment, and the other side has already reverted back. Have a look at the discussion page on the WW2 article and you will see what I mean. Thank you. Wallie 20:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:A Man Without A Country.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 03:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hocus Pocus.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Player Piano.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mother Night (film).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mother Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:01, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. Easter Monkey has not edited Wikipedia since 28 March 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I see nobody have welcomed you yet. Well, WELCOME to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. You are doing great so I won't give you a bunch of links to get you started. I will just say: thank you and stick around. We need every had we can get ;) Renata3 13:18, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your copyediting!
As quite some parts of the original article have been moved to Status of religious freedom in France that article could probably also profit from your English. Irmgard 13:37, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Hey, it looks like somebody already redirected it to the main Onion article, which IMO is probably the best thing. It just didn't seem like it was definitely a speedy to me, and outright deletion under such circumstances is sometimes condemned by other editors as "unilateralism". I agree there was too much content for it all to be merged, but the nice thing is, with a redirect, as much or as little as desired can be merged. It's possible someone else would have decided to delete it, but I generally prefer other options in cases that may be considered questionable. Friday (talk) 13:43, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
The Bronze Star was awarded to him posthumously by his commanders and they nominated him for the Medal of Honor. The Medal of Honor nomination has to go through a much more complicated process. The action has to be reviewed by the President and Congress. The Bronze Star can be awarded by a consensus of his division's high command. At least that's how I understand it. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 13:53, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Regarding the peanut gallery on Khmer Rouge, the only one I take with any seriousness is Adam Carr, who is a longtime user, and would have been an admin long ago if he wanted to be. That's not to say everything he does is correct, he has been criticized by ArbCom for certain things he tends to do.
Anyhow, I actually have more sources for the Lon Nol thing on the CPK page. As you can see, I had already posted the source on the page, but no one bothered to look (you're new to the page, they saw it before and didn't care). I repost it but they take it out anyway. They don't care, in fact, several of the peanut gallery on that page are sock puppets, and haven't tried that hard to hide that fact. No matter what proof and whatnot I post it's never good enough. They don't care how much research I do, how many sources are cited and whatnot, "they" (they in quotes due to the sock puppets) simply want to revert.
I actually have several sources for the coup, but since things are as they are, I only tend to put up stuff that is iron-clad, and Samuel Thornton is a pretty iron-clad source. Believe him or not, he is someone to be listened to. I didn't say what he said was true, I just mentioned what he said, which is of course relevant, but "they" removed it.
But back to my point, I have several sources. As I said, due to the circumstances, I only put up iron-clad stuff, if I put up what I have now it would be torn to shreds. Not that I should have to, there's no reason for Samuel Thornton to not be mentioned. In fact, if I recall correctly, I believe Adam Carr does not have a big problem with saying the US was involved with the coup.
Allusions to US involvement in the coup are made by the "official" scholars of the CPK such as Chandler and Kiernan. I believe Carr is who put them in the article, but I am not sure about that, I do know that I didn't cite them, someone else put it in. But if I recall correctly, one of them was kind of vague about it. And there are other sources about it. The problem is I have to do research for it. Which would be on top of the dozens of hours of research down the drain I've done on this. I have to do days of research and then fight weeks to months to get a milquetoast sentence in, while in the meantime a ridiculous POV paragraph, or picture with a graph of deaths (I'm accused of being an "apologist for the Khmer Rouge", but not mentioned is that the graph is an apologist for the US carpet bombing of Cambodia, as it assumes almost no one was killed by that) or whatnot. Plus I am very busy in real life. Anyhow, I will probably fight over the sentence and Thornton for a while (who is iron-clad), but I do have other sources alluding to US involvement in the coup, which I will bring forward in the coming weeks. Ruy Lopez 04:09, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Apparently, Lopez believes everybody who disagrees with him is a sockpuppet. CJK 22:04, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Funny how you haven't been here more than six months. Bjorn made his second edit two months ago. And that proves... nothing. CJK 20:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello, I've been lurking here on Wikipedia for a long time now. I've made some annonymous minor edits to many pages, suggested some changes and new articles and a few months ago decided that, for as much time as I spend here, I should take the plunge and create an account. So although, I may appear as a "newbie", I would like to, with Easter Monkey's indulgence (this is HIS talk page), weigh in on Ruy Lopez and the Khmer Rouge article. First of all, like Easter Monkey, I am intimate with the Culture and People of Cambodia, both in Cambodia and those in exile in Boston, MA and here where I now live in California. In addition, I have done much study on South East Asia and the VietNam War in general and the politics of Cambodia in particular.
I feel I must preface this by saying that Ruy Lopez and people like him almost make me long for the "good-ole-days" of the McCarthy Hearings. While I personally believe Ruy's claim that the US played a part (albeit minor) in overthrowing Sihanouk has some merit, that is still no justification for his blatant POV pro-Khmer Rouge, Anti-American ranting and raving. My wife's brother was killed by the Khmer Rouge for not working hard enough, her mother was seperated from her children and sent by the Khmer Rouge to work in a rock quarry, breaking massive rocks sun-up to sun-down with a small hammer and nothing to eat but one small rationed bowl of watery rice. My best friend's father was killed because he wasn't pure Khmer, his grandfather was Cham. Monks, village chiefs, and educated professionals were tortured and killed in full view of the public, with children given front-row seats to the spectacle. I could go on and on with first-hand accounts but this isn't the place.
It's widely known that the French-installed Sihanouk spent all his time on wine, womem and his own movie production company and had little personal interest in suppressing the communist insurgency led by the French/Algerian educated Saloth Sar (Pol Pot), Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary and others. Although there are no legitimate sources to prove it, most scholars and practically every Cambodian believe that while the coup was largely concieved by Lon Nol and his supporters, the US helped indirectly by advising and providing intelligence because they recognized he would be better for Cambodia and a better ally against the communists. While all of this MAY be true, it is UNDISPUTED FACT that the Khmer Rouge leaders were evil personified, comparable to Hitler, Stalin, Mousilinni and the like. The possible US involvement in the coup in no way excuses these paranoid megalomaniacs bent on domination and power who wrapped their ambitions in a Utopian Philosophy to brainwash their disillusioned followers. Ruy you are a sad, sad man whose POV is dangerous to the world and to the America I will leave to my children and I will fight people like you whenever and wherever I find them. That's my POV. WilliamThweatt 03:16, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks very much for translating German articles! Punkmorten 22:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, if you don't mind, here's a load of prominent names I copied from 80's championships: de:Jürgen Hingsen de:Siegfried Wentz de:Werner Schildhauer de:Hansjörg Kunze de:Detlef Michel de:Boris Henry de:Udo Beyer de:Ines Müller de:Helga Radtke de:Ronald Weigel de:Torsten Voss de:Christine Wachtel de:Cornelia Oschkenat de:Kirsten Emmelmann de:Petra Felke de:Martina Hellmann de:Kathrin Neimke de:Diana Gansky de:Steffi Nerius de:Claudia Losch and also de:Tamara Press and de:Tamara Bykowa (must be Tamara Bykova).
Of course you don't have to do this, but you did ask for it :) Thank you and happy editing, Punkmorten 21:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
the German Wikipedias are based on translations of each other. Therefore, when we translate an article we should always note that (a) it was a translation and (b) where it was translated from. This has the result of people not needing to check facts again, because they were already checked in the source wiki. I've put the "translation" note back into the article for that reason. -- Mmounties ( Talk) 14:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
The Rosetta Barnstar | ||
For your efforts I award you the The Rosetta Barnstar. Punkmorten 05:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
Hi again! Thanks for doing all the translations!
If you want to translate more, there are always Stephan Freigang, Karen Forkel, Lutz Dombrowski, Evelin Jahl, Siegfried Stark, Uwe Hohn, Sabine Busch, Ilona Slupianek, Melanie Paschke, Heinz Weis, Hildegard Falck, Heide Rosendahl, Sabine John, Ellen Fiedler, Gloria Siebert, Kerstin Behrendt, Beate Anders, Peter Frenkel, Dieter Lindner, Hans-Georg Reimann, Roland Wieser, Hartwig Gauder, Bernd Kannenberg, Gerd Wessig and also Jüri Tarmak, Ernesto Canto and Daniel Bautista. But if you want I can post the translation request elsewhere :) Regards, Punkmorten 05:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Your edits of "Loung Ung" are not acceptable to me. If you care to argue, I will gladly take the argument to arbitration. -- RogerK 01:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting the spelling, it was a mistake. As I said I wrote it rather quickly, just to get something up. I didn't purposefully use the UK English. It's ironic because I've been trying to keep up with User:Hintha's constant attempts to change all the spellings in the Cambodia article (and others as well) to British English.-- WilliamThweatt 18:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, you've been interested in Sanssouci in the past. The page has now been much altered, and the FAC page is again back in business. Perhaps you would now like to review the page. This is not meant to be a soliciting spam, I'm just contacting those few who have already shown an interest, as I'm just concerned that people may not realise, the FAC is back and running. Thanks. Giano | talk 16:55, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my userpage. :-) Agathoclea 12:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi EM :). I've put this article up for peer review, and would very much like your opinion; I enjoy working with you. Thanks in advance, my friend -- RogerK 04:06, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Placed it in peer review. I know you have something worthwhile to say. Would appreciate it. -- RogerK 06:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
As you speak Arabic, I'd like to ask if you could comment on this deletion request for an Arabic article - nobody knows what it is about. Kusma (討論) 01:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Easter! I, too, am very interested in these subjects. Thanks for your kind reply. Let me try to make some sensible explanation of myself.
Hmm. Reading over this I can see that I've rambled on for a good deal more than I should. I always overwrite this late at night; my apologies. All the best, Kasreyn 08:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
I enjoyed your "words to live by". I'm very fond of collecting quotes myself. I have been putting a few of my favorites online at my user page: tell me what you think. :) Kasreyn 22:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Another page in Arabic, could you have a look? You might want to check this version instead of the current one. Please comment at WP:PNT#Futureal. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 02:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
hey, I've made a few changes to the vonnegut template ( template:vonnegut), as well as a few comments on its talk page. I see that you've been a frequent editor (perhaps creator) of the the page, so I thought I'd notify you. JianLi 18:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
How could I be offended with you? Quite the opposite. I think you make a lot of sense. I never get offended with anyone. As far as I am concerned, people can say whatever they like. As my wife says "you can do anything, as long as it doesn't frighten the animals". I sometimes have heavy debates with people, as they sometimes have to unlearn what they were taught at school. I had to learn the hard way at university. I was told not to give my opinions in essays, but to say what happened without the commentary of why I think it happened, ie, without editorial bias. As they say, the facts usually speak for themselves. Wallie 19:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Would you also be able to support us on the wording of the introduction. The vote is tied 3/3 at the moment, and the other side has already reverted back. Have a look at the discussion page on the WW2 article and you will see what I mean. Thank you. Wallie 20:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:A Man Without A Country.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 03:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hocus Pocus.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Player Piano.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mother Night (film).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mother Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:01, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)