Qhfdhrqqhrjfwbtwhtwhqhtqhqtb

Asswipe

!!!!!!!!

Visit WP:HK!

If you are going to revert a image, please state a valid reason in the comment, not "Leave at it is." I asked you why you reverted the newer version in your commons talk page, and you replied with "Please stop adding lines into the images. The lines aren't even accurate, and is original research." The lines in the image are country borders from the NASA gallery version, and I don't see how it could be OR. You seem to have disregarded me and reverted back anyways with what I think might be a sockpuppet of yours. Instead of going back and reverting the image again, I have came here to tell you why so we can both avoid a 3RR. Also, is the User:kwlam259 a sockpuppet of yours? You seemed to have switched accounts in order to revert me, which also used the same edit summaries. According to [1], the edits from the two accounts seems to come in alternate intervals. Please take you time to read this prior to rashly reverting again. Thanks, - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 02:53, 18 June 2013 (UTC) reply

No, I have never, and will never sockpuppet.

It is for this reasons: 1. I have never thought about Sockpuppeting when i first signed up to Wikipedia. 2. I learned in the policies that it is against the law of Wikipedia. 3. It is a bad, uncivilized thing to do. 4. I would like to treasure my one and only account, and let other users be sure that this is my only account.

Thank you for your input. I now understand that your images are of no problem.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Good, now, will you please focus on your mentorship program? Y E ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello? My account, and my choice. -- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC) reply

I am busy in real life, and now whatever time that I could use in Wikipedia isn't even going to the contributions.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC) reply

What exactly is this in reference to? I don't see any image reversions from Earth100's account with a "Leave at it is" edit summary--either here or on the Commons. Never mind; I found it. Inks.LWC ( talk) 06:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC) reply

A bit of a hiccup, knowing that my talk page and contribution list page is being stalked by possibly tens of users.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 12:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC) reply

What does your talk page on Wikipedia being watched have anything to do with something you did on the Commons? Inks.LWC ( talk) 21:55, 24 June 2013 (UTC) reply

That account was not made by me, and at that time, I was blocked, and I was also account creation blocked. Given that I have never thought of sockpuppeting, knowingly that it is forbidden, and the account creation was blocked, I would like my user page to return to it's original look. And besides that can someone remove the template that on User:Earth101 userpage that says This account is a sock puppet of Earth100 and has been blocked indefinitely. It is extremely annoying, especially for something I have never, never done.

And I would like to continue my mentorship. And for anyone who replies, please do not say that I would like to return to my mentorship only to get unblocked, as my only intention is to be a good user, and continue the mentorship. Besides, this current block was done because I have only said something like: I can stand this mentorship!!!, and something like: Can I cancel this mentorship?? Now, look at the above statements. All I did was to ask and say something, and for that, should a user get blocked for like...indefinitely??!!! And I never said that I want to cancel. It took confirmation for me to get unblocked and to enter the mentorship but should it take something without confirmation to get blocked?...indefinitely??!

Points for Admins to double think:

• Should a user get indefinitely blocked for not doing anything wrong, or action without confirmation??!
• I have know the rules and never thought of even doing sockpuppeting.

And for that, should I even be blocked and be accused of sockpuppeting?

• Should I get my talk page blocked indefinitely for only being a bit bold on expressing my views and freedom of speech?
• Overall, my whole time on Wikipedia was for only 1 reason, not for vandalizing, doing OR (I did it because I didn't know it was bad) or for sockpuppeting, and troubling other users, but for contributing and building a better Wikipedia. That was my only intention.
• Overall, as I always say, research before action.
• Bbb23 blanked my page without good "research before action", without my permission, and to me, it is a bit rude, and i would consider it pure 100% Vandalism. Can a top admin do this??!

Finally for anyone who wishes to kindly reply this message, please reply it with the understanding of the above statements. Thank you.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC) reply

In my opinion, you can do the mentorship while blocked. You just have to do it in sections on this talk page rather than on a subpage. Given that you're still weeks if not months away from editing mainspace directly, there's no need to be unblocked in order to continue the mentorship. I've removed the sock tag from User:Earth101, and left an explanatory note on that account's talk page. I've also restored your user page. Qwyrxian ( talk) 12:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC) reply

You were blocked for several reasons including the addition of Original Research, Edit warring over pictures with Meow, Attacking other people and cultures and finally for not participating in your Mentorship programme. It is also worth noting that as things stand you do not have a mentor since Hurricanehink has decided to quit because you were taking too long over exercises etc. (see above). Jason Rees ( talk) 12:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Thank You Qwyrxian!! You are clearly the most understand admin here!-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 13:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Jason, that was history. It happened a long time ago and I didn't even got blocked weeks later. I was blocked because the admins thought I would like to cancel my adoption.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 13:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Jason, you are NOT Hink. How can you say he has cancel my adoption? Besides, can a adopter have patience? -- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 13:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I know im not Hink but i can say he has cancelled your adoption, because he posted on this page last week - i have bolded his comment so that it stands out. Jason Rees ( talk) 13:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Yeah, he clearly said, "I'd like to end my duties as a mentor." I don't understand how he could make it any clearer that he doesn't want to be your mentor, Earth100. Inks.LWC ( talk) 16:20, 3 July 2013 (UTC) reply

So, Earth100, with no mentor, you're stuck. I can post a request on the Adopter page saying we're looking for a mentor, but no promises on when someone will decide to take up the cause. In fact, there's not even a guarantee that someone will ever do so; I know that a number of our mentors known for their work with difficult mentees (i.e., those being forced into adoption, rather than doing so voluntarily) are completely busy, either on or off wiki. If you wish me to make such a request, I will do so, and then you'll just have to wait. Qwyrxian ( talk) 23:34, 3 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I would oppose looking for a new mentor. I might consider it after six months have elapsed and Earth100 making a more convincing case that there's some basis for us believing that he would take a mentorship more seriously, but not now. It's hard to imagine anyone more patient than Hink, so getting a new mentor would be a waste of the new mentor's time and our time. The problem here is not with the mentor.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I think we should have him wait a while before he attempts to find a new mentor. Y E ^{Pacific Hurricane} 00:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I know that I am not an admin and I shouldn't be reading/commenting right now, but Earth, what is it that makes you want to edit Wikipedia so much? You have been extremely persistent about getting unblocked yet you stated that you are busy and cannot edit Wikipedia. - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 01:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

(Hurricane Spin, in accordance of what you typed, it clearly means that you did not read / understand my message. I might be busy, but that dosen't mean I can't spend a minute or two contributing wikipedia)

I suggest we wait for Hink's comments before drawing the next step. Can anyone alert Hink? -- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 02:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

For civil discussions regarding the above topic, please comment above this line:

Sorry Earth, but the above is all true. You had little to no interest in mentoring, from the beginning when you were looking for anyone else to mentor you, to the end when you asked if you could get out of it. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I agree with Hink. You really don't wanna be mentored. You have no patience and just want to edit. When mentored, you played around a commons and never did your assignments. This is not the admin's fault, it is your fault. You were the one who edit warred with Meow and moving images all around and added false stuff to articles, not the admins. I'm sorry to say this Earth, but you have nobody to blame but yourself. Y E ^{Pacific Hurricane} 02:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

How dare you two say something and draw to a conclusion when you are not me.I said, that I want to be mentored and how can you ridiculously say that!! Besides, the desion for mentoring is in my hands. Not anyone else like Yellow Evan!-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

None of what you say is true! You didn't even read what I said! Listen to me, not anyone else!-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:31, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Order please!-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:35, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Please stop making personal attacks against me. Why should you be mentored again if the last time, you messed around on commons, and did not take it seriously, and asked to cancel the adaption and was very selective with your mentor selection? You even broke your mentorship agreement. Y E ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:37, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

That was history! I am talking about right now, and for good, WHY am I not being adopted when I didn't say I wanna cancel! All the things you said was completely not true about me. And later, there's a big chance the Admins will listen to you, not me.

Besides, I was using whatever time I have to make a good contribution! If everybody thinks that I'm a ol' bad user, why why why don't I get a chance like a week or two to be free and contribute and to show everybody I am okay!-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC) -- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

You had a chance but you blew it. What has really changed since the last time your were mentored? You are not being mentored because Hink resigned to be your mentor after it was clear you did not want to be mentored. I am not an admin, but I doubt there will listen to you. Y E ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:48, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Either get me adopted on my order, or give me a chance to be free and prove I am a good user.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

The odds of the latter happening is not much bigger than a coin landing on its side, I guess there is a slight chance that former may happen, but I am not 100% convinced it's the best option at this time for reasons I've already gone into. Y E ^{Pacific Hurricane} 06:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I suggest you change your heading before you get your talk page access removed. This is highly inappropriate: "For Hink, Yellow Evan, Hurricanespin, and Inks, and for a bit of non-civil action, please comment below this line." Hink, YE, Hurricanespin, and myself have all been civil in this discussion. You're blocked, and you have to wait 6 months to ask to be unblocked and apply for another mentorship. I suggest you just take a step back from Wikipedia until then so that you don't dig yourself a bigger hole. Inks.LWC ( talk) 10:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I will not tolerate a block that was not necessary. I will not wait. I have already stepped away from Wikipedia for more than half a year, and I will not waste anymore time to try to contribute wikipedia. -- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

The block was necessary because you broke your mentorship agreement. What don't you understand about that? Y E ^{Pacific Hurricane} 15:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

• Warning. Earth, I'd like to leave you access to your talk page so that in perhaps six months you can convince us that we should try again - if you're so inclined. But you're making it hard. If you continue these abusive comments, I will revoke your talk page access.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 17:56, 4 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Bbb23 is the blocking admin here, so I'm not going to override his opinions on the options for you seeking a new mentor. At this point, you have exactly 3 options:

1. Follow the provisions of WP:OFFER: leave Wikipedia for at least 6 months, and then come back and ask for an unblock, which would likely only be granted under the same terms as before (mandatory, highly restrictive mentorship).
2. Post a new unblock request, and see if a different admin feels differently. Note that I personally believe you only get one more shot at this approach--you don't get to just keep making unblock requests, until you get the result you want. Should this unblock request fail, you'll have to go for one of the other options.
3. Request an unblock at WP:BASC. This appeal would go to the Arbitration Committee, which is a separate governance body elected yearly, which, among other things, is a "court of last resort". They would rule on your unblock request privately. Note that if you do go to BASC, and they decline, there is nowhere else to go; in fact, even an WP:OFFER request would have to go to the whole community--no individual admin could then ever unblock you (at least, that's my opinion of how BASC requests should be handled).

So, you choose. Meanwhile, I don't think that anyone else's commentary here is helpful. I say this without any compulsion, but I think that there's just not much y'all can say here that will help Earth100. Qwyrxian ( talk) 00:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC) reply

New section

Just asking, please.

• I've got an idea! Why not all of you admins treat me as a new user?

Like, unblocking me, and I'll do my best on Wikipedia. Watch me for about a week, a think if I should be reblocked or whatever. Why? Because, well, you see you may have not seen me finnish the mentorhsip, but given that I may not be readopted, I just want a simple, 1 week take off to be free. Note: This is only to show that I could be okay without a mentor, and I'll make sure my edits will be clean, and perfect. You are free to reblock me if you aren't satisfied, or think i'm not doing good enough. -- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 12:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

It's tough not to respond sarcastically to this request as it's the same refrain you've been spouting for quite some time. If you want to choose Option #2 above and make an unblock request, go ahead. I think it's a waste of time, but I'm not going to stop you. But if you continue to post these sorts of comments, I will end this discussion by revoking access to your talk page. You continue to waste our time.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I'll go to option 2. -- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 13:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I just want to talk, and for that should my talk page be blocked?For now, I hope another admin will respond my question above. I need more responses. -- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 13:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

You need to formulate an actual unblock request. Otherwise, it's unlikely that another admin will respond. A formal request automatically places you in a category that all admins can see if they wish to.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:18, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

(ec)Add the following to the end of this discussion: {{ unblock|reason = Write your reason here. ~~~~}}. Remove the "tlx", and add your reason. You may wish to review guide to appealing blocks first. You should also review all of the previous discussions we've had that explain in detail why you've been blocked. You should finally note that if your block is declined, I will be removing your talk page access, and then you will have to send all further appeals to WP:BASC. Qwyrxian ( talk) 14:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Wait, why if my request is declined i'll get my talk page blocked?(Any reply will likely be done on June 7. Please, I just want to ask and discuss.)-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 14:47, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Is it possible to tell User:David Fuchs to come here and discuss?-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 14:51, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

There's nothing more to discuss, Earth100. Bbb23 and I both believe you're more harm to the encyclopedia than benefit, and even this discussion here is detrimental, because so many users waste so much time on it. Make your unblock request. There's no need for you to have talk page access for any other reason. No more responses here from me. Qwyrxian ( talk) 15:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I may have a bad history, but I've learned. I can prove it, than I'm more unique than other users. I have learned the lesson well especially the policies. The problem is that I don't get any chance to prove it. Please, I already have nothing left in wikipedia, and I just want my own talk page to be left as it is right now. I'll make the unblock request when I have enough time. Besides, this is my talk page. Only if I did anything that violates the policies should this talk page be blocked from me.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 00:34, 7 July 2013 (UTC) -- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 00:34, 7 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I'm worried sick the block request will decline, as I have never never made a successful unblock request. The thing is that I need to prove, show that I'm beneficial. Bye for now, I've got to go to work.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 00:34, 7 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Please I just need my talk page. It's my talk page, and I need it.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 12:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC) reply

It is not your talk page. It is a page hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation which they have allowed the community to give a purpose to; the community has decided that the purpose of talk pages is primarily to communicate with a specific user regarding Wikipedia editing. Since you cannot edit WIkipedia, you may use this page for one and only one purpose: to request an unblock. The next edit you make to this page that is not an unblock request will result in me removing your talk page access, and you'll be back to needing to ask WP:BASC. Stop wasting our time. Qwyrxian ( talk) 13:33, 9 July 2013 (UTC) reply

• Cleisostoma simondii-Mission: To expand, improve, source, and replace the images with higher quality images (it flowers in October here in Hong Kong)
• Choy sum-Mission: To Expand, improve, source the article, and add a few images.

And more.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 12:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Earth100, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jackmcbarn ( talk) 23:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC) reply

No, I haven't been editing Wikipedia for weeks(I mean my talk page). I have no intention of sockpuppeting. Please help me verify if User:Earth102 is not my account. I guarantee the checkuser results will shown I am innocent.-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 00:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC) reply

You can reply here to the sockpuppetry accusation without risking your talk page access.I'll go take a look into it now. Qwyrxian ( talk) 00:34, 28 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Oh Thank you so much so so so much!-- ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 00:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I've commented on the SPI that I don't think this is you. While I do think you've had difficulty learning WP policies, I don't think you're stupid, and you would have to be extremely stupid to create such an obvious sock. Thus, I think it's that same impersonator as before. A Checkuser will run a check, which will help provide some info. Qwyrxian ( talk) 00:44, 28 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I believe that I was extremely clear above: no edits to this page that are not unblock requests. You again chose to flout that requirement by posting a request for someone to proxy edit for you. As such, I've removed your talk page access. If you wish to be unblocked, submit a request to WP:UTRS. Qwyrxian ( talk) 01:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC) reply

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 83
	Date: November 15
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 82 - next: Meetup 84

SusanLai ( talk) 09:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC) reply

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 84
	Date: December 13
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 83 - next: Meetup 85

SusanLai ( talk) 06:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC) reply