I have used Wikipedia as a source, and never bothered doing any editing. When I noticed what I considered a good definition being continually slammed down after the user was obviously working hard to come up with something better than the lame one it replaced, I went in and reverted it, only to be promptly blocked by some person called jayjg, and termed a "sockpuppet". What a trip. I emailed a few administrators, including him, and got nowhere. That makes me think its more important for the administrators here(at least Jayjg and Angela, the ones I contacted) to stick together than be fair. Apparently USERS of the site aren't as important as EDITORS! -- EKBK 14:47, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for speaking up when you see blatantly corrupt editing. You should see this guy, Mel, over at Inalienable rights. He's changed the wording of the Declaration of Independence from unalienable to inalienable. If you want to speak up about this too, please feel free. -- Zephram Stark 22:28, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
I've blocked this account indefinitely as a sockpuppet used to violate policy. If you feel this block is unfair or mistaken, you're welcome to e-mail me using the link on my user page, and I'll get straight back to you. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
I've unblocked this account. Feel free to post evidence or something that's convincing (other than your say-so) as to why this user should be blocked. -- Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:24, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
I've also unprotected this page... I'm not sure why it was protected in the first place. -- Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:25, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
I have used Wikipedia as a source, and never bothered doing any editing. When I noticed what I considered a good definition being continually slammed down after the user was obviously working hard to come up with something better than the lame one it replaced, I went in and reverted it, only to be promptly blocked by some person called jayjg, and termed a "sockpuppet". What a trip. I emailed a few administrators, including him, and got nowhere. That makes me think its more important for the administrators here(at least Jayjg and Angela, the ones I contacted) to stick together than be fair. Apparently USERS of the site aren't as important as EDITORS! -- EKBK 14:47, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for speaking up when you see blatantly corrupt editing. You should see this guy, Mel, over at Inalienable rights. He's changed the wording of the Declaration of Independence from unalienable to inalienable. If you want to speak up about this too, please feel free. -- Zephram Stark 22:28, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
I've blocked this account indefinitely as a sockpuppet used to violate policy. If you feel this block is unfair or mistaken, you're welcome to e-mail me using the link on my user page, and I'll get straight back to you. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
I've unblocked this account. Feel free to post evidence or something that's convincing (other than your say-so) as to why this user should be blocked. -- Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:24, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
I've also unprotected this page... I'm not sure why it was protected in the first place. -- Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:25, 4 October 2005 (UTC)