Hi Dynasty Power! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Dynasty Power! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Super League Greece several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Super League Greece, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
18:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Dynasty Power ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am uncertain as to the reason behind my recent block. I took measures to safeguard two particular articles [1] [2] from instances of vandalism and unwarranted edits. Importantly, I adhered to the three-revert rule and made an effort to initiate a discussion with the user responsible for the vandalism. The user has been engaging in an edit war, posted five personal attacks against me, which have been brought to the attention of the sissop - instead they ended up blocking just me for two weeks!! The other user was partially blocked after vandalising repeatedly. What is going on? I believe that my actions were in line with the principles of maintaining the integrity of the articles, and I find the imposed two-week block disproportionate to the circumstances. PS. I noticed that there are some accusations of sockpuppetry? I got blocked with no evidence and the sissop implies that somehow I am using another account? I seriously don't know what is going on. Dynasty Power ( talk) 18:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per discussion below and my review of edit history. You were editing disruptively, which can happen when you disregard community norms even while editing with the best of intentions. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dynasty Power ( talk) 18:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The three revert rule is clear: "There is a bright line known as the three-revert rule (3RR). To revert is to undo the action of another editor. The three-revert rule states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period." Can ~ ToBeFree explain what rule I have broken that led to the two-week suspension? Dynasty Power ( talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
23:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Hi Dynasty Power! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Dynasty Power! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Super League Greece several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Super League Greece, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
18:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Dynasty Power ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am uncertain as to the reason behind my recent block. I took measures to safeguard two particular articles [1] [2] from instances of vandalism and unwarranted edits. Importantly, I adhered to the three-revert rule and made an effort to initiate a discussion with the user responsible for the vandalism. The user has been engaging in an edit war, posted five personal attacks against me, which have been brought to the attention of the sissop - instead they ended up blocking just me for two weeks!! The other user was partially blocked after vandalising repeatedly. What is going on? I believe that my actions were in line with the principles of maintaining the integrity of the articles, and I find the imposed two-week block disproportionate to the circumstances. PS. I noticed that there are some accusations of sockpuppetry? I got blocked with no evidence and the sissop implies that somehow I am using another account? I seriously don't know what is going on. Dynasty Power ( talk) 18:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per discussion below and my review of edit history. You were editing disruptively, which can happen when you disregard community norms even while editing with the best of intentions. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dynasty Power ( talk) 18:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The three revert rule is clear: "There is a bright line known as the three-revert rule (3RR). To revert is to undo the action of another editor. The three-revert rule states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period." Can ~ ToBeFree explain what rule I have broken that led to the two-week suspension? Dynasty Power ( talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
23:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)